The Benghazi Lie in Black and White

Let it begin, the end. The end of the Benghazi story. The left doesn't give a crap and the right has pretty much talked it out. It is disgusting the LIE(s) that occurred to ensure an election win. Obama and Mrs. Tuzla have no shame.

The Benghazi Lie in Black and White

You are totally correct, and that is the biggest problem with this >>> the LEFT doesn't care!

They embrace any liar, scoundrel or traitor, so long as they are on the left.
 
Let it begin, the end. The end of the Benghazi story. The left doesn't give a crap and the right has pretty much talked it out. It is disgusting the LIE(s) that occurred to ensure an election win. Obama and Mrs. Tuzla have no shame.

The Benghazi Lie in Black and White

You are totally correct, and that is the biggest problem with this >>> the LEFT doesn't care!

They embrace any liar, scoundrel or traitor, so long as they are on the left.

I am not sure what other option the left has. They have hitched their wagon to an old cow and will try and get milk from the cow. They more or less have to ignore the many faults with Mrs. Tuzla.
 
Let it begin, the end. The end of the Benghazi story. The left doesn't give a crap and the right has pretty much talked it out. It is disgusting the LIE(s) that occurred to ensure an election win. Obama and Mrs. Tuzla have no shame.

The Benghazi Lie in Black and White

Yo,
758.gif

"GTP"
 
It's pretty hard to choose...
80 witnesses never talked to in other reports, Clinton NEVER spoke with Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta that night
one is this-

The CIA’s September 13, 2012, intelligence assessment was rife with errors. On the first page, there is a single mention of “the early stages of the protest” buried in one of the bullet points. The article cited to support the mention of a protest in this instance was actually from September 4. In other words, the analysts used an article from a full week before the attacks to support the premise that a protest had occurred just prior to the attack on September 11. [pg. 47]


Another-


Five of the 10 action items from the 7:30 PM White House meeting referenced the video, but no direct link or solid evidence existed connecting the attacks in Benghazi and the video at the time the meeting took place. The State Department senior officials at the meeting had access to eyewitness accounts to the attack in real time. The Diplomatic Security Command Center was in direct contact with the Diplomatic Security Agents on the ground in Benghazi and sent out multiple updates about the situation, including a “Terrorism Event Notification.” The State Department Watch Center had also notified Jake Sullivan and Cheryl Mills that it had set up a direct telephone line to Tripoli. There was no mention of the video from the agents on the ground. Greg Hicks—one of the last people to talk to Chris Stevens before he died—said there was virtually no discussion about the video in Libya leading up to the attacks. [pg. 28]





Select Committee on Benghazi Releases Proposed Report
link to the actual report. It is pretty damning, imo

could you post the most damning part so we can get over with the back and forth accusations?
 
Opinions about what happen have already been formed. Hardly anyone will read the report with an open mind. Hardly anyone will read the report, period.
 
No assets were ever turned toward Libya.
The group that went went on their own..

I found this interesting and somewhat puzzling-

The Libyan forces that evacuated Americans from the CIA Annex to the Benghazi airport was not affiliated with any of the militias the CIA or State Department had developed a relationship with during the prior 18 months. Instead, it was comprised of former Qadhafi loyalists who the U.S. had helped remove from power during the Libyan revolution. [pg. 144]
 
A Fleet Antiterrorism Security Team (FAST) sat on a plane in Rota, Spain, for three hours, and changed in and out of their uniforms four times. [pg. 154]
 
With Ambassador Stevens missing, the White House convened a roughly two-hour meeting at 7:30 PM, which resulted in action items focused on a YouTube video, and others containing the phrases “f any deployment is made,” and “Libya must agree to any deployment,” and “[w]ill not deploy until order comes to go to either Tripoli or Benghazi.” [pg. 115]

where was the damn order to come from? There were still around 30 people in harms way!
 
In February 2012, the lead Diplomatic Security Agent at Embassy Tripoli informed his counterpart in Benghazi that more DS agents would not be provided by decision makers, because “substantive reporting” was not Benghazi’s purpose. [pg. 77]




So, even though more security was requested, the 'decision makers' said no.
 
House committee report investigating Benghazi attack faults Obama administration's response
The Republican-led House committee investigating the Sept. 11, 2012, Benghazi terrorist attack -- in which four American diplomatic staff were killed -- finds fault with the Obama administration's response, blaming a 'rusty bureaucratic process' that focused on crafting a public response to the attack rather than actually taking action to resolve the crisis. (FoxNews)
 

Forum List

Back
Top