pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 73,742
- 28,813
- 2,210
Who would vote for the shithead after she exposed his blatant hypocrisy? Only an idiot, right?
Irrelevant. Do you have a link where his career ended?
Yes or no?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who would vote for the shithead after she exposed his blatant hypocrisy? Only an idiot, right?
Who didn't have that option?I've got no argument with you on that one. Its just the ones who didn't have that option.
Who didn't have that option?
Link?Millions didn't have that option, private companies and the federal govt.
That is how gestation works.The fetus is attached to the pregnant woman's body is it not?
So your contention is that the military can opt for testing rather then the shot? That every business offers the same? You made the claim link to the story from the Government announcing ALL Federal Employees can opt for testing now instead of getting the shot.Link?
That is how gestation works.
Just get immoral, nasty liberal whores to learn to have responsible sex and TA-DA!……problem solved.
Simple shit…no?
I asked for a link what you ASSUME my intentions are is completely irrelevant.So your contention is that the military can opt for testing rather then the shot? That every business offers the same? You made the claim link to the story from the Government announcing ALL Federal Employees can opt for testing now instead of getting the shot.
How did you teach your children the principle of right and wrong?I don't make moral judgements on others as I have absolutely no authority to do so.
Link?
Why do you assume I have children?How did you teach your children the principle of right and wrong?
Teaching right from wrong requires one to “judge” in order to make simple distinctions. That’s how morality is established.Why do you assume I have children?
And teaching is not judging.
More Employers Have Started Firing Workers for Refusing to Get Vaccinated
Unvaccinated workers at Citigroup, Google and the federal government face the possibility of termination.money.com
The federal government, which employs approximately 3.5 million workers, is also beginning to take action against workers who weren’t fully vaccinated by Nov. 22, 2021, a deadline set by President Biden.
The General Services Administration (GSA) says unvaccinated federal workers are “subject to discipline, up to and including termination or removal.” The federal government takes several steps before firing workers, according to the GSA. First, federal agencies typically provide education and counseling. Then they issue letters of reprimand followed by a suspension of up to 14 days. If the workers still are not vaccinated after those steps, they may be terminated.
For all of the organizations mentioned above, the vast majority of workers have complied with vaccine mandates. But the ones refusing to get vaccinated may be putting employers in a bind. Thanks to a record number of job openings and the ongoing "Great Resignation," workers have newfound leverage. Many employers are already facing staffing issues, which may make it extra difficult to figure out how or if to enforce vaccine mandates.
No voter has the right to control what I do to my own self.
No it really doesn't.Teaching right from wrong requires one to “judge” in order to make simple distinctions. That’s how morality is established.
And why can't a private employer require vaccines if they want to? No private employer is obligated to give you a job or to allow you to keep the one you have.
Saying someone is wrong for killing is in-fact “passing judgement”. Semantics are gay.No it really doesn't.
'
You can say it is wrong to kill without passing any moral judgement on those that do.
Um, actually it’s not in real America among real Americans.Morality is relative and constantly changing
I disagree.Basically, its really none of the business' concern what vaccines one has taken or not taken. Simple as that. No business wants to deal with the repercussions that may come back to them by forcing someone to take an injection that may be potentially deadly for that person. No way.
Morality is relative across all societies and always has been.Saying someone is wrong for killing is in-fact “passing judgement”. Semantics are gay.
Um, actually it’s not in real America among real Americans.
The Left is always hoping to change the moral order that all good core Americans operate under, that’s why we want ALL Lefties in Auschwitz type concentration camps.
We don’t really have time to discuss all societies…I think we both know we are talking about American society.Morality is relative across all societies and always has been.
Morals have evolved along with societies
You’re reaching now and just making shit up…NOBODY I know has ever said killing is always wrong…For example; ALL sane people would have no problem with killing anyone who broke into their home to cause harm.We say it's wrong to murder but if the government gives you a weapon and tells you to murder people in another country that's OK.
We say killing in vengeance is wrong but we still kill people convicted of certain crimes in 27 states and that's OK
Killing is either wrong or it's not and we obviously can't decide which.