The blueprint for prosperity

[danielpalos]

We have the blueprint for prosperity. All it requires rejecting the leftist lunacy in its entirety. Remember, Elon Musk's operations were in California. But like tens of thousands of other corporations, he moved out and moved to Texas. And look at all of the jobs being created...

Tech & Work Archives

www.techrepublic.com

Coincidence or conspiracy to get Texas to vote blue and not red?

Musk is a conservative, you moron.

So what. Even the electoral college requires more than one vote, "smarty pants".

 

[P@triot]

We have the blueprint for prosperity. Free markets - free from government regulations, corruption, and red-tape - results in a robust economy and transformative innovation for mankind.

Real Infrastructure Opportunity for Congress: Speed Deployment of 5G

The American Broadband Act would eliminate unreasonable restrictions and excessive fees that many localities impose before granting rights-of-way access and construction permits for towers and antennas.

www.dailysignal.com

 

[Cellblock2429]

We have the blueprint for prosperity. Free markets - free from government regulations, corruption, and red-tape - results in a robust economy and transformative innovation for mankind.

Real Infrastructure Opportunity for Congress: Speed Deployment of 5G

The American Broadband Act would eliminate unreasonable restrictions and excessive fees that many localities impose before granting rights-of-way access and construction permits for towers and antennas.

www.dailysignal.com

/——/ Yeah, but liberals know what’s best for us, and Americans don’t deserve to be prosperous. We should be taxed and regulated until we’re as miserable as those socialist nanny states and commie dictatorships.

 

[danielpalos]

/——/ Yeah, but liberals know what’s best for us, and Americans don’t deserve to be prosperous. We should be taxed and regulated until we’re as miserable as those socialist nanny states and commie dictatorships.

Who doesn't love modern broadband times? That package should be included in the overall infrastructure upgrade.

 

[WinterBorn]

Who doesn't love modern broadband times? That package should be included in the overall infrastructure upgrade.

Internet providers have been upgrading almost constantly for 25+ years. And being private businesses, they are making money from those upgrades.

We need to save the tax dollars for the parts of the infrastructure that the gov't is responsible for.

 

[danielpalos]

Internet providers have been upgrading almost constantly for 25+ years. And being private businesses, they are making money from those upgrades.

We need to save the tax dollars for the parts of the infrastructure that the gov't is responsible for.

We should cut the extra-Constitutional spending on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. That money could be put to better use on "social welfare spending" than on "military welfare spending".

 

[WinterBorn]

We should cut the extra-Constitutional spending on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. That money could be put to better use on "social welfare spending" than on "military welfare spending".

I have long been an advocate for cutting defense spending by roughly one-third. And there is much that could be done for the people with the savings.

But just as an FYI, there will still not be an unemployment compensation check for those who quit their job and who do not even look for another.

 

[danielpalos]

I have long been an advocate for cutting defense spending by roughly one-third. And there is much that could be done for the people with the savings.

But just as an FYI, there will still not be an unemployment compensation check for those who quit their job and who do not even look for another.

I don't advocate a percentage but a risk assessment to determine what we need most for the common Defense.

And, your opinion doesn't matter since that issue is before the Court now.

 

[WinterBorn]

I don't advocate a percentage but a risk assessment to determine what we need most for the common Defense.

And, your opinion doesn't matter since that issue is before the Court now.

I am sure the court is having a good laugh.

 

[danielpalos]

I am sure the court is having a good laugh.

You are welcome to love your own opinion more than Constitutional law.

 

[WinterBorn]

You are welcome to love your own opinion more than Constitutional law.

My opinion is in line with Constitutional Law.

Your insistence that not allowing someone who quits a job to draw UC being unconstitutional is bogus and always has been.

 

[danielpalos]

My opinion is in line with Constitutional Law.

Your insistence that not allowing someone who quits a job to draw UC being unconstitutional is bogus and always has been.

No, it isn't. You simply love your opinion more than any sublime Truth(value) discoverable through argumentation. You have no understanding of the concept, storyteller.

 

[hadit]

No, it isn't. You simply love your opinion more than any sublime Truth(value) discoverable through argumentation. You have no understanding of the concept, storyteller.

Be sure to let us know when the judge rules against you, and tell us how he doesn't understand the law.

 

[danielpalos]

Be sure to let us know when the judge rules against you, and tell us how he doesn't understand the law.

I am not the one with nothing but continuance, diversion, or other forms of fallacies.

 

[hadit]

I am not the one with nothing but continuance, diversion, or other forms of fallacies.

That has nothing to do with the ruling. Be sure to tell us how the judge doesn't understand the law when you lose.

 

[WinterBorn]

I am not the one with nothing but continuance, diversion, or other forms of fallacies.

Yes, you are. Your claims that the unemployment compensation is somehow inequality before the law is nothing but fallacy.

 

[danielpalos]

That has nothing to do with the ruling. Be sure to tell us how the judge doesn't understand the law when you lose.

The judge has to apply the law, not right-wing fantasy. Our Constitution is express not implied in any way.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, you are. Your claims that the unemployment compensation is somehow inequality before the law is nothing but fallacy.

Now, all you need is a valid argument to support your story, storyteller.

 

[WinterBorn]

Now, all you need is a valid argument to support your story, storyteller.

No, I have asked you numerous times to explain how the UC law is in violation of the equality called for by the US Constitution. You have yet to provide an answer.

 

[danielpalos]

No, I have asked you numerous times to explain how the UC law is in violation of the equality called for by the US Constitution. You have yet to provide an answer.

lol. Ok. I have no problem supporting my position Every time it comes up; unlike the fake news right-wing fantasists.

Here is the federal doctrine regarding employment at will:

At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."

Why do you believe any State has any authority to enact any public policies that are repugnant to that understanding of employment at the will of Either party not just one party or the State for Any benefits enacted by the legislature?