The blueprint for prosperity

[Donald H]

An astounding 80% drop in food stamps recipients in just over one year, and a 114% increase in incomes. Who could possibly argue with these results?

Try to keep it in context with the miles long foodlines and starving people on America's streets.

It's easy to take away food stamp subsistence when it's applauded as the American way.

It's the same 'way' that is the lack of health care for nearly a hundred million people! The equivalent of third world standards that can't even measure up to Cuba!

 

[WinterBorn]

If one can't leave one job and immediately find another with the same pay them the system is not working according to true capitalism. In these times stimulus checks should go out to every citizen making less than 80 grand whether they are employed at this time or not.

And if the walk off a job and make no attempt to find another?

Only illegals don't care about express law regarding the whole and entire concept of employment at the will of either party.

Only a human leech would expect to be given funds from tax payers when they have enough to live on without it.

What are you referring to? Why do we have a homeless problem.

The homeless problem has nothing to do with someone having enough to live, but demanding an additional income at tax payer expense.

However did you reach your conclusion? We should have no homeless problem in our first world economy in an at-will employment State.

You are simply trying to change the subject. Someone who is homeless would qualify for welfare.

Why are they on the street? UC for simply being unemployed is easier and more economically efficient. Means tested welfare generates a multiplier of around .8 while UC for simply being unemployed has been measured at 2 or more.

We have been through this numerous times. The majority of homeless have problems involving mental issues and addictions.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. With UC for simply being unemployed they could be going to rehab and have a "roof over their heads". Free market Capitalism is not just for the Richest.

And they would, no doubt, pass a means test.

Is that why we still have a homeless problem?

We still have a homeless problem mostly because of untreated mental illness and addiction.

Maybe in right wing fantasy. We have a homeless problem due to unequal protection of the laws.

Pure bullshit.

lol. You have no "gospel Truth" you need valid arguments with quotes and citations. Ready full of fallacy right winger?

I have posted links to the major causes of homelessness. I have asked you about the lack of a mailing address and bank account. I have asked about the dangers of giving addicts cash. I have asked about the dangers of homeless people having wads of cash on their person. You just gloss over all that because you want welfare without a means test.

 

[Indeependent]

If one can't leave one job and immediately find another with the same pay them the system is not working according to true capitalism. In these times stimulus checks should go out to every citizen making less than 80 grand whether they are employed at this time or not.

And if the walk off a job and make no attempt to find another?

Only illegals don't care about express law regarding the whole and entire concept of employment at the will of either party.

Only a human leech would expect to be given funds from tax payers when they have enough to live on without it.

What are you referring to? Why do we have a homeless problem.

The homeless problem has nothing to do with someone having enough to live, but demanding an additional income at tax payer expense.

However did you reach your conclusion? We should have no homeless problem in our first world economy in an at-will employment State.

You are simply trying to change the subject. Someone who is homeless would qualify for welfare.

Why are they on the street? UC for simply being unemployed is easier and more economically efficient. Means tested welfare generates a multiplier of around .8 while UC for simply being unemployed has been measured at 2 or more.

We have been through this numerous times. The majority of homeless have problems involving mental issues and addictions.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. With UC for simply being unemployed they could be going to rehab and have a "roof over their heads". Free market Capitalism is not just for the Richest.

And they would, no doubt, pass a means test.

Is that why we still have a homeless problem?

We still have a homeless problem mostly because of untreated mental illness and addiction.

Maybe in right wing fantasy. We have a homeless problem due to unequal protection of the laws.

Pure bullshit.

lol. You have no "gospel Truth" you need valid arguments with quotes and citations. Ready full of fallacy right winger?

I have posted links to the major causes of homelessness. I have asked you about the lack of a mailing address and bank account. I have asked about the dangers of giving addicts cash. I have asked about the dangers of homeless people having wads of cash on their person. You just gloss over all that because you want welfare without a means test.

And yet you still feed the troll.

 

[Donald H]

[

I have posted links to the major causes of homelessness. I have asked you about the lack of a mailing address and bank account. I have asked about the dangers of giving addicts cash. I have asked about the dangers of homeless people having wads of cash on their person. You just gloss over all that because you want welfare without a means test.

That interests me! Do you want a rational and decent discussion? In case you don't know already, I'm a Canadian and I can keep US politics out of it. In my opinion neither side has any more credibility than the other in your politics.
Everything you've mentioned is directly related to socially responsible government, not corrupted and greedy capitalism.

What is the 'means test' you bring up?

 

[WinterBorn]

If one can't leave one job and immediately find another with the same pay them the system is not working according to true capitalism. In these times stimulus checks should go out to every citizen making less than 80 grand whether they are employed at this time or not.

And if the walk off a job and make no attempt to find another?

Only illegals don't care about express law regarding the whole and entire concept of employment at the will of either party.

Only a human leech would expect to be given funds from tax payers when they have enough to live on without it.

What are you referring to? Why do we have a homeless problem.

The homeless problem has nothing to do with someone having enough to live, but demanding an additional income at tax payer expense.

However did you reach your conclusion? We should have no homeless problem in our first world economy in an at-will employment State.

You are simply trying to change the subject. Someone who is homeless would qualify for welfare.

Why are they on the street? UC for simply being unemployed is easier and more economically efficient. Means tested welfare generates a multiplier of around .8 while UC for simply being unemployed has been measured at 2 or more.

We have been through this numerous times. The majority of homeless have problems involving mental issues and addictions.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. With UC for simply being unemployed they could be going to rehab and have a "roof over their heads". Free market Capitalism is not just for the Richest.

And they would, no doubt, pass a means test.

Is that why we still have a homeless problem?

We still have a homeless problem mostly because of untreated mental illness and addiction.

Maybe in right wing fantasy. We have a homeless problem due to unequal protection of the laws.

Pure bullshit.

lol. You have no "gospel Truth" you need valid arguments with quotes and citations. Ready full of fallacy right winger?

I have posted links to the major causes of homelessness. I have asked you about the lack of a mailing address and bank account. I have asked about the dangers of giving addicts cash. I have asked about the dangers of homeless people having wads of cash on their person. You just gloss over all that because you want welfare without a means test.

And yet you still feed the troll.

Yep. Boredom can cause all sorts of odd things.

 

[P@triot]

Equal protection of the laws is simple and more cost effective.

“Equal protection of the law” currently exists and has for 100 years.

 

[P@triot]

Everything you've mentioned is directly related to socially responsible government...

And therein lies the problem. As a Canadian, you are not knowledgeable about the United States Constitution to any significant degree.

It explicitly restricts the federal government to 18 enumerated powers and being “socially responsible” is not one of them. As James Madison once said, “Charity is no part of the legislative duty of government”.

not corrupted and greedy capitalism.

Capitalism can neither be “corrupt” nor “greedy”. It is a system. An economic system to be exact. It doesn’t have feelings, thoughts, or actions. Only people can be corrupt or greedy.

You’re 0-for-2 Canadian. Probably should quit before this gets any worse.

 

[Agit8r]

Those food stamp recipients just lost eligibility. And many because the homeless folks y'all complain about.

 

[Donald H]

Everything you've mentioned is directly related to socially responsible government...

And therein lies the problem. As a Canadian, you are not knowledgeable about the United States Constitution to any significant degree.

It explicitly restricts the federal government to 18 enumerated powers and being “socially responsible” is not one of them. As James Madison once said, “Charity is no part of the legislative duty of government”.

not corrupted and greedy capitalism.

Capitalism can neither be “corrupt” nor “greedy”. It is a system. An economic system to be exact. It doesn’t have feelings, thoughts, or actions. Only people can be corrupt or greedy.

You’re 0-for-2 Canadian. Probably should quit before this gets any worse.

See me in the CDZ section where you're obliged to act like a grownup.
I'm more than happy to talk to Americans but I won't be dragged down into your cesspools of hate and racism. We're finished here!

 

[P@triot]

Everything you've mentioned is directly related to socially responsible government...

And therein lies the problem. As a Canadian, you are not knowledgeable about the United States Constitution to any significant degree.

It explicitly restricts the federal government to 18 enumerated powers and being “socially responsible” is not one of them. As James Madison once said, “Charity is no part of the legislative duty of government”.

not corrupted and greedy capitalism.

Capitalism can neither be “corrupt” nor “greedy”. It is a system. An economic system to be exact. It doesn’t have feelings, thoughts, or actions. Only people can be corrupt or greedy.

You’re 0-for-2 Canadian. Probably should quit before this gets any worse.

See me in the CDZ section where you're obliged to act like a grownup.
I'm more than happy to talk to Americans but I won't be dragged down into your cesspools of hate and racism. We're finished here!

Bwahahaha! I didn’t say a single “hateful” or “racist” thing.

 

[danielpalos]

If one can't leave one job and immediately find another with the same pay them the system is not working according to true capitalism. In these times stimulus checks should go out to every citizen making less than 80 grand whether they are employed at this time or not.

And if the walk off a job and make no attempt to find another?

Only illegals don't care about express law regarding the whole and entire concept of employment at the will of either party.

Only a human leech would expect to be given funds from tax payers when they have enough to live on without it.

What are you referring to? Why do we have a homeless problem.

The homeless problem has nothing to do with someone having enough to live, but demanding an additional income at tax payer expense.

However did you reach your conclusion? We should have no homeless problem in our first world economy in an at-will employment State.

You are simply trying to change the subject. Someone who is homeless would qualify for welfare.

Why are they on the street? UC for simply being unemployed is easier and more economically efficient. Means tested welfare generates a multiplier of around .8 while UC for simply being unemployed has been measured at 2 or more.

We have been through this numerous times. The majority of homeless have problems involving mental issues and addictions.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. With UC for simply being unemployed they could be going to rehab and have a "roof over their heads". Free market Capitalism is not just for the Richest.

