The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

[LA RAM FAN]

Amazing!!....................You STILL didn't address my point.
There is evidence that Oswald owned THAT gun. Evidence the gun was in the TSBD. Evidence that he handled the gun. Evidence he was in that building. And evidence that the bullet fragments matched his gun and ammunition..............and ONLY his gun & ammunition. No other caliber ammunition was found. Which would include your ghost gun in the car.
To claim that there isn't a picture or video is a bit juvenile. Do you honestly think that no murder charge can be prosecuted unless there is a video or picture of the accused person actually committing the crime?

Evidence that he handled the gun? yeah like maybe at the rifle shooting range. evidence the bullet fragements matched his gun? your obviously talking about the fake planted fragment found on the gurney found in pristine condition.Lol.you also ignore the facts how there is a photo of a policemen picking up a bullet in the grass and putting it in his pocket which should have resulted in prosecution for removing evidence at crime scene and yet he wasnt.

also amazing is how he could have pulled it off and run down the stairs in front of witnesses in 30 seconds and not be out of breath,a feat nobody has ever been able to duplicate, and that the rifle was a piece of crap with a scope badly misalined. oh and whatever happened the the original rifle,THE MAUSER rifle the police originally reported finding at the crime scene BEFORE they said they found the carcano? give it up,you guys are really making yourselves look like idiots the more and more you say oswald did it.

So APPARENTLY, everything that isn't on video is "fake" evidence?

"Evidence that he handles the gun?"............Palm print found on the gun. (Of course that's fake because it wasn't videotaped)

"evidence the bullet fragements matched his gun?" You make the assumption that I am talking about the stretcher bullet. I am not, they did conclude that that bullet did come from Oswalds rifle, but that is not what I am talking about. I am talking about all the fragments found in the car, in JFK's head, and in Connolly. All matched Oswalds ammunition. Oddly enough, no fragments matched ammunition from a hand gun. (Of course that's fake because it wasn't videotaped)

"also amazing is how he could have pulled it off and run down the stairs in front of witnesses in 30 seconds and not be out of breath,a feat nobody has ever been able to duplicate". I don't know where you pulled 30 seconds from. Office Baker "estimated" 90 seconds. (need help with the math? that's 3 times as long). Plenty of time to descent 4 floors. (Of course that's fake because it wasn't videotaped)

And witnesses?......you got me! No one claims to have seen him on the staircase. Again, to claim that he didn't do it, because no saw him, is ridiculous. Number one, there were very few people in the building. Most were outside. Number two, there were witnesses on the 5th floor that claimed they could hear the shells hitting the floor during the shooting. (and those claims ARE made on videotape).

The rifle was an Italian Military issue rifle for many years. It wasn't a "great" rifle, but it was hardly a piece of junk. Oswalds was bench tested, and found to be quite accurate.

The Mauser was nothing but an officers claim that it "looked like a Mauser" in the minutes after the shooting. That got translated to reporters before a proper ID could be made. Also, all these interviews can be found online too. (Of course that's fake because it wasn't videotaped)

the palm print was only there two days AFTER the FBI had the gun frady cat. plenty of time to put his palm print on the gun fool.. our FBI with Hoover who hated Kennedy would NEVER mess with evidence. you are a troll and have been caught lying,after connolly died in 93 i believe it was,the family resisted requests to exhume to body to see if the bullet fragments could be found and did not allow it. all matched his ammunition? your full of shit,your talking to someone who has interviewed witnesses that were there over the years and have read over a hundred books on it. plus you also conviently leave out how the secret service destroyed the evidence in the limo destroying the limo and removing the bullet fragments troll.

thats what I meant 90.my bad.i accidently hit the 3 button instead of the 9,neven been a very good typist. again you have only read the warren report because there were at least a couple witnesses that descended the stairs that time according to their testimony and they never saw oswald. as usual,you lose.

as usual your full of shit,oswalds rifle WAS pure JUNK.you can brainwash that one fool who loved your lies so much,not me,unlike him,i have done research.

sorry troll,you lose again,those officers knew it was a mauser.

you clearly make up likes when your losing a debate and just here to troll since the truth scares you.that other is scared of the truth as well so you can brainwash him with your lies,but they wont work on me.

again you ignore facts how the secret service violated standard security protocals and were not punished for their ALLEGED incompetence and how the police and them destroyed evidence.therefore a coverup happened since nobody got reprimended for removing evidence or wen to jail.you are way too easy to defeat your a joke.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

No viewable/photographic source exists showing Oswald brandishing/holding or firing a weapon on that day. But Greer passes the gun and his left arm crosses in the two obscure films.

He is afraid of the truth so he wont look at the nix film where you can see that happen.

I think you have claimed that I am afraid of the truth in the past. Again, I will tell you that I'm not. If the "truth" is that there was a conspiracy, I'm not afraid to hear that. I, for one, have not claimed that there wasn't a conspiracy. I am very open to that idea. What I have claimed is that Oswald was obviously involved. I believe that he is the one that shot JFK. I believe when you claim that he wasn't involved, you're not backed by evidence. But I think it is very possible, if not likely, that he was one of many that were involved. I believe that LBJ could of had a dirty hand in it. There are no hard facts to back that up, but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence that points to that. So, don't give me this crap that "I'm afraid of the truth" because I don't buy that Greer shot Kennedy!
Of all the claims, and there are A LOT, of who killed JFK, you are backing the most ridiculous one out there. Not only is there no real evidence, and yes that includes the videos, the lack logic behind it is breathe taking. No large conspiracy, run by the government, with the ability to make ANYBODY be quite (apparently what you believe) & access to the highest caliber of marksmen, is going to put forth a strategy that says:

"lets put the shooter in the car, a wide open convertible and while in a wide open area, with a couple hundred people around, probably with cameras, have him assassinate the back seat passenger. And no one will notice, because we will have a diversionary shot fired from somewhere else in the plaza."

The best comedy writer in the world, couldn't come up with something funnier than that.

So, I don't know if you are backing this theory because it is the only one that places the shooter on video. Because, according to 7forever, unless there is video of it.......it didn't happen.

No viewable/photographic source exists showing Oswald brandishing/holding or firing a weapon on that day.

Apparently THIS proves Oswald is innocent!
Following that LOGIC, the shooter HAS to be on film......right?

you oswald apologists are the best comedy writers in the world,your lies you make up to try and support your case are very amusing. yeah you believe that he shot JFK because the truth scares you that he didnt.just like it does the other guy. thats why you ignore facts that prove he could not do it.for one thing,there was photo taken of the 6th floor window just 10 seconds before the assassination and oswald is not seen in that window.thats what a witness claimed he took it during the time of.not only that,Garrisons investigaters learned that it was impossible for him to do it because the trees back then were blocking his view,you can see that in the photos. and none of Garrisons investigaters were even able to come close to the 90 second time frame that they said oswald did it when they tried to duplicate his feat.lol.

as usual,you lie,we both know you are afraid of the truth and not open to a conspiracy at all.we spelled it out for you dummies style how Greer pulled it off,you ignored it.
not out fault you wont look at the nix film and watch greers left hand leave the wheel.

as seven
said before,there has been many books that prove there is no evidence he did it,not out fault you wont read anything other than the warren commission report.

the shot he was alledged to have done is far much more difficult than the shot would have been on Houston instead of Elm where he had a clear shot.

I have never said what seven has that because its not on video it didnt happen,but like i told you,according to the witness who took the photo of the sixth floor window,he took it just ten seconds before the motorcade came up and oswald is not in that window. funny how he magically came out on time to do it.plus you ignore witness testimony of the two workers who placed themselves going down the stairs during that timeframe of 90 seconds after the shooting which both said they never saw oswald pass them.

again you cant get around the fact the ss agents destroyed the evidence of the ballistics in the limo and made shit up that the workers were all outside that time to support your thesis.again you have clearly done nothing but read the warren commission report and have resulted to making up lies and have no credibility except with that other lone nut theorist who is also afraid of the truth.you are clearly just here to troll like LIAR ABILTY and candyfag always does except unlike them,you are not an agent,your just afraid of the truth and have only read the warren commission report.come back sometime in the future AFTER reading other books.I could refer you to many that expose the coverup but as we both know, you wont read it.have fun trolling and talking to yourself. like i said,you can brainwash that other lone nut theorist who is also afraid of the truth,but not me a seasoned researcher for may years.so keep brainwashing him with your lies and ignoring that greer did it.He is willing to listen to your lies and doesnt know any better so he will swallow them hook,line, and sinker.ta ta.troll.

Like i said previously,you obviously slept through junior high school science classes since like I said,if you accept the warren report,you got to conclude the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years no longer applys anymore. not only that,you also are implying that all these experienced doctors who said he had a FRONT entrance wound to the forehead and witnesses who saw gunmen behind the picket fence firing a rifle are all lying. and that the photos that show that a gunman behind the picket fence firing a rifle as well are lying. you sure provide great comedy relief.you seriously should consider starting a comedy club,you'll get great laughs with posts like these how you ignore evidence and facts and policemen and ss agents destroying and removing evidence.how convient for you how you ignored all that and had to resort to lies.

the riflemen behind the picket fence were there obviously to get everybodys attention away from Greer to fire the headshot as a diversion.one was there to fire the shot to the throat which the doctors Also said was an entrance wound to the front,but you will ignore that just like you ignore how they all said he had an entrance wound to the forehead and not the back as well of course.and as we both know,you will also claim that witnesses were lying when they said they saw shooters firing from the opposite side of the knoll as well,instead of considering they were they as a diversion as well.
you did provide me great comedy relief,I'll say that much. oh and they kept the majority of the press in the back as evidenced in photos but the NIX film exposes Greer as the shooter.again its not my fault you wont look at it and ignore that Greers left arm left the wheel. pretty hard to have a discussion with someone who wont look at any evidence or facts since it doesnt go along with their version of events that they are comfortable with and ignores and wont even address points brought up to them.lol.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

I have addressed this, but I will do it again.
There is an obvious "flap" that blows out the right side of the head, above the right ear. The autopsy photos show the flap on the right side. That is caused by the "exiting" bullet that entered in the rear. You do know that the exit wound is larger wound? The red blast that comes out of the right side of his head is not the "entering" bullet's impact with the skull. It is the "exiting" bullet pulling all the displaced brain tissue out with it.
And again, the bullet fragments pulled from his skull matched the ammunition used in Oswalds rifle.

The back of jfk's head opens up after 312 but before 313. The impact's in the right front, not the right side.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I]YouTube - ‪JFK last shot Slow Motion Zapruder Film frames 310 to 328‬‏[/ame]
The driver's shot exited the right rear, clearly.

anyone who doent think that is afraid of the truth "except For Liarability,a troll agent that has penetrated this site and KNOWS the CIA did it." because to accept the governments version,they are implying that the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years no longer applys anymore not only that, we have witness testimonys who saw a riflemen behind the picket fence and all dallas doctors said it was an ENTRANCE wound to both the forehead and throat.they obviously slept through junior high school science classes and are afraid of the truth the way they keep ignoring the testimony of expert doctors. "rolls on floor laughing" what a bunch of morons.

funny how this post got ignored by the lone nut theorists. They always do that since it doesnt go along with their version of events so no surprise there. especially since they wont look at the nix film where Greers left hand so obviously leaves the wheel and points back towards kennedy. I guess rationalist thinks his left hand was reaching back like that to remove the bullet in his forehead.

 

[Warrior102]

7forever + 9/11 Inside Job.
You two need a jar of vaseline and a hotel room

 

[LA RAM FAN]

7forever + 9/11 Inside Job.
You two need a jar of vaseline and a hotel room

your posts are always amusing when you know you are defeated and cant refute the facts. typical post from a lone nut theorist.

 

[Warrior102]

7forever + 9/11 Inside Job.
You two need a jar of vaseline and a hotel room

your posts are always amusing when you know you are defeated and cant refute the facts. typical post from a lone nut theorist.

Do you actually think anyone is reading your crap? Or 7forever's crap? You can't be serious.

You and he - idiots to the first degree.

Keep talking to yourselves..... no one's listening.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

7forever + 9/11 Inside Job.
You two need a jar of vaseline and a hotel room

your posts are always amusing when you know you are defeated and cant refute the facts. typical post from a lone nut theorist.

Do you actually think anyone is reading your crap? Or 7forever's crap? You can't be serious.

You and he - idiots to the first degree.

Keep talking to yourselves..... no one's listening.

again,great comeback by a lone nut theorist when he knows he is defeated.
yeah you lone nut theorists have demonstrated countless numbers of times you are not interested in the truth and only see what you want to see.great job. you just showed what an idiot liar you are as well like all lone nut theorists.I wasnt talking to myself,I was addressing and taking IRRATIONALIST to school.candyfag talks to himself all the time.He address posts of mine all the time DESPITE the fact that he knows I have him on ignore.Yet I never see you telling him how he talks to himself which he obviously does as I proved and how he obviously is here just seeking attention.

 

[Warrior102]

your posts are always amusing when you know you are defeated and cant refute the facts. typical post from a lone nut theorist.

Do you actually think anyone is reading your crap? Or 7forever's crap? You can't be serious.

You and he - idiots to the first degree.

Keep talking to yourselves..... no one's listening.

again,great comeback by a lone nut theorist when he knows he is defeated.
yeah you lone nut theorists have demonstrated countless numbers of times you are not interested in the truth and only see what you want to see.great job. you just showed what an idiot liar you are as well like all lone nut theorists.I wasnt talking to myself,I was addressing and taking IRRATIONALIST to school.candyfag talks to himself all the time.He address posts of mine all the time DESPITE the fact that he knows I have him on ignore.Yet I never see you telling him how he talks to himself which he obviously does as I proved and how he obviously is here just seeking attention.

Incoherent. I need four bong hits to comprehend what it is you're attempting to blather about. Drool on Shemp.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Do you actually think anyone is reading your crap? Or 7forever's crap? You can't be serious.

You and he - idiots to the first degree.

Keep talking to yourselves..... no one's listening.

again,great comeback by a lone nut theorist when he knows he is defeated.
yeah you lone nut theorists have demonstrated countless numbers of times you are not interested in the truth and only see what you want to see.great job. you just showed what an idiot liar you are as well like all lone nut theorists.I wasnt talking to myself,I was addressing and taking IRRATIONALIST to school.candyfag talks to himself all the time.He address posts of mine all the time DESPITE the fact that he knows I have him on ignore.Yet I never see you telling him how he talks to himself which he obviously does as I proved and how he obviously is here just seeking attention.

Incoherent. I need four bong hits to comprehend what it is you're attempting to blather about. Drool on Shemp.

again,great comeback when shown you are a liar and an idiot who doesnt know what he is talking about.I love it.

 

[Warrior102]

again,great comeback by a lone nut theorist when he knows he is defeated.
yeah you lone nut theorists have demonstrated countless numbers of times you are not interested in the truth and only see what you want to see.great job. you just showed what an idiot liar you are as well like all lone nut theorists.I wasnt talking to myself,I was addressing and taking IRRATIONALIST to school.candyfag talks to himself all the time.He address posts of mine all the time DESPITE the fact that he knows I have him on ignore.Yet I never see you telling him how he talks to himself which he obviously does as I proved and how he obviously is here just seeking attention.

Incoherent. I need four bong hits to comprehend what it is you're attempting to blather about. Drool on Shemp.

again,great comeback when shown you are a liar and an idiot who doesnt know what he is talking about.I love it.

You mean you're typing your incoherent mindless rants NOT under the influence of drugs or alcohol?

Wow.

You're sicker than I thought.

 

[Rationalist1016]

again,great comeback by a lone nut theorist when he knows he is defeated.
yeah you lone nut theorists have demonstrated countless numbers of times you are not interested in the truth and only see what you want to see.great job. you just showed what an idiot liar you are as well like all lone nut theorists.I wasnt talking to myself,I was addressing and taking IRRATIONALIST to school.candyfag talks to himself all the time.He address posts of mine all the time DESPITE the fact that he knows I have him on ignore.Yet I never see you telling him how he talks to himself which he obviously does as I proved and how he obviously is here just seeking attention.

Incoherent. I need four bong hits to comprehend what it is you're attempting to blather about. Drool on Shemp.

again,great comeback when shown you are a liar and an idiot who doesnt know what he is talking about.I love it.

LOL!! You took me to school alright. To bad you couldn't teach me anything.
You feel you have the facts because you have read a lot of the books published? Are you SERIOUS!? Because if it is published in a book, it is a fact?
Now I understand where you are getting these ideas. Reading books that were written by guys that read the reports written about someone's research. You are 3rd generation stupid!

Actually, I shouldn't say you didn't teach me anything. I have never heard that an "Oswald look-alike" was taken out of the Texas Theater. That's hilarious!!

Interesting how you consider yourself a winner in these debates. Last time I checked, the "official story" is still that Oswald did it. The only debate is Oswald alone or Oswald & a conspiracy. Why? Because all of that pesky evidence that points to Oswald. I understand that evidence isn't something you deal in. Only ideas that point to your conclusion are paid any attention. Your login name "9/11 inside job" screams close minded.

