The Man Who Owns the Current Iran Crisis

List the promises they kept.
See, this poster and several others, don't have the ability to change perspective as their party is doing, to win elections.
These dolts simply want to double down on a losing strategy, hate Trump, be woke, racist, and ending free speech.


The party needs to change and they know it, and will have to suffer with these sorts of voters who don't see the pivot:

1.Here on the board we have only one sort of Democrat supporter, the really dumb ones who are unable to think or question, and still support what cost their party a landslide loss.


2. But there are intelligent Democrat officials.....contrary to the sort that they allowed to take control of the party.......and they are planning a return, a more moderate, more centrist party sans the woke Fascist element.


3.These officials finally realize the futility of attacking Trump, making him the bĆŖte noire, making fake claims about Trump and some imagined Russia connection, They want to win....and they see the path.



4.
1747665712795.webp


......on the right (Right).




5.Do you see who they are now going to let all the blame fall on?


www.nbcnews.com

Can Democrats blame their problems all on Biden?

As the party ponders a full reckoning, some on the left say blaming their 2024 White House loss all on Biden is a cop-out and positions the party poorly for 2028.
www.nbcnews.com
www.nbcnews.com



Why Did Kamala Harris lose her White House bid? David Plouffe says ā€œit’s all Biden.ā€

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/13/biden-book-david-plouffe-harris-2024-00344449




1747665899952.webpFox News
Biden made Harris campaign a 'nightmare,' destroyed her chances by staying in 2024 race too long, aides charge
Biden made Harris campaign a 'nightmare,' destroyed her chances by staying in 2024 race too long, aides charge



1747665947468.webpThe Atlantic
An Autopsy Report on Biden’s In-Office Decline
Five people were running the country,ā€ a political insider told the authors of the new book Original Sin. ā€œAnd Joe Biden was at best a...



www.youtube.com › watch

1747665998924.webp


Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris' Aides Blame Joe Biden for Election Defeat | Firstpost America After US Vice President Kamala Harris was ...
 
The one thing that Trump's actions do, is to provide proof positive that Netanyahu has played him - again. No US President has ever been so easily manipulated into acting against the USA's best interests as Donald Trump.
Really?


Does Iran still have nuclear facilities?


What are you, stupid? You don't have to answer that.......

.....but answer this: why did you and Obama feel that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism had to be guaranteed nuclear weapons?





One more......If the intended target, enemy, was Israel......why was Iran working on an intercontinental ballistic missile?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Project Koussar, also known as Project Kowsar, is an alleged intermediate range or intercontinental ballistic missile program of the Islamic Republic of Iran.




Looks like you, Obama, and Iran FAILED
 
List the promises they kept.

They promised not to enrich uranium to build a bomb until at 2025, and they KEPT their promise. You promised to lift sanctions if they did it and you DIDN'T lift the sanctions.

You promised not to attack if they kept their promises, and you assassinated Sulemani.

You asked for peace negotiations and they agreed, and you bombed them instead.

It doesn't say much for your country when the Ayatollah and the Mullahs show more honesty and decency than the American President.

SHAME, SHAME, SHAME!


Why do you think a nuclear Iran is in the US’s best interest?

Where did say that? Where did I even suggest it. If Iran wanted to build a bomb, they would have built a bomb in the past 10 years.
 
They promised not to enrich uranium to build a bomb until at 2025, and they KEPT their promise. You promised to lift sanctions if they did it and you DIDN'T lift the sanctions.

You promised not to attack if they kept their promises, and you assassinated Sulemani.

You asked for peace negotiations and they agreed, and you bombed them instead.

It doesn't say much for your country when the Ayatollah and the Mullahs show more honesty and decency than the American President.

SHAME, SHAME, SHAME!




Where did say that? Where did I even suggest it. If Iran wanted to build a bomb, they would have built a bomb in the past 10 years.
1) um what? They’ve been enriching uranium in violation of the UN treaty


2) when you said it’s not in our interest to take out their enrichment sites and stockpiles
 
Really?


Does Iran still have nuclear facilities?


What are you, stupid? You don't have to answer that.......

.....but answer this: why did you and Obama feel that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism had to be guaranteed nuclear weapons?





One more......If the intended target, enemy, was Israel......why was Iran working on an intercontinental ballistic missile?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Project Koussar, also known as Project Kowsar, is an alleged intermediate range or intercontinental ballistic missile program of the Islamic Republic of Iran.




Looks like you, Obama, and Iran FAILED

Define nuclear facilities? A nuclear power plant is a "nuclear facility".

You sources are a ******* joke you stupid *****. Wikipedia isn't a source.

Why are you posting about Biden.
 
Define nuclear facilities? A nuclear power plant is a "nuclear facility".

You sources are a ******* joke you stupid *****. Wikipedia isn't a source.

Why are you posting about Biden.
Sure we are talking about the nuclear enrichment facilities they had hidden deepn in caves to avoid inspections and to hide what they were doing
 
1) um what? They’ve been enriching uranium in violation of the UN treaty


2) when you said it’s not in our interest to take out their enrichment sites and stockpiles

1. That is not what the report said at all you lying piece of shit. From your link:

"The development follows serious warnings from the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) earlier this week that inspectors have been unable to determine whether Iran’s nuclear programme was ā€œexclusively peacefulā€ – as per the terms of the 2015 nuclear deal from which the United States subsequently withdrew."

They are unable to determine whether Iran is in compliance with the treaty that TRUMP TORE UP. WHY IS IRAN REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE TREATY TRUMP TORE UP?

2. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THERE ARE ENRICHMENT SITES OR STOCKPILES TO TAKE OUT.

Why is Trump bombing Iran, when there is no proof they aren't in compliance with the treaty Trump tore up.

WITH EVERY NEW PIECE OF INFORMATION THAT COMES UP, TRUMP LOOKS WEAK, GULLIBLE AND EASILY MANIPULATED INTO DOING STUPID THINGS FOR STUPID REASONS.

Trump is doing things that cannot be undone, for dangerous and stupid reasons.
 
They promised not to enrich uranium to build a bomb until at 2025, and they KEPT their promise. You promised to lift sanctions if they did it and you DIDN'T lift the sanctions.

You promised not to attack if they kept their promises, and you assassinated Sulemani.

You asked for peace negotiations and they agreed, and you bombed them instead.

It doesn't say much for your country when the Ayatollah and the Mullahs show more honesty and decency than the American President.

SHAME, SHAME, SHAME!




Where did say that? Where did I even suggest it. If Iran wanted to build a bomb, they would have built a bomb in the past 10 years.

Define nuclear facilities? A nuclear power plant is a "nuclear facility".

You sources are a ******* joke you stupid *****. Wikipedia isn't a source.

Why are you posting about Biden.
Once again they resort to vulgarity when they know they've lost the argument.



Let's rub it in:

1. The starting point seems to be, not what is best for America, and the civilized world, but anything that opposes their bete noire, Trump. This notwithstanding that the Democrat Party itself is trying ot pivot away from simply running on "not Trump." So this morn, Rubio put Margaret Brennan in her place by giving the bare facts as to why the attack was necessary.


2. "What the IAEA knows they are enriching uranium well beyond anything you need for a- for a for a civil nuclear program. So why would you enrich uranium at 60%, if you don't intend to one day use it to take it to 90 and build a weapon?


3. Why are you why are you developing ICBMs? Why do you have 8000 short range missiles and two to 3000 long- mid range missiles that you continue to develop? Why do you do all these things?


4. They have everything they need for a nuclear weapon. They have the delivery mechanisms, they have the enrichment capability, they have the highly enriched uranium that is stored.



5. That's all we need to see. Especially in the hands of the regime that's already involved in terrorism and proxies and all kinds of things. They are the source of all the instability in the Middle East."
Rubio



Stop including Trump, and see if you can explain why the Obama Democrats felt it imperative that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them to America.
 
1. That is not what the report said at all you lying piece of shit. From your link:

"The development follows serious warnings from the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) earlier this week that inspectors have been unable to determine whether Iran’s nuclear programme was ā€œexclusively peacefulā€ – as per the terms of the 2015 nuclear deal from which the United States subsequently withdrew."

They are unable to determine whether Iran is in compliance with the treaty that TRUMP TORE UP. WHY IS IRAN REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE TREATY TRUMP TORE UP?

2. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THERE ARE ENRICHMENT SITES OR STOCKPILES TO TAKE OUT.

Why is Trump bombing Iran, when there is no proof they aren't in compliance with the treaty Trump tore up.

WITH EVERY NEW PIECE OF INFORMATION THAT COMES UP, TRUMP LOOKS WEAK, GULLIBLE AND EASILY MANIPULATED INTO DOING STUPID THINGS FOR STUPID REASONS.

Trump is doing things that cannot be undone, for dangerous and stupid reasons.
1) the USA wasn’t part of the deal but other countries were, and the concerns have been growing since 2019

2) what were the sites used for then?
 
1. That is not what the report said at all you lying piece of shit. From your link:

"The development follows serious warnings from the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) earlier this week that inspectors have been unable to determine whether Iran’s nuclear programme was ā€œexclusively peacefulā€ – as per the terms of the 2015 nuclear deal from which the United States subsequently withdrew."

They are unable to determine whether Iran is in compliance with the treaty that TRUMP TORE UP. WHY IS IRAN REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE TREATY TRUMP TORE UP?

2. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THERE ARE ENRICHMENT SITES OR STOCKPILES TO TAKE OUT.

Why is Trump bombing Iran, when there is no proof they aren't in compliance with the treaty Trump tore up.

WITH EVERY NEW PIECE OF INFORMATION THAT COMES UP, TRUMP LOOKS WEAK, GULLIBLE AND EASILY MANIPULATED INTO DOING STUPID THINGS FOR STUPID REASONS.

Trump is doing things that cannot be undone, for dangerous and stupid reasons.
1. As the adage goes, "realitly is defined by actions, not words."
If you check, Obama himself said that Iran would never be allowed nuclear weapons. Then he guaranteed them nuclear weapons.
And made certain that no inspections could occur.


2. To make sure they could enrich uranium and build inter-continental missiles, Obama gave them a deal with no inspections.
AI Overview
According to the
Bipartisan Policy Center: "Iran Deal Limits Inspectors' Access to Suspicious Sites". The Bipartisan Policy Center notes that the timeline for IAEA access to suspicious sites in Iran is 54 days, not the commonly reported 24 days.


3. A bit late, but ask yourself now, since Trump removed any pressure, why the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism should be given.....guaranteeded.....nuclear weaponss?


4.And as far as the otherr great enemy of America, the second biggest loser is China, who bought a million barrels of Iran's oil. And China need oil.


5. And the third loser? The war put on display the difference between Russian military equipment, and air defenses, and America's military equipment.




Did you vote for Iran and the Democrats??? That make you the really biggest loser.
 
1. As the adage goes, "realitly is defined by actions, not words."
If you check, Obama himself said that Iran would never be allowed nuclear weapons. Then he guaranteed them nuclear weapons.
And made certain that no inspections could occur.


2. To make sure they could enrich uranium and build inter-continental missiles, Obama gave them a deal with no inspections.
AI Overview
According to the
Bipartisan Policy Center: "Iran Deal Limits Inspectors' Access to Suspicious Sites". The Bipartisan Policy Center notes that the timeline for IAEA access to suspicious sites in Iran is 54 days, not the commonly reported 24 days.


3. A bit late, but ask yourself now, since Trump removed any pressure, why the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism should be given.....guaranteeded.....nuclear weaponss?


4.And as far as the otherr great enemy of America, the second biggest loser is China, who bought a million barrels of Iran's oil. And China need oil.


5. And the third loser? The war put on display the difference between Russian military equipment, and air defenses, and America's military equipment.




Did you vote for Iran and the Democrats??? That make you the really biggest loser.
Dragonlady like most radicalized dembots aligns herself with then Supreme Leader and Iran
 
Really?


Does Iran still have nuclear facilities?


What are you, stupid? You don't have to answer that.......

.....but answer this: why did you and Obama feel that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism had to be guaranteed nuclear weapons?





One more......If the intended target, enemy, was Israel......why working on an intercontinental ballistic missile?

Project Koussar​


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Project Koussar, also known as Project Kowsar, is an alleged intermediate range or intercontinental ballistic missile program of the Islamic Republic of Iran.




Looks like you, Obama, and Iran FAILED
Your cowboy named trump has opened up a can of worms. Poootin is now vowing to send nuclear warhead to Tehran. How is your boy gonna handle that? He doesn't have the balls that Kennedy had in the Cuban missile crisis.
 
JimH52, shut yer trap, ya sissy.

No, Russian President Vladimir Putin has not said that he would send a nuclear weapon to Iran.

However, Dmitry Medvedev, a close ally of Putin and the Deputy Chairman of Russia’s Security Council, made a provocative statement on June 22, 2025, suggesting that ā€œa number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheadsā€ in response to U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities

In contrast, Putin himself has publicly stated that:
  • Russia has no evidence that Iran is seeking nuclear weapons.
  • Russia supports Iran’s right to a peaceful nuclear program.
  • Russia has communicated this position to Israel and the international community
So while Medvedev’s comments were alarming, they do not represent an official declaration by Putin or the Russian government that they intend to supply Iran with nuclear weapons.
 
15th post
Your cowboy named trump has opened up a can of worms. Poootin is now vowing to send nuclear warhead to Tehran. How is your boy gonna handle that? He doesn't have the balls that Kennedy had in the Cuban missile crisis.
I need to help you and the failed Democrat Party. I believe we need two strong, pro-American, Judeo-Christian parties rather than being a one-party nation.....your party has proven not to be any of those things.


One problem is that the adults in your party are trying to pivot away from losing strategies, mainly being anti-Trump, and not standing for American values......and voters like you seem unable to get with the program.


What Trump did benefitted America, and you should simply praise the fact, Trump notwithstanding.



Consider this:

1.Here on the board we have only one sort of Democrat supporter, the really dumb ones who are unable to think or question, and still support what cost their party a landslide loss.


2. But there are intelligent Democrat officials.....contrary to the sort that they allowed to take control of the party.......and they are planning a return, a more moderate, more centrist party sans the woke Fascist element.


3.These officials finally realize the futility of attacking Trump, making him the bĆŖte noire, making fake claims about Trump and some imagined Russia connection, They want to win....and they see the path.



4.
1747665712795.webp


......on the right (Right).




5.Do you see who they are now going to let all the blame fall on?


www.nbcnews.com

Can Democrats blame their problems all on Biden?

As the party ponders a full reckoning, some on the left say blaming their 2024 White House loss all on Biden is a cop-out and positions the party poorly for 2028.
www.nbcnews.com
www.nbcnews.com



Why Did Kamala Harris lose her White House bid? David Plouffe says ā€œit’s all Biden.ā€

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/13/biden-book-david-plouffe-harris-2024-00344449




1747665899952.webpFox News
Biden made Harris campaign a 'nightmare,' destroyed her chances by staying in 2024 race too long, aides charge
Biden made Harris campaign a 'nightmare,' destroyed her chances by staying in 2024 race too long, aides charge



1747665947468.webpThe Atlantic
An Autopsy Report on Biden’s In-Office Decline
Five people were running the country,ā€ a political insider told the authors of the new book Original Sin. ā€œAnd Joe Biden was at best a...



www.youtube.com › watch

1747665998924.webp


Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris' Aides Blame Joe Biden for Election Defeat | Firstpost America After US Vice President Kamala Harris was ...
 
Your cowboy named trump has opened up a can of worms. Poootin is now vowing to send nuclear warhead to Tehran. How is your boy gonna handle that? He doesn't have the balls that Kennedy had in the Cuban missile crisis.
1. The war revealed how poorly Russian air defenses and military equipment stands up to American.

2. Putin will not confront Trump.

3. Trump is not "my boy" as I vote for policies not persons.

4. I will bet you cannot explain voting for these policies:

Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system


5. You need to grow a pair and learn to question your party when it goes full Fascist.
 
They turned over 97% of their nuclear material
The allowed inspections

Even the JCS thought the deal was working just fine, until Trump tanked it.
"The allowed inspections"

Never. The Obama scam allowed them to put off requests for inspections for 54 days.


