Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oops, NBC/WSJ poll today shows Obama crashing and burning, especially on the economy.
Even that idiot Chuck Todd from MSNBC this morning referred to the economic situation across the country as MALAISE.
LMAO, yes he used the big M word, Dad23. I think you libs need to throw in the towel.
Yes, according to YOUR theory, Dubya lost 5 million PRIVATE sector jobs in 8 years and Obama has 10+ million under him
That's a difference of 15+ million. Which side failed?
Your ass has got to be sore from all those numbers you keep pulling from it, D23. I've never seen a more obtuse number cruncher.
You need to go get some econ training to learn how to read the data.
And stop thinking in your 2nd grade math.
I'd say weak wage growth for the working class over three decades is catching up with the US consumer driven economy. Of course that's easy for me to say as most economist have stated the same thing.
So we have had the very un-American practice of shipping jobs offshore.
Many companies are waving a carrot in front of potential illegal immigrants who happily accept low wage jobs.
Automation is replacing workers.
The rejection of an increase of the minimum wage (70% of Americans support this).
The rejection of the equal pay for women (over 60% of Americans support this).
All these items listed are killing the working middle class and working poor class which makes it really tough for these folks to contribute to the economy.
I remember when the recovery was really dragging a group of CEOs were asked "why is the economy dragging"? The overwhelming response was "people aren't spending". Which makes sense, as people watch their expendable income dwindle and dwindle. We have the private sector doing nothing about wages, despite very good profits and we have our representatives doing nothing about it because of polarized ideological politics.
It's no wonder the US is slipping while other countries who have middle class getting stronger catch up and in some cases passing the US.
Since Dubya was responsible for the F/Y that started Oct 1, 2008, don't you think HE SHOULD TAKE RESPONSIBILITY, LIKE EVERY OTHER US PREZ?
CBO JAN 8, 2009 PRE STIMULUS
CBO Projects $1.2 Trillion Deficit for 2009
CBO Projects $1.2 Trillion Deficit for 2009 - Memphis Daily News
I KNOW, OBAMA WAS 'RESPONSIBLE FOR' THE ECONOMY SINCE BEFORE THE ELECTIONS IN 2008, ACCORDING TO RIGHT WINGERS LIKE LIMBAUGH RIGHT? lol
You klowns are as bright as your are honest, not very!
Since Dubya was responsible for the F/Y that started Oct 1, 2008,
He didn't sign that budget.
If you back out all the spending the Dems passed after he left office, then you'd have an idea of what he was responsible for.
Or you can look at debt the day he started and the day he left. The math for that was up thread.
Right, MORE magical fairy dust would keep the US economy going, NOT that a budget needed to be signed by Dubya, after all we didn't have a couple of wars going on (that he NEVER funded) or an economic meltdown. And that $700+ billion TARP program he asked for, well heck it shouldn't be in a budget either!
Since Dubya was responsible for the F/Y that started Oct 1, 2008, don't you think HE SHOULD TAKE RESPONSIBILITY, LIKE EVERY OTHER US PREZ?
CBO JAN 8, 2009 PRE STIMULUS
CBO Projects $1.2 Trillion Deficit for 2009
CBO Projects $1.2 Trillion Deficit for 2009 - Memphis Daily News
I KNOW, OBAMA WAS 'RESPONSIBLE FOR' THE ECONOMY SINCE BEFORE THE ELECTIONS IN 2008, ACCORDING TO RIGHT WINGERS LIKE LIMBAUGH RIGHT? lol
You klowns are as bright as your are honest, not very!
Since Dubya was responsible for the F/Y that started Oct 1, 2008,
He didn't sign that budget.
If you back out all the spending the Dems passed after he left office, then you'd have an idea of what he was responsible for.
Or you can look at debt the day he started and the day he left. The math for that was up thread.
Or you can look at debt the day he started and the day he left. The math for that was up thread.
