Why should they whine?
Their life styles are paid for by hard working people. The more little bastards, the more welfare money. The more unreasonable demand for undeserved wages and pensions the more union jobs will go to India and China. But the union thugs already feathered their own nests, so why should they whine?
One Republican accomplishment is giving everyone an EQUAL chance to succeed, on their own merit, on honest hard work, without being propped by morally corrupt crutch like affirmative action. By making your own way, speaking for themselves, without a union thug pretending to speak for them.
You know, personal freedom and honest sense of self-worth.
Rest assured, the more I see you liberals gloat the more sure I become convinced that history will repeat itself, as it always does. The Party with the false assumption that they are invincible and the other Party is forever doomed, will always overreach and becomes an unbearable bully. So, gloat and brag, but keep in mind that nobody likes and eventually everyone becomes tired of a bully.
First of all, just how many people do you think have union jobs today? Do you think that most workers have union jobs?
And how is it the Dems don't like "freedom" and "self worth". You are just making that up aren't you?
But again, you rethugs just want to do the same ole same ole. Making pronouncemets how you love "freedom" and "self worth".
I am talking about an idea that brings about real positive change for people. We have had plenty of "freedom" and "self worth". It ain't making no jobs. Why is that? I thought you Repubs said that the ultra wealthy were gonna create all these jobs.
It's the unions fault, isn't it. No. It's abortions fault? No. It's the medias fault? No. Its the unions fault. They made the companies take the jobs overseas. Bingo. There is your answer. The unions and teachers and MSM. And welfare. I heard that there are 260 million people on welfare. Matter of fact the only people who are not on welfare are the people that voted republican last election. Is that correct? Sure it is dude. Sure it is.
The unions outlived their usefulness about 50 years ago. Nowadays only natural born free loaders would support unions and only thugs like Leo Girard and Richard Tramke and Jimmy Hoffa would debase themselves by willingly be part of a union. Of course having unlimited access to the White House and unlimited access to dues collected would sweeten the pot for those whose last day of honest work - if ever - was years and years ago.
Unions are fewer in numbers, because nobody likes to have their rights to support their families away by strikes that will NEVER bring results to make up for the lost wages which resulted in parading on streets, like an idiot sandwich between two pieces of card board, yelling obscenities.
More and more states are becoming "right to work" states, because it is everyone's RIGHT to work and support their families, regardless what the likes of Tramke and Girard and Hoffa try to say and do otherwise.
Now, for teachers. Shamefully, teaching, which was once considered a vocation, a commitment to be guidance and teaching, became a job, valued no more than any job with no educational personal involvement. To convince children that they don't have to be good because they all will get a prize, they will all graduate without being able to read and add two and two, is now mainstream "teaching". Nothing is more important than having three months vacation and suspending a 6 year old for drawing a picture of a gun and pointing his finger at a classmate. And, of course, a totally lousy teacher is protected by - you guessed it - a UNION.