Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh puhleeze. Try to address the issues I bring up rather than engaging in these idiotic personal attacks.I have studied it.......The story of the theory of continental proves you are wrong, moron.You claim I don't understand what it means? Prove it. Otherwise, shut your fucking yap.How am I misusing it?Appeal to authority....
I've aleady [sic] explained my positiion [sic] of the court. .......
What are your qualifications in Constitutional Law? We know you can barely string together a sentence in English.
Next!
You should learn what that means before repeating it again, dumbass.
You clearly don't understand what it means. Why don't you Google, or Wiki, or whatever you ignorant fools do when you're confused?
You can't even understand the Wiki page about it? That's pretty fucking sad.
Referring to an authority on a subject is not a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority on one subject to 'prove' something about an unrelated subject is a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority that does not address the specific issue at hand can be a fallacy, idiot. Referring to a very elite authority on a very specific topic in regards to that specific topic is not a fallacy, idiot.
Have you ever studied logic at any level?
Look brainless, if you really want to talk about logic, why not take the time to actually study it at least a little?
Where? At what level? How?
You're full of shit, and you know it.
He invaded Virginia, which wasn't his own countryInvadiing Virginia was how we settle differences peacefully?Our nation of, by, and for the People provides the mechanisms of self-governance by peaceful means.It was about the extra-Constitutional measures taken by seditious persons to resolve a political problem. Innumerable issues were therein tangled, but it comes down to that.
Wee-weeing up fanatics via lies, propaganda, and inflammatory rhetoric to attack our government of, by, and for the People after matters have been democratically decided was and remains an unacceptable recourse for sore loser malcontents.
You can't "invade" your own country.
What "straws?" You mean the questions you never answer?So admit that you're too stupid to understand an analogy.Irrelevant. According to you, the USSR was ......Completely relevant, wannabe.Irrelevant.....
Lot's of people have claimed otherwise, especially at the time. ......
What country ever recognized the so-called 'confederacy' as a sovereign nation?
We are not talking about the USSR, idiot. Focus.
Those straws you're grasping at won't save you, idiot.
Oh puhleeze. Try to address the issues I bring up rather than engaging in these idiotic personal attacks.I have studied it.......The story of the theory of continental proves you are wrong, moron.You claim I don't understand what it means? Prove it. Otherwise, shut your fucking yap.How am I misusing it?Appeal to authority....
I've aleady [sic] explained my positiion [sic] of the court. .......
What are your qualifications in Constitutional Law? We know you can barely string together a sentence in English.
Next!
You should learn what that means before repeating it again, dumbass.
You clearly don't understand what it means. Why don't you Google, or Wiki, or whatever you ignorant fools do when you're confused?
You can't even understand the Wiki page about it? That's pretty fucking sad.
Referring to an authority on a subject is not a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority on one subject to 'prove' something about an unrelated subject is a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority that does not address the specific issue at hand can be a fallacy, idiot. Referring to a very elite authority on a very specific topic in regards to that specific topic is not a fallacy, idiot.
Have you ever studied logic at any level?
Look brainless, if you really want to talk about logic, why not take the time to actually study it at least a little?
Where? At what level? How?
You're full of shit, and you know it.
You have heard my answer a dozen times. Ignoring it doesn't change a thing. You're still an idiot.He invaded Virginia, which wasn't his own countryInvadiing Virginia was how we settle differences peacefully?Our nation of, by, and for the People provides the mechanisms of self-governance by peaceful means.It was about the extra-Constitutional measures taken by seditious persons to resolve a political problem. Innumerable issues were therein tangled, but it comes down to that.
Wee-weeing up fanatics via lies, propaganda, and inflammatory rhetoric to attack our government of, by, and for the People after matters have been democratically decided was and remains an unacceptable recourse for sore loser malcontents.
You can't "invade" your own country.
Virginia was and is part of the UNITED States of America. Keep insisting otherwise, but it won't change anything, idiot.
You're still running away, like you always do, pussy.Oh puhleeze. Try to address the issues I bring up rather than engaging in these idiotic personal attacks.I have studied it.......The story of the theory of continental proves you are wrong, moron.You claim I don't understand what it means? Prove it. Otherwise, shut your fucking yap.How am I misusing it?Appeal to authority....
I've aleady [sic] explained my positiion [sic] of the court. .......
What are your qualifications in Constitutional Law? We know you can barely string together a sentence in English.
Next!
You should learn what that means before repeating it again, dumbass.
You clearly don't understand what it means. Why don't you Google, or Wiki, or whatever you ignorant fools do when you're confused?
You can't even understand the Wiki page about it? That's pretty fucking sad.
Referring to an authority on a subject is not a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority on one subject to 'prove' something about an unrelated subject is a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority that does not address the specific issue at hand can be a fallacy, idiot. Referring to a very elite authority on a very specific topic in regards to that specific topic is not a fallacy, idiot.
Have you ever studied logic at any level?
Look brainless, if you really want to talk about logic, why not take the time to actually study it at least a little?
Where? At what level? How?
You're full of shit, and you know it.
Stop trying to use terms you don't understand and it won't be an issue.
What "straws?" You mean the questions you never answer?So admit that you're too stupid to understand an analogy.Irrelevant. According to you, the USSR was ......Completely relevant, wannabe.Irrelevant.....
Lot's of people have claimed otherwise, especially at the time. ......
What country ever recognized the so-called 'confederacy' as a sovereign nation?
We are not talking about the USSR, idiot. Focus.
Those straws you're grasping at won't save you, idiot.
"Nuh uhn!" isn't an adequate response to any question I have asked.He invaded Virginia, which wasn't his own countryInvadiing Virginia was how we settle differences peacefully?Our nation of, by, and for the People provides the mechanisms of self-governance by peaceful means.It was about the extra-Constitutional measures taken by seditious persons to resolve a political problem. Innumerable issues were therein tangled, but it comes down to that.
Wee-weeing up fanatics via lies, propaganda, and inflammatory rhetoric to attack our government of, by, and for the People after matters have been democratically decided was and remains an unacceptable recourse for sore loser malcontents.
You can't "invade" your own country.
Virginia was and is part of the UNITED States of America. Keep insisting otherwise, but it won't change anything, idiot.
You have heard my answer a dozen times. ...He invaded Virginia, which wasn't his own countryInvadiing Virginia was how we settle differences peacefully?Our nation of, by, and for the People provides the mechanisms of self-governance by peaceful means.It was about the extra-Constitutional measures taken by seditious persons to resolve a political problem. Innumerable issues were therein tangled, but it comes down to that.
Wee-weeing up fanatics via lies, propaganda, and inflammatory rhetoric to attack our government of, by, and for the People after matters have been democratically decided was and remains an unacceptable recourse for sore loser malcontents.
You can't "invade" your own country.
Virginia was and is part of the UNITED States of America. Keep insisting otherwise, but it won't change anything, idiot.
Now you are simply refusing to answer any questions. Your "argument" is simply to launch verbal attacks on me.What "straws?" You mean the questions you never answer?So admit that you're too stupid to understand an analogy.Irrelevant. According to you, the USSR was ......Completely relevant, wannabe.Irrelevant.....
Lot's of people have claimed otherwise, especially at the time. ......
What country ever recognized the so-called 'confederacy' as a sovereign nation?
We are not talking about the USSR, idiot. Focus.
Those straws you're grasping at won't save you, idiot.
Red herring for breakfast today, idiot?
What lies were those?You have heard my answer a dozen times. ...He invaded Virginia, which wasn't his own countryInvadiing Virginia was how we settle differences peacefully?Our nation of, by, and for the People provides the mechanisms of self-governance by peaceful means.It was about the extra-Constitutional measures taken by seditious persons to resolve a political problem. Innumerable issues were therein tangled, but it comes down to that.
Wee-weeing up fanatics via lies, propaganda, and inflammatory rhetoric to attack our government of, by, and for the People after matters have been democratically decided was and remains an unacceptable recourse for sore loser malcontents.
You can't "invade" your own country.
Virginia was and is part of the UNITED States of America. Keep insisting otherwise, but it won't change anything, idiot.
You have repeated several lies a dozen times, idiot.
You're still running away, like you always do......Oh puhleeze. Try to address the issues I bring up rather than engaging in these idiotic personal attacks.I have studied it.......The story of the theory of continental proves you are wrong, moron.You claim I don't understand what it means? Prove it. Otherwise, shut your fucking yap.How am I misusing it?Appeal to authority....
I've aleady [sic] explained my positiion [sic] of the court. .......
What are your qualifications in Constitutional Law? We know you can barely string together a sentence in English.
Next!
You should learn what that means before repeating it again, dumbass.
You clearly don't understand what it means. Why don't you Google, or Wiki, or whatever you ignorant fools do when you're confused?
You can't even understand the Wiki page about it? That's pretty fucking sad.
Referring to an authority on a subject is not a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority on one subject to 'prove' something about an unrelated subject is a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority that does not address the specific issue at hand can be a fallacy, idiot. Referring to a very elite authority on a very specific topic in regards to that specific topic is not a fallacy, idiot.
Have you ever studied logic at any level?
Look brainless, if you really want to talk about logic, why not take the time to actually study it at least a little?
Where? At what level? How?
You're full of shit, and you know it.
Stop trying to use terms you don't understand and it won't be an issue.
Now you are simply refusing to answer any questions. ....What "straws?" You mean the questions you never answer?So admit that you're too stupid to understand an analogy.Irrelevant. According to you, the USSR was ......Completely relevant, wannabe.Irrelevant.....
Lot's of people have claimed otherwise, especially at the time. ......
What country ever recognized the so-called 'confederacy' as a sovereign nation?
We are not talking about the USSR, idiot. Focus.
Those straws you're grasping at won't save you, idiot.
Red herring for breakfast today, idiot?
You're running away with your tail between your legs. That's what you always do.You're still running away, like you always do......Oh puhleeze. Try to address the issues I bring up rather than engaging in these idiotic personal attacks.I have studied it.......The story of the theory of continental proves you are wrong, moron.You claim I don't understand what it means? Prove it. Otherwise, shut your fucking yap.How am I misusing it?Appeal to authority....
I've aleady [sic] explained my positiion [sic] of the court. .......
What are your qualifications in Constitutional Law? We know you can barely string together a sentence in English.
Next!
You should learn what that means before repeating it again, dumbass.
You clearly don't understand what it means. Why don't you Google, or Wiki, or whatever you ignorant fools do when you're confused?
You can't even understand the Wiki page about it? That's pretty fucking sad.
Referring to an authority on a subject is not a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority on one subject to 'prove' something about an unrelated subject is a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority that does not address the specific issue at hand can be a fallacy, idiot. Referring to a very elite authority on a very specific topic in regards to that specific topic is not a fallacy, idiot.
Have you ever studied logic at any level?
Look brainless, if you really want to talk about logic, why not take the time to actually study it at least a little?
Where? At what level? How?
You're full of shit, and you know it.
Stop trying to use terms you don't understand and it won't be an issue.
Says the wannabe who has been chasing his own tail for page after page.
Everyone understands that you hate America. You can go now.
What lies were those?You have heard my answer a dozen times. ...He invaded Virginia, which wasn't his own countryInvadiing Virginia was how we settle differences peacefully?Our nation of, by, and for the People provides the mechanisms of self-governance by peaceful means.It was about the extra-Constitutional measures taken by seditious persons to resolve a political problem. Innumerable issues were therein tangled, but it comes down to that.
Wee-weeing up fanatics via lies, propaganda, and inflammatory rhetoric to attack our government of, by, and for the People after matters have been democratically decided was and remains an unacceptable recourse for sore loser malcontents.
You can't "invade" your own country.
Virginia was and is part of the UNITED States of America. Keep insisting otherwise, but it won't change anything, idiot.
You have repeated several lies a dozen times, idiot.
You're running away with your tail between your legs. That's what you always do.You're still running away, like you always do......Oh puhleeze. Try to address the issues I bring up rather than engaging in these idiotic personal attacks.I have studied it.......The story of the theory of continental proves you are wrong, moron.You claim I don't understand what it means? Prove it. Otherwise, shut your fucking yap.How am I misusing it?Appeal to authority....
I've aleady [sic] explained my positiion [sic] of the court. .......
What are your qualifications in Constitutional Law? We know you can barely string together a sentence in English.
Next!
You should learn what that means before repeating it again, dumbass.
You clearly don't understand what it means. Why don't you Google, or Wiki, or whatever you ignorant fools do when you're confused?
You can't even understand the Wiki page about it? That's pretty fucking sad.
Referring to an authority on a subject is not a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority on one subject to 'prove' something about an unrelated subject is a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority that does not address the specific issue at hand can be a fallacy, idiot. Referring to a very elite authority on a very specific topic in regards to that specific topic is not a fallacy, idiot.
Have you ever studied logic at any level?
Look brainless, if you really want to talk about logic, why not take the time to actually study it at least a little?
Where? At what level? How?
You're full of shit, and you know it.
Stop trying to use terms you don't understand and it won't be an issue.
Says the wannabe who has been chasing his own tail for page after page.
Everyone understands that you hate America. You can go now.
Do the continents move? Why are you afraid to answer that question?Oh puhleeze. Try to address the issues I bring up rather than engaging in these idiotic personal attacks.I have studied it.......The story of the theory of continental proves you are wrong, moron.You claim I don't understand what it means? Prove it. Otherwise, shut your fucking yap.How am I misusing it?Appeal to authority....
I've aleady [sic] explained my positiion [sic] of the court. .......
What are your qualifications in Constitutional Law? We know you can barely string together a sentence in English.
Next!
You should learn what that means before repeating it again, dumbass.
You clearly don't understand what it means. Why don't you Google, or Wiki, or whatever you ignorant fools do when you're confused?
You can't even understand the Wiki page about it? That's pretty fucking sad.
Referring to an authority on a subject is not a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority on one subject to 'prove' something about an unrelated subject is a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority that does not address the specific issue at hand can be a fallacy, idiot. Referring to a very elite authority on a very specific topic in regards to that specific topic is not a fallacy, idiot.
Have you ever studied logic at any level?
Look brainless, if you really want to talk about logic, why not take the time to actually study it at least a little?
Where? At what level? How?
You're full of shit, and you know it.
Stop trying to use terms you don't understand and it won't be an issue.
You're here pretending you're deaf, blind and dumb.You're running away with your tail between your legs. That's what you always do.You're still running away, like you always do......Oh puhleeze. Try to address the issues I bring up rather than engaging in these idiotic personal attacks.I have studied it.......The story of the theory of continental proves you are wrong, moron.You claim I don't understand what it means? Prove it. Otherwise, shut your fucking yap.How am I misusing it?Appeal to authority....
I've aleady [sic] explained my positiion [sic] of the court. .......
What are your qualifications in Constitutional Law? We know you can barely string together a sentence in English.
Next!
You should learn what that means before repeating it again, dumbass.
You clearly don't understand what it means. Why don't you Google, or Wiki, or whatever you ignorant fools do when you're confused?
You can't even understand the Wiki page about it? That's pretty fucking sad.
Referring to an authority on a subject is not a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority on one subject to 'prove' something about an unrelated subject is a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority that does not address the specific issue at hand can be a fallacy, idiot. Referring to a very elite authority on a very specific topic in regards to that specific topic is not a fallacy, idiot.
Have you ever studied logic at any level?
Look brainless, if you really want to talk about logic, why not take the time to actually study it at least a little?
Where? At what level? How?
You're full of shit, and you know it.
Stop trying to use terms you don't understand and it won't be an issue.
Says the wannabe who has been chasing his own tail for page after page.
Everyone understands that you hate America. You can go now.
I'm right here, idiot. Keep chasing your own tail, wannabe.
Do the continents move? Why are you afraid to answer that question?Oh puhleeze. Try to address the issues I bring up rather than engaging in these idiotic personal attacks.I have studied it.......The story of the theory of continental proves you are wrong, moron.You claim I don't understand what it means? Prove it. Otherwise, shut your fucking yap.How am I misusing it?Appeal to authority....
I've aleady [sic] explained my positiion [sic] of the court. .......
What are your qualifications in Constitutional Law? We know you can barely string together a sentence in English.
Next!
You should learn what that means before repeating it again, dumbass.
You clearly don't understand what it means. Why don't you Google, or Wiki, or whatever you ignorant fools do when you're confused?
You can't even understand the Wiki page about it? That's pretty fucking sad.
Referring to an authority on a subject is not a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority on one subject to 'prove' something about an unrelated subject is a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority that does not address the specific issue at hand can be a fallacy, idiot. Referring to a very elite authority on a very specific topic in regards to that specific topic is not a fallacy, idiot.
Have you ever studied logic at any level?
Look brainless, if you really want to talk about logic, why not take the time to actually study it at least a little?
Where? At what level? How?
You're full of shit, and you know it.
Stop trying to use terms you don't understand and it won't be an issue.
