You already know that I don't believe the god existed either before or after the universe.So then you agree with me that God existed before the universe.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You already know that I don't believe the god existed either before or after the universe.So then you agree with me that God existed before the universe.
False.There is no separation of church and state in any clause of the Constitution or in any amendment
Theory? Theories can be tested.The angels are still around, but back in their spirit bodies, although the fallen angels may be inhabiting some of the vicious animals, and vicious people as well.
It's my working theory.
I've tested it, it's sound so far.Theory? Theories can be tested.
Don't be your usual fool, it is here and you won't accept that the poster is right and you are , well, your usual foolWell that's total nonsense.
In reality, science has shown us that design is simply not necessary at all to form things that are complicated and "seem designed" to our puny little minds.
Which is why everyone shoud think it is absurd that this thread even exists in the year 2024.
No you haven't. Let's keep it honest, shall we?I've tested it, it's sound so far.
Well, they are spirit beings, invisible to us unless they appear in the flesh for a special duty.
Hebrews 13:2
Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.
Lots of evidence in the scriptures if you know what to look for.No you haven't. Let's keep it honest, shall we?
Search "Angels in the Bible".Oh great, they're invisible. And nobody sees them.
And what "special duty" do they have? Like killing all animals and humans in Noah's Ark kind of thing?
Science does not do proof it does evidence. The current explanations are those that best fit known evidence. That you appear to think them proof is an indication you prefer faith based creed rather than scientific uncertainty.That the universe does not cycle is beyond dispute , so it had a start and it has an end. It didn't pop out of nowhere.
Even the rankest scientistic agnostic can NOT deny this
PROOF
At some point ya gotta make up your mind.Science does not do proof it does evidence. The current explanations are those that best fit known evidence. That you appear to think them proof is an indication you prefer faith based creed rather than scientific uncertainty.
I see you still can't manage an opinion of your own. I had thought that a requirement in Zone 1.The Design Argument for God’s Existence - Aish.com
Is there a compelling, science-based argument that God exists? Check this one out.aish.com
No.At some point ya gotta make up your mind.
I see you still can't manage an opinion of your own. I had thought that a requirement in Zone 1.
Oh well, TIL.
Search "Angels in the Bible".
Was just over at the local college and saw great handouts on the DESIGN ARGUMENT. Some fools on here , unread , unthinking and poseurs at best, will say 'Design occurs naturally ' not realizing that even that statement proves design. At any rate you need to seeAt some stage, nearly everyone ponders the fundamental question: Does God exist? While we each explore our own paths to answer this question, many turn to science as the ultimate guide for unraveling life's most profound mysteries.
Is there a compelling, science-based argument that God exists?
In this essay, we’ll argue that recent discoveries in modern physics provide an argument that strongly suggests that an intelligent designer, God, is behind the universe and its laws. While this particular argument is based upon discoveries that are only a few decades old, the basic form of the argument follows in the footsteps of the age-old design argument.
The Design Argument for God’s Existence - Aish.com
Is there a compelling, science-based argument that God exists? Check this one out.aish.com
You silly uneducated person...Science does not do proof it does evidence. The current explanations are those that best fit known evidence. That you appear to think them proof is an indication you prefer faith based creed rather than scientific uncertainty.
Just yell 'UNCLE!!"You silly uneducated person...
MICHAEL POLANYI
So long as we use a certain language, all questions that we can ask will have to be formulated in it and will thereby confirm the theory of the universe which is implied in the vocabulary and structure of the language.
Michael Polanyi
The amount of knowledge which we can justify from evidence directly available to us can never be large. The overwhelming proportion of our factual beliefs continue therefore to be held at second hand through trusting others, and in the great majority of cases our trust is placed in the authority of comparatively few people of widely acknowledged standing.
Michael Polanyi
And worst of all for you
a series of observations which at one time were held to be important scientific facts, were a few years later completely discredited and committed to oblivion, without ever having been disproved or indeed newly tested, simply because the conceptual framework of science had meanwhile so altered that the facts no longer appeared credible.