The metaphorical wrecking ball analogy takes a physical form.

The democrats lied...AGAIN! CNN tells the truth and the democrats still fail to realize who's truly at fault for the government shutdown.


 
571149863_122258672978021315_728103850335398432_n.jpg
 
Cow farts and cow belching:


I really hope that this clears things up a tiny bit for August West

AOC is opposed to cow farts and cow belches. And to think that AOC’s livelihood once depended on fermentation of alcohol.
 
Cow farts and cow belching:


I really hope that this clears things up a tiny bit for August West

AOC is opposed to cow farts and cow belches. And to think that AOC’s livelihood once depended on fermentation of alcohol.


Funny, but what does that have to do with the ballroom though?
 
Cow farts and cow belching:


I really hope that this clears things up a tiny bit for August West

AOC is opposed to cow farts and cow belches. And to think that AOC’s livelihood once depended on fermentation of alcohol.
You aware there are companies that are trying to develop catalytic converter type technology for cow emissions?

This is a concern because there would be up to 900 people at a ballroom function and I'm sure dairy products would be used for an event one way or another.
 
Last edited:
You aware there are companies that are trying to develop catalytic converter type technology for cow emissions?
I was not. But I’ll betchya there are serious downsides (environmentally) to catalytic converter technology.
 
I've been around cows since I was knee high to a grasshopper and I've never seen a cow belch, burp or whatever

Even if they did it's not a freaking climate issue
I haven’t lived around cows.

I am only repeating what several scientific analyses have claimed.

If d be shocked — SHOCKED! — if they got it wrong.

Belches out the front end from the forestomach. Farts out the hind end from the back stomach.

Ironically, cows also contribute to additional global geeenhouse gas emissions because milk has that effect on the lactose intolerant.
 
15th post
Cow farts and cow belching:


I really hope that this clears things up a tiny bit for August West

AOC is opposed to cow farts and cow belches. And to think that AOC’s livelihood once depended on fermentation of alcohol.
How about a link or a YouTube video to AOC`s actual words?
 
The contractors called OSHA, but they got a recording of Schumer saying to call back in a few months cuz he shut down the government.


fake-news-2-850_1.webp



Not only is Schumer trying to starve poor Americans,


fake-news-2-850_1.webp


October 27, 2025
| Dottie Rosenbaum

SNAP’s Contingency Reserve Is Available for Regular SNAP Benefits, as USDA and OMB Have Ruled in Past​

The Trump Administration recently claimed that SNAP benefits are not available for November 2025 because SNAP’s “contingency funds are not legally available to cover regular benefits.”[1] This stands in opposition to the law and prior practice, including by the Trump Administration itself. Also, the Administration could use its legal transfer authority — the same authority it already used to provide additional funds to WIC — to supplement the contingency reserves, which alone are not enough to fund families’ full benefits for November. The Administration must use all available options to fund November benefits for the 1 in 8 people in the U.S. who need SNAP to afford their grocery bill.

The Administration must use all available options to fund November benefits for the 1 in 8 people in the U.S. who need SNAP to afford their grocery bill.
The Administration’s assertion that it cannot use SNAP’s contingency reserves to cover regular SNAP benefits is contrary to:

  • The plain language of the law;
  • Prior Trump Administration practice ― including as recently as a few weeks ago in the Agriculture Department (USDA) Lapse of Funding Plan, which the agency has since removed from its website;[2]
  • The first Trump Administration’s understanding, as communicated repeatedly in multiple USDA documents and confirmed by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), that contingency funds could be used for SNAP benefits during the 2018-2019 shutdown.
  • Previous administrations’ understanding that contingency funds could be used for SNAP benefits during a shutdown.
https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-...s-available-for-regular-snap-benefits-as-usda

this is all on donny & his (R)s. it will all come to bite them, because red hat MAGAts get hungry too. some of y'all can read facts.


he is trying to give the rest of us cancer from asbestos.

Asshole.

fake-news-2-850_1.webp
 
Last edited:
Explain the grift when Trump and private donors are paying for it? Exactly who is the victim here?

like when yer chosen one said he was gonna fund his own campaign the first time around & VIOLA! a big fat red DONATE button smack dab in the middle of his website. he's probably gonna try to get his DOJ to pay for ' his ' portion. the rest of the donors? you think they are donating outa the goodness of their heart or do you think they are gonna want their backs rubbed?

pay fer play is the onlything your grifting clown knows how to do.
 
Last edited:
Proof Schumer is holding America hostage on a political stunt. CRs are for funding already negotiated and voted on programs, not new programs.

Since board Dimtards are avoiding my education thread like it's a job.............




Summary

The program activities of most federal agencies are generally funded on an annual basis through the enactment of regular appropriations acts. When those annual appropriations acts are not enacted by the beginning of the fiscal year (October 1), one or more continuing appropriations acts (commonly known as continuing resolutions or CRs) may be enacted to provide temporary funding to continue certain programs and activities until action on the regular appropriations acts is completed.

There are six main features of CRs.

First, CRs have provided funding for certain activities (coverage), which are typically specified with reference to the prior fiscal year's appropriations acts.

Second, CRs provide budget authority for a specified duration of time. This duration may be as short as a single day or as long as the remainder of the fiscal year.

Third, in recent practice, CRs have typically provided funds based on an overall funding rate rather than in specified amounts.

Fourth, the use of budget authority provided in the CR has been prohibited for new activities not funded in the previous fiscal year.

Fifth, the duration and amount of funds in the CR, and purposes for which they may be used for specified activities, may be adjusted through anomalies.

Sixth, legislative provisions—which create, amend, or extend other laws—have been included in some instances.


https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R46595

the (R)s are filthy liars & won't 'revisit' the subsidies or anything else after this supposed CR gets passed.

thune can pull the nuclear option & then it will be all clean & tidy. why won't he?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom