The "Beautiful" Budget bill in Congress right now (pushed by both Trump and Johnson), would raise National debt by $4 Trillion, if passed!

[Mashmont]

Trump's actions of cutting spending by getting rid of many of the department's presently in place at the beginning of 2025, was supposed to get rid of much of the debt that U.S. has amassed over the past 60 years. Nonetheless and if passed, the present budget bill that Johnson has put together and that Trump supports, will add to the U.S debt by $4 Trillion. In addition, it takes away from the poor (cuts Medicaid for 7.6 to 10.3 million) and gives more money to the rich.

AI Overview

The House budget resolution being considered in Congress proposes a $4 trillion increase to the debt limit, according to PBS and McGuireWoods Consulting. This is intended to allow the Treasury to continue paying bills and avoid a federal debt default. The bill also includes provisions for tax cuts and potential cuts in other areas to offset the cost, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

AI Overview

The potential impact of President Trump's budget bill on Medicaid enrollment is significant, with estimates varying between 7.6 and 10.3 million people potentially losing coverage by 2034 if the proposed cuts and reforms are enacted.

Is this what Americans need and want?


.

So you agree Trump should cut even MORE government programs. Welcome aboard!!

 

[The Duke]

Trump's actions of cutting spending by getting rid of many of the department's presently in place at the beginning of 2025, was supposed to get rid of much of the debt that U.S. has amassed over the past 60 years. Nonetheless and if passed, the present budget bill that Johnson has put together and that Trump supports, will add to the U.S debt by $4 Trillion. In addition, it takes away from the poor (cuts Medicaid for 7.6 to 10.3 million) and gives more money to the rich.

AI Overview

The House budget resolution being considered in Congress proposes a $4 trillion increase to the debt limit, according to PBS and McGuireWoods Consulting. This is intended to allow the Treasury to continue paying bills and avoid a federal debt default. The bill also includes provisions for tax cuts and potential cuts in other areas to offset the cost, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

AI Overview

The potential impact of President Trump's budget bill on Medicaid enrollment is significant, with estimates varying between 7.6 and 10.3 million people potentially losing coverage by 2034 if the proposed cuts and reforms are enacted.

Is this what Americans need and want?


.

If NOT passed, everyone's taxes go up 65%, dickweed.

 

[schmidlap]

We have to assume that you're lying....because anything that helps the economy is bad.....according to you leftists.

The best way to improve the economy is make sure that we the people can keep more of our money.

And because we keep more of OUR MONEY we end up spending more of OUR MONEY, which tends to improve the GDP.

And Trump wants to cut Medicaid to people who aren't doing anything but taking drugs and watching TV......and illegals that are collecting Medicaid benefits when they shouldn't be.

It also seems that much of the spending that's been going on is being cut by this bill....but you folks on the left don't want to cut spending because it would improve the economy.

Whiny Trumpbots aside, the empirical data is irrefutable:

From the beginning of Trump’s presidency in 2017 to its end in 2021, the national debt increased by 40.43%, about $8.18 trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.​

​

​

"I'm the king of debt!"​

What Trump’s 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Would Do to National Debt​

Nonpartisan research groups studying the proposal have estimated that it would add more than $2.5 trillion to the federal debt—currently at an all-time high of $36.8 trillion—over the next decade. ​

​

Army estimates that Trump's birthday parade could cost $16 Million in damage to Washington Streets​

​

 

[mudwhistle]

Whiny Trumpbots aside, the empirical data is irrefutable:

From the beginning of Trump’s presidency in 2017 to its end in 2021, the national debt increased by 40.43%, about $8.18 trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.​

​

View attachment 1117688​

"I'm the king of debt!"​

What Trump’s 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Would Do to National Debt​

Nonpartisan research groups studying the proposal have estimated that it would add more than $2.5 trillion to the federal debt—currently at an all-time high of $36.8 trillion—over the next decade. ​

​

Army estimates that Trump's birthday paradecould cost $16 Million​

View attachment 1117693View attachment 1117700​

Democrat presidents can spend all they want.....and they did. They also double the costs of living while in office.

Republican presidents can't spend anything. Congress fights them tooth and nail on any spending.
But when they do get to sign any spending into law, the Nancy Pelosis and Chuck Schumers in congress always said it wasn't enough spending.

Just wanted to set the record straight.

 

[Mac1958]

Whiny Trumpbots aside, the empirical data is irrefutable:

Limbaugh convinced them that having an (R) after their name made them macroeconomic authorities. The fact is, they simply don't know what they're talking about.

Aggressive ignorance, the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

 

[schmidlap]

Democrat presidents can spend all they want.....and they did. They also double the costs of living while in office.

Republican presidents can't spend anything. Congress fights them tooth and nail on any spending.
But when they do get sign any spending into law, Nancy Pelosi always said it wasn't enough spending.

Just wanted to set that record straight.

I understand your inability to honestly discuss Trump's budget and the expert non-partisan analysis of it. Your desperate need to concoct diversions is quite blatant.

 

[mudwhistle]

Limbaugh convinced them that having an (R) after their name made them macroeconomic authorities. The fact is, they simply don't know what they're talking about.

Aggressive ignorance, the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

The (R) usually goes before the name.

FYI, most people don't hold a degree in economics, so they are usually a little weak on the details.

 

[schmidlap]

Limbaugh convinced them that having an (R) after their name made them macroeconomic authorities. The fact is, they simply don't know what they're talking about.

Aggressive ignorance, the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

Diehard trumpbots spew articles of faith, not empirical data.

 

[mudwhistle]

I understand your inability to honestly discuss Trump's budget and the expert non-partisan analysis of it. Your desperate need to concoct diversions is quite blatant.

View attachment 1117706​

Uh.......when has congress ever passed one of Trump's budgets exactly the way he wrote it, instead of one CR after another?

NEVER.

Every budget produced by congress is swathered with pork and earmarks. A few tax cuts to keep us happy with the usual spending going to their special interest groups.

 

[mudwhistle]

Diehard trumpbots spew articles of faith, not empirical data.

Yeah.....fcking Trumpsters are so stooooooopid.

 

[schmidlap]

Uh.......when has congress ever passed one of Trump's budgets exactly the way he wrote it, instead of one CR after another?

NEVER.

Why do you need to divert to what is true of every budget ever submitted by every president?

Every budget produced by congress is swathered with pork and earmarks. A few tax cuts to keep us happy with the usual spending going to their special interest groups.

Generalizations aside, can you address Trump's budget and the non-partisan analysis of it?

Trump added $8.4 trillion to the national debt​

 

[mudwhistle]

Why do you need to divert to what is true of every budget ever submitted by every president?

Generalizations aside, can you address Trump's budget and the non-partisan analysis of it?

Trump added $8.4 trillion to the national debt​

I'm just a realist hoping one of these days you'll get real.

 

[schmidlap]

I'm just a realist hoping one of these days you'll get real.

If you are unable to deal with Trump's "big, beautiful, bill," so be it.

Trump’s “big, beautiful” tax-and-spending bill could come with a big, ugly cost, economists warn.​

​

Nonpartisan research groups studying the proposal have estimated that it would add more than $2.5 trillion to the federal debt—currently at an all-time high of $36.8 trillion—over the next decade. ​

​

The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates​

that the House bill in its current form will increase debt by $3.3 trillion through 2034, and increase annual deficits by $2.9 trillion to $3.3 trillion.​

​

​

Trump faces the challenge of convincing Republican senators, global investors, voters and even Elon Musk that he won't bury the federal government in debt with his multitrillion-dollar tax breaks package.​

​

The response so far from financial markets has been skeptical as Trump seems unable to trim deficits as promised...​

​

​

MSN

​

 

[mudwhistle]

If you are unable to deal with Trump's "big, beautiful, bill," so be it.

Trump’s “big, beautiful” tax-and-spending bill could come with a big, ugly cost, economists warn.​

​

Nonpartisan research groups studying the proposal have estimated that it would add more than $2.5 trillion to the federal debt—currently at an all-time high of $36.8 trillion—over the next decade. ​

​

The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates​

that the House bill in its current form will increase debt by $3.3 trillion through 2034, and increase annual deficits by $2.9 trillion to $3.3 trillion.​

Now all you have to do is prove that the shit-bill that congress created was word for word what Trump wanted.

Nonpartisan doesn't mean that Trump wrote the thing.

It just means that both the GOP and the Dems helped write that POS.


Problem with so many is that they think that misleading quotes are accurate, and exactly what they're led to believe it means.

 

[Nostra]

Whiny Trumpbots aside, the empirical data is irrefutable:

From the beginning of Trump’s presidency in 2017 to its end in 2021, the national debt increased by 40.43%, about $8.18 trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.​

​

View attachment 1117688​

"I'm the king of debt!"​

What Trump’s 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Would Do to National Debt​

Nonpartisan research groups studying the proposal have estimated that it would add more than $2.5 trillion to the federal debt—currently at an all-time high of $36.8 trillion—over the next decade. ​

​

Army estimates that Trump's birthday parade could cost $16 Million in damage to Washington Streets​

View attachment 1117693View attachment 1117700​

$2.5 trillion.
If they just enact the DOGE cuts so far that would save $1.7 trillion. I’m sure they can make up,the difference over the next 3.5 years.

 

[schmidlap]

$2.5 trillion.
If they just enact the DOGE cuts so far that would save $1.7 trillion. I’m sure they can make up,the difference over the next 3.5 years.

Your faith is great.

 

[Nostra]

Your faith is great.

What part of “if” confuses you, Shitlips?

 

[schmidlap]

Now all you have to do is prove that the shit-bill that congress created was word for word what Trump wanted.

Nonpartisan doesn't mean that Trump wrote the thing.

It just means that both the GOP and the Dems helped write that POS.


Problem with so many is that they think that misleading quotes are accurate, and exactly what they're led to believe it means.

If you need to absolve the Blowhard his the "big, beautiful bill" or whatever version of it he signs, I understand why you refuse to confront it.

 

[mudwhistle]

If you need to absolve the Blowhard his the "big, beautiful bill" or whatever version of it he signs, I understand why you refuse to confront it.

I hate to remind your dumb ass, but we're not at that point yet.

What we keep hearing from the usual suspects is negativity and non-productive wishful thinking.

Just about every criticism coming from leftists and Establishment pukes, is opinion based only.

 

[schmidlap]

I hate to remind your dumb ass, but we're not at that point yet.

What we keep hearing from the usual suspects is negativity and non-productive wishful thinking.

Just about every criticism coming from leftists and Establishment pukes, is opinion based only.

If you need to pretend that the Congressional Budget Office is "leftist," your perversion is painfully obvious.

The Blowhard's "Big, Beautiful Bill", as submitted to Congress would bloat the national debt by
more than $2.5 trillion, currently at an all-time high of $36.8 trillion—over the next decade.

"I'm the king of debt!"!"​