The FCC may be going after Jimmy Kimmel for his claiming Charlie Kirk's killer was MAGA.

[WEATHER53]

FCC put pressure on ABC to punish kimmel. That's just not their responsibility to do

They are in fact a policing entity of the airwaves
In feelings and wishes they overstepped

 

[Zincwarrior]

What is the purpose of ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE?

Emphasis on the ILLEGAL

So AGAIN you can't cite anything. Got it.

 

[WEATHER53]

Feel free to show the evidence they did.

The results thereof

 

[struth]

Private companies shouldn’t be subject to government retribution for airing Kimmel.

But that’s exactly what the authoritarians are doing.

They aren’t


Private companies shouldn’t be forced to keep some one employed that harms their brand. What I am hearing from you is that is what you would in fact do, force abc to air Kimmel

How very fascist of you

 

[SurferH2O]

I remember when Kimmel gloated about Tucker Carlson being fired.

I also remember Barack and Michelle Obama contacting Bob Iger to get Roseanne Barr fired.

Gina Carrano, anyone?

 

[westwall]

So AGAIN you can't cite anything. Got it.

Others have posted the results of that ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE. And you avoided their posts.

Try again, simp.

 

[rightwinger]

Deliberate misidentification thus a lie.

Since his political influence and feelings have not been identified, they are open to opinion

 

[westwall]

Since his political influence and feelings have not been identified, they are open to opinion

No, they are well known. So, YOU are lying.

 

[struth]

Since his political influence and feelings have not been identified, they are open to opinion

No they are well known and documented, you just don’t like to admit it so you deny it…typical cult behavior

 

[rightwinger]

No they are well known and documented, you just don’t like to admit it so you deny it…typical cult behavior

Raised in a MAGA household

 

[Zincwarrior]

I remember when Kimmel gloated about Tucker Carlson being fired.

I also remember Barack and Michelle Obama contacting Bob Iger to get Roseanne Barr fired.

Gina Carrano, anyone?

Did the government put pressure on the companies in these examples?

 

[struth]

Raised in a MAGA household

Yes and apparently was a smart kid with a bright future until he got radicalized by the left

Another sad case and victim of demafascim

 

[westwall]

Raised in a MAGA household

So what. He's a leftoid. Just like you.

 

[otto105]

There was no retribution here at all.

ABC pulled the program because TV stations refused to air it.

Just the weaponization of government on those who make fun of the king Heil Shitler!.

 

[WEATHER53]

Just the weaponization of government on those who make fun of the king Heil Shitler!.

Rhetoric that was causal and now lib loons face the consequences of continuing it. Responsibility and repercussions are the two deadly R words

 

[otto105]

Rhetoric that was causal and now lib loons face the consequences of continuing it. Responsibility and repercussions are the two deadly R words

Hilarious


Weaponization of government. Where have we heard that before hypocrite.

 

[WEATHER53]

Hilarious


Weaponization of government. Where have we heard that before hypocrite.

Government has always had weapons for illegal federal acts

 

[otto105]

Government has always had weapons for illegal federal acts

Hilarious

So, just grow the deep state swamp.

 

[MisterBeale]

Good, lying isn’t free speech, it’s fraud.

Ironically? Your post is protected as well.

Even lies are protected speech: New Trump indictment bulldozes the First Amendment​

https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/4137650-even-lies-are-protected-speech-new-trump-indictment-bulldozes-the-first-amendment/

Why the First Amendment protects liars​

How a tall tale from a California water official tested the Constitution’s limits.

Why the First Amendment protects liars

The price of truth might be the (more than) occasional lie.

www.theverge.com

Why (most) lies are protected speech, and why they should stay that way​

Even with our current climate of fake news, misinformation, disinformation, and election lies, we shouldn’t use government power to try enforcing the truth.

Why (most) lies are protected speech, and why they should stay that way

Even with our current climate of fake news, misinformation, disinformation, and election lies, we shouldn’t use government power to limit speech.

www.thefire.org

U.S. Supreme Court Finds a Constitutional Right to Lie | MacDonald Illig

The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a significant First Amendment freedom of speech case in United States v. Xavier Alvarez (decided June 28, 2012), which has received little attention in the mainstream media. The decision, by a divided Court, is contrary to a long line of prior Supreme...

www.macdonaldillig.com

United States v. Alvarez​

LII note: The U.S Supreme Court has now decided United States v. Alvarez

United States v. Alvarez

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[rightwinger]

Yes and apparently was a smart kid with a bright future until he got radicalized by the left

Another sad case and victim of demafascim

Follower of Nick Fuentes
Don’t get more right than that