The Man Who Owns the Current Iran Crisis

[PoliticalChic]

They promised not to enrich uranium to build a bomb until at 2025, and they KEPT their promise. You promised to lift sanctions if they did it and you DIDN'T lift the sanctions.

You promised not to attack if they kept their promises, and you assassinated Sulemani.

You asked for peace negotiations and they agreed, and you bombed them instead.

It doesn't say much for your country when the Ayatollah and the Mullahs show more honesty and decency than the American President.

SHAME, SHAME, SHAME!




Where did say that? Where did I even suggest it. If Iran wanted to build a bomb, they would have built a bomb in the past 10 years.

There never were any inspections requred by the Obama scam.

He wanted them to have nuclear weapons. Why?????????



I'm really getting tired of pointing out how frequently you lie.

Now....let's take care of this particular lie of yours: the claim that there were inspections of Iran to see if they were obeying the terms of the 'deal.'

And that's the problem: the 'deal' itself saw to it that there were no inspections, 'cause the war criminal, Obama, wanted to guarantee nukes to the savage regime.



"Americans and Israelis who hate the new nuclear agreement with Iran are already focusing on one part in particular: It doesn’t authorize snap, no-notice inspections of all locations. Israel’s hard-right Education Minister Naftali Bennett claims the accord is a “farce” because “in order to go and make an inspection, you have to notify the Iranians 24 days in advance.”



This is not exactly right, but close enough. (Iran’s declared nuclear sites will be under continuous monitoring. If the International Atomic Energy Agency wants to inspect a non-declared site and Iran refuses, Iran has 14 days to convince the IAEA it’s doing nothing wrong without providing access. If it can’t, the commission governing the agreement has seven days to vote on whether to force Iran to provide access, and if it does Iran has three more days to comply. The exact procedure is established in paragraphs 74-78 of the agreement text.)"
Why Is Iran’s Refusal to Allow No-Notice Inspections Legit? U.S. History With Iraq



“Particularly troublesome, you have to wait 24 days before you can inspect.”

–Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), speaking to reporters about the international nuclear agreement with Iran, Aug. 10, 2015
“At non-designated sites it will take 24 days to get an inspection.”
–Schumer, speaking to reporters, Aug. 11



It was a bad agreement for the beginning. We said it years ago. And let me tell you a few examples about why it is a bad agreement. You cannot inspect the facilities. You have to let them know in advance if you want to come to inspect the military facilities. It's a joke. They continue with a ballistic missile program. Prime Minister Netanyahu exposed documents that we found in Tehran and we showed it to the world that they're continuing with their ballistic missile program. Third, is the issue of the expiration date. What will happen in five, six, seven years and the most important the President has talk about it is the funding. Today they have a lot of funding and they put into their military and sponsoring their proxies in Syria, in Lebanon, in Yemen. They're using that money that they're getting from the Europeans to sponsor terrorism all over the world.
Rep. Michael McCaul on Iran deal flaws, immigration policy




FACT: Obama, Rhodes and Moniz had already been caught lying about the Iran Deal. All you had to do was listen to the words coming out of their mouths at various times and compare them to each other.

“It cuts off all of Iran’s pathways to a bomb,” Obama claimed of the deal. But he had also admitted that it would give Iran a zero breakout time to a bomb. Both statements can’t be true.

“Under this deal you will have anywhere, anytime 24⁄7 access,” Ben Rhodes told CNN. A few months later, he also told CNN, “We never sought in this negotiation the capacity for so-called anytime, anywhere where you could basically go anywhere in the country.”
According to Iran’s atomic spokesman, the samples were collected “in the absence of the inspectors affiliated to the International Atomic Energy Agency.”
Frontpagemag



Obama's Iran Nuclear Deal Allows the Regime to Develop a Weapon ...
"Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon"
Read more at: Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon



§ The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was not allowed to inspect or monitor Iran's military sites where nuclear activities were most likely being carried out. Among the many concessions that the Obama administration gave the Iranian government, one was accepting the Iranian leaders' demand that these military sites would be out of the IAEA's reach.

§ Due to this surrender, various high-profile Iranian sites such as the Parchin military complex, located southeast of Tehran, were free to engage in nuclear activities without the risk of inspection.

§ Once the authoritarian, anti-Semitic and anti-American government of Iran possess a nuclear bomb, no amount of actions will be able reverse the catastrophe.

§ Stop Iran From Going Nuclear




“Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close
Iran can easily stretch out the inspection of suspect nuclear sites for three months or more.”

Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close​

Iran can easily stretch out the inspection of suspect nuclear sites for three months or more.

www.wsj.com



Now.....what is your next lie????

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

They turned over 97% of their nuclear material
The allowed inspections

Even the JCS thought the deal was working just fine, until Trump tanked it.

But Trump did not. Most Americans do not.

 

[LeftofLeft]

It’s beyond ironic to watch liberals defend a Middle East theocracy to have weapons yet the same mindset loses its shit over Bibles in the classroom under a Democracy.

 

[JimH52]

I need to help you and the failed Democrat Party. I believe we need two strong, pro-American, Judeo-Christian parties rather than being a one-party nation.....your party has proven not to be any of those things.


One problem is that the adults in your party are trying to pivot away from losing strategies, mainly being anti-Trump, and not standing for American values......and voters like you seem unable to get with the program.


What Trump did benefitted America, and you should simply praise the fact, Trump notwithstanding.



Consider this:

1.Here on the board we have only one sort of Democrat supporter, the really dumb ones who are unable to think or question, and still support what cost their party a landslide loss.


2. But there are intelligent Democrat officials.....contrary to the sort that they allowed to take control of the party.......and they are planning a return, a more moderate, more centrist party sans the woke Fascist element.


3.These officials finally realize the futility of attacking Trump, making him the bête noire, making fake claims about Trump and some imagined Russia connection, They want to win....and they see the path.



4.

......on the right (Right).




5.Do you see who they are now going to let all the blame fall on?

Can Democrats blame their problems all on Biden?​

As the party ponders a full reckoning, some on the left say blaming their 2024 White House loss all on Biden is a cop-out and positions the party poorly for 2028.

www.nbcnews.com



Why Did Kamala Harris lose her White House bid? David Plouffe says “it’s all Biden.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/13/biden-book-david-plouffe-harris-2024-00344449




Fox News
Biden made Harris campaign a 'nightmare,' destroyed her chances by staying in 2024 race too long, aides charge
Biden made Harris campaign a 'nightmare,' destroyed her chances by staying in 2024 race too long, aides charge



The Atlantic
An Autopsy Report on Biden’s In-Office Decline
Five people were running the country,” a political insider told the authors of the new book Original Sin. “And Joe Biden was at best a...



www.youtube.com › watch

Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris' Aides Blame Joe Biden for Election Defeat | Firstpost America After US Vice President Kamala Harris was ...

Blah Blah Blah Blah...anything to protect the FELON IN CHIEF.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

It’s beyond ironic to watch liberals defend a Middle East theocracy to have weapons yet the same mindset loses its shit over Bibles in the classroom under a Democracy.

That does not mean what you think it means.

 

[LeftofLeft]

That does not mean what you think it means.

Provide what you think it means.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Provide what you think it means.

You are incapable of understanding.

 

[Rigby5]

1. As the adage goes, "realitly is defined by actions, not words."
If you check, Obama himself said that Iran would never be allowed nuclear weapons. Then he guaranteed them nuclear weapons.


2. To make sure they could enrich uranium and build inter-continental missiles, Obama gave them a deal with no inspections.
AI Overview
According to the
Bipartisan Policy Center: "Iran Deal Limits Inspectors' Access to Suspicious Sites". The Bipartisan Policy Center notes that the timeline for IAEA access to suspicious sites in Iran is 54 days, not the commonly reported 24 days.


3. A bit late, but ask yourself now, since Trump removed any pressure, why the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism should be given.....guaranteeded.....nuclear weaponss?


4.And as far as the otherr great enemy of America, the second biggest loser is China, who bought a million barrels of Iran's oil. And China need oil.


5. And the third loser? The war put on display the difference between Russian military equipment, and air defenses, and America's military equipment.




Did you vote for Iran and the Democrats??? That make you the really biggest loser.

Wrong!
The 2015 deal between Iran and Obama included the installation of video cameras for constant inspection.

{...
The 2015 nuclear treaty with Iran included inspections by allowing the IAEA to have a "long-term presence" in Iran to monitor materials and nuclear development that wouldn't be used in weapons. Inspectors would have continuous monitoring capabilities at known nuclear facilities12. The deal also required Iran to permanently install cameras and sensors at nuclear sites
...}
What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote

No one would ever do any sort of nuclear deal without inspections.

 

[Rigby5]

Only trouble was they were lying and cheating.

Kinda funny too, enriching to 60% is way beyond what's needed for power generation.

Wrong.
Iran not only was unable to like of cheat, but clearly they never did.
Typical power generation is always 60% enrichment.
Anything lower requires a huge containment dome and amplifies the size of everything.

 

[Rigby5]

There never were any inspections requred by the Obama scam.

He wanted them to have nuclear weapons. Why?????????



I'm really getting tired of pointing out how frequently you lie.

Now....let's take care of this particular lie of yours: the claim that there were inspections of Iran to see if they were obeying the terms of the 'deal.'

And that's the problem: the 'deal' itself saw to it that there were no inspections, 'cause the war criminal, Obama, wanted to guarantee nukes to the savage regime.



"Americans and Israelis who hate the new nuclear agreement with Iran are already focusing on one part in particular: It doesn’t authorize snap, no-notice inspections of all locations. Israel’s hard-right Education Minister Naftali Bennett claims the accord is a “farce” because “in order to go and make an inspection, you have to notify the Iranians 24 days in advance.”



This is not exactly right, but close enough. (Iran’s declared nuclear sites will be under continuous monitoring. If the International Atomic Energy Agency wants to inspect a non-declared site and Iran refuses, Iran has 14 days to convince the IAEA it’s doing nothing wrong without providing access. If it can’t, the commission governing the agreement has seven days to vote on whether to force Iran to provide access, and if it does Iran has three more days to comply. The exact procedure is established in paragraphs 74-78 of the agreement text.)"
Why Is Iran’s Refusal to Allow No-Notice Inspections Legit? U.S. History With Iraq



“Particularly troublesome, you have to wait 24 days before you can inspect.”

–Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), speaking to reporters about the international nuclear agreement with Iran, Aug. 10, 2015
“At non-designated sites it will take 24 days to get an inspection.”
–Schumer, speaking to reporters, Aug. 11



It was a bad agreement for the beginning. We said it years ago. And let me tell you a few examples about why it is a bad agreement. You cannot inspect the facilities. You have to let them know in advance if you want to come to inspect the military facilities. It's a joke. They continue with a ballistic missile program. Prime Minister Netanyahu exposed documents that we found in Tehran and we showed it to the world that they're continuing with their ballistic missile program. Third, is the issue of the expiration date. What will happen in five, six, seven years and the most important the President has talk about it is the funding. Today they have a lot of funding and they put into their military and sponsoring their proxies in Syria, in Lebanon, in Yemen. They're using that money that they're getting from the Europeans to sponsor terrorism all over the world.
Rep. Michael McCaul on Iran deal flaws, immigration policy




FACT: Obama, Rhodes and Moniz had already been caught lying about the Iran Deal. All you had to do was listen to the words coming out of their mouths at various times and compare them to each other.

“It cuts off all of Iran’s pathways to a bomb,” Obama claimed of the deal. But he had also admitted that it would give Iran a zero breakout time to a bomb. Both statements can’t be true.

“Under this deal you will have anywhere, anytime 24⁄7 access,” Ben Rhodes told CNN. A few months later, he also told CNN, “We never sought in this negotiation the capacity for so-called anytime, anywhere where you could basically go anywhere in the country.”
According to Iran’s atomic spokesman, the samples were collected “in the absence of the inspectors affiliated to the International Atomic Energy Agency.”
Frontpagemag



Obama's Iran Nuclear Deal Allows the Regime to Develop a Weapon ...
"Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon"
Read more at: Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon



§ The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was not allowed to inspect or monitor Iran's military sites where nuclear activities were most likely being carried out. Among the many concessions that the Obama administration gave the Iranian government, one was accepting the Iranian leaders' demand that these military sites would be out of the IAEA's reach.

§ Due to this surrender, various high-profile Iranian sites such as the Parchin military complex, located southeast of Tehran, were free to engage in nuclear activities without the risk of inspection.

§ Once the authoritarian, anti-Semitic and anti-American government of Iran possess a nuclear bomb, no amount of actions will be able reverse the catastrophe.

§ Stop Iran From Going Nuclear




“Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close
Iran can easily stretch out the inspection of suspect nuclear sites for three months or more.”

Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close​

Iran can easily stretch out the inspection of suspect nuclear sites for three months or more.

www.wsj.com



Now.....what is your next lie????

Wrong.
Not only did Iran allow inspections, but the IAEA installed video cameras for constant inspection of Iran's facilities.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Blah Blah Blah Blah...anything to protect the FELON IN CHIEF.

The jury for the case was the nation....the election reflected the fact that said trial was merely a Democrat lynching.

The electorate found "not guilty."

Now you:
This sort of poster is a greater problem for the Democrats than are the Republicans. He, and those like him, are not able to process the loss in the election, while the brighter Democrats are looking at ways to regain power, and know it will not be by doubling down on what lost them the landslide.

This is one of those 22% who believe ( I almost said 'think') that they need to keep attacking the other side, Trump, while it is the agenda that produced the loss.


1 There are those of us who have been brought up correctly, with the right principles and knowledge of right and wrong



2. Some of us may not have had that start, and been misled by sophistry, but finally saw through it and moved in the right direction.



3. I see that you belong to neither of those categories. But you are not alone: Around 22% of Americans identify as strong Democrats, meaning they are highly likely to consistently vote for Democratic candidates, no matter how many lies and hoaxes are revealed.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Wrong!
The 2015 deal between Iran and Obama included the installation of video cameras for constant inspection.

{...
The 2015 nuclear treaty with Iran included inspections by allowing the IAEA to have a "long-term presence" in Iran to monitor materials and nuclear development that wouldn't be used in weapons. Inspectors would have continuous monitoring capabilities at known nuclear facilities12. The deal also required Iran to permanently install cameras and sensors at nuclear sites
...}
What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote

No one would ever do any sort of nuclear deal without inspections.

Please get lost and stop wasting bytes here.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Wrong.
Not only did Iran allow inspections, but the IAEA installed video cameras for constant inspection of Iran's facilities.

I'm never wrong.


To make sure they could enrich uranium and build inter-continental missiles, Obama gave them a deal with no inspections.
AI Overview
According to the
Bipartisan Policy Center: "Iran Deal Limits Inspectors' Access to Suspicious Sites". The Bipartisan Policy Center notes that the timeline for IAEA access to suspicious sites in Iran is 54 days, not the commonly reported 24 days.



Remember the last time you were correct about something?





Me neither.

 

[LeftofLeft]

You are incapable of understanding.

You are specious at best.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

So what?

good answer, I may use that someday.

Iran is entitled to nuclear technology just like any other sovereign state.

So what?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

You are specious at best.

AND YOU!!...Do not ever get rid of that avatar! I just love it!!

 

[Delldude]

They turned over 97% of their nuclear material
The allowed inspections

Even the JCS thought the deal was working just fine, until Trump tanked it.

Iran uses advanced uranium-enriching centrifuges in underground plant in breach of 2015 nuclear agreement

Iran admits breach of nuclear deal discovered by UN inspectorate

Iran uses advanced uranium-enriching centrifuges in underground plant in breach of 2015 nuclear agreement

www.theguardian.com

Earlier in 2018, Israeli agents conducted a dramatic operation in Tehran, breaking into a secret warehouse and capturing a trove of Iranian nuclear files. These documents revealed a more advanced and comprehensive nuclear weapons program than had been previously known. The nuclear archive also showed Iranian officials’ plan for concealing nuclear weapons efforts under the guise of civilian research and development, and how Iranian officials systematically deceived the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Seven Myths about the Iran Nuclear Deal

View PDF

www.hudson.org

Iran Newly Breaches Nuclear Deal | Arms Control Association

www.armscontrol.org

 

[Delldude]

Typical power generation is always 60% enrichment.

LOL..........

AI Overview


That statement is incorrect. While uranium enrichment is necessary for most nuclear power plants, the typical enrichment level for power generation is 3% to 5% uranium-235, not 60%.

Here's why the difference matters:

• Low-Enriched Uranium (LEU): Nuclear power plants use LEU, enriched to a relatively low percentage of U-235 (3-5%). This level is sufficient to sustain a controlled nuclear chain reaction, generating heat for electricity production, but it's not enough to be easily used for a nuclear weapon.
• Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU): To build a nuclear bomb, a much higher concentration of U-235 is required, typically above 90%. This is referred to as weapons-grade uranium.

 

[dudmuck]

Wrong.
Iran not only was unable to like of cheat, but clearly they never did.
Typical power generation is always 60% enrichment.
Anything lower requires a huge containment dome and amplifies the size of everything.

For use in nuclear power plants, uranium is typically enriched to 3% to 5% of the U-235 isotope. This level of enrichment, known as low-enriched uranium (LEU), is sufficient to sustain a controlled nuclear chain reaction for electricity generation, according to OilPrice.com and the Department of Energy. Uranium enriched to higher levels, such as 90% or more, is needed for nuclear weapons, says Northeastern Global News

 

[Delldude]

For use in nuclear power plants, uranium is typically enriched to 3% to 5% of the U-235 isotope. This level of enrichment, known as low-enriched uranium (LEU), is sufficient to sustain a controlled nuclear chain reaction for electricity generation, according to OilPrice.com and the Department of Energy. Uranium enriched to higher levels, such as 90% or more, is needed for nuclear weapons, says Northeastern Global News

Post in thread 'The Man Who Owns the Current Iran Crisis'

Jun 22, 2025

Typical power generation is always 60% enrichment.

LOL..........

AI Overview


That statement is incorrect. While uranium enrichment is necessary for most nuclear power plants, the typical enrichment level for power generation is 3% to 5% uranium-235, not 60%.

Here's why the difference matters:

• Low-Enriched Uranium (LEU): Nuclear power plants use LEU, enriched to a relatively low percentage of U-235 (3-5%). This level is sufficient to sustain a controlled nuclear chain reaction, generating heat for electricity production, but it's not enough to...

• Delldude

•