WHY THE FUCK ISN'T DUBYA RESPONSIBLE FOR US DEBT UNDER HIS F/Y'S LIKE EVERY OTHER PREZ? BECAUSE HE ACTED IRRESPONSIBLY AND DIDN'T SHOW 'LEADERSHIP'?
Or the GOP's 7%.
What will it mean when the GOP with 7% takes back the Senate?
Gerrymandering worked. What did it mean when for the first time in 50+ years Obama was elected (twice) with 52%+ of the popular vote?
well.., that leaves out 99.9999999999999% to infinity of all libertards....anyone with a brain...
damn !! i wish i could find that one that does exist, he/she certainly does not reside on USMB !!.............
The jobs lost in the recession were lost BECAUSE of Republican Policies, lies and fallacies- Can we say Trickle Down (Voodoo!) Economics? Hell, even Dubya's Dad knew that stuff was, uh, Bunk!
Now they want you to believe them when they claim they know what's best for the rest of us?
What will it mean when the GOP with 7% takes back the Senate?
Gerrymandering worked. What did it mean when for the first time in 50+ years Obama was elected (twice) with 52%+ of the popular vote?
Hey, fucktard, explain how gerrymandering impacts the Senate.
I'll be here, laughing at your stupid ass.
well.., that leaves out 99.9999999999999% to infinity of all libertards.
damn !! i wish i could find that one that does exist, he/she certainly does not reside on USMB !!
The jobs lost in the recession were lost BECAUSE of Republican Policies, lies and fallacies- Can we say Trickle Down (Voodoo!) Economics? Hell, even Dubya's Dad knew that stuff was, uh, Bunk!
Now they want you to believe them when they claim they know what's best for the rest of us?
Yup. As Dubya himself said, "Wall Street got drunk!"
I'd say weak wage growth for the working class over three decades is catching up with the US consumer driven economy. Of course that's easy for me to say as most economist have stated the same thing.
So we have had the very un-American practice of shipping jobs offshore.
Many companies are waving a carrot in front of potential illegal immigrants who happily accept low wage jobs.
Automation is replacing workers.
The rejection of an increase of the minimum wage (70% of Americans support this).
The rejection of the equal pay for women (over 60% of Americans support this).
All these items listed are killing the working middle class and working poor class which makes it really tough for these folks to contribute to the economy.
I remember when the recovery was really dragging a group of CEOs were asked "why is the economy dragging"? The overwhelming response was "people aren't spending". Which makes sense, as people watch their expendable income dwindle and dwindle. We have the private sector doing nothing about wages, despite very good profits and we have our representatives doing nothing about it because of polarized ideological politics.
It's no wonder the US is slipping while other countries who have middle class getting stronger catch up and in some cases passing the US.
As usual you add a few talking points and unsubstantiated assertions.
I dont recall a group of CEOs saying that. I do recall them fingering regulatory and tax uncertainty with the Obama administration.
The economy is going downhill thanks to Obama's policies. Here.
Thanks for confirming what I already knew,,,you are clueless. Graph's typically have data running vertically and horizontally as reference points to the line's progress left to right. Sometimes bars are used, again with data references vertically and horizontally. That graph you posted means absolutely nothing without data references.
Gerrymandering worked. What did it mean when for the first time in 50+ years Obama was elected (twice) with 52%+ of the popular vote?
Hey, fucktard, explain how gerrymandering impacts the Senate.
I'll be here, laughing at your stupid ass.
So YOU are a dumbfuck who can't critically think? Got it
You don't think having more House GOPers helps with the Senate elections? Seriously?
Did Gerrymandering Cost Dems the NC Senate? A Fair Map Suggests Not in 2012, But Likely Will in 2014
Did Gerrymandering Cost Dems the NC Senate? A Fair Map Suggests Not in 2012, But Likely Will in 2014
GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority
"The rationale was straightforward," reads the memo. "Controlling the redistricting process in these states would have the greatest impact on determining how both state legislative and congressional district boundaries would be drawn.
GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority
I'd say weak wage growth for the working class over three decades is catching up with the US consumer driven economy. Of course that's easy for me to say as most economist have stated the same thing.
So we have had the very un-American practice of shipping jobs offshore.
Many companies are waving a carrot in front of potential illegal immigrants who happily accept low wage jobs.
Automation is replacing workers.
The rejection of an increase of the minimum wage (70% of Americans support this).
The rejection of the equal pay for women (over 60% of Americans support this).
All these items listed are killing the working middle class and working poor class which makes it really tough for these folks to contribute to the economy.
I remember when the recovery was really dragging a group of CEOs were asked "why is the economy dragging"? The overwhelming response was "people aren't spending". Which makes sense, as people watch their expendable income dwindle and dwindle. We have the private sector doing nothing about wages, despite very good profits and we have our representatives doing nothing about it because of polarized ideological politics.
It's no wonder the US is slipping while other countries who have middle class getting stronger catch up and in some cases passing the US.
As usual you add a few talking points and unsubstantiated assertions.
I dont recall a group of CEOs saying that. I do recall them fingering regulatory and tax uncertainty with the Obama administration.
The economy is going downhill thanks to Obama's policies. Here.
Now I see why you ask so many questions about graphs and charts. You seem to think the graph you posted is supposed to mean something?
Oh, read this; Wall Street's new worry: American consumers
Wall Street's new worry: American consumers- MSN Money
Now I know you might have a difficult time because the above article isn't your everyday, every hour and every minute talking points, but go ahead and at least try. Maybe you can digest information that isn't spoon fed to you?
Finally, do I think Obama shares some blame? Of course I do, along with Congress (that includes both do-nothing parties) and the private sector.
Hey, fucktard, explain how gerrymandering impacts the Senate.
I'll be here, laughing at your stupid ass.
So YOU are a dumbfuck who can't critically think? Got it
You don't think having more House GOPers helps with the Senate elections? Seriously?
Did Gerrymandering Cost Dems the NC Senate? A Fair Map Suggests Not in 2012, But Likely Will in 2014
Did Gerrymandering Cost Dems the NC Senate? A Fair Map Suggests Not in 2012, But Likely Will in 2014
GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority
"The rationale was straightforward," reads the memo. "Controlling the redistricting process in these states would have the greatest impact on determining how both state legislative and congressional district boundaries would be drawn.
GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority
Did Gerrymandering Cost Dems the NC Senate?
Fucktard! Where did I mention a state senate? Or the US House? Moron.
Hey, fucktard, explain how gerrymandering impacts the Senate.
I'd say weak wage growth for the working class over three decades is catching up with the US consumer driven economy. Of course that's easy for me to say as most economist have stated the same thing.
So we have had the very un-American practice of shipping jobs offshore.
Many companies are waving a carrot in front of potential illegal immigrants who happily accept low wage jobs.
Automation is replacing workers.
The rejection of an increase of the minimum wage (70% of Americans support this).
The rejection of the equal pay for women (over 60% of Americans support this).
All these items listed are killing the working middle class and working poor class which makes it really tough for these folks to contribute to the economy.
I remember when the recovery was really dragging a group of CEOs were asked "why is the economy dragging"? The overwhelming response was "people aren't spending". Which makes sense, as people watch their expendable income dwindle and dwindle. We have the private sector doing nothing about wages, despite very good profits and we have our representatives doing nothing about it because of polarized ideological politics.
It's no wonder the US is slipping while other countries who have middle class getting stronger catch up and in some cases passing the US.
As usual you add a few talking points and unsubstantiated assertions.
I dont recall a group of CEOs saying that. I do recall them fingering regulatory and tax uncertainty with the Obama administration.
The economy is going downhill thanks to Obama's policies. Here.
As usual you add a few talking points and unsubstantiated assertions.
I dont recall a group of CEOs saying that. I do recall them fingering regulatory and tax uncertainty with the Obama administration.
