"the law is a ass - a idiot".

[PoliticalChic]

Somehow, judges behave as though they actually have the knowledge to pass judgements on every subject that comes before them….



5. Those who have been trained to worship the state, government, call propaganda ‘science.’ It isn’t.

The following is by Michelle Cretella, MD, who is a Board Certified Pediatrician with a focus on adolescent health. She serves as Vice President of the American College of Pediatricians and on the Board of Directors of the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality.



“Transgenderism: A Mental Illness Is Not a Civil Right
…transgender ideology holds that people can be born into the wrong body: It's simply not true. We can demonstrate this by looking at twin studies. No one is born in the wrong body.

…prior to transgender ideology, these children were treated with watchful waiting, because for many kids it may be a passing phase. Sometimes the girls may just be tomboys. So with either watchful waiting or family and individual therapy the vast majority, 75-95% of kids, would accept their biological sex by young adulthood.


The definition of a delusion is a fixed false belief. So if I persistently and consistently insist that I am Margaret Thatcher, or persistently, consistently insist that I am a cat, or that I am an amputee trapped in a normal body -- I am delusional.

In fact, there are people who believe they're amputees trapped in a normal body and they are appropriately diagnosed as having Body Identity Integrity Disorder, a mouthful, but you get my drift. So if you want to cut off an arm or a leg you're mentally ill, but if you want to cut off healthy breasts and genitals then you are transgender and you don't have a mental illness. That's completely unscientific.”
Dr. Michelle Cretella on Transgenderism: A Mental Illness Is Not a Civil Right



That Brit judge, James Tayler, must feel that he knows more than a certified physician, and that not offending the delusional supersedes free speech.
Clearly this judge, like so many of 'em, feels that his biased opinion is more valid than science.....or the right to have an alternative opinion.

Now....which group is determined to ban free speech:
Communists, Fascists, Progressives, Socialists Nazis, Liberals?

Yup....all of 'em.



"the law is a ass - a idiot".

 

[Tommy Tainant]

No matter the subject, including science, for the woke millennial, they cannot bear to hear an opposing view.

Now we have judges agreeing with that.





4. Once, it was informative to remind those who are unaware, that America provides freedom that even our sister nation, Britain, didn’t. And what could happen if we weren’t alert. But, sadly, government school has turned out waves of ignorant drones who would actually like to erase first amendment protections of free speech.

“40% of Millennials OK with limiting speech offensive to minorities”
40% of Millennials OK with limiting speech offensive to minorities

Millennials look forward to the day when we are ruled as Brits are, and your speech rights are whatever a judge says they are.


America is no longer America if unalienable rights…..aren’t.

Your free speech is basically a charter protecting pigs like yourself and your cronies on here. A proper society protects the vulnerable from your various hates.

"Your free speech is basically a charter protecting" freedom.


Now....which do you prefer...'Good Morning," or 'Sieg Heil"????

You seem to be confused about hate speech and its effects. It doesnt hinder my free expression in any way.
For example I am able to state,

"Chic is a pompous conservative right wing dickhead who peddles "gor blimey" philosophy to other dickheads"

What would be more questionable would be

"Chic is a fake christian whore/dyke trying to set a bullshit agenda based on her evil homicidal religious beliefs which include the mass rape of young boys "

In the first statement, I focussed on the bare facts. In the second statement, I broadened the attack by introducing your sex, religion, sexuality and then linking your religious beliefs to a set of peripheral events that I would imagine you deplore rather than support.
I could probably come up with a better example if I could be arsed but the point is made.We can argue around the margins of what is and isnt acceptable but that will always be the case. Please explain how my freedom of expression is limited here ?

"You seem to be confused about hate speech..."


There is no such thing a 'hate speech.'

The term 'speech' requires no modifier.


Leftists cannot win the debate of ideas: conservatives eat Liberal’s lunch. That explains the following:

First on the list of targets for Communists, Fascists.....and Liberals......is Free Speech.

Case in point, CNN news-speaker, and grad of..."Yale University, where he obtained an undergraduate degree, and Fordham University where he obtained his Juris Doctor (J.D.). He is a licensed attorney.
He currently works at CNN,[1][2] and has previously been the ABC Newschief law and justice correspondent and the co-anchor for ABC's 20/20."
Chris Cuomo - Wikipedia


One smart Liberal, huh?


With all that supposed education, Liberal Democrat Cuomo said this:

"CNN's Chris Cuomo: First Amendment doesn't cover hate speech
"Hate speech is excluded from protection" under the First Amendment.
— Chris Cuomo on Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 in a Tweet

"Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.

Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.


Cuomo’s tweet, and his stubborn campaign to defend it in the wake of a merciless assault from the Twitterverse, errs in two ways. First, it’s ludicrous to state that “reading” the Constitution will reveal that hate speech is “excluded from protection.” There is no such language anywhere in the Constitution."
Chris Cuomo Won’t Walk Back His Ignorant Tweet About Hate Speech



No wonder the majority of Democrats favor ending free speech.....that's CNN's audience.




Now.....go press your brown shirt, you Fascist....it's all wrinkled, like your face.

OK if you dont want to discuss it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

No matter the subject, including science, for the woke millennial, they cannot bear to hear an opposing view.

