The Benghazi Lie in Black and White

[Slade3200]

Let it begin, the end. The end of the Benghazi story. The left doesn't give a crap and the right has pretty much talked it out. It is disgusting the LIE(s) that occurred to ensure an election win. Obama and Mrs. Tuzla have no shame.

The Benghazi Lie in Black and White

From the very first page it is clear that the Weekly Standard continues to distort reality for the RWNJ's. The selective excerpt for her original statement confirm this.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

When she said:

I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.

This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.

so your point is what? That they paraphrased the exact words she said? That nothing they posted changed what she said? There is no distortion. It is clear she is blaming it on a video. The rest is just fluff BS that is what they cut out.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

Is this really the statement that you all think blames the video?? I haven't cared enough to really look into the bluster... But if this is what you got then it is not even close.

 

[JBond]

I'll take it for my start up biz... I could create a fair amount of jobs with that... Would rather put funds to use for that rather than paying a bunch of blowholes to waste time trying to politicize a tragedy.

I'm all for a good thorough investigation but this one has been taken way too far.

Sure you are. Explain the delays. You know for certain Hillary's private server was never hacked?

 

[Slade3200]

I'll take it for my start up biz... I could create a fair amount of jobs with that... Would rather put funds to use for that rather than paying a bunch of blowholes to waste time trying to politicize a tragedy.

I'm all for a good thorough investigation but this one has been taken way too far.

Sure you are. Explain the delays. You know for certain Hillary's private server was never hacked?

Wish I could but I don't know what you are talking about. I haven't gone down the rabbit hole on this one

 

[Freewill]

Let it begin, the end. The end of the Benghazi story. The left doesn't give a crap and the right has pretty much talked it out. It is disgusting the LIE(s) that occurred to ensure an election win. Obama and Mrs. Tuzla have no shame.

The Benghazi Lie in Black and White

From the very first page it is clear that the Weekly Standard continues to distort reality for the RWNJ's. The selective excerpt for her original statement confirm this.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

When she said:

I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.

This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.

so your point is what? That they paraphrased the exact words she said? That nothing they posted changed what she said? There is no distortion. It is clear she is blaming it on a video. The rest is just fluff BS that is what they cut out.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

Is this really the statement that you all think blames the video?? I haven't cared enough to really look into the bluster... But if this is what you got then it is not even close.

My grandson held up a coat and asked me if it were gray or blue. It looked like both to me but he wanted me to decide to settle the argument with his Mom. I am pretty much a primary color person. So I told him I could see both.

The argument over what she says is pretty much the same thing. You are going to see what you see and I am going to see what I see.

In regards to the provided quotes. There is no mention of any other reason for the attack other than the "inflammatory material" that "some" blame. Who is the "some" she refers? What I read is that she is saying, without agreeing, that "some", Obama?, blame the violence on the video but that video isn't justification. I am not sure how you see it as any other color.

 

[Slade3200]

Let it begin, the end. The end of the Benghazi story. The left doesn't give a crap and the right has pretty much talked it out. It is disgusting the LIE(s) that occurred to ensure an election win. Obama and Mrs. Tuzla have no shame.

The Benghazi Lie in Black and White

From the very first page it is clear that the Weekly Standard continues to distort reality for the RWNJ's. The selective excerpt for her original statement confirm this.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

When she said:

I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.

This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.

so your point is what? That they paraphrased the exact words she said? That nothing they posted changed what she said? There is no distortion. It is clear she is blaming it on a video. The rest is just fluff BS that is what they cut out.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

Is this really the statement that you all think blames the video?? I haven't cared enough to really look into the bluster... But if this is what you got then it is not even close.

My grandson held up a coat and asked me if it were gray or blue. It looked like both to me but he wanted me to decide to settle the argument with his Mom. I am pretty much a primary color person. So I told him I could see both.

The argument over what she says is pretty much the same thing. You are going to see what you see and I am going to see what I see.

In regards to the provided quotes. There is no mention of any other reason for the attack other than the "inflammatory material" that "some" blame. Who is the "some" she refers? What I read is that she is saying, without agreeing, that "some", Obama?, blame the violence on the video but that video isn't justification. I am not sure how you see it as any other color.