And they would, no doubt, pass a means test.

Is that why we still have a homeless problem?

We still have a homeless problem mostly because of untreated mental illness and addiction.

Maybe in right wing fantasy. We have a homeless problem due to unequal protection of the laws.

Pure bullshit.

lol. You have no "gospel Truth" you need valid arguments with quotes and citations. Ready full of fallacy right winger?

I have posted links to the major causes of homelessness. I have asked you about the lack of a mailing address and bank account. I have asked about the dangers of giving addicts cash. I have asked about the dangers of homeless people having wads of cash on their person. You just gloss over all that because you want welfare without a means test.

All I remember is that you appealed to ignorance of modern times. The eviction moratorium is expiring soon.

 

[danielpalos]

Equal protection of the laws is simple and more cost effective.

“Equal protection of the law” currently exists and has for 100 years.

No, it doesn't and you can't prove that it has or does now. Black codes is as seriously as I can take right wingers appealing to ignorance.

 

[danielpalos]

And therein lies the problem. As a Canadian, you are not knowledgeable about the United States Constitution to any significant degree.

lol. Neither does the right wing. Fantasy is all y'all have not any form of moral of true witness bearing or faithful execution of the laws.

 

[WinterBorn]

If one can't leave one job and immediately find another with the same pay them the system is not working according to true capitalism. In these times stimulus checks should go out to every citizen making less than 80 grand whether they are employed at this time or not.

And if the walk off a job and make no attempt to find another?

Only illegals don't care about express law regarding the whole and entire concept of employment at the will of either party.

Only a human leech would expect to be given funds from tax payers when they have enough to live on without it.

What are you referring to? Why do we have a homeless problem.

The homeless problem has nothing to do with someone having enough to live, but demanding an additional income at tax payer expense.

However did you reach your conclusion? We should have no homeless problem in our first world economy in an at-will employment State.

You are simply trying to change the subject. Someone who is homeless would qualify for welfare.

Why are they on the street? UC for simply being unemployed is easier and more economically efficient. Means tested welfare generates a multiplier of around .8 while UC for simply being unemployed has been measured at 2 or more.

We have been through this numerous times. The majority of homeless have problems involving mental issues and addictions.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. With UC for simply being unemployed they could be going to rehab and have a "roof over their heads". Free market Capitalism is not just for the Richest.

And they would, no doubt, pass a means test.

Is that why we still have a homeless problem?

We still have a homeless problem mostly because of untreated mental illness and addiction.

Maybe in right wing fantasy. We have a homeless problem due to unequal protection of the laws.

Pure bullshit.

lol. You have no "gospel Truth" you need valid arguments with quotes and citations. Ready full of fallacy right winger?

I have posted links to the major causes of homelessness. I have asked you about the lack of a mailing address and bank account. I have asked about the dangers of giving addicts cash. I have asked about the dangers of homeless people having wads of cash on their person. You just gloss over all that because you want welfare without a means test.

All I remember is that you appealed to ignorance of modern times. The eviction moratorium is expiring soon.

I remember you accusing me of that, yes. I did not, of course, appeal to ignorance.

 

[danielpalos]

 

[WinterBorn]

I am sure it is a tragic video. I am not denying that homelessness is a serious problem.

I am just denying that your simplistic answer of turning unemployment compensation into welfare is the answer to all poverty and homelessness. It is ridiculous.

The only complaint you have where welfare is concerned is the means test. In other words, you want states to give out tax dollars without the recipients having to show they need them. You want to completely revamp UC, despite the fact that is works for what it is designed to do.

 

[danielpalos]

I am just denying that your simplistic answer of turning unemployment compensation into welfare is the answer to all poverty and homelessness. It is ridiculous.

Why do you believe using the socialism of Government to solve simple poverty by correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on an at-will basis, is ridiculous?

 

[WinterBorn]

I am just denying that your simplistic answer of turning unemployment compensation into welfare is the answer to all poverty and homelessness. It is ridiculous.

Why do you believe using the socialism of Government to solve simple poverty by correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on an at-will basis, is ridiculous?

I did not say that. I believe that the welfare is the answer, not a completely revamped UC system.

 

[danielpalos]

I am just denying that your simplistic answer of turning unemployment compensation into welfare is the answer to all poverty and homelessness. It is ridiculous.

Why do you believe using the socialism of Government to solve simple poverty by correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on an at-will basis, is ridiculous?

I did not say that. I believe that the welfare is the answer, not a completely revamped UC system.

Why do you believe means tested welfare is the answer?

 

[WinterBorn]

I am just denying that your simplistic answer of turning unemployment compensation into welfare is the answer to all poverty and homelessness. It is ridiculous.

Why do you believe using the socialism of Government to solve simple poverty by correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on an at-will basis, is ridiculous?

I did not say that. I believe that the welfare is the answer, not a completely revamped UC system.

Why do you believe means tested welfare is the answer?

Because it addresses the problem, yet does not allow tax dollars to me given to people who do not need it to get by.