The Evolution of Early Homo in One Image

[abu afak]

An amazing graphic of the last 7 Million years of Mostly-Homo to Human evolution, encompassing many crucial factors.
Again, progression/descent with modification... including those survived with mutations favorable to the current conditions of the/their environment. (savannah, woodland, forest, etc)

The Evolution of Early Homo in One Image​

"...Human evolution encompasses millions of years. The timeline below contains the major events that eventually resulted in the emergence of the first humans. When most people think about human evolution they often do so through the lens of species. Personally I find it helpful to view human evolution more broadly. Notice that the left, green, side of the timeline represents a forest and woodland environment while the right portion represents a bushland and savanna environment. Without prior knowledge, knowing the major events of human evolution allows an individual to paint a picture of how relationships between phenotypical traits, behavior, and environmental change drive human evolution.

Take a minute to study the evolutionary history of early Homo. Do not worry about species. In fact, after reviewing these major evolutionary events it is likely that you will be able to pinpoint time periods when speciation likely occurred.

(Click on it to Expand)

Time scale = millions of years.
Green portion = forest/woodland ecosystem
Orange portion = savanna/bushland ecosystem
​

Seven MYA to 2.6 MYA​

[.........]
[.........]

The Evolution of Early Homo in One Image

Human evolution encompasses millions of years. The timeline below contains the major events that eventually resulted in the emergence of the first humans. When most people think about human evoluti…

dawnofsapiens.com

`

 

[Innocynioc]

Looks about right to me.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

An amazing graphic of the last 7 Million years of Mostly-Homo to Human evolution, encompassing many crucial factors.
Again, progression/descent with modification... including those survived with mutations favorable to the current conditions of the/their environment. (savannah, woodland, forest, etc)

The Evolution of Early Homo in One Image​

"...Human evolution encompasses millions of years. The timeline below contains the major events that eventually resulted in the emergence of the first humans. When most people think about human evolution they often do so through the lens of species. Personally I find it helpful to view human evolution more broadly. Notice that the left, green, side of the timeline represents a forest and woodland environment while the right portion represents a bushland and savanna environment. Without prior knowledge, knowing the major events of human evolution allows an individual to paint a picture of how relationships between phenotypical traits, behavior, and environmental change drive human evolution.

Take a minute to study the evolutionary history of early Homo. Do not worry about species. In fact, after reviewing these major evolutionary events it is likely that you will be able to pinpoint time periods when speciation likely occurred.

(Click on it to Expand)
View attachment 627381

Time scale = millions of years.
Green portion = forest/woodland ecosystem
Orange portion = savanna/bushland ecosystem
​

Seven MYA to 2.6 MYA​

[.........]
[.........]

The Evolution of Early Homo in One Image

Human evolution encompasses millions of years. The timeline below contains the major events that eventually resulted in the emergence of the first humans. When most people think about human evoluti…

dawnofsapiens.com

`

Archeologists Are Crackpots Who Search for Cracked Pots

Your drawing only tells about Man's body. Without intelligence, it is meaningless, just a fantasy academic blowhards use to get funding.

Around 70,000 BC, a catastrophic volcanic eruption's fallout blocked sunlight and practically wiped out the pre-humans. Since the body didn't evolve any, this was the beginning of intelligence's conquest of Nature. Nothing before that was human.

 

[abu afak]

Archeologists Are Crackpots Who Search for Cracked Pots
Your drawing only tells about Man's body. Without intelligence, it is meaningless, just a fantasy academic blowhards use to get funding.

Around 70,000 BC, a catastrophic volcanic eruption's fallout blocked sunlight and practically wiped out the pre-humans. Since the body didn't evolve any, this was the beginning of intelligence's conquest of Nature. Nothing before that was human.

Idiotic Ad hom reply.
Archaeologists are Not "crackpots".
This is a completely empty claim.

And the Chart's increasing brain size Does tell us a good deal about intelligence.
The Chart also includes a switch to more sophisticated tools, Use and then Creation of fire, and finally Bow and Arrow as well.

So you missed a great deal due to bias and utter Lack of Intelligence.
`

 

[Cougarbear]

Idiotic Ad hom reply.
Archaeologists are Not "crackpots".
This is a completely empty claim.

And the Chart's increasing brain size Does tell us a good deal about intelligence.
The Chart also includes a switch to more sophisticated tools, Use and then Creation of fire, and finally Bow and Arrow as well.

So you missed a great deal due to bias and utter Lack of Intelligence.
`

The Chart is just pushing ideological bull crap while trying to force changes in monkeys to fit an idea. There is no proof of this chart being true.

 

[fncceo]

And, if things continue along the same path ...

 

[fncceo]

The Chart is just pushing ideological bull crap while trying to force changes in monkeys to fit an idea. There is no proof of this chart being true.

We're here now, we weren't here a million or so years ago ... do you have a better explanation?

 

[Cougarbear]

We're here now, we weren't here a million or so years ago ... do you have a better explanation?

Your question doesn't prove a thing of your theory true. There's no evidence that more complicated creatures developed from less complicated creatures. All you have is more maybe's than empirical evidence.
The answer is simple. God created or brought in from other worlds every living creature and at the times Genesis prescribes.

 

[fncceo]

There's no evidence that more complicated creatures developed from less complicated creatures.

There actually is. The fossil evidence shows unequivocally that more simple organisms predate more complex ones ... including humans.

But, if you're going to dispute a theory, you absolutely have to propose an alternative theory. Otherwise, you're just being a contrarian crackpot.

 

[james bond]

OP = SAF and POS. Pick any era you like. What do you have to back it up using science?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

And, if things continue along the same path ...

View attachment 627996

Both of my brothers are envious of my venation.

 

[james bond]

An amazing graphic of the last 7 Million years of Mostly-Homo to Human evolution, encompassing many crucial factors.
Again, progression/descent with modification... including those survived with mutations favorable to the current conditions of the/their environment. (savannah, woodland, forest, etc)

The Evolution of Early Homo in One Image​

"...Human evolution encompasses millions of years. The timeline below contains the major events that eventually resulted in the emergence of the first humans. When most people think about human evolution they often do so through the lens of species. Personally I find it helpful to view human evolution more broadly. Notice that the left, green, side of the timeline represents a forest and woodland environment while the right portion represents a bushland and savanna environment. Without prior knowledge, knowing the major events of human evolution allows an individual to paint a picture of how relationships between phenotypical traits, behavior, and environmental change drive human evolution.

Take a minute to study the evolutionary history of early Homo. Do not worry about species. In fact, after reviewing these major evolutionary events it is likely that you will be able to pinpoint time periods when speciation likely occurred.

(Click on it to Expand)
View attachment 627381

Time scale = millions of years.
Green portion = forest/woodland ecosystem
Orange portion = savanna/bushland ecosystem
​

Seven MYA to 2.6 MYA​

[.........]
[.........]

The Evolution of Early Homo in One Image

Human evolution encompasses millions of years. The timeline below contains the major events that eventually resulted in the emergence of the first humans. When most people think about human evoluti…

dawnofsapiens.com

`

I knew you didn't have any hard evidence as this is part of the paper BS from evolution scientists. They got paid to do these types of charts from universities and government. These institutions prolly thought it would lead to some breakthroughs in biology, paleontology and other sciences but it didn't. It just fooled people like you who can't compare and think for themselves, i.e. SAF.

 

[james bond]

Here's my evidence for God creating the water.

"It is clear from these verses that God created everything. God created things such as the earth (with water), space (which was empty, except for the earth), time, and light on Day One (Genesis 1:1–2). None of these things existed before Day One (Hebrews 11:3, Colossians 1:16). He created the atmosphere, by separating the waters, on Day Two (Genesis 1:6–8)."

Does Genesis 1:2 Presume There Was Water at Creation?

In Genesis 1:2 why does the verse refer to “over the surface of the deep” and “the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters?”

answersingenesis.org

"Water is becoming an increasingly important issue in the developed world. But this issue is nothing new for other, less developed nations. For centuries, clean drinking water has been hard to come by for many populations, especially those in impoverished nations. In some areas, water may be available, but it's often disease-ridden, and drinking it can be fatal. In other areas, a viable water supply is simply not available at all.

According to the World Health Organization, more than 2 billion people live in water-stressed countries, and that number is expected to increase in some regions because of climate change and population growth. This leads us to wonder: Since the world needs clean water so badly, why can't we just make it?"

The lie:

"

How is water made in nature?​

Research suggests that the water on Earth came from asteroids and heavy clouds of gas and dust soon after the formation of the sun. Moreover, Earth’s atmosphere is filled with oxygen, which joins with deuterium and hydrogen to create water."

Can We Manufacture Water Out of Thin Air?

Water is just hydrogen and oxygen, so why can't we do what nature does and combine the two? Unfortunately, it's not that simple, and the results can be rather ... explosive.

science.howstuffworks.com

 

[Colin norris]

The Chart is just pushing ideological bull crap while trying to force changes in monkeys to fit an idea. There is no proof of this chart being true.

There's a bloody lot more than your silly belief some God did it.

 

[Colin norris]

Here's my evidence for God creating the water.

"It is clear from these verses that God created everything. God created things such as the earth (with water), space (which was empty, except for the earth), time, and light on Day One (Genesis 1:1–2). None of these things existed before Day One (Hebrews 11:3, Colossians 1:16). He created the atmosphere, by separating the waters, on Day Two (Genesis 1:6–8)."

Does Genesis 1:2 Presume There Was Water at Creation?

In Genesis 1:2 why does the verse refer to “over the surface of the deep” and “the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters?”

answersingenesis.org

"Water is becoming an increasingly important issue in the developed world. But this issue is nothing new for other, less developed nations. For centuries, clean drinking water has been hard to come by for many populations, especially those in impoverished nations. In some areas, water may be available, but it's often disease-ridden, and drinking it can be fatal. In other areas, a viable water supply is simply not available at all.

According to the World Health Organization, more than 2 billion people live in water-stressed countries, and that number is expected to increase in some regions because of climate change and population growth. This leads us to wonder: Since the world needs clean water so badly, why can't we just make it?"

The lie:

"

How is water made in nature?​

Research suggests that the water on Earth came from asteroids and heavy clouds of gas and dust soon after the formation of the sun. Moreover, Earth’s atmosphere is filled with oxygen, which joins with deuterium and hydrogen to create water."

Can We Manufacture Water Out of Thin Air?

Water is just hydrogen and oxygen, so why can't we do what nature does and combine the two? Unfortunately, it's not that simple, and the results can be rather ... explosive.

science.howstuffworks.com

Thats not evidence of anything other than your ignorance. Firstly you say it came with asteroids etc, which is correct then you suggest god did that.

Youre off your meds again son. Stay away from that alter wine.

 

[abu afak]

OP = SAF and POS. Pick any era you like. What do you have to back it up using science?

Evidence of common descent - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Contents​

• 1 Evidence from comparative physiology and biochemistry
  • 1.1 Genetics
  • 1.2 Specific examples from comparative physiology and biochemistry
• 2 Evidence from comparative anatomy
  • 2.1 Atavisms
  • 2.2 Evolutionary developmental biology and embryonic development
  • 2.3 Homologous structures and divergent (adaptive) evolution
  • 2.4 Nested hierarchies and classification
  • 2.5 Vestigial structures
  • 2.6 Specific examples from comparative anatomy
• 3 Evidence from paleontology
  • 3.1 Fossil record
  • 3.2 Limitations
  • 3.3 Specific examples from paleontology
• 4 Evidence from biogeography
  • 4.1 Continental distribution
  • 4.2 Island biogeography
  • 4.3 Ring species
  • 4.4 Specific examples from biogeography
• 5 Evidence from selection
  • 5.1 Artificial selection and experimental evolution
  • 5.2 Invertebrates
  • 5.3 Microbes
  • 5.4 Plants and fungi
  • 5.5 Vertebrates
• 6 Evidence from speciation
  • 6.1 Fossils
  • 6.2 Invertebrates
  • 6.3 Plants
  • 6.4 Vertebrates
• 7 Evidence from coloration
  • 7.1 Mimicry and aposematism
  • 7.2 Camouflage
• 8 Evidence from behavior
• 9 Evidence from mathematical modeling and simulation
• 10 See also
• 11 References
• 12 Sources
• 13 External links

And now we await Evidence for Creationism, ID, the designER/god. Any evidence at all.​

`

 

[Hollie]

Here's my evidence for God creating the water.

"It is clear from these verses that God created everything. God created things such as the earth (with water), space (which was empty, except for the earth), time, and light on Day One (Genesis 1:1–2). None of these things existed before Day One (Hebrews 11:3, Colossians 1:16). He created the atmosphere, by separating the waters, on Day Two (Genesis 1:6–8)."

Does Genesis 1:2 Presume There Was Water at Creation?

In Genesis 1:2 why does the verse refer to “over the surface of the deep” and “the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters?”

answersingenesis.org

"Water is becoming an increasingly important issue in the developed world. But this issue is nothing new for other, less developed nations. For centuries, clean drinking water has been hard to come by for many populations, especially those in impoverished nations. In some areas, water may be available, but it's often disease-ridden, and drinking it can be fatal. In other areas, a viable water supply is simply not available at all.

According to the World Health Organization, more than 2 billion people live in water-stressed countries, and that number is expected to increase in some regions because of climate change and population growth. This leads us to wonder: Since the world needs clean water so badly, why can't we just make it?"

The lie:

"

How is water made in nature?​

Research suggests that the water on Earth came from asteroids and heavy clouds of gas and dust soon after the formation of the sun. Moreover, Earth’s atmosphere is filled with oxygen, which joins with deuterium and hydrogen to create water."

Can We Manufacture Water Out of Thin Air?

Water is just hydrogen and oxygen, so why can't we do what nature does and combine the two? Unfortunately, it's not that simple, and the results can be rather ... explosive.

science.howstuffworks.com

Are you suggesting your gods assembled all the water molecules by hand. Do your gods hand assemble every molecule of every cancer cell the way they hand assemble water molecules?

 

[Grumblenuts]

Probably the "Early Homo" and "Hairless Homo" period descriptors are responsible for triggering them most.

 

[james bond]

Evidence of common descent - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Contents​

• 1 Evidence from comparative physiology and biochemistry
  • 1.1 Genetics
  • 1.2 Specific examples from comparative physiology and biochemistry
• 2 Evidence from comparative anatomy
  • 2.1 Atavisms
  • 2.2 Evolutionary developmental biology and embryonic development
  • 2.3 Homologous structures and divergent (adaptive) evolution
  • 2.4 Nested hierarchies and classification
  • 2.5 Vestigial structures
  • 2.6 Specific examples from comparative anatomy
• 3 Evidence from paleontology
  • 3.1 Fossil record
  • 3.2 Limitations
  • 3.3 Specific examples from paleontology
• 4 Evidence from biogeography
  • 4.1 Continental distribution
  • 4.2 Island biogeography
  • 4.3 Ring species
  • 4.4 Specific examples from biogeography
• 5 Evidence from selection
  • 5.1 Artificial selection and experimental evolution
  • 5.2 Invertebrates
  • 5.3 Microbes
  • 5.4 Plants and fungi
  • 5.5 Vertebrates
• 6 Evidence from speciation
  • 6.1 Fossils
  • 6.2 Invertebrates
  • 6.3 Plants
  • 6.4 Vertebrates
• 7 Evidence from coloration
  • 7.1 Mimicry and aposematism
  • 7.2 Camouflage
• 8 Evidence from behavior
• 9 Evidence from mathematical modeling and simulation
• 10 See also
• 11 References
• 12 Sources
• 13 External links

And now we await Evidence for Creationism, ID, the designER/god. Any evidence at all.​

`

You ARE the STUPIDEST ASSIEST FARKER-IEST OF ALL-TIME. You need to go to the lowest level you SAF and POS. You have absolutely no evidence. All you have are papers and articles. That isn't evidence. Bashing yourself in the face with a sledgehammer would be evidence.

All you have is just evidence that atheist scientists wrote papers and got funding like I said. OTOH, I have hard evidence that humans could not have created water, the liquid essence of life AND...

"

Natural selection and evolution​

Natural selection is often considered to be synonymous with evolution, but the two ideas are distinct.

Concepts similar to Natural Selection were described by a number of people before Darwin, and in particular by creationist Edward Blyth, from 1835 to 1837. Blyth described it as "a mechanism by which the sick, old and unfit were removed from a population; that is, as a preserving factor and for the maintenance of the status quo—the created kind".[2]

Evolution uses the idea of Natural Selection to explain why some living things survive at the expense of other living things, but Natural Selection doesn't explain how the variations to select from came to be. Variations can arise in at least two different ways.

• When male and female produce offspring, half the offspring's DNA is derived from each parent. Thus the offspring have a different selection of genetic information than either parent.
• Mutations can alter the genetic information.

Some of the variations produced by these mechanisms are better suited for given environments than other variations. Natural Selection removes the variations that are unsuited or less suited to those environments, in favour of those more suited ("fitter") to those environments.

According to evolution, mutations can give rise to new genetic information, thus the offspring can have new capabilities that were not coded in the DNA of their parents, and that Natural Selection will therefore select for these new capabilities if they constitute a survival advantage.

Creationists reject this claim (of mutations producing new genetic information), on the grounds that it has not been observed in science.

In the example above of plans for a dam, the engineer started off with plans that had been designed by someone, and although some of the measurements were altered, nothing new was introduced. For example, if the original plans did not include a bypass tunnel, no amount of altering measurements on the plan would produce one.

This is analogous to what we observe in nature. We see that variations only come to already-existing plans (DNA), and that changes to the plans produce nothing new."

Natural selection - Conservapedia

www.conservapedia.com

BASH-BASH-BASH-LOL.

 

[jwoodie]

I don't know what is more pitiful; the cartoon chart or the discussions that follow it. But I did get a kick out of this advice:

Do not worry about species.