The Fraud of the "sinking" Pacific Islands...

[LaDexter]

You've seen it, you've felt guilt, or so the media wanted...

Life in a disappearing country


"They've internalized the gravest of predictions -- that the Marshall Islands, this loose collection of no-elevation coral atolls, likely will be submerged beneath the waves as humans continue to warm the atmosphere and the oceans continue to rise. "


And that is what I call "the IDIOCY of the FRAUD."

The "warmers" have two island chains "sinking," the Marshalls and the Solomons, but nothing else is sinking, not the Hawaiians, the Galapagos, New Zealand, Catalina etc...

So, our "top climate scientists" want you to believe that YOU are causing the Marshalls to sink, and it is because of "rising seas" and "warming" from atmospheric CO2.

But is the sea really rising, or are those two island chains sinking because they are both right on the lip of the tectonic formation known as the Pacific Ring of Fire, which sends the tectonic plate both are on down under the adjacent plate and back into the sub crust lava for "recycling?"

Punch up a map of Pacific Ring of Fire and notice both the Marshalls and the Solomons are right on the edge of the Pacific Ring of Fire. Both are sinking because the plate they are attached to is sinking. In two million years, both island chains won't just be under the oceans, they will be UNDER THE CRUST....


But but but but "the ice is melting..."

Um, nope. 90% of Earth ice is on land mass Antarctica, which has gained at least 80 billion tons of ice every year since Algore started lying about CO2. We verified that in British Court in 2007...

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

"The film suggest Antarctic ice is melting, when in fact the evidence is that it is increasing"

Then NASA chimed in with the data...

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses


"According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008."

and, of course, Antarctic sea ice has set 5 all time record highs since O took office...

So that is why the "warmers" find "sinking" Pacific Islands right on the lip of the Pacific Ring of Fire, because there is no net planetary ice melt ongoing, which is why the oceans are not rising, and why the fraudulent "warmers" have to use deceit about "sinking" islands...

 

[Crick]

First, there's this:

Sea level is rising.

Regarding Antarctica, ONE study found ice mass increasing. Dozens of other studies found ice mass shrinking.

 

[PredFan]

Because it is a scam, they must rely on lies, intimidation and fraud.

Islands have sunk and risen since the dawn of time.

 

[LaDexter]

Indeed, many here have a problem understanding the difference between data and fudge. The charts posted above were shown in the British Court, or charts like them. They were deemed fudge. The DATA shows ice increasing, has all along.

Indeed, here's the best example of all - atmospheric readings...

: Global Warming Differences Resolved with Corrections in Readings

"But while temperature readings at the surface showed this increase, readings in the atmosphere taken by satellites and radiosondes -- instruments carried by weather balloons -- had shown little or no warming."

The raw data actually showed microscopic cooling in both the oceans and the atmosphere, but look who is "reporting" here. Nevermind the bias, there was no warming in the atmosphere from the highly correlated data from the two and only two readings of the atmosphere. If the two and only two data sets measuring something are highly correlated, an honest scientist would accept that data. But with tens of billions of taxdollars at stake the "top climate scientists" could not accept the truth that increasing CO2 in the atmosphere resulted in precisely no warming...

so they fudged... with two uncorrelated "corrections..."


"errors in the satellite and radiosonde data have been identified and corrected"


and this is precisely what our "top climate scientists" do, they take data showing no warming and cook them into "studies" that show "warming" with all sorts of colored graphs for the scientifically challenged to post everywhere. Pictures over hard science - good thing the public schools suck here....

 

[Crick]

You might want to check your dates. Those charts did not come from An Inconvenient Truth and, since most were made well past 2012, certainly didn't appear in a British courtroom in 2007.

 

[Old Rocks]

The reality is that LaDexter knew that when he typed the post.

 

[ScienceRocks]

The oceans are raising and every single dataset shows that this is so. Kids, don't do acid or hard drugs or you might become nutz like the op.

 

[Crick]

The reality is that LaDexter knew that when he typed the post.

I would not be so sure. I get the impression that either physically or mentally, he's a fair ways from his age of majority

 

[LaDexter]

The reality is that LaDexter knew that when he typed the post.

Didn't even edit it. Fudged color charts have been a hallmark of the Fraud since it started. When trying to impress those who have a 4th grade level of intellect, color charts help...

 

[LaDexter]

The oceans are raising and every single dataset shows that this is so. Kids, don't do acid or hard drugs or you might become nutz like the op.

LOL!!!

The inhabitants of the Marshall Islands are fleeing a sinking island chain. You won't find one single life form on Hawaii doing that, since Hawaii is not sinking.

As for "evern single dataset" comment, that's just laughable. The satellite raw data shows ocean drop for the past decade. Ice growing on Antarctica means oceans not rising. Fudged "studies" are not "datasets." The supporters of Algore seem to think there are like 400 different measures of things like atmospheric temps, since they have parroted 400 fudged "studies." In reality, there are two. For ocean levels, nothing except islands bordering on the lip of the Pacific Ring of Fire show any signs of ocean level fluctuations. If you cannot figure out why the island chains on the lip of the Ring of Fire are the "examples" your fudgebaking heroes use for "ocean rise," you are just as dumb as Algore hopes...

 

[Divine Wind]

The inhabitants of the Marshall Islands are fleeing a sinking island chain. You won't find one single life form on Hawaii doing that, since Hawaii is not sinking.....

Not sinking, the oceans are rising.

NASA Science Zeros in on Ocean Rise: How Much? How Soon?
Seas around the world have risen an average of nearly 3 inches since 1992, with some locations rising more than 9 inches due to natural variation, according to the latest satellite measurements from NASA and its partners. An intensive research effort now underway, aided by NASA observations and analysis, points to an unavoidable rise of several feet in the future.


Sea Level Rise -- National Geographic
Core samples, tide gauge readings, and, most recently, satellite measurements tell us that over the past century, the Global Mean Sea Level (GMSL) has risen by 4 to 8 inches (10 to 20 centimeters). However, the annual rate of rise over the past 20 years has been 0.13 inches (3.2 millimeters) a year, roughly twice the average speed of the preceding 80 years.

 

[LaDexter]

Granted, the tens of billions of dollars the US taxpayer has completely wasted funding these fudge studies means morons can parrot every single lie of the FRAUD.

You have people fleeing the Solomon and Marshall Island chains. You have nobody fleeing Hawaii.

Why, if the sea is "rising" everywhere as your parroting of fudge suggests?

Does it concern you that the "warmers" identify the Marshalls and Solomons, but nothing else, as "sinking" islands?

If the ocean was really rising, wouldn't every island be sinking, and not those right on the lip of the Pacific Ring of Fire??

If you can't think through that, then Algore really likes you...

 

[Divine Wind]

....
You have people fleeing the Solomon and Marshall Island chains. You have nobody fleeing Hawaii....

...yet. Do you know anything about the term "height above sea level"?

 

[LaDexter]

....
You have people fleeing the Solomon and Marshall Island chains. You have nobody fleeing Hawaii....

...yet. Do you know anything about the term "height above sea level"?

Indeed I do. Sea level affects ALL ISLANDS. Your BS "sea level rise" is only affecting the two island chains on the planet closest to being pushed tectonically under the crust and "recycled" into sub crust lava. Nothing else is sinking, no matter how many times your BIRDBRAIN keeps parroting otherwise.

 

[Divine Wind]

Indeed I do. Sea level affects ALL ISLANDS. Your BS "sea level rise" is only affecting the two island chains on the planet closest to being pushed tectonically under the crust and "recycled" into sub crust lava. Nothing else is sinking, no matter how many times your BIRDBRAIN keeps parroting otherwise.

You say you do then don't comprehend that that all coastal areas are affected by sea level changes either up or down.

Sea Level Rise Website

1. Erosion – SLR may lead to changes in coastal sediment transport and storage resulting in erosion of beaches, dunes, bluffs, estuarine shorelines, and tidal wetlands. Fine sediment released by erosion may impact coastal water quality, and combined with ocean acidification and warming cause negative impacts to reefs32. On the islands of Oahu, Maui and Kauai most shorelines are eroding with 70% of all beaches exhibiting erosional trends33. Erosion has led to beach loss, usually in front of seawalls and other types of armoring, such that 9% (13 mi, 21 km) of the original length of beaches on these islands have been completely lost to erosion. Maui beaches are the most erosional of the three islands with 85% of beaches showing chronic erosion, including 11% lost, and an average rate of shoreline change equal to -0.17 ± 0.01 m/yr (-0.55 ± 0.03 ft/yr). Seventy-one percent of Kauai beaches are erosional, including 8% lost, with an average rate of shoreline change equal to -0.11 ± 0.01 m/yr (-0.36 ± 0.03 ft/yr). The majority, or 60%, of Oahu beaches are erosional, including 8% lost, with an average rate of shoreline change equal to -0.06 ± 0.01 m/yr (-0.19 ± 0.03 ft/yr). Studies show that shoreline change is highly spatially variable along Hawaii beaches with pockets of erosion alternating with areas where the beach is stable or even accreting; areas of chronic erosion are identified on all sides of the islands. With chronic coastal erosion already a major problem, continued (and accelerated) sea level rise is likely to pose significant problems in the near future.

Your propensity to reply with insults instead of fact denotes an emotional personality of low intellect and a high level of personal frustration.

 

[LaDexter]

Show us an island where the inhabitants are claiming the island is sinking other than the Marshall and Solomon Islands, where the inhabitants ARE LEAVING...


Thousands of 'climate refugees' could be soon heading to this Middle America town


The residents of the Marshall Islands are leaving. Show us another island not on the lip of the Pacific Ring of Fire where the inhabitants are leaving as "climate refugees?"

You can't.

That is because what you parrot is BS....

but you have to have more than a BIRDBRAIN to figure that out...

 

[skookerasbil]

Dang, Ledexter.........man you are going to have these bozo's heads exploding in short order. They get pretty violent around here when their ruse is exposed...........but its a rush to watch, let me tell you!!. Expect you'll be called any and every personal insult in the book......its the progressive way. When you're losing, call the person pwning you a retard.

And yes........the alarmists are very fond of using fabulous colors, particularly red!! It illustrates heat even if is 0.14 degree's!!



You basically have Crick, Old Rocks, Matthew and Rolling Thunder...........after 8 years, those are the only OCD's we deal with in here. All the others flee after a few days. These 4 are particularly shakey in the connect the dots realm. Place is dominated by the skeptics.......we even have a thread that is ePiC called PROOF THE SKEPTICS ARE WINNING with about 4 billion links that make the alarmist nutters look silly.

 

[Weatherman2020]

That 3 inch rise in the ocean the cultists believe in did ya know. Got Atlantas too.

 

[Crick]

Ten Islands and One Coastal Nation Threatened by Rising Sea Levels

The Republic of Kiribati

Maldives

Seychelles

Torres Strait Islands

Tegua

Solomon Islands

Micoronesia

Palau

Carteret Islands

Tuvalu

Bangladesh

 

[Crick]

PS, since 1870, the ocean has risen 8 inches