Except that the Jews aren’t in Palestine, snowflake. They are in Israel. The land granted to them by the U.N. - that one world order organization that your dumb ass wanted.

You always fantasize about the US surrendering its sovereignty but then piss and moan like a little bitch whenever the One World Order acts. I guess that’s what makes you a low-IQ leftist.

Actually, the UN has realized its mistake.

The ZIONIST ENTITY is an illegal state, built on the theft of other people's land. That anyone other than the people who lived there signed off on it is irrelevant, Poodle.
 
Snowflake, they are the only stabilizing force in the Middle East (not to mention the only ally of the US). It would be about the worst thing imaginable to lose Israel.

How are they a stabilizing influence? The one thing the Arab world agrees on is how much they hate the Zionist Entity on their land. Without the Zionist Entity, they would go back to their tribal concerns.

Especially considering when America elects a Dumbocrat, Israel is the only nation in the world keeping us safe from Muslims. When Obama was giving Mahmoud Ahmadinejad blowjobs, Israel was killing their nuclear scientists.

Uh, okay, how does that make us "safer". Nuclear Weapons are 80 year old technology. Murdering their citizens makes them want a bomb more, not less.

Here's how we make ourselves safe from the Scary Muslims.

Stop invading their countries
Stop stealing their oil
Stop propping up corrupt government (Saddam, the Shah, the Saudi Royals, etc.)
Stop supporting the Zionist Entity.

Then they won't have a problem with us.
 
srael was given to the Jews by God. Palestinian Nazis came from Arabia they should go back there.

Um, so if they were God's special people, why does God keep letting them get genocided? God seems like a pretty neglectful pet owner. Someone needs to call the Cosmic SPCA.

Actually, it's a little worse than that. God's relationship with his people mostly seems to be abusive.

I mean, if God actually existed, which thankfully he doesn't.
You sound like an antisemite Nazi. There are Jewish texts on suffering.Suffering

The word "Semitic" means of an Arab language group.
It does NOT mean Jewish, even though Hebrew is of an Arab language group.
All those who speak any Arab language group natively are Semitic, so Omar and Tlaib are Semitic.
There are several branches of Semitic languages. Jewish Hebrew is one, Arabic is another, Maltese is one, Akkaddian was one, Aramaic was another.

Wrong.
All the branches of the original Arab language group are still part of the Arab language group.
The fact there are more modern branches does not change the original source.
The word Semitic mean of Arab origins and refers to language.
It in no way means Jewish, and certainly not Ashkenazi Jews who speak the Germanic Yiddish as their native language.

Since Hasidic Jews are Arab, they are also Semitic, so you can say that a person how hates Arabs or Hasidic Jews is anti-Semitic, but you can never say an Arab is anti-Semitic, and hating an Askenazi Jew does not make the person anti-Semitic.

wrong again----the word "SEMITIC" does not come close to meaning "ARAB" It refers to a large group of languages emanating from a large area----afro-asiatic.
Your explanation of YIDDISH is even more idiotic. Yiddish is a FUSION of the Indo-european language
HIGH GERMAN and Hebrew. It arose amongst Jews who had migrated to that area during the Roman conquests. Hebrew is a Semitic language. It is not arabic.

Wrong.
The word Semitic ONLY refers to the Arab language group, which includes, Hebrew, Akkadians, Phoenicians, Amorites, Canaanites, Chaldeans, etc., as well as more modern Arabs.

And you seem to know even less about Yiddish.
It most certainly is of Germanic origins.
It contains no significant Hebrew at all, and contains far more Slavic than Hebrew.
read my note again----it is entirely correct. "ARAB LANGUAGE GROUP" is not a "thing"
SEMITIC LANGUAGE GROUP is a thing. Try not to tell a chaldean that he is AN ARAB.
That garbage has come and gone with the stench of BAATHISM. Yiddish is written using
the Hebrew alphabet-----it certainly LOOKS LIKE HEBREW ---but its common or profane vocabulary is slavic and german -----words like SHIT AND WHORE AND PIG. More sublime words and concepts are Hebrew
 
Yiddish is nothing even remotely like Hebrew, and is totally of Germanic origins, not from the Mideast at all.

And English is indigenous to nowhere but a tiny obscure island off the coast of Europe.

Your point?

Wrong.
English is of Anglo Saxon origins, with come Celt and Jute thrown in, and is totally from the mainland Europe.
You can trace the migration of tribes through the language they split into.
And it is clear Yiddish did not come from the Mideast at all.
In fact----it is very clear that Yiddish came from the Mideast just as it is clear that LADINO came from the Mideast and the Hebraic form of FARSI (believe it or not----there is an hebraic form of Farsi. And then there is the Hebraic form of ARAMAIC ----------are you stupid enough to claim that the same alphabet JUST CAME TO BE over most of the world MAGICALLY?
 
Stop supporting the Zionist Entity.

It would just kill you to refer to Israel by it's proper name. You could get a job in an Arab Country using a marker pen to cover up any mention of the name Israel in foreign press.
 
The ZIONIST ENTITY is an illegal state

India and Pakistan were created in exactly the same way a year before Israel. They were a former British colony, partitioned into separate states which declared themselves to be independent states. Are they illegal states too? Are you over in the India / Pakistan threat spewing hate at them?

Or .... as I suspect ... this is all about Jews, isn't it?
 
I hope that you are wrong.

For goodness' sake, let the Jewish people live in that tiny piece of land.

Haven't they suffered enough throughout history?

Okay. by that logic, we should pay black people in this country reparations...

I'd have no problem giving the Jews a bit of land. Let them have some miserable state in the western US that nobody live in.

Thank you for your opinion.

IMHO, there is a bit of a difference: the Jewish people, by and large, have been a positive and constructive element in any society.


Have a nice day!
 
Last edited:
That anyone other than the people who lived there signed off on it is irrelevant, Poodle.
All evidence to the contrary, little kitty. :laugh:

You wanted a One World Order, you got it. The UN gave the Jews Israel and they are absolutely, unequivocally recognized world-wide. This is what happens when nations surrender their sovereignty.

You’re the only one I know dumb enough to complain about getting exactly what you ignorantly desired.
 
It would just kill you to refer to Israel by it's proper name. You could get a job in an Arab Country using a marker pen to cover up any mention of the name Israel in foreign press.

It's proper name is "The Zionist Entity"


It's very childish, isn't it?

Naw, man, Childish is supporting a Zionist Apartheid State because you hate Arabs irrationally. And you think Jesus is going to come back.

All evidence to the contrary, little kitty. :laugh:

You wanted a One World Order, you got it. The UN gave the Jews Israel and they are absolutely, unequivocally recognized world-wide. This is what happens when nations surrender their sovereignty.

You’re the only one I know dumb enough to complain about getting exactly what you ignorantly desired.

Where did I say I wanted one world order? Zionism is a bad idea of the old century. It was the failing British Empire's attempt to do Colonialism by Proxie (i.e. no Brit wanted to live there, or anywhere else their empire was failing in the 1940's).

Of course, the problem was the British promised that land to the Arabs if they revolted against the Turks in WWI. Then they promised the land to the Jews in the hope the Jews would keep Russia in the war with Germany. It was kind of fucked up, Poodle.

India and Pakistan were created in exactly the same way a year before Israel. They were a former British colony, partitioned into separate states which declared themselves to be independent states. Are they illegal states too? Are you over in the India / Pakistan threat spewing hate at them?

Or .... as I suspect ... this is all about Jews, isn't it?

The Indians and Pakistanis didn't have to be imported to create those nations. They had lived their for centuries before that.

As opposed to the Zionist Entity, where they had to import a bunch of people from Europe to colonize it.

India has a different problem, of course, is that they are a loose federation of nations, of Tamils and Gujarats and Punjabs. I would be very surprised if it continues in it's present form. The fact Modi is scapegoating Muslims in the country is going to be a real problem in the future.

As for Pakistan, it started as a largely artificial designation of "Let's call all the Muslim Parts Pakistan"... until East Pakistan decided they would rather be Bangladesh.
 
The Indians and Pakistanis didn't have to be imported to create those nations.

In fact, the 1947 partition saw the displacement of millions (20 million from some estimates) of Hindus from what became Pakistan and Muslims from what remained of India. Resulting in up to 2 million deaths.

Like Israel, India and Pakistan have had an ongoing, and bloody conflict for 70 + years over the disputed borders.

Today, India (like Israel) retains a 25% Muslim population while Pakistan contains 0% Hindus.

The parallels are striking ... except the Indian partition casualties are an order of magnitude higher than the Israeli / Palestinian conflict ... with 1/1,000,000 of the worlds outrage and attention.
 
srael was given to the Jews by God. Palestinian Nazis came from Arabia they should go back there.

Um, so if they were God's special people, why does God keep letting them get genocided? God seems like a pretty neglectful pet owner. Someone needs to call the Cosmic SPCA.

Actually, it's a little worse than that. God's relationship with his people mostly seems to be abusive.

I mean, if God actually existed, which thankfully he doesn't.
You sound like an antisemite Nazi. There are Jewish texts on suffering.Suffering

The word "Semitic" means of an Arab language group.
It does NOT mean Jewish, even though Hebrew is of an Arab language group.
All those who speak any Arab language group natively are Semitic, so Omar and Tlaib are Semitic.
There are several branches of Semitic languages. Jewish Hebrew is one, Arabic is another, Maltese is one, Akkaddian was one, Aramaic was another.

Wrong.
All the branches of the original Arab language group are still part of the Arab language group.
The fact there are more modern branches does not change the original source.
The word Semitic mean of Arab origins and refers to language.
It in no way means Jewish, and certainly not Ashkenazi Jews who speak the Germanic Yiddish as their native language.

Since Hasidic Jews are Arab, they are also Semitic, so you can say that a person how hates Arabs or Hasidic Jews is anti-Semitic, but you can never say an Arab is anti-Semitic, and hating an Askenazi Jew does not make the person anti-Semitic.

wrong again----the word "SEMITIC" does not come close to meaning "ARAB" It refers to a large group of languages emanating from a large area----afro-asiatic.
Your explanation of YIDDISH is even more idiotic. Yiddish is a FUSION of the Indo-european language
HIGH GERMAN and Hebrew. It arose amongst Jews who had migrated to that area during the Roman conquests. Hebrew is a Semitic language. It is not arabic.

Wrong.
The word Semitic ONLY refers to the Arab language group, which includes, Hebrew, Akkadians, Phoenicians, Amorites, Canaanites, Chaldeans, etc., as well as more modern Arabs.

And you seem to know even less about Yiddish.
It most certainly is of Germanic origins.
It contains no significant Hebrew at all, and contains far more Slavic than Hebrew.
read my note again----it is entirely correct. "ARAB LANGUAGE GROUP" is not a "thing"
SEMITIC LANGUAGE GROUP is a thing. Try not to tell a chaldean that he is AN ARAB.
That garbage has come and gone with the stench of BAATHISM. Yiddish is written using
the Hebrew alphabet-----it certainly LOOKS LIKE HEBREW ---but its common or profane vocabulary is slavic and german -----words like SHIT AND WHORE AND PIG. More sublime words and concepts are Hebrew

You don't know what an Arab is.
A Chaldean most certainly IS an Arab, and so is a Hebrew.
Semitic means Arab.
It does not mean Arabic, as that is a more modern Arab language.
Arabs came from Africa by way of the Levant, they did not come from the Arabian Peninsula.
Baathism is totally modern 20th century invention and irrelevant.

As for the "Hebrew alphabet", Hebrew historically had no written script at all until around 100 BC, and then essentially the Phoenician script of Aramaic was borrowed. There really is no independent Hebrew alphabet.

{...
The Hebrew alphabet, known variously by scholars as the Ktav Ashuri, Jewish script, square script and block script, is an abjad script used in the writing of the Hebrew language and other Jewish languages, most notably Yiddish, Judeo-Spanish, Judeo-Arabic, and Judeo-Persian. It is an offshoot of the Imperial Aramaic alphabet, which flourished during the Achaemenid Empire and which itself derives from the Phoenician alphabet.
...}

And once again, there can be no doubt that Phoenician and Aramaic are of Arab origins.
 
Yiddish is nothing even remotely like Hebrew, and is totally of Germanic origins, not from the Mideast at all.

And English is indigenous to nowhere but a tiny obscure island off the coast of Europe.

Your point?

Wrong.
English is of Anglo Saxon origins, with come Celt and Jute thrown in, and is totally from the mainland Europe.
You can trace the migration of tribes through the language they split into.
And it is clear Yiddish did not come from the Mideast at all.
In fact----it is very clear that Yiddish came from the Mideast just as it is clear that LADINO came from the Mideast and the Hebraic form of FARSI (believe it or not----there is an hebraic form of Farsi. And then there is the Hebraic form of ARAMAIC ----------are you stupid enough to claim that the same alphabet JUST CAME TO BE over most of the world MAGICALLY?

Not a single person thinks Yiddish came from the Mideast.
It has always been classified by everyone as Germanic.

The fact everyone now uses the Arab Phoenician alphabet is irrelevant.
It has nothing to do with Hebrew.
 
srael was given to the Jews by God. Palestinian Nazis came from Arabia they should go back there.

Um, so if they were God's special people, why does God keep letting them get genocided? God seems like a pretty neglectful pet owner. Someone needs to call the Cosmic SPCA.

Actually, it's a little worse than that. God's relationship with his people mostly seems to be abusive.

I mean, if God actually existed, which thankfully he doesn't.
You sound like an antisemite Nazi. There are Jewish texts on suffering.Suffering

The word "Semitic" means of an Arab language group.
It does NOT mean Jewish, even though Hebrew is of an Arab language group.
All those who speak any Arab language group natively are Semitic, so Omar and Tlaib are Semitic.
There are several branches of Semitic languages. Jewish Hebrew is one, Arabic is another, Maltese is one, Akkaddian was one, Aramaic was another.

Wrong.
All the branches of the original Arab language group are still part of the Arab language group.
The fact there are more modern branches does not change the original source.
The word Semitic mean of Arab origins and refers to language.
It in no way means Jewish, and certainly not Ashkenazi Jews who speak the Germanic Yiddish as their native language.

Since Hasidic Jews are Arab, they are also Semitic, so you can say that a person how hates Arabs or Hasidic Jews is anti-Semitic, but you can never say an Arab is anti-Semitic, and hating an Askenazi Jew does not make the person anti-Semitic.

wrong again----the word "SEMITIC" does not come close to meaning "ARAB" It refers to a large group of languages emanating from a large area----afro-asiatic.
Your explanation of YIDDISH is even more idiotic. Yiddish is a FUSION of the Indo-european language
HIGH GERMAN and Hebrew. It arose amongst Jews who had migrated to that area during the Roman conquests. Hebrew is a Semitic language. It is not arