The Fraud of the "sinking" Pacific Islands...

No inhabited islands have disappeared under the waves in the last decade or two. More than one, however, has suffered loss of occupiable space, loss of arable land and increased vulnerability to storm damage that is pushing their islands closer and closer to uninhabitability. These people are not evacuating these islands because they're stupid or because someone is lying to them. They're leaving because their walking around in salt water.
 
"They're leaving because their walking around in salt water."


and nevermind that Crick doesn't want to talk about how JUST THREE ISLANDS on the planet are sinking and precisely NOTHING ELSE IS...

so it is not CO2..

which means CRICK was 100% WRONG, DUPED, made to look REALLY STUPID...

Feel for those who live on the lip of the Pacific Ring of Fire. It is not their fault.
 
Global sea level is rising. ALL islands are being submerged. It's simply more important for some than others. And it's important right now for more than 3 of them.

Are you EVER going to show any data to support ANYTHING you claim? Ever?

How about some data that the Marshall Islands are actually sinking from subduction and not from rising sea levels? How about some data that show a correlation between ice ages and how much land is found above and below the 67th parallels? How about some data that show the world is cooling? Anything?
 
YOU have THREE ISLANDS where the inhabitants are leaving = THREE.

NO OTHER ISLAND has the inhabitants leaving.

Your bogus "sea level rise" only affects THREE.

The others, the "DENIER ISLANDS," show what an unreal MORON you really are.


"How about some data that the Marshall Islands are actually sinking from subduction and not from rising sea levels?"

The Church of Algore speaketh... only parroting from the tippy toppiests matter.
 
My asking you a question isn't parroting anyone. You failing to answer ANY of the many questions I've put to you IS an utter fail though.

That there is a lowest island and that it will be the first to require evacuation in the face of a rising ocean is a pretty simple concept. I bet I could explain it to my dog. But, apparently, not to you.
 
Full of crap as usual.

You have three islands evacuating. All three of those are on the lip of the Pacific Ring of Fire. You blame a fudged "sea level rise" stat. That's what religious nuts do, they parrot forever in the face of truth that outs what they parrot as false...

No other island has natives claiming their island is sinking, NOT ONE. Unless it is on the Pac Ring of Fire lip, it ain't sinking, but the fudgebakers cannot accept that, so fudge they will, and parrot Crick will...
 
The mayor of Miami, Florida, a fair distance from the Pacific's Ring of Fire, has had to deal with sea level rise. Please explain.

And still, NO DATA, NO LINKS, NO REFERENCES.
 
Every year, with the coming of high spring and autumn tides, the sea surges up the Florida coast and hits the west side of Miami Beach, which lies on a long, thin island that runs north and south across the water from the city of Miami. The problem is particularly severe in autumn when winds often reach hurricane levels. Tidal surges are turned into walls of seawater that batter Miami Beach's west coast and sweep into the resort's storm drains, reversing the flow of water that normally comes down from the streets above. Instead seawater floods up into the gutters of Alton Road, the first main thoroughfare on the western side of Miami Beach, and pours into the street. Then the water surges across the rest of the island.

The effect is calamitous. Shops and houses are inundated; city life is paralysed; cars are ruined by the corrosive seawater that immerses them. During one recent high spring tide, laundromat owner Eliseo Toussaint watched as slimy green saltwater bubbled up from the gutters. It rapidly filled the street and then blocked his front door. "This never used to happen," Toussaint told the New York Times. "I've owned this place eight years and now it's all the time."

Miami, the great world city, is drowning while the powers that be look away

Only a matter of time
 
Every year, with the coming of high spring and autumn tides, the sea surges up the Florida coast and hits the west side of Miami Beach, which lies on a long, thin island that runs north and south across the water from the city of Miami. The problem is particularly severe in autumn when winds often reach hurricane levels. Tidal surges are turned into walls of seawater that batter Miami Beach's west coast and sweep into the resort's storm drains, reversing the flow of water that normally comes down from the streets above. Instead seawater floods up into the gutters of Alton Road, the first main thoroughfare on the western side of Miami Beach, and pours into the street. Then the water surges across the rest of the island.

The effect is calamitous. Shops and houses are inundated; city life is paralysed; cars are ruined by the corrosive seawater that immerses them. During one recent high spring tide, laundromat owner Eliseo Toussaint watched as slimy green saltwater bubbled up from the gutters. It rapidly filled the street and then blocked his front door. "This never used to happen," Toussaint told the New York Times. "I've owned this place eight years and now it's all the time."

Miami, the great world city, is drowning while the powers that be look away

Only a matter of time

Guam, one the DENIER! Islands, refuses to believe in your fake, phony, fraud EnviroMarxist "Science"

Can't wait for Trump to zero out your federal funding

Guam-from-air.jpg


guam-009.jpg
 
LOL!!!

Are the residents of Miami fleeing??

No.


Well, are most midwest people flooding that live on a 100 year flood plain? Not really. Are most people on the gulf coast fleeing that get hit with hurricanes all the time? Not really. Right now, the problem isn't big enough to force such fleeing but in 50 or 100 years that may well change. Ladexter that is reality and I hope you don't live near a coast.
 
Full of crap as usual.

You have three islands evacuating. All three of those are on the lip of the Pacific Ring of Fire. You blame a fudged "sea level rise" stat. That's what religious nuts do, they parrot forever in the face of truth that outs what they parrot as false...

No other island has natives claiming their island is sinking, NOT ONE. Unless it is on the Pac Ring of Fire lip, it ain't sinking, but the fudgebakers cannot accept that, so fudge they will, and parrot Crick will...

They don't care how many times they're caught lying and fudging the data; it's Marxism, not science that motivates them
 
You've seen it, you've felt guilt, or so the media wanted...

Life in a disappearing country


"They've internalized the gravest of predictions -- that the Marshall Islands, this loose collection of no-elevation coral atolls, likely will be submerged beneath the waves as humans continue to warm the atmosphere and the oceans continue to rise. "


And that is what I call "the IDIOCY of the FRAUD."

The "warmers" have two island chains "sinking," the Marshalls and the Solomons, but nothing else is sinking, not the Hawaiians, the Galapagos, New Zealand, Catalina etc...

So, our "top climate scientists" want you to believe that YOU are causing the Marshalls to sink, and it is because of "rising seas" and "warming" from atmospheric CO2.

But is the sea really rising, or are those two island chains sinking because they are both right on the lip of the tectonic formation known as the Pacific Ring of Fire, which sends the tectonic plate both are on down under the adjacent plate and back into the sub crust lava for "recycling?"

Punch up a map of Pacific Ring of Fire and notice both the Marshalls and the Solomons are right on the edge of the Pacific Ring of Fire. Both are sinking because the plate they are attached to is sinking. In two million years, both island chains won't just be under the oceans, they will be UNDER THE CRUST....


But but but but "the ice is melting..."

Um, nope. 90% of Earth ice is on land mass Antarctica, which has gained at least 80 billion tons of ice every year since Algore started lying about CO2. We verified that in British Court in 2007...

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

"The film suggest Antarctic ice is melting, when in fact the evidence is that it is increasing"

Then NASA chimed in with the data...

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses


"According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008."

and, of course, Antarctic sea ice has set 5 all time record highs since O took office...

So that is why the "warmers" find "sinking" Pacific Islands right on the lip of the Pacific Ring of Fire, because there is no net planetary ice melt ongoing, which is why the oceans are not rising, and why the fraudulent "warmers" have to use deceit about "sinking" islands...

Hold on a second there sport, you just said that Antartic sea ice has set 5 all time record highs since BO TOOK OFFICE. So he did it, he reversed global warming! The man is the savior of our delicate planet in spite of all the evil oil companies. Hail Obama! Amend the constitution and make him POTUS for life. Who's with me?
 
LOL!!!

Are the residents of Miami fleeing??

No.


Well, are most midwest people flooding that live on a 100 year flood plain? Not really. Are most people on the gulf coast fleeing that get hit with hurricanes all the time? Not really. Right now, the problem isn't big enough to force such fleeing but in 50 or 100 years that may well change. Ladexter that is reality and I hope you don't live near a coast.


The tippy toppiest "top climate scientists" aren't selling their beachfront property, because nobody is more certain than they are that the "rising sea level" BS is BS, since they are the source of the BS...
 
Not only do you not know what you're talking about on any topic that's come up so far, but when clearly informed that you do not, you do absolutely nothing to ameliorate the situation. You're reminiscent of Trump doubling down on his mistakes.
 
Tell us again why the "warmers" have three and only three islands "sinking," and all three are right on the lip of the Pacific Ring of Fire. Tell us how CO2 made Greenland freeze and NA thaw at the same time. Tell us how CO2 is responsible for the Antarctic Circle having 9 times the ice of the Arctic.

You, sir, have serious mental issues...
 
The tippy toppiest "top climate scientists" aren't selling their beachfront property, because nobody is more certain than they are that the "rising sea level" BS is BS, since they are the source of the BS...

Data?
 
Global sea level is rising. ALL islands are being submerged. It's simply more important for some than others. And it's important right now for more than 3 of them.

Are you EVER going to show any data to support ANYTHING you claim? Ever?

How about some data that the Marshall Islands are actually sinking from subduction and not from rising sea levels? How about some data that show a correlation between ice ages and how much land is found above and below the 67th parallels? How about some data that show the world is cooling? Anything?
all islands? you have proof of that or is that you exaggerating as usual?

BTW, if we are to believe that sea levels rose eight inches since 1870, as was posted earlier, then how does eight inches submerge an island like hawaii or guam? I'm just saying, how do you get to submerge? explain.
 
The mayor of Miami, Florida, a fair distance from the Pacific's Ring of Fire, has had to deal with sea level rise. Please explain.

And still, NO DATA, NO LINKS, NO REFERENCES.
And still, NO DATA, NO LINKS, NO REFERENCES
 
Sad, really. The "warmers" have three islands sinking with residents fleeing. All three are on the lip of the Pacific Ring of Fire.

And then they have the gall to say "you have no data" when THAT IS THE DATA...

What do they have ??

FUDGE
 

Forum List

Back
Top