Now we have judges agreeing with that.





4. Once, it was informative to remind those who are unaware, that America provides freedom that even our sister nation, Britain, didn’t. And what could happen if we weren’t alert. But, sadly, government school has turned out waves of ignorant drones who would actually like to erase first amendment protections of free speech.

“40% of Millennials OK with limiting speech offensive to minorities”
40% of Millennials OK with limiting speech offensive to minorities

Millennials look forward to the day when we are ruled as Brits are, and your speech rights are whatever a judge says they are.


America is no longer America if unalienable rights…..aren’t.

Your free speech is basically a charter protecting pigs like yourself and your cronies on here. A proper society protects the vulnerable from your various hates.

"Your free speech is basically a charter protecting" freedom.


Now....which do you prefer...'Good Morning," or 'Sieg Heil"????

You seem to be confused about hate speech and its effects. It doesnt hinder my free expression in any way.
For example I am able to state,

"Chic is a pompous conservative right wing dickhead who peddles "gor blimey" philosophy to other dickheads"

What would be more questionable would be

"Chic is a fake christian whore/dyke trying to set a bullshit agenda based on her evil homicidal religious beliefs which include the mass rape of young boys "

In the first statement, I focussed on the bare facts. In the second statement, I broadened the attack by introducing your sex, religion, sexuality and then linking your religious beliefs to a set of peripheral events that I would imagine you deplore rather than support.
I could probably come up with a better example if I could be arsed but the point is made.We can argue around the margins of what is and isnt acceptable but that will always be the case. Please explain how my freedom of expression is limited here ?

"You seem to be confused about hate speech..."


There is no such thing a 'hate speech.'

The term 'speech' requires no modifier.


Leftists cannot win the debate of ideas: conservatives eat Liberal’s lunch. That explains the following:

First on the list of targets for Communists, Fascists.....and Liberals......is Free Speech.

Case in point, CNN news-speaker, and grad of..."Yale University, where he obtained an undergraduate degree, and Fordham University where he obtained his Juris Doctor (J.D.). He is a licensed attorney.
He currently works at CNN,[1][2] and has previously been the ABC Newschief law and justice correspondent and the co-anchor for ABC's 20/20."
Chris Cuomo - Wikipedia


One smart Liberal, huh?


With all that supposed education, Liberal Democrat Cuomo said this:

"CNN's Chris Cuomo: First Amendment doesn't cover hate speech
"Hate speech is excluded from protection" under the First Amendment.
— Chris Cuomo on Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 in a Tweet

"Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.

Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.


Cuomo’s tweet, and his stubborn campaign to defend it in the wake of a merciless assault from the Twitterverse, errs in two ways. First, it’s ludicrous to state that “reading” the Constitution will reveal that hate speech is “excluded from protection.” There is no such language anywhere in the Constitution."
Chris Cuomo Won’t Walk Back His Ignorant Tweet About Hate Speech



No wonder the majority of Democrats favor ending free speech.....that's CNN's audience.




Now.....go press your brown shirt, you Fascist....it's all wrinkled, like your face.

OK if you dont want to discuss it.

If you are going to be two faced, at least make one of them pretty.


I just put you in your place, Nazi.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Your free speech is basically a charter protecting pigs like yourself and your cronies on here. A proper society protects the vulnerable from your various hates.

"Your free speech is basically a charter protecting" freedom.


Now....which do you prefer...'Good Morning," or 'Sieg Heil"????

You seem to be confused about hate speech and its effects. It doesnt hinder my free expression in any way.
For example I am able to state,

"Chic is a pompous conservative right wing dickhead who peddles "gor blimey" philosophy to other dickheads"

What would be more questionable would be

"Chic is a fake christian whore/dyke trying to set a bullshit agenda based on her evil homicidal religious beliefs which include the mass rape of young boys "

In the first statement, I focussed on the bare facts. In the second statement, I broadened the attack by introducing your sex, religion, sexuality and then linking your religious beliefs to a set of peripheral events that I would imagine you deplore rather than support.
I could probably come up with a better example if I could be arsed but the point is made.We can argue around the margins of what is and isnt acceptable but that will always be the case. Please explain how my freedom of expression is limited here ?

"You seem to be confused about hate speech..."


There is no such thing a 'hate speech.'

The term 'speech' requires no modifier.


Leftists cannot win the debate of ideas: conservatives eat Liberal’s lunch. That explains the following:

First on the list of targets for Communists, Fascists.....and Liberals......is Free Speech.

Case in point, CNN news-speaker, and grad of..."Yale University, where he obtained an undergraduate degree, and Fordham University where he obtained his Juris Doctor (J.D.). He is a licensed attorney.
He currently works at CNN,[1][2] and has previously been the ABC Newschief law and justice correspondent and the co-anchor for ABC's 20/20."
Chris Cuomo - Wikipedia


One smart Liberal, huh?


With all that supposed education, Liberal Democrat Cuomo said this:

"CNN's Chris Cuomo: First Amendment doesn't cover hate speech
"Hate speech is excluded from protection" under the First Amendment.
— Chris Cuomo on Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 in a Tweet

"Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.

Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.


Cuomo’s tweet, and his stubborn campaign to defend it in the wake of a merciless assault from the Twitterverse, errs in two ways. First, it’s ludicrous to state that “reading” the Constitution will reveal that hate speech is “excluded from protection.” There is no such language anywhere in the Constitution."
Chris Cuomo Won’t Walk Back His Ignorant Tweet About Hate Speech



No wonder the majority of Democrats favor ending free speech.....that's CNN's audience.




Now.....go press your brown shirt, you Fascist....it's all wrinkled, like your face.

OK if you dont want to discuss it.

If you are going to be two faced, at least make one of them pretty.


I just put you in your place, Nazi.

I cant argue with a child.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Your free speech is basically a charter protecting" freedom.


Now....which do you prefer...'Good Morning," or 'Sieg Heil"????

You seem to be confused about hate speech and its effects. It doesnt hinder my free expression in any way.
For example I am able to state,

"Chic is a pompous conservative right wing dickhead who peddles "gor blimey" philosophy to other dickheads"

What would be more questionable would be

"Chic is a fake christian whore/dyke trying to set a bullshit agenda based on her evil homicidal religious beliefs which include the mass rape of young boys "

In the first statement, I focussed on the bare facts. In the second statement, I broadened the attack by introducing your sex, religion, sexuality and then linking your religious beliefs to a set of peripheral events that I would imagine you deplore rather than support.
I could probably come up with a better example if I could be arsed but the point is made.We can argue around the margins of what is and isnt acceptable but that will always be the case. Please explain how my freedom of expression is limited here ?

"You seem to be confused about hate speech..."


There is no such thing a 'hate speech.'

The term 'speech' requires no modifier.


Leftists cannot win the debate of ideas: conservatives eat Liberal’s lunch. That explains the following:

First on the list of targets for Communists, Fascists.....and Liberals......is Free Speech.

Case in point, CNN news-speaker, and grad of..."Yale University, where he obtained an undergraduate degree, and Fordham University where he obtained his Juris Doctor (J.D.). He is a licensed attorney.
He currently works at CNN,[1][2] and has previously been the ABC Newschief law and justice correspondent and the co-anchor for ABC's 20/20."
Chris Cuomo - Wikipedia


One smart Liberal, huh?


With all that supposed education, Liberal Democrat Cuomo said this:

"CNN's Chris Cuomo: First Amendment doesn't cover hate speech
"Hate speech is excluded from protection" under the First Amendment.
— Chris Cuomo on Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 in a Tweet

"Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.

Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.


Cuomo’s tweet, and his stubborn campaign to defend it in the wake of a merciless assault from the Twitterverse, errs in two ways. First, it’s ludicrous to state that “reading” the Constitution will reveal that hate speech is “excluded from protection.” There is no such language anywhere in the Constitution."
Chris Cuomo Won’t Walk Back His Ignorant Tweet About Hate Speech



No wonder the majority of Democrats favor ending free speech.....that's CNN's audience.




Now.....go press your brown shirt, you Fascist....it's all wrinkled, like your face.

OK if you dont want to discuss it.

If you are going to be two faced, at least make one of them pretty.


I just put you in your place, Nazi.

I cant argue with a child.

Right now you’re probably trying to brush something off your face….you didn’t realize it was the floor.

 

[theHawk]

No matter the subject, including science, for the woke millennial, they cannot bear to hear an opposing view.

Now we have judges agreeing with that.





4. Once, it was informative to remind those who are unaware, that America provides freedom that even our sister nation, Britain, didn’t. And what could happen if we weren’t alert. But, sadly, government school has turned out waves of ignorant drones who would actually like to erase first amendment protections of free speech.

“40% of Millennials OK with limiting speech offensive to minorities”
40% of Millennials OK with limiting speech offensive to minorities

Millennials look forward to the day when we are ruled as Brits are, and your speech rights are whatever a judge says they are.


America is no longer America if unalienable rights…..aren’t.

Your free speech is basically a charter protecting pigs like yourself and your cronies on here. A proper society protects the vulnerable from your various hates.

"Your free speech is basically a charter protecting" freedom.


Now....which do you prefer...'Good Morning," or 'Sieg Heil"????

You seem to be confused about hate speech and its effects. It doesnt hinder my free expression in any way.
For example I am able to state,

"Chic is a pompous conservative right wing dickhead who peddles "gor blimey" philosophy to other dickheads"

What would be more questionable would be

"Chic is a fake christian whore/dyke trying to set a bullshit agenda based on her evil homicidal religious beliefs which include the mass rape of young boys "

In the first statement, I focussed on the bare facts. In the second statement, I broadened the attack by introducing your sex, religion, sexuality and then linking your religious beliefs to a set of peripheral events that I would imagine you deplore rather than support.
I could probably come up with a better example if I could be arsed but the point is made.We can argue around the margins of what is and isnt acceptable but that will always be the case. Please explain how my freedom of expression is limited here ?

"You seem to be confused about hate speech..."


There is no such thing a 'hate speech.'

The term 'speech' requires no modifier.


Leftists cannot win the debate of ideas: conservatives eat Liberal’s lunch. That explains the following:

First on the list of targets for Communists, Fascists.....and Liberals......is Free Speech.

Case in point, CNN news-speaker, and grad of..."Yale University, where he obtained an undergraduate degree, and Fordham University where he obtained his Juris Doctor (J.D.). He is a licensed attorney.
He currently works at CNN,[1][2] and has previously been the ABC Newschief law and justice correspondent and the co-anchor for ABC's 20/20."
Chris Cuomo - Wikipedia


One smart Liberal, huh?


With all that supposed education, Liberal Democrat Cuomo said this:

"CNN's Chris Cuomo: First Amendment doesn't cover hate speech
"Hate speech is excluded from protection" under the First Amendment.
— Chris Cuomo on Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 in a Tweet

"Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.

Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.


Cuomo’s tweet, and his stubborn campaign to defend it in the wake of a merciless assault from the Twitterverse, errs in two ways. First, it’s ludicrous to state that “reading” the Constitution will reveal that hate speech is “excluded from protection.” There is no such language anywhere in the Constitution."
Chris Cuomo Won’t Walk Back His Ignorant Tweet About Hate Speech



No wonder the majority of Democrats favor ending free speech.....that's CNN's audience.




Now.....go press your brown shirt, you Fascist....it's all wrinkled, like your face.

OK if you dont want to discuss it.

You’ve been thoroughly trounced by these ladies in this thread. You really should crawl back into your grub hole. However I say carry on, dipshit. It’s quite entertaining to see you being made into a bigger fool than you already are.

 

[PoliticalChic]

.What an interesting case we have today…and most pertinent for those who wish to live in America….the real America, not the one the Democrats would create if they win control of the government.

It raises and combines issues of :

Justice

Free speech

Science

Geopolitical differences




6. In the case at issue, we see exactly why normal folks gave the British Labour Party the thrashing that it did.

The following is by a British voter, one who always voted Left….but he recognized what was missing from materialism. In it there is a lesson for Democrats/Liberals/Progressives.

“…the British working-class was not, in the end, willing to throw its weight behind a London-centric, youth-obsessed, middle-class party that preached the gospels of liberal cosmopolitanism and class war…. the so-called Red Wall to have crumbled so spectacularly underlines the sheer scale of the failure…. no surprise to anyone who was paying attention and wasn’t blinded by ideology or fanaticism.

…in the local and European elections, Labour haemorrhaged support in several working-class communities across the north and Midlands. But the woke liberals and Toytown revolutionaries who now dominate the party didn’t listen to us. [And the Trump victory in 2016.]

“Issues of transgenderism and abortion can cause a voter to abandon the party of his parents and grandparents. Churchgoing voters, of whom there are still many in Britain outside of the big cities, heard from their clergy that Corbyn was going too far in his calls for abortion-on-demand.
Is this the end for Labour? - UnHerd


Are you Liberals listening?

Learning?????

 

[theHawk]

"Your free speech is basically a charter protecting" freedom.


Now....which do you prefer...'Good Morning," or 'Sieg Heil"????

You seem to be confused about hate speech and its effects. It doesnt hinder my free expression in any way.
For example I am able to state,

"Chic is a pompous conservative right wing dickhead who peddles "gor blimey" philosophy to other dickheads"

What would be more questionable would be

"Chic is a fake christian whore/dyke trying to set a bullshit agenda based on her evil homicidal religious beliefs which include the mass rape of young boys "

In the first statement, I focussed on the bare facts. In the second statement, I broadened the attack by introducing your sex, religion, sexuality and then linking your religious beliefs to a set of peripheral events that I would imagine you deplore rather than support.
I could probably come up with a better example if I could be arsed but the point is made.We can argue around the margins of what is and isnt acceptable but that will always be the case. Please explain how my freedom of expression is limited here ?

"You seem to be confused about hate speech..."


There is no such thing a 'hate speech.'

The term 'speech' requires no modifier.


Leftists cannot win the debate of ideas: conservatives eat Liberal’s lunch. That explains the following:

First on the list of targets for Communists, Fascists.....and Liberals......is Free Speech.

Case in point, CNN news-speaker, and grad of..."Yale University, where he obtained an undergraduate degree, and Fordham University where he obtained his Juris Doctor (J.D.). He is a licensed attorney.
He currently works at CNN,[1][2] and has previously been the ABC Newschief law and justice correspondent and the co-anchor for ABC's 20/20."
Chris Cuomo - Wikipedia


One smart Liberal, huh?


With all that supposed education, Liberal Democrat Cuomo said this:

"CNN's Chris Cuomo: First Amendment doesn't cover hate speech
"Hate speech is excluded from protection" under the First Amendment.
— Chris Cuomo on Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 in a Tweet

"Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.

Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.


Cuomo’s tweet, and his stubborn campaign to defend it in the wake of a merciless assault from the Twitterverse, errs in two ways. First, it’s ludicrous to state that “reading” the Constitution will reveal that hate speech is “excluded from protection.” There is no such language anywhere in the Constitution."
Chris Cuomo Won’t Walk Back His Ignorant Tweet About Hate Speech



No wonder the majority of Democrats favor ending free speech.....that's CNN's audience.




Now.....go press your brown shirt, you Fascist....it's all wrinkled, like your face.

OK if you dont want to discuss it.

If you are going to be two faced, at least make one of them pretty.


I just put you in your place, Nazi.

I cant argue with a child.

^^ Says the cross-dressing biology denier.

 

[RodISHI]

Dickens put that observation in the mouth of Bumble…and, it turns out he was spot on!

1.What an interesting case we have today…and most pertinent for those who wish to live in America….the real America, not the one the Democrats would create if they win control of the government.

It raises and combines issues of :

Justice

Free speech

Science

Geopolitical differences

2. Seems a young lady, who worked in the accounting department of a think tank in England, “a tax expert at the think tank Center for Global Development,” gave an opinion on social media that runs counter to the woke orthodoxy. It ran counter to the woke view of biology, specifically ‘transgenderism,’ and, just like the Fascists in America (read ‘Democrats/Liberals’), opinions that differ from theirs cannot be allowed.

“Ms Forstater had taken to social media to question government proposals to reform the Gender Recognition Act to allow people to self-identify as the opposite sex.”
Judge rules against researcher who was FIRED for saying 'men cannot change into women' · Caldron Pool

So…she was fired.

3. She went to court, and was told by the judge, her “views are not covered by the law, and are "not worthy of respect in a democratic society."

…UK judge has said it is legal to fire employees for saying that transgender women are not real women.”
A UK judge ruled that it is legal to fire workers for saying that transgender women are not real women

“Judge rules against researcher who was FIRED for saying ‘men cannot change into women’ Judge rules against researcher who was FIRED for saying 'men cannot change into women' · Caldron Pool

“Maya Forstater: Woman loses tribunal over transgender tweets” Woman loses tribunal over transgender tweets

Any difference between insulting a protected class, in Britain, and disparaging Hitler or Stalin in their place and time?????

Think it could happen here?

You betcha'....

You are evidently a proponent and exponent of the Trump gotcha gender test.

There is only one gender test
Do you have a penis or not
PENIS MAKES YOU A MALE
NO PENIS MAKES YOU A FEMALE

I'm gonna go in a slightly different direction, reb....and make DNA the Litmus Test.

Male and Female are biological categories. People lie; DNA doesn’t.

That may not work as the vaccine industry continues to work on ways to alter DNA and RNA.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

You seem to be confused about hate speech and its effects. It doesnt hinder my free expression in any way.
For example I am able to state,

"Chic is a pompous conservative right wing dickhead who peddles "gor blimey" philosophy to other dickheads"

What would be more questionable would be

"Chic is a fake christian whore/dyke trying to set a bullshit agenda based on her evil homicidal religious beliefs which include the mass rape of young boys "

In the first statement, I focussed on the bare facts. In the second statement, I broadened the attack by introducing your sex, religion, sexuality and then linking your religious beliefs to a set of peripheral events that I would imagine you deplore rather than support.
I could probably come up with a better example if I could be arsed but the point is made.We can argue around the margins of what is and isnt acceptable but that will always be the case. Please explain how my freedom of expression is limited here ?

"You seem to be confused about hate speech..."


There is no such thing a 'hate speech.'

The term 'speech' requires no modifier.


Leftists cannot win the debate of ideas: conservatives eat Liberal’s lunch. That explains the following:

First on the list of targets for Communists, Fascists.....and Liberals......is Free Speech.

Case in point, CNN news-speaker, and grad of..."Yale University, where he obtained an undergraduate degree, and Fordham University where he obtained his Juris Doctor (J.D.). He is a licensed attorney.
He currently works at CNN,[1][2] and has previously been the ABC Newschief law and justice correspondent and the co-anchor for ABC's 20/20."
Chris Cuomo - Wikipedia


One smart Liberal, huh?


With all that supposed education, Liberal Democrat Cuomo said this:

"CNN's Chris Cuomo: First Amendment doesn't cover hate speech
"Hate speech is excluded from protection" under the First Amendment.
— Chris Cuomo on Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 in a Tweet

"Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.

Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.


Cuomo’s tweet, and his stubborn campaign to defend it in the wake of a merciless assault from the Twitterverse, errs in two ways. First, it’s ludicrous to state that “reading” the Constitution will reveal that hate speech is “excluded from protection.” There is no such language anywhere in the Constitution."
Chris Cuomo Won’t Walk Back His Ignorant Tweet About Hate Speech



No wonder the majority of Democrats favor ending free speech.....that's CNN's audience.




Now.....go press your brown shirt, you Fascist....it's all wrinkled, like your face.

OK if you dont want to discuss it.

If you are going to be two faced, at least make one of them pretty.


I just put you in your place, Nazi.

I cant argue with a child.

Right now you’re probably trying to brush something off your face….you didn’t realize it was the floor.

And how is my freedom of expression restricted? I gave you a decent example but it seems like kryptonite to you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Dickens put that observation in the mouth of Bumble…and, it turns out he was spot on!

1.What an interesting case we have today…and most pertinent for those who wish to live in America….the real America, not the one the Democrats would create if they win control of the government.

It raises and combines issues of :

Justice

Free speech

Science

Geopolitical differences

2. Seems a young lady, who worked in the accounting department of a think tank in England, “a tax expert at the think tank Center for Global Development,” gave an opinion on social media that runs counter to the woke orthodoxy. It ran counter to the woke view of biology, specifically ‘transgenderism,’ and, just like the Fascists in America (read ‘Democrats/Liberals’), opinions that differ from theirs cannot be allowed.

“Ms Forstater had taken to social media to question government proposals to reform the Gender Recognition Act to allow people to self-identify as the opposite sex.”
Judge rules against researcher who was FIRED for saying 'men cannot change into women' · Caldron Pool

So…she was fired.

3. She went to court, and was told by the judge, her “views are not covered by the law, and are "not worthy of respect in a democratic society."

…UK judge has said it is legal to fire employees for saying that transgender women are not real women.”
A UK judge ruled that it is legal to fire workers for saying that transgender women are not real women

“Judge rules against researcher who was FIRED for saying ‘men cannot change into women’ Judge rules against researcher who was FIRED for saying 'men cannot change into women' · Caldron Pool

“Maya Forstater: Woman loses tribunal over transgender tweets” Woman loses tribunal over transgender tweets

Any difference between insulting a protected class, in Britain, and disparaging Hitler or Stalin in their place and time?????

Think it could happen here?

You betcha'....

You are evidently a proponent and exponent of the Trump gotcha gender test.

There is only one gender test
Do you have a penis or not
PENIS MAKES YOU A MALE
NO PENIS MAKES YOU A FEMALE

I'm gonna go in a slightly different direction, reb....and make DNA the Litmus Test.

Male and Female are biological categories. People lie; DNA doesn’t.

That may not work as the vaccine industry continues to work on ways to alter DNA and RNA.

Why?

 

[RodISHI]

Dickens put that observation in the mouth of Bumble…and, it turns out he was spot on!

1.What an interesting case we have today…and most pertinent for those who wish to live in America….the real America, not the one the Democrats would create if they win control of the government.

It raises and combines issues of :

Justice

Free speech

Science

Geopolitical differences

2. Seems a young lady, who worked in the accounting department of a think tank in England, “a tax expert at the think tank Center for Global Development,” gave an opinion on social media that runs counter to the woke orthodoxy. It ran counter to the woke view of biology, specifically ‘transgenderism,’ and, just like the Fascists in America (read ‘Democrats/Liberals’), opinions that differ from theirs cannot be allowed.

“Ms Forstater had taken to social media to question government proposals to reform the Gender Recognition Act to allow people to self-identify as the opposite sex.”
Judge rules against researcher who was FIRED for saying 'men cannot change into women' · Caldron Pool

So…she was fired.

3. She went to court, and was told by the judge, her “views are not covered by the law, and are "not worthy of respect in a democratic society."

…UK judge has said it is legal to fire employees for saying that transgender women are not real women.”
A UK judge ruled that it is legal to fire workers for saying that transgender women are not real women

“Judge rules against researcher who was FIRED for saying ‘men cannot change into women’ Judge rules against researcher who was FIRED for saying 'men cannot change into women' · Caldron Pool

“Maya Forstater: Woman loses tribunal over transgender tweets” Woman loses tribunal over transgender tweets

Any difference between insulting a protected class, in Britain, and disparaging Hitler or Stalin in their place and time?????

Think it could happen here?

You betcha'....

You are evidently a proponent and exponent of the Trump gotcha gender test.

There is only one gender test
Do you have a penis or not
PENIS MAKES YOU A MALE
NO PENIS MAKES YOU A FEMALE

I'm gonna go in a slightly different direction, reb....and make DNA the Litmus Test.

Male and Female are biological categories. People lie; DNA doesn’t.

That may not work as the vaccine industry continues to work on ways to alter DNA and RNA.

Why?

They are learning how to alter DNA and RNA. In certain cases they know now DNA can be altered to express the DNA of the donor.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"You seem to be confused about hate speech..."


There is no such thing a 'hate speech.'

The term 'speech' requires no modifier.


Leftists cannot win the debate of ideas: conservatives eat Liberal’s lunch. That explains the following:

First on the list of targets for Communists, Fascists.....and Liberals......is Free Speech.

Case in point, CNN news-speaker, and grad of..."Yale University, where he obtained an undergraduate degree, and Fordham University where he obtained his Juris Doctor (J.D.). He is a licensed attorney.
He currently works at CNN,[1][2] and has previously been the ABC Newschief law and justice correspondent and the co-anchor for ABC's 20/20."
Chris Cuomo - Wikipedia


One smart Liberal, huh?


With all that supposed education, Liberal Democrat Cuomo said this:

"CNN's Chris Cuomo: First Amendment doesn't cover hate speech
"Hate speech is excluded from protection" under the First Amendment.
— Chris Cuomo on Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 in a Tweet

"Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.

Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.


Cuomo’s tweet, and his stubborn campaign to defend it in the wake of a merciless assault from the Twitterverse, errs in two ways. First, it’s ludicrous to state that “reading” the Constitution will reveal that hate speech is “excluded from protection.” There is no such language anywhere in the Constitution."
Chris Cuomo Won’t Walk Back His Ignorant Tweet About Hate Speech



No wonder the majority of Democrats favor ending free speech.....that's CNN's audience.




Now.....go press your brown shirt, you Fascist....it's all wrinkled, like your face.

OK if you dont want to discuss it.

If you are going to be two faced, at least make one of them pretty.


I just put you in your place, Nazi.

I cant argue with a child.

Right now you’re probably trying to brush something off your face….you didn’t realize it was the floor.

And how is my freedom of expression restricted? I gave you a decent example but it seems like kryptonite to you.

Au contraire.

You claimed that there is 'hate speech' and that totalitarian governance can restrict speech of free citizens.

I schooled you on why there is no such thing, or such authority in free nations.



Your next lesson....take notes.


1. "Unalienable: incapable of being alienated, that is, sold and transferred." Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, page 1523:

You can not surrender, sell or transfer unalienable rights, they are a gift from the creator to the individual and can not under any circumstances be surrendered or taken. All individual's have unalienable rights.

Inalienable rights: Rights which are not capable of being surrendered or transferred without the consent of the one possessing such rights. Morrison v. State, Mo. App., 252 S.W.2d 97, 101.



We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

Men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,-'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness;' and to 'secure,' not grant or create, these rights, governments are instituted. That property which a man has honestly acquired he retains full control of, subject to these limitations: First, that he shall not use it to his neighbor's injury, and that does not mean that he must use it for his neighbor's benefit; second, that if the devotes it to a public use, he gives to the public a right to control that use; and third, that whenever the public needs require, the public may take it upon payment of due compensation. BUDD v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK, 143 U.S. 517 (1892)




For Fascists like you, government can restrict freedom when it find same to its advantage.

As Democrats have done.

Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????

 

[PoliticalChic]

You are evidently a proponent and exponent of the Trump gotcha gender test.

There is only one gender test
Do you have a penis or not
PENIS MAKES YOU A MALE
NO PENIS MAKES YOU A FEMALE

I'm gonna go in a slightly different direction, reb....and make DNA the Litmus Test.

Male and Female are biological categories. People lie; DNA doesn’t.

That may not work as the vaccine industry continues to work on ways to alter DNA and RNA.

Why?

They are learning how to alter DNA and RNA. In certain cases they know now DNA can be altered to express the DNA of the donor.

Why?

 

[RodISHI]

There is only one gender test
Do you have a penis or not
PENIS MAKES YOU A MALE
NO PENIS MAKES YOU A FEMALE

I'm gonna go in a slightly different direction, reb....and make DNA the Litmus Test.

Male and Female are biological categories. People lie; DNA doesn’t.

That may not work as the vaccine industry continues to work on ways to alter DNA and RNA.

Why?

They are learning how to alter DNA and RNA. In certain cases they know now DNA can be altered to express the DNA of the donor.

Why?

Population control, eugenics. Have you ever heard of knockout mice?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'm gonna go in a slightly different direction, reb....and make DNA the Litmus Test.

Male and Female are biological categories. People lie; DNA doesn’t.

That may not work as the vaccine industry continues to work on ways to alter DNA and RNA.

Why?

They are learning how to alter DNA and RNA. In certain cases they know now DNA can be altered to express the DNA of the donor.

Why?

Population control, eugenics. Have you ever heard of knockout mice?

Who would opt to use it?

Government????

 

[RodISHI]

That may not work as the vaccine industry continues to work on ways to alter DNA and RNA.

Why?

They are learning how to alter DNA and RNA. In certain cases they know now DNA can be altered to express the DNA of the donor.

Why?

Population control, eugenics. Have you ever heard of knockout mice?

Who would opt to use it?

Government????

Some I believe already are or well have bureaucrats of some type or another assisting in the use of what they have currently. A lot of cases already out there of tragedies people have experienced. Can't recall the island nation off hand that they went into and talked the mountain folk into vaccinating. It left the women sterile.

I started a thread about the global billionaire elites who call themselves "the good" who are pushing eugenics. Their is a list out there of some of the attendees but that doesn't say all of them are going along with the program.

For those who have children that have damage from vaccine they know that their children have the MTHFR gene which lets them know they are more susceptible to vaccine injuries. Many already know this but they are ignoring it and many legislators are putting in mandates to force vaccinations.

MTHFR stands for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. It's getting attention due to a genetic mutation that may lead to high levels of homocysteine in the blood and low levels of folate and other vitamins.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why?

They are learning how to alter DNA and RNA. In certain cases they know now DNA can be altered to express the DNA of the donor.

Why?

Population control, eugenics. Have you ever heard of knockout mice?

Who would opt to use it?

Government????

Some I believe already are or well have bureaucrats of some type or another assisting in the use of what they have currently. A lot of cases already out there of tragedies people have experienced. Can't recall the island nation off hand that they went into and talked the mountain folk into vaccinating. It left the women sterile.

I started a thread about the global billionaire elites who call themselves "the good" who are pushing eugenics. Their is a list out there of some of the attendees but that doesn't say all of them are going along with the program.

For those who have children that have damage from vaccine they know that their children have the MTHFR gene which lets them know they are more susceptible to vaccine injuries. Many already know this but they are ignoring it and many legislators are putting in mandates to force vaccinations.

MTHFR stands for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. It's getting attention due to a genetic mutation that may lead to high levels of homocysteine in the blood and low levels of folate and other vitamins.

I know you are aware of the fact that most mutations are harmful at best and lethal at worst.


It is a major flaw in Darwin's theory.


But....when Fascists are in power, "you've got to crack a few eggs to make an omelette."

 

[Blues Man]

"Your free speech is basically a charter protecting" freedom.


Now....which do you prefer...'Good Morning," or 'Sieg Heil"????

You seem to be confused about hate speech and its effects. It doesnt hinder my free expression in any way.
For example I am able to state,

"Chic is a pompous conservative right wing dickhead who peddles "gor blimey" philosophy to other dickheads"

What would be more questionable would be

"Chic is a fake christian whore/dyke trying to set a bullshit agenda based on her evil homicidal religious beliefs which include the mass rape of young boys "

In the first statement, I focussed on the bare facts. In the second statement, I broadened the attack by introducing your sex, religion, sexuality and then linking your religious beliefs to a set of peripheral events that I would imagine you deplore rather than support.
I could probably come up with a better example if I could be arsed but the point is made.We can argue around the margins of what is and isnt acceptable but that will always be the case. Please explain how my freedom of expression is limited here ?

"You seem to be confused about hate speech..."


There is no such thing a 'hate speech.'

The term 'speech' requires no modifier.


Leftists cannot win the debate of ideas: conservatives eat Liberal’s lunch. That explains the following:

First on the list of targets for Communists, Fascists.....and Liberals......is Free Speech.

Case in point, CNN news-speaker, and grad of..."Yale University, where he obtained an undergraduate degree, and Fordham University where he obtained his Juris Doctor (J.D.). He is a licensed attorney.
He currently works at CNN,[1][2] and has previously been the ABC Newschief law and justice correspondent and the co-anchor for ABC's 20/20."
Chris Cuomo - Wikipedia


One smart Liberal, huh?


With all that supposed education, Liberal Democrat Cuomo said this:

"CNN's Chris Cuomo: First Amendment doesn't cover hate speech
"Hate speech is excluded from protection" under the First Amendment.
— Chris Cuomo on Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 in a Tweet

"Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.

Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.


Cuomo’s tweet, and his stubborn campaign to defend it in the wake of a merciless assault from the Twitterverse, errs in two ways. First, it’s ludicrous to state that “reading” the Constitution will reveal that hate speech is “excluded from protection.” There is no such language anywhere in the Constitution."
Chris Cuomo Won’t Walk Back His Ignorant Tweet About Hate Speech



No wonder the majority of Democrats favor ending free speech.....that's CNN's audience.




Now.....go press your brown shirt, you Fascist....it's all wrinkled, like your face.

OK if you dont want to discuss it.

If you are going to be two faced, at least make one of them pretty.


I just put you in your place, Nazi.

I cant argue with a child.

Only children like you cry when someone says something mean about you

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[PoliticalChic]

You seem to be confused about hate speech and its effects. It doesnt hinder my free expression in any way.
For example I am able to state,

"Chic is a pompous conservative right wing dickhead who peddles "gor blimey" philosophy to other dickheads"

What would be more questionable would be

"Chic is a fake christian whore/dyke trying to set a bullshit agenda based on her evil homicidal religious beliefs which include the mass rape of young boys "

In the first statement, I focussed on the bare facts. In the second statement, I broadened the attack by introducing your sex, religion, sexuality and then linking your religious beliefs to a set of peripheral events that I would imagine you deplore rather than support.
I could probably come up with a better example if I could be arsed but the point is made.We can argue around the margins of what is and isnt acceptable but that will always be the case. Please explain how my freedom of expression is limited here ?

"You seem to be confused about hate speech..."


There is no such thing a 'hate speech.'

The term 'speech' requires no modifier.


Leftists cannot win the debate of ideas: conservatives eat Liberal’s lunch. That explains the following:

First on the list of targets for Communists, Fascists.....and Liberals......is Free Speech.

Case in point, CNN news-speaker, and grad of..."Yale University, where he obtained an undergraduate degree, and Fordham University where he obtained his Juris Doctor (J.D.). He is a licensed attorney.
He currently works at CNN,[1][2] and has previously been the ABC Newschief law and justice correspondent and the co-anchor for ABC's 20/20."
Chris Cuomo - Wikipedia


One smart Liberal, huh?


With all that supposed education, Liberal Democrat Cuomo said this:

"CNN's Chris Cuomo: First Amendment doesn't cover hate speech
"Hate speech is excluded from protection" under the First Amendment.
— Chris Cuomo on Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 in a Tweet

"Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.

Chris Cuomo is a law-school graduate. He was once the chief law and justice correspondent for ABC News. He is a host of a show on a network that bills itself as “the most trusted name in news.” Given all that, he really ought to know better.


Cuomo’s tweet, and his stubborn campaign to defend it in the wake of a merciless assault from the Twitterverse, errs in two ways. First, it’s ludicrous to state that “reading” the Constitution will reveal that hate speech is “excluded from protection.” There is no such language anywhere in the Constitution."
Chris Cuomo Won’t Walk Back His Ignorant Tweet About Hate Speech



No wonder the majority of Democrats favor ending free speech.....that's CNN's audience.




Now.....go press your brown shirt, you Fascist....it's all wrinkled, like your face.

OK if you dont want to discuss it.

If you are going to be two faced, at least make one of them pretty.


I just put you in your place, Nazi.

I cant argue with a child.

Only children like you cry when someone says something mean about you

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Children and Liberals.