I'm really getting tired of pointing out how frequently you lie.

Now....let's take care of this particular lie of yours: the claim that there were inspections of Iran to see if they were obeying the terms of the 'deal.'

And that's the problem: the 'deal' itself saw to it that there were no inspections, 'cause the war criminal, Obama, wanted to guarantee nukes to the savage regime.



"Americans and Israelis who hate the new nuclear agreement with Iran are already focusing on one part in particular: It doesn’t authorize snap, no-notice inspections of all locations. Israel’s hard-right Education Minister Naftali Bennett claims the accord is a ā€œfarceā€ because ā€œin order to go and make an inspection, you have to notify the Iranians 24 days in advance.ā€



This is not exactly right, but close enough. (Iran’s declared nuclear sites will be under continuous monitoring. If the International Atomic Energy Agency wants to inspect a non-declared site and Iran refuses, Iran has 14 days to convince the IAEA it’s doing nothing wrong without providing access. If it can’t, the commission governing the agreement has seven days to vote on whether to force Iran to provide access, and if it does Iran has three more days to comply. The exact procedure is established in paragraphs 74-78 of the agreement text.)"
Why Is Iran’s Refusal to Allow No-Notice Inspections Legit? U.S. History With Iraq



ā€œParticularly troublesome, you have to wait 24 days before you can inspect.ā€

–Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), speaking to reporters about the international nuclear agreement with Iran, Aug. 10, 2015
ā€œAt non-designated sites it will take 24 days to get an inspection.ā€
–Schumer, speaking to reporters, Aug. 11



It was a bad agreement for the beginning. We said it years ago. And let me tell you a few examples about why it is a bad agreement. You cannot inspect the facilities. You have to let them know in advance if you want to come to inspect the military facilities. It's a joke. They continue with a ballistic missile program. Prime Minister Netanyahu exposed documents that we found in Tehran and we showed it to the world that they're continuing with their ballistic missile program. Third, is the issue of the expiration date. What will happen in five, six, seven years and the most important the President has talk about it is the funding. Today they have a lot of funding and they put into their military and sponsoring their proxies in Syria, in Lebanon, in Yemen. They're using that money that they're getting from the Europeans to sponsor terrorism all over the world.
Rep. Michael McCaul on Iran deal flaws, immigration policy




FACT: Obama, Rhodes and Moniz had already been caught lying about the Iran Deal. All you had to do was listen to the words coming out of their mouths at various times and compare them to each other.

ā€œIt cuts off all of Iran’s pathways to a bomb,ā€ Obama claimed of the deal. But he had also admitted that it would give Iran a zero breakout time to a bomb. Both statements can’t be true.

ā€œUnder this deal you will have anywhere, anytime 24⁄7 access,ā€ Ben Rhodes told CNN. A few months later, he also told CNN, ā€œWe never sought in this negotiation the capacity for so-called anytime, anywhere where you could basically go anywhere in the country.ā€
According to Iran’s atomic spokesman, the samples were collected ā€œin the absence of the inspectors affiliated to the International Atomic Energy Agency.ā€
Frontpagemag



Obama's Iran Nuclear Deal Allows the Regime to Develop a Weapon ...
"Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ā€˜Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon"
Read more at:
Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ā€˜Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon



§ The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was not allowed to inspect or monitor Iran's military sites where nuclear activities were most likely being carried out. Among the many concessions that the Obama administration gave the Iranian government, one was accepting the Iranian leaders' demand that these military sites would be out of the IAEA's reach.

§ Due to this surrender, various high-profile Iranian sites such as the Parchin military complex, located southeast of Tehran, were free to engage in nuclear activities without the risk of inspection.

§ Once the authoritarian, anti-Semitic and anti-American government of Iran possess a nuclear bomb, no amount of actions will be able reverse the catastrophe.

§
Stop Iran From Going Nuclear




ā€œIran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close
Iran can easily stretch out the inspection of suspect nuclear sites for three months or more.ā€
www.wsj.com

Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close

Iran can easily stretch out the inspection of suspect nuclear sites for three months or more.
www.wsj.com
www.wsj.com



Now.....what is your next lie????
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom