The Democrats want to stop the SS cap.

Penelope

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2014
60,265
15,795
2,210

Shown Here:​

Introduced in House (04/12/2019)​

Protecting and Preserving Social Security Act

This bill revises the methodology for calculating Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) benefits and phases out the cap on compensation subject to Social Security taxation.

The bill directs the Bureau of Labor Statistics to prepare and publish a Consumer Price Index for Elderly Consumers (CPI-E) to track cost-of-living changes for individuals age 62 or older. The Social Security Administration shall use the CPI-E to calculate the cost-of-living adjustment for OASDI benefits, where it currently uses the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers.

The bill phases out and after 2025 eliminates the cap on compensation ($132,900 in 2019) subject to Social Security taxation. This change applies to both wage earners and the self-employed.

The bill also changes the calculation for the primary insurance amount (the amount received by a beneficiary who elects to receive OASDI benefits at full retirement age) by including the additional earnings that are now taxed as a result of the cap elimination.


Fine by me, I often said they should remove the SS cap.
 
Your a radical lib, so of course Higher and Higher taxes are "fine by you".

And I bet you love Sleepy Joe's idea of increasing the number of IRS agents exponentially to torture the beleaguered taxpayer as well?

1659786586213.png
 
Wouldn't that result in the biggest payroll tax hike in history to support it?

The maximum taxable amount reflects the original purpose of the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Program: to provide workers with a "safety net" of retirement income. Social Security was created as a pay-related contributory pension system rather than as a welfare program that would redistribute money from workers to those in need, regardless of whether or not its recipients had paid into the system. The benefits that retirees received were linked to the taxes they had paid when they were in the work force. Social Security was intended also to supplement, rather than replace, private sources of retirement income by providing only a basic, government-guaranteed source of income.

Within this context, Congress determined that it was appropriate to set an upper limit on the amount of income Americans would receive from Social Security. A limit on benefits, combined with the principle that workers' benefits should relate to the amount of money they paid into the system, made an upper limit on the taxes that workers would pay appropriate as well.
 

Shown Here:​

Introduced in House (04/12/2019)​

Protecting and Preserving Social Security Act

This bill revises the methodology for calculating Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) benefits and phases out the cap on compensation subject to Social Security taxation.

The bill directs the Bureau of Labor Statistics to prepare and publish a Consumer Price Index for Elderly Consumers (CPI-E) to track cost-of-living changes for individuals age 62 or older. The Social Security Administration shall use the CPI-E to calculate the cost-of-living adjustment for OASDI benefits, where it currently uses the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers.

The bill phases out and after 2025 eliminates the cap on compensation ($132,900 in 2019) subject to Social Security taxation. This change applies to both wage earners and the self-employed.

The bill also changes the calculation for the primary insurance amount (the amount received by a beneficiary who elects to receive OASDI benefits at full retirement age) by including the additional earnings that are now taxed as a result of the cap elimination.


Fine by me, I often said they should remove the SS cap.

first they need to get rid of this cap.


1659786654923.png
 
How about we get rid of the failed Big Brother retirement program that the govt should have never been involved in?
SS is a Ponzi scheme & slush fund for the pols.

The govt has very specific duties they are empowered to fulfill. Retirement & benevolence is not something we should have ever allowed the Feds to get involved in
 
SS needs a reset

Removing the current cap will do that
If you make a million dollars a year, you only pay SS on the first $133,000
SS needs to be revamped alright.

Let people keep their money in privately held accounts so they can actually create wealth instead of being dependent on the pittance that SS pays
 
SS needs a reset

Removing the current cap will do that
If you make a million dollars a year, you only pay SS on the first $133,000


That's true enough, but you pay a higher marginal rate in federal income tax.

How much do you libs really want to punish Success?

Remember, whatever you tax at a higher rate, you'll get less of. Raising the tax on cigarettes reduced smoking, raising the tax on Success will mean less success and more failure.
 
SS needs to be revamped alright.

Let people keep their money in privately held accounts so they can actually create wealth instead of being dependent on the pittance that SS pays
Nothing stops you from you and your employer contributing to an IRA or 401k

SS provides a pension and also covers you if you are sick or injured and provides payments to survivors
 
Nothing stops you from you and your employer contributing to an IRA or 401k

SS provides a pension and also covers you if you are sick or injured and provides payments to survivors
Add that 12% of your life time income to what is confiscated by SS to your ROTH 401k and what do you get?

You get wealthy enough to retire early AND live in style in retirement AND you get to leave a lot of money to your heirs
 
That's true enough, but you pay a higher marginal rate in federal income tax.

How much do you libs really want to punish Success?

Remember, whatever you tax at a higher rate, you'll get less of. Raising the tax on cigarettes reduced smoking, raising the tax on Success will mean less success and more failure.
Then they will make more money.
 
The republican wont go for it, the republicans want to stop SS and Medicare.


That's really not true.

They just don't want to destroy the country by increasing the size of this program .

If the Federal Government wants to help seniors, they should eliminate the tax on Social Security benefits so that us old people can have more money to spend.
 

Forum List

Back
Top