I am just denying that your simplistic answer of turning unemployment compensation into welfare is the answer to all poverty and homelessness. It is ridiculous.
Why do you believe using the socialism of Government to solve simple poverty by correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on an at-will basis, is ridiculous?

I did not say that. I believe that the welfare is the answer, not a completely revamped UC system.
Why do you believe means tested welfare is the answer?

Because it addresses the problem, yet does not allow tax dollars to me given to people who do not need it to get by.
People who are unemployed need to be able to circulate capital.

Means testing does nothing to solve simple poverty only complex poverty as measured by means testing. UC for simply being unemployed in an at-will employment State actually solves for the economic phenomena of Capitalisms, not Labor's, natural rate of unemployment.
 
I am just denying that your simplistic answer of turning unemployment compensation into welfare is the answer to all poverty and homelessness. It is ridiculous.
Why do you believe using the socialism of Government to solve simple poverty by correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on an at-will basis, is ridiculous?

I did not say that. I believe that the welfare is the answer, not a completely revamped UC system.
Why do you believe means tested welfare is the answer?

Because it addresses the problem, yet does not allow tax dollars to me given to people who do not need it to get by.
People who are unemployed need to be able to circulate capital.

Means testing does nothing to solve simple poverty only complex poverty as measured by means testing. UC for simply being unemployed in an at-will employment State actually solves for the economic phenomena of Capitalisms, not Labor's, natural rate of unemployment.

Capital will still circulate, whether it is redistributed by the state or not. The people who earn the money will not stuff it into a mattress.

People who are unemployed, through their own choice, and have the means to live, do not need money forcibly taken from the people who earned it.
 
Capital will still circulate, whether it is redistributed by the state or not.
Why do you believe that? The Only reason for Socialism's existence is because what you allege is simply False and Always has been.

Unless you are claiming that any money not taken by taxes will be stored in their house, what I claim is true. Capital will circulate.
 
Capital will still circulate, whether it is redistributed by the state or not.
Why do you believe that? The Only reason for Socialism's existence is because what you allege is simply False and Always has been.

Unless you are claiming that any money not taken by taxes will be stored in their house, what I claim is true. Capital will circulate.
Not very well. If that is your economic rationale, the public policies enacted via the socialism of Government created the first world we know today. True capitalism is usually third world.

Both promote and provide for the (socialism of) the general welfare means using public policies for economic purposes.
 
“Equal protection of the law” currently exists and has for 100 years.
No, it doesn't and you can't prove that it has or does now.
Sure I can. Every court case shows it. As I stated previously, the problem is what you want the law to say and what it actually says. There is a huge disconnect there, but you're too stupid to know it.
 
Capital will still circulate, whether it is redistributed by the state or not.
Why do you believe that? The Only reason for Socialism's existence is because what you allege is simply False and Always has been.
Not true at all. The only reason for the existence of socialism is ignorance. You illustrate it.
 
“Equal protection of the law” currently exists and has for 100 years.
No, it doesn't and you can't prove that it has or does now.
Sure I can. Every court case shows it. As I stated previously, the problem is what you want the law to say and what it actually says. There is a huge disconnect there, but you're too stupid to know it.
Maybe in Right Wing fantasy. I know of no Court cases where equal protection of the law for UC in an at-will employment State exists, otherwise, States would have no repugnant statutes on the books for UC in any at-will employment State.
 
Capital will still circulate, whether it is redistributed by the state or not.
Why do you believe that? The Only reason for Socialism's existence is because what you allege is simply False and Always has been.
Not true at all. The only reason for the existence of socialism is ignorance. You illustrate it.
You illustrate it more with nothing but appeals to ignorance and argumentum ad hominem. Prove Your assertion with a Valid argument in the Public Domain, right winger. Or, simply be full of fallacy in that same venue.
 
I know of no Court cases where equal protection of the law for UC in an at-will employment State exists, otherwise, States would have no repugnant statutes on the books for UC in any at-will employment State.
Ok, "court" is not a proper noun and it is not starting a sentence there, so it should not be capitalized. If you can't learn our native language, don't bother trolling.
 
I know of no Court cases where equal protection of the law for UC in an at-will employment State exists, otherwise, States would have no repugnant statutes on the books for UC in any at-will employment State.
Ok, "state" is not a proper noun and it is not starting a sentence there, so it should not be capitalized. If you can't learn our native language, don't bother trolling.
 
You illustrate it more with nothing but appeals to ignorance and argumentum ad hominem. Prove Your assertion with a Valid argument in the Public Domain, right winger.
Says the Chinese disinformation dill-hole who routinely capitalizes standard nouns, adjectives, and verbs in the middle of a sentence :eusa_doh:

You're literally the poster child for why children should stay in school. That's not a compliment.
 
I know of no Court cases where equal protection of the law for UC in an at-will employment State exists,
The existing laws are equally applied to all businesses and all citizens the same. The problem is the disconnect between what the laws actually say, and what your ignorant mind wants them to say.
 
We have the blueprint for prosperity. All it requires rejecting the leftist lunacy in its entirety. Remember, Elon Musk's operations were in California. But like tens of thousands of other corporations, he moved out and moved to Texas. And look at all of the jobs being created...
 
We have the blueprint for prosperity. All it requires rejecting the leftist lunacy in its entirety. Remember, Elon Musk's operations were in California. But like tens of thousands of other corporations, he moved out and moved to Texas. And look at all of the jobs being created...
 
We have the blueprint for prosperity. All it requires rejecting the leftist lunacy in its entirety. Remember, Elon Musk's operations were in California. But like tens of thousands of other corporations, he moved out and moved to Texas. And look at all of the jobs being created...
Coincidence or conspiracy to get Texas to vote blue and not red?
 
We have the blueprint for prosperity. All it requires rejecting the leftist lunacy in its entirety. Remember, Elon Musk's operations were in California. But like tens of thousands of other corporations, he moved out and moved to Texas. And look at all of the jobs being created...
Coincidence or conspiracy to get Texas to vote blue and not red?

Musk is a conservative, you moron.
 

Forum List

Back
Top