That's a good analogy, I like it... I'm interpreting her quote saying that "some justify the violence"... By talking about people that support the terror attack. It's a degradation of those that were and are coming after us, and those who support the violence. It wasn't a detailed explanation of what happened... I'm sure they were in the heat of investigating all of that and if they had suspects or a group in mind, you don't run on to camera and tell them we are on to them. Again, I'm just making assumptions as I wasn't there and don't know anything... Like the rest of us. It just seems like this video thing was and is blown way out of proportion.

 

[Freewill]

Let it begin, the end. The end of the Benghazi story. The left doesn't give a crap and the right has pretty much talked it out. It is disgusting the LIE(s) that occurred to ensure an election win. Obama and Mrs. Tuzla have no shame.

The Benghazi Lie in Black and White

From the very first page it is clear that the Weekly Standard continues to distort reality for the RWNJ's. The selective excerpt for her original statement confirm this.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

When she said:

I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.

This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.

so your point is what? That they paraphrased the exact words she said? That nothing they posted changed what she said? There is no distortion. It is clear she is blaming it on a video. The rest is just fluff BS that is what they cut out.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

Is this really the statement that you all think blames the video?? I haven't cared enough to really look into the bluster... But if this is what you got then it is not even close.

My grandson held up a coat and asked me if it were gray or blue. It looked like both to me but he wanted me to decide to settle the argument with his Mom. I am pretty much a primary color person. So I told him I could see both.

The argument over what she says is pretty much the same thing. You are going to see what you see and I am going to see what I see.

In regards to the provided quotes. There is no mention of any other reason for the attack other than the "inflammatory material" that "some" blame. Who is the "some" she refers? What I read is that she is saying, without agreeing, that "some", Obama?, blame the violence on the video but that video isn't justification. I am not sure how you see it as any other color.

That's a good analogy, I like it... I'm interpreting her quote saying that "some justify the violence"... By talking about people that support the terror attack. It's a degradation of those that were and are coming after us, and those who support the violence. It wasn't a detailed explanation of what happened... I'm sure they were in the heat of investigating all of that and if they had suspects or a group in mind, you don't run on to camera and tell them we are on to them. Again, I'm just making assumptions as I wasn't there and don't know anything... Like the rest of us. It just seems like this video thing was and is blown way out of proportion.

It wasn't that long ago, believe it or not I can still remember things that happened a few years ago. :^D.

I remember the administration, Obama, Mrs. Tulza and Rice saying for days it was about a video. In my opinion, they didn't want the world knowing that they got our gay ambassador to Libya killed because they bomb the crap out of Libya. That would look badly before an election.

I look at it this way. If they were not sure of the what was the cause why say anything? Why tell the parents days after that they would get the maker of the video? You can mull that over or just call the parents liars, as has Mrs. Tuzla. To call the parents liar seems silly since they have no reason to lie.

 

[BlindBoo]

Let it begin, the end. The end of the Benghazi story. The left doesn't give a crap and the right has pretty much talked it out. It is disgusting the LIE(s) that occurred to ensure an election win. Obama and Mrs. Tuzla have no shame.

The Benghazi Lie in Black and White

From the very first page it is clear that the Weekly Standard continues to distort reality for the RWNJ's. The selective excerpt for her original statement confirm this.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

When she said:

I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.

This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.

so your point is what? That they paraphrased the exact words she said? That nothing they posted changed what she said? There is no distortion. It is clear she is blaming it on a video. The rest is just fluff BS that is what they cut out.

It was a hack job because the Weekly Standard is part of the Echo-Chamber. That's why they left out the other things she said in that short statement. What is clear is that she said "Some have sought to justify......" . And of course some did.

 

[Freewill]

Let it begin, the end. The end of the Benghazi story. The left doesn't give a crap and the right has pretty much talked it out. It is disgusting the LIE(s) that occurred to ensure an election win. Obama and Mrs. Tuzla have no shame.

The Benghazi Lie in Black and White

From the very first page it is clear that the Weekly Standard continues to distort reality for the RWNJ's. The selective excerpt for her original statement confirm this.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

When she said:

I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.

This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.

so your point is what? That they paraphrased the exact words she said? That nothing they posted changed what she said? There is no distortion. It is clear she is blaming it on a video. The rest is just fluff BS that is what they cut out.

It was a hack job because the Weekly Standard is part of the Echo-Chamber. That's why they left out the other things she said in that short statement. What is clear is that she said "Some have sought to justify......" . And of course some did.

you would have a valid point if, somewhere Mrs. Tuzla had said, "some have sought to justify the violance over a video, but we do not know that cause of the riot, at this point we can only collect the facts and then we may know the motive."

But she didn't. Her implication is quite clear. Considering what she told the parents of those killed, Mrs Tuzla certainly did blame it on a video, when she knew otherwise.

 

[BlindBoo]

Let it begin, the end. The end of the Benghazi story. The left doesn't give a crap and the right has pretty much talked it out. It is disgusting the LIE(s) that occurred to ensure an election win. Obama and Mrs. Tuzla have no shame.

The Benghazi Lie in Black and White

From the very first page it is clear that the Weekly Standard continues to distort reality for the RWNJ's. The selective excerpt for her original statement confirm this.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

When she said:

I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.

This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.

so your point is what? That they paraphrased the exact words she said? That nothing they posted changed what she said? There is no distortion. It is clear she is blaming it on a video. The rest is just fluff BS that is what they cut out.

It was a hack job because the Weekly Standard is part of the Echo-Chamber. That's why they left out the other things she said in that short statement. What is clear is that she said "Some have sought to justify......" . And of course some did.

you would have a valid point if, somewhere Mrs. Tuzla had said, "some have sought to justify the violance over a video, but we do not know that cause of the riot, at this point we can only collect the facts and then we may know the motive."

But she didn't. Her implication is quite clear. Considering what she told the parents of those killed, Mrs Tuzla certainly did blame it on a video, when she knew otherwise.

This statement was released the night of the 11th. With the Cairo Rioters blaming the video for their actions, it was simple not unreasonable to assume that more violent riots were to come. Considering how the Muslims reacted to a few cartoons not unreasonable at all.

So when she becomes President will you call her President Tuzla?

 

[Slade3200]

From the very first page it is clear that the Weekly Standard continues to distort reality for the RWNJ's. The selective excerpt for her original statement confirm this.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

When she said:

I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.

This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.

so your point is what? That they paraphrased the exact words she said? That nothing they posted changed what she said? There is no distortion. It is clear she is blaming it on a video. The rest is just fluff BS that is what they cut out.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

Is this really the statement that you all think blames the video?? I haven't cared enough to really look into the bluster... But if this is what you got then it is not even close.

My grandson held up a coat and asked me if it were gray or blue. It looked like both to me but he wanted me to decide to settle the argument with his Mom. I am pretty much a primary color person. So I told him I could see both.

The argument over what she says is pretty much the same thing. You are going to see what you see and I am going to see what I see.

In regards to the provided quotes. There is no mention of any other reason for the attack other than the "inflammatory material" that "some" blame. Who is the "some" she refers? What I read is that she is saying, without agreeing, that "some", Obama?, blame the violence on the video but that video isn't justification. I am not sure how you see it as any other color.

That's a good analogy, I like it... I'm interpreting her quote saying that "some justify the violence"... By talking about people that support the terror attack. It's a degradation of those that were and are coming after us, and those who support the violence. It wasn't a detailed explanation of what happened... I'm sure they were in the heat of investigating all of that and if they had suspects or a group in mind, you don't run on to camera and tell them we are on to them. Again, I'm just making assumptions as I wasn't there and don't know anything... Like the rest of us. It just seems like this video thing was and is blown way out of proportion.

It wasn't that long ago, believe it or not I can still remember things that happened a few years ago. :^D.

I remember the administration, Obama, Mrs. Tulza and Rice saying for days it was about a video. In my opinion, they didn't want the world knowing that they got our gay ambassador to Libya killed because they bomb the crap out of Libya. That would look badly before an election.

I look at it this way. If they were not sure of the what was the cause why say anything? Why tell the parents days after that they would get the maker of the video? You can mull that over or just call the parents liars, as has Mrs. Tuzla. To call the parents liar seems silly since they have no reason to lie.

I just don't think they would be nieve enough to try and lie or cover up what obviously is going to be revealed to the world. It makes no sense and their opponents took full advantage trying to spin it into a cover up. I didn't like that. And I still don't like it. There was a video, the video instigated riots in other places around the world. Although Libya was an organized attack it still may have been instigated that day by the video. It isn't far fetched and it isnt really that significant of a thing or statement. At times when we should be rallying together against this kind of violence, it's all finger pointing and knit picking. It's just sad how our politics is devolving. Both parties are responsible plus the media.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Chris Stevens’s Family: Don’t Blame Hillary Clinton for Benghazi - The New Yorker

 

[Siete]

The Benghazi Lie in Black and White


the truth, published in color yesterday, is the reason RW's can't see it.

 

[chikenwing]

Let it begin, the end. The end of the Benghazi story. The left doesn't give a crap and the right has pretty much talked it out. It is disgusting the LIE(s) that occurred to ensure an election win. Obama and Mrs. Tuzla have no shame.

The Benghazi Lie in Black and White

From the very first page it is clear that the Weekly Standard continues to distort reality for the RWNJ's. The selective excerpt for her original statement confirm this.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

When she said:

I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.

This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.

so your point is what? That they paraphrased the exact words she said? That nothing they posted changed what she said? There is no distortion. It is clear she is blaming it on a video. The rest is just fluff BS that is what they cut out.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

Is this really the statement that you all think blames the video?? I haven't cared enough to really look into the bluster... But if this is what you got then it is not even close.

No problem Rice repeated that it was over a video how many times?
obama did the same thing for a week.

They ran with the video lie until people started asking questions,snd the spin doctor's went to work

National news shows , recorded yet the I can't see the truth though my partisan goggles ignore a huge lie to help obama get reelected.

 

[Siete]

Let it begin, the end. The end of the Benghazi story. The left doesn't give a crap and the right has pretty much talked it out. It is disgusting the LIE(s) that occurred to ensure an election win. Obama and Mrs. Tuzla have no shame.

The Benghazi Lie in Black and White

From the very first page it is clear that the Weekly Standard continues to distort reality for the RWNJ's. The selective excerpt for her original statement confirm this.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

When she said:

I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.

This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.

so your point is what? That they paraphrased the exact words she said? That nothing they posted changed what she said? There is no distortion. It is clear she is blaming it on a video. The rest is just fluff BS that is what they cut out.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

Is this really the statement that you all think blames the video?? I haven't cared enough to really look into the bluster... But if this is what you got then it is not even close.

No problem Rice repeated that it was over a video how many times?
obama did the same thing for a week.

They ran with the video lie until people started asking questions,snd the spin doctor's went to work

National news shows , recorded yet the I can't see the truth though my partisan goggles ignore a huge lie to help obama get reelected.

````````````````
pretty sure he won't be elected again.. maybe though

 

[Freewill]

Let it begin, the end. The end of the Benghazi story. The left doesn't give a crap and the right has pretty much talked it out. It is disgusting the LIE(s) that occurred to ensure an election win. Obama and Mrs. Tuzla have no shame.

The Benghazi Lie in Black and White

From the very first page it is clear that the Weekly Standard continues to distort reality for the RWNJ's. The selective excerpt for her original statement confirm this.

"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."

When she said:

I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.

This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.

so your point is what? That they paraphrased the exact words she said? That nothing they posted changed what she said? There is no distortion. It is clear she is blaming it on a video. The rest is just fluff BS that is what they cut out.

It was a hack job because the Weekly Standard is part of the Echo-Chamber. That's why they left out the other things she said in that short statement. What is clear is that she said "Some have sought to justify......" . And of course some did.

you would have a valid point if, somewhere Mrs. Tuzla had said, "some have sought to justify the violance over a video, but we do not know that cause of the riot, at this point we can only collect the facts and then we may know the motive."

But she didn't. Her implication is quite clear. Considering what she told the parents of those killed, Mrs Tuzla certainly did blame it on a video, when she knew otherwise.

This statement was released the night of the 11th. With the Cairo Rioters blaming the video for their actions, it was simple not unreasonable to assume that more violent riots were to come. Considering how the Muslims reacted to a few cartoons not unreasonable at all.

So when she becomes President will you call her President Tuzla?

There was one protest on 9/11 and the was in Egypt. Many followed but who knows if most of those were not because of the rhetoric of the administration?

I'll call her a lot more then Mrs. Tuzla if she is tragically elected.

I am never quite sure of what the left is so in love with Mrs. Tuzla.

She called urban blacks, super predators that needed brought to heel, her heel I assume.

She supported NAFTA and now lies about it.

She outright lied about sniper fire, that alone is enough to disqualify her.

She voted for the Iraq war and support for it on every vote.

there is lots more but you have already made the decision to ignore anything and everything about Mrs. Tuzla.