I’ve seen no evidence his family followed Nick Fuentes
Nor do I see what it matters if they did. Their son, the left wing radical did the killing
The FCC may be going after Jimmy Kimmel for his claiming Charlie Kirk's killer was MAGA.
- Thread starter MarathonMike
- Start date
Nor do I see what it matters if they did. Their son, the left wing radical did the killing
WEATHER53
Diamond Member
- Apr 13, 2017
- 39,354
- 27,989
- 2,915
Lies are not protected speech over FCC regulated airwaves. You went a long way to try and walk around the actual issue but failedIronically? Your post is protected as well.
Even lies are protected speech: New Trump indictment bulldozes the First Amendment
Why the First Amendment protects liars
How a tall tale from a California water official tested the Constitution’s limits.
Why the First Amendment protects liars
The price of truth might be the (more than) occasional lie.www.theverge.com
Why (most) lies are protected speech, and why they should stay that way
Even with our current climate of fake news, misinformation, disinformation, and election lies, we shouldn’t use government power to try enforcing the truth.
Why (most) lies are protected speech, and why they should stay that way
Even with our current climate of fake news, misinformation, disinformation, and election lies, we shouldn’t use government power to limit speech.www.thefire.org
U.S. Supreme Court Finds a Constitutional Right to Lie | MacDonald Illig
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a significant First Amendment freedom of speech case in United States v. Xavier Alvarez (decided June 28, 2012), which has received little attention in the mainstream media. The decision, by a divided Court, is contrary to a long line of prior Supreme...www.macdonaldillig.comUnited States v. Alvarez
LII note: The U.S Supreme Court has now decided United States v. Alvarez
United States v. Alvarez
www.law.cornell.edu
Nobody is saying Jimmy should be charged with a crimeIronically? Your post is protected as well.
Even lies are protected speech: New Trump indictment bulldozes the First Amendment
Why the First Amendment protects liars
How a tall tale from a California water official tested the Constitution’s limits.
Why the First Amendment protects liars
The price of truth might be the (more than) occasional lie.
Why (most) lies are protected speech, and why they should stay that way
Even with our current climate of fake news, misinformation, disinformation, and election lies, we shouldn’t use government power to try enforcing the truth.
Why (most) lies are protected speech, and why they should stay that way
Even with our current climate of fake news, misinformation, disinformation, and election lies, we shouldn’t use government power to limit speech.
U.S. Supreme Court Finds a Constitutional Right to Lie | MacDonald Illig
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a significant First Amendment freedom of speech case in United States v. Xavier Alvarez (decided June 28, 2012), which has received little attention in the mainstream media. The decision, by a divided Court, is contrary to a long line of prior Supreme...www.macdonaldillig.comUnited States v. Alvarez
LII note: The U.S Supreme Court has now decided United States v. Alvarez
United States v. Alvarez
It’s going to be very difficult for Dems to ever get a job on a network now that the Trump admin is enforcing the law
WEATHER53
Diamond Member
- Apr 13, 2017
- 39,354
- 27,989
- 2,915
Ducking while clucking
Lib 101
OhPleaseJustQuit
Diamond Member
- Jul 27, 2021
- 74,633
- 87,859
- 3,488
OhPleaseJustQuit
Diamond Member
- Jul 27, 2021
- 74,633
- 87,859
- 3,488
Holy shit dude, why are you even here postin? What in the world do you think the FCC does?
Here’s a hint, it enforces the communications act of 1934 and the telecommunications act of 1996
Stop being so stupid
Gina sued Disney and won. Her post was nowhere near the tastelessness level compare with leftists celebrating this assassination.
- Sep 16, 2012
- 75,507
- 72,591
- 3,605
No, but they are saying that the FCC should not be pressuring Nextar and Sinclair groups over a free speech issue, as these groups need FCC cooperation for their expansion plans.
Regulatory capture - Wikipedia
No different than the Biden administration pressuring social media companies to ban or suspend users.No, but they are saying that the FCC should not be pressuring Nextar and Sinclair groups over a free speech issue, as these groups need their cooperation for their expansion plans.
Regulatory capture - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It’s not a free speech issue, the fcc enforces federal law and the law doesn’t allow broadcasters to distort the news https://www.fcc.gov/broadcast-news-distortion
Jimmy was lying to viewers and distorting the news to suggest a Republican killed Kirk
Now Jimmy is free to express his lies on his own time but not on a broadcast network
ABC realized their exposure not to mention the show was already costing therm a fortune and getting horrible ratings so they made a smart business decision
Not sure i know what you are trying to pretend to talk about
We are talking about the FCC and ABC
That’s not a joke
The good news now for Kimmel, is he will now be winning an Emmy.
It’s not using any law to silence its critics
If someone at Fox said that, what news was being distorted?
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Canada and Denmark are now enemies of the United States- Started by Anarchy666
- Replies: 4
-
Pete Hegseth's Pastor "I pray that God kills him (James Talarico)"- Started by citygator
- Replies: 10
-
California Sheriff Seizes Half Million Ballots in Voter Fraud Investigation- Started by excalibur
- Replies: 2
-
Husband and wife experience Delores park in San Francisco... wow- Started by Robert W
- Replies: 0