The economy is going downhill thanks to Obama's policies. Here.
Now I see why you ask so many questions about graphs and charts. You seem to think the graph you posted is supposed to mean something?
Oh, read this; Wall Street's new worry: American consumers
Wall Street's new worry: American consumers- MSN Money
Now I know you might have a difficult time because the above article isn't your everyday, every hour and every minute talking points, but go ahead and at least try. Maybe you can digest information that isn't spoon fed to you?
Finally, do I think Obama shares some blame? Of course I do, along with Congress (that includes both do-nothing parties) and the private sector.
You are a dolt.
The article doesnt support whatever it is you think it means.
So YOU are a dumbfuck who can't critically think? Got it
You don't think having more House GOPers helps with the Senate elections? Seriously?
Did Gerrymandering Cost Dems the NC Senate? A Fair Map Suggests Not in 2012, But Likely Will in 2014
Did Gerrymandering Cost Dems the NC Senate? A Fair Map Suggests Not in 2012, But Likely Will in 2014
GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority
"The rationale was straightforward," reads the memo. "Controlling the redistricting process in these states would have the greatest impact on determining how both state legislative and congressional district boundaries would be drawn.
GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority
Did Gerrymandering Cost Dems the NC Senate?
Fucktard! Where did I mention a state senate? Or the US House? Moron.
Hey, fucktard, explain how gerrymandering impacts the Senate.
Got it, you can't critically think OR be honest
Did Gerrymandering Cost Dems the NC Senate?
Fucktard! Where did I mention a state senate? Or the US House? Moron.
Hey, fucktard, explain how gerrymandering impacts the Senate.
Got it, you can't critically think OR be honest
You're the idiot who brought up gerrymandering in response to my comment about a state-wide office.
I'm very critical of your stupid response. Honestly.
Got it, you can't critically think OR be honest
You're the idiot who brought up gerrymandering in response to my comment about a state-wide office.
I'm very critical of your stupid response. Honestly.
YOU:
"What will it mean when the GOP with 7% takes back the Senate?"
ON RESPONSE TO
ME:
"Let me know when he hits Dubya's 23% or Ronnie's 35% Jan 1983
Presidential Approval for President Reagan"
Rdean:
"Or the GOP's 7%."
ONCE MORE
So YOU are a dumbfuck who can't critically think? Got it
You don't think having more House GOPers helps with the Senate elections? Seriously?
You're the idiot who brought up gerrymandering in response to my comment about a state-wide office.
I'm very critical of your stupid response. Honestly.
YOU:
"What will it mean when the GOP with 7% takes back the Senate?"
ON RESPONSE TO
ME:
"Let me know when he hits Dubya's 23% or Ronnie's 35% Jan 1983
Presidential Approval for President Reagan"
Rdean:
"Or the GOP's 7%."
ONCE MORE
So YOU are a dumbfuck who can't critically think? Got it
You don't think having more House GOPers helps with the Senate elections? Seriously?
Me: What will it mean when the GOP with 7% takes back the Senate?
Idiot who doesn't know the US Senate seats are voted on state-wide and can't be gerrymandered: Gerrymandering worked.
Seriously? LOL!
YOU:
"What will it mean when the GOP with 7% takes back the Senate?"
ON RESPONSE TO
ME:
"Let me know when he hits Dubya's 23% or Ronnie's 35% Jan 1983
Presidential Approval for President Reagan"
Rdean:
"Or the GOP's 7%."
ONCE MORE
So YOU are a dumbfuck who can't critically think? Got it
You don't think having more House GOPers helps with the Senate elections? Seriously?
Me: What will it mean when the GOP with 7% takes back the Senate?
Idiot who doesn't know the US Senate seats are voted on state-wide and can't be gerrymandered: Gerrymandering worked.
Seriously? LOL!
So YOU are a dumbfuck who can't critically think? Got it
You don't think having more House GOPers helps with the Senate elections? Seriously?