 

[7forever]

The fairy tale we are dealing with is the WC Fairy Tale. Nix shows Greer crossing his arm over to the right side of his body at the moment of JFKs execution. At the very least this film should arouse even a slight, fleeting, tiny curiosity that perhaps, maybe, possibly, Greer should have been handcuffed at Parkland, tried before a jury with a competent prosecutor, and swung on a rope for murder after being found guilty. The case against Greer, as presented here is solid as granite rock. If the rock is too hard for some people than perhaps its time to hear the WC Fairy Tale again and hit the pillow again as reality is becoming too challenging. Its OK ....the government prefers you this way.

Jay

 

[candycorn]

Incoherent. I need four bong hits to comprehend what it is you're attempting to blather about. Drool on Shemp.

again,great comeback when shown you are a liar and an idiot who doesnt know what he is talking about.I love it.

LOL!! You took me to school alright. To bad you couldn't teach me anything.
You feel you have the facts because you have read a lot of the books published? Are you SERIOUS!? Because if it is published in a book, it is a fact?
Now I understand where you are getting these ideas. Reading books that were written by guys that read the reports written about someone's research. You are 3rd generation stupid!

Actually, I shouldn't say you didn't teach me anything. I have never heard that an "Oswald look-alike" was taken out of the Texas Theater. That's hilarious!!

Interesting how you consider yourself a winner in these debates. Last time I checked, the "official story" is still that Oswald did it. The only debate is Oswald alone or Oswald & a conspiracy. Why? Because all of that pesky evidence that points to Oswald. I understand that evidence isn't something you deal in. Only ideas that point to your conclusion are paid any attention. Your login name "9/11 inside job" screams close minded.

He needed 20 bong hits to write it.

He also thinks there was a shooter behind the fence in addition to the driver doing the shooting. It would have been less complicated to kill Kennedy using a blow dart apparently.

 

[Mr. Jones]

Incoherent. I need four bong hits to comprehend what it is you're attempting to blather about. Drool on Shemp.

again,great comeback when shown you are a liar and an idiot who doesnt know what he is talking about.I love it.

LOL!! You took me to school alright. To bad you couldn't teach me anything.
You feel you have the facts because you have read a lot of the books published? Are you SERIOUS!? Because if it is published in a book, it is a fact?
Now I understand where you are getting these ideas. Reading books that were written by guys that read the reports written about someone's research. You are 3rd generation stupid!

Actually, I shouldn't say you didn't teach me anything. I have never heard that an "Oswald look-alike" was taken out of the Texas Theater. That's hilarious!!

Interesting how you consider yourself a winner in these debates. Last time I checked, the "official story" is still that Oswald did it. The only debate is Oswald alone or Oswald & a conspiracy. Why? Because all of that pesky evidence that points to Oswald. I understand that evidence isn't something you deal in. Only ideas that point to your conclusion are paid any attention. Your login name "9/11 inside job" screams close minded.

Is it at all possible that the evidence used to pin this on Oswald, could have been fabricated?? Or is something that is beyond the realm of decency for authorities to do?
Just wondering...

 

[Rationalist1016]

again,great comeback when shown you are a liar and an idiot who doesnt know what he is talking about.I love it.

LOL!! You took me to school alright. To bad you couldn't teach me anything.
You feel you have the facts because you have read a lot of the books published? Are you SERIOUS!? Because if it is published in a book, it is a fact?
Now I understand where you are getting these ideas. Reading books that were written by guys that read the reports written about someone's research. You are 3rd generation stupid!

Actually, I shouldn't say you didn't teach me anything. I have never heard that an "Oswald look-alike" was taken out of the Texas Theater. That's hilarious!!

Interesting how you consider yourself a winner in these debates. Last time I checked, the "official story" is still that Oswald did it. The only debate is Oswald alone or Oswald & a conspiracy. Why? Because all of that pesky evidence that points to Oswald. I understand that evidence isn't something you deal in. Only ideas that point to your conclusion are paid any attention. Your login name "9/11 inside job" screams close minded.

Is it at all possible that the evidence used to pin this on Oswald, could have been fabricated?? Or is something that is beyond the realm of decency for authorities to do?
Just wondering...

I wouldn't say that it is outside the realm of possibilities. Whether it be a government agency or anybody else. I just haven't seen the evidence that would point to that. There is evidence that he owned the rifle found on the 6th floor. Evidence that he handled it. There is "pretty good" evidence that he brought a brown paper bag, about the length of the broken down gun, with him that day, based on the testimony of his ride that day, Wesley Frazier.
Now there is no absolute evidence that proves he pulled the trigger.
I just think it is almost impossible for him to not have been involved at all. If there was a conspiracy that did not involve him but was to be blamed on him, then the people controlling the conspiracy would have to make sure he was out of sight at the time of the shooting. In other words, if he had absolutely nothing to do with it, it would be very likely that he would be with, or at least seen by, co-works at the time of the shooting. If that were the case, then it would be pretty hard to convict him. Even if his gun was to been stolen from his house, used in the shooting, left on the sixth floor, it would still be hard to put on him if he was sitting in the lunch room with a half dozen co-workers or standing out in front of the building with couple hundred people around him.

With all that said, I for the most part, believe he did it, and did it alone. But over the years, I have read and watched a lot of things that have made me wonder if there was more to it. Nothing that eliminates him entirely though.

Now, the theory that has dominated this thread, the one that claims that Greer, the driver did it, I believe is absolutely ludicrous. There is absolutely no evidence that shows this, not even the videos that are claimed to be "proof positive" that he did it. The videos show that he DID NOT do it. There is NOTHING that points to him as the shooter. And it absolutely defies all logic that he would.

 

[Obamerican]

Incoherent. I need four bong hits to comprehend what it is you're attempting to blather about. Drool on Shemp.

again,great comeback when shown you are a liar and an idiot who doesnt know what he is talking about.I love it.

LOL!! You took me to school alright. To bad you couldn't teach me anything.
You feel you have the facts because you have read a lot of the books published? Are you SERIOUS!? Because if it is published in a book, it is a fact?
Now I understand where you are getting these ideas. Reading books that were written by guys that read the reports written about someone's research. You are 3rd generation stupid!

Actually, I shouldn't say you didn't teach me anything. I have never heard that an "Oswald look-alike" was taken out of the Texas Theater. That's hilarious!!

Interesting how you consider yourself a winner in these debates. Last time I checked, the "official story" is still that Oswald did it. The only debate is Oswald alone or Oswald & a conspiracy. Why? Because all of that pesky evidence that points to Oswald. I understand that evidence isn't something you deal in. Only ideas that point to your conclusion are paid any attention. Your login name "9/11 inside job" screams close minded.

"9/11 Inside Job" screams WASTE OF OXYGEN. The man is a moron.

BTW the idiot thinks that CandyCorn and I are the same person.

 

[7forever]

I've flip-flopped on this issue so many times in my life that I don't know if I can convince myself of any conspiracy. All the angles look worthy of mention, but there's still nothing I can hang my hat on. I read about the "driver shot him" angle years back from Bill Cooper I believe. Whether I can agree or not, still have to give 7forever credit for the research and video. :thumbs: I'll have to keep reading and investigating further and maybe I'll live to see those documents opened and I can finally sit on a decision.

For google's sake. My work makes sense and hangs together. It's not rocket science.

 

[Obamerican]

I've flip-flopped on this issue so many times in my life that I don't know if I can convince myself of any conspiracy. All the angles look worthy of mention, but there's still nothing I can hang my hat on. I read about the "driver shot him" angle years back from Bill Cooper I believe. Whether I can agree or not, still have to give 7forever credit for the research and video. :thumbs: I'll have to keep reading and investigating further and maybe I'll live to see those documents opened and I can finally sit on a decision.

For google's sake. My work makes sense and hangs together. It's not rocket science.

The words "my work makes sense" in any post you make is an out and out lie.

 

[Rationalist1016]

I've flip-flopped on this issue so many times in my life that I don't know if I can convince myself of any conspiracy. All the angles look worthy of mention, but there's still nothing I can hang my hat on. I read about the "driver shot him" angle years back from Bill Cooper I believe. Whether I can agree or not, still have to give 7forever credit for the research and video. :thumbs: I'll have to keep reading and investigating further and maybe I'll live to see those documents opened and I can finally sit on a decision.

For google's sake. My work makes sense and hangs together. It's not rocket science.

Why is it that the last couple "quotes" that you have posted that are supporting you, are invalid links. They can't be followed back to a real thread. Are you "making up" support for yourself?

 

[uscitizen]

Hey I know who, I saw that movie. Kevin Kostner was the good guy.