The Civil War

[schmidlap]

The South Was Right!...

In summation,

In 1860, Abraham Lincoln was elected President of the United States - of all 33 United States.

Lincoln deployed United States troops on United States soil to suppress a regional rebellion within the United States, in strict compliance with his Oath of Office. The rebellious states cited their determination to perpetuate slavery as their excuse, the demand of special interests within them.

No nation on earth ever recognized a sovereign nation calling itself "The Confederate States of America" that was an attempt to deprive Americans within their state borders of their United States citizenship.

Those who attacked the United States from within exacted an enormous price upon the nation, but were defeated and the Union was preserved.

 

[Unkotare]

....
Lot's of people have claimed otherwise, especially at the time. ......

What country ever recognized the so-called 'confederacy' as a sovereign nation?

The Confederate States of America did(CSA).
.....

That was not a country. It was a criminal enterprise that was rightfully crushed.

You sure about that, chief???

Greg

Yes, I am.

 

[Unkotare]

.... He is the one that instigated hostilities. ...

The criminal scum of the so-called 'confederacy' started the war.

 

[Unkotare]

...

Of course the war really didn't start at ft Sumter. ...

Of course it did.

 

[Unkotare]

....
Lot's of people have claimed otherwise, especially at the time. ......

What country ever recognized the so-called 'confederacy' as a sovereign nation?

Irrelevant.

Completely relevant, wannabe.

Irrelevant. According to you, the USSR was ......

We are not talking about the USSR, idiot. Focus.

 

[there4eyeM]

How many states joined the Union before the Civil War and after the Republican Party was formed?

 

[Unkotare]

...
I've aleady [sic] explained my positiion [sic] of the court. .......

What are your qualifications in Constitutional Law? We know you can barely string together a sentence in English.

Appeal to authority.

Next!

You should learn what that means before repeating it again, dumbass.

How am I misusing it?

You clearly don't understand what it means. Why don't you Google, or Wiki, or whatever you ignorant fools do when you're confused?

You claim I don't understand what it means? Prove it. Otherwise, shut your fucking yap.

You can't even understand the Wiki page about it? That's pretty fucking sad.

Referring to an authority on a subject is not a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority on one subject to 'prove' something about an unrelated subject is a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority that does not address the specific issue at hand can be a fallacy, idiot. Referring to a very elite authority on a very specific topic in regards to that specific topic is not a fallacy, idiot.


Have you ever studied logic at any level?

The story of the theory of continental proves you are wrong, moron.

Look brainless, if you really want to talk about logic, why not take the time to actually study it at least a little?

I have studied it.......

Where? At what level? How?

You're full of shit, and you know it.

 

[there4eyeM]

The Civil War was not about political parties.

 

[schmidlap]

The Civil War was not about political parties.

However, it was about politics - the violent attempt, driven by special interests in some states, to deprive all the people in those states of their U.S. citizenship.

 

[there4eyeM]

The Civil War was not about political parties.

However, it was about politics - the violent attempt, driven by special interests in some states, to deprive all the people in those states of their U.S. citizenship.

It was about the extra-Constitutional measures taken by seditious persons to resolve a political problem. Innumerable issues were therein tangled, but it comes down to that.

 

[schmidlap]

It was about the extra-Constitutional measures taken by seditious persons to resolve a political problem. Innumerable issues were therein tangled, but it comes down to that.

Our nation of, by, and for the People provides the mechanisms of self-governance by peaceful means.

Wee-weeing up fanatics via lies, propaganda, and inflammatory rhetoric to attack our government of, by, and for the People after matters have been democratically decided was and remains an unacceptable recourse for sore loser malcontents.

 

[there4eyeM]

It was about the extra-Constitutional measures taken by seditious persons to resolve a political problem. Innumerable issues were therein tangled, but it comes down to that.

Our nation of, by, and for the People provides the mechanisms of self-governance by peaceful means.

Wee-weeing up fanatics via lies, propaganda, and inflammatory rhetoric to attack our government of, by, and for the People after matters have been democratically decided was and remains an unacceptable recourse for sore loser malcontents.

It is one thing to want to take your ball and go home. It is another thing when it is not your ball.

 

[bripat9643]

....
Lot's of people have claimed otherwise, especially at the time. ......

What country ever recognized the so-called 'confederacy' as a sovereign nation?

Irrelevant.

Completely relevant, wannabe.

Irrelevant. According to you, the USSR was ......

We are not talking about the USSR, idiot. Focus.

So admit that you're too stupid to understand an analogy.

 

[bripat9643]

It was about the extra-Constitutional measures taken by seditious persons to resolve a political problem. Innumerable issues were therein tangled, but it comes down to that.

Our nation of, by, and for the People provides the mechanisms of self-governance by peaceful means.

Wee-weeing up fanatics via lies, propaganda, and inflammatory rhetoric to attack our government of, by, and for the People after matters have been democratically decided was and remains an unacceptable recourse for sore loser malcontents.

Invadiing Virginia was how we settle differences peacefully?

 

[schmidlap]

It is one thing to want to take your ball and go home. It is another thing when it is not your ball.

Going home is good. Preferably before savaging the ball.

 

[Unkotare]

It was about the extra-Constitutional measures taken by seditious persons to resolve a political problem. Innumerable issues were therein tangled, but it comes down to that.

Our nation of, by, and for the People provides the mechanisms of self-governance by peaceful means.

Wee-weeing up fanatics via lies, propaganda, and inflammatory rhetoric to attack our government of, by, and for the People after matters have been democratically decided was and remains an unacceptable recourse for sore loser malcontents.

Invadiing Virginia was how we settle differences peacefully?

You can't "invade" your own country.

 

[bripat9643]

The Civil War was not about political parties.

However, it was about politics - the violent attempt, driven by special interests in some states, to deprive all the people in those states of their U.S. citizenship.

It was about the extra-Constitutional measures taken by seditious persons to resolve a political problem. Innumerable issues were therein tangled, but it comes down to that.

They decided that Constitution was unworkable. Your opinion that it requires the states to accept whatever the federal government dishes out is pure horseshit.

 

[bripat9643]

It was about the extra-Constitutional measures taken by seditious persons to resolve a political problem. Innumerable issues were therein tangled, but it comes down to that.

Our nation of, by, and for the People provides the mechanisms of self-governance by peaceful means.

Wee-weeing up fanatics via lies, propaganda, and inflammatory rhetoric to attack our government of, by, and for the People after matters have been democratically decided was and remains an unacceptable recourse for sore loser malcontents.

Invadiing Virginia was how we settle differences peacefully?

You can't "invade" your own country.

He invaded Virginia, which wasn't his own country

 

[bripat9643]

The Civil War was not about political parties.

However, it was about politics - the violent attempt, driven by special interests in some states, to deprive all the people in those states of their U.S. citizenship.

Lincoln is the one who resorted to violence, moron.

 

[Unkotare]

....
Lot's of people have claimed otherwise, especially at the time. ......

What country ever recognized the so-called 'confederacy' as a sovereign nation?

Irrelevant.

Completely relevant, wannabe.

Irrelevant. According to you, the USSR was ......

We are not talking about the USSR, idiot. Focus.

So admit that you're too stupid to understand an analogy.

Those straws you're grasping at won't save you, idiot.