Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In didn't slam it. I said it would make no difference, ceteris parabus.LOL - you're not opposed to it, you're just slamming it because ...?
Actually it's had a profound effect. But let me ask you, what "difference" are you expecting to see?In didn't slam it. I said it would make no difference, ceteris parabus.
As evidenced by the times it has been implemented.
Which problems?I think it will be a useful tool, once the systemic problems are addressed.
Uh, no.Actually it's had a profound effect.
The Libertarian Party has no clout.
That's something I'd like to see. But it's not the goal of RCV.Uh, no.
What "difference"? Are you fking for real?
What difference have you been ranting about for years? Viable candidates not in the two major parties.
There are many case studies. A good one is the Alaska rep election:And no, it has not had such an effect. Nor will it, ever, in the current system.
reason.com
They don't influence Presidential elections.It does in certain townships and counties in New Hampshire.
They don't influence Presidential elections.
Indeed. It will take much more that that. But waking people up is the first step toward any meaningful reform. Of course we're also up against all the duopoly douchebags who want things to stay just the way they are. In the end, we might lose. But I'll be damned if I'll join the morons tearing the country apart.
Uh, oookay, I admit, I kind of thought that was the discussion.That might give third party candidates a window, but it's not the point.
I can't make heads or tails out of this. Did you read the article?Palin? Wait, now the people who voted for the democrat instead of the republican AREN'T idiotic sheep who love lack of choice and think it was an absolute honor to vote for the lesser of two evils?
I dunno man. Do some reading I guess. I haven't got time for your remedial learning.I'm trying to keep up. I gotta tell ya, you're giving me whiplash.
I'd be content with the majors changing their tune. But everyone is so consumed by the Lo2e con they can't see straight. Nothing will change if we don't change the way we vote.Honestly, I don't think they will ever wake up.
Biden is the worst of the worst democrat they could imagine. For reason's listed 1000 times already.
Trumps on his 3rd nomination in a row, with an actual record (on important things) that's resembles Biden's record.
Every election season, the reasons to get a third party elected to something in DC gets bigger and bigger. But it never happens.
Indeed I did. As far as a third party candidate being viable... no difference.I can't make heads or tails out of this. Did you read the article?
I told you, that isn't the point. It will, in fact, make third parties more viable because people no longer need be afraid that voting for their favorites will "help" a candidate they're scared of. But the biggest change is that it will undercut the partisan poo flinging and reward candidates who seek consensus.Indeed I did. As far as a third party candidate being viable... no difference.
Suddenly, it's not the point. because we have exited the discussion entirely, as it started.I told you, that isn't the point.
No, it actually will open things up and they'll get more traction. They won't have to fight against your precious "lesser-of-two-evils" conceit. People won't have to be afraid to vote for their favorite candidate and we'll finally get honest numbers on what voters prefer.Suddenly, it's not the point. because we have exited the discussion entirely, as it started.
Okay.
It will not make third parties more viable. At all.
Nope. That kind of nonsense is nullified with RCV. You rank all the candidates and there's no need to worry about about whether they can win. It doesn't sound like really understand how it works.People will still vote for candidates they know and that they think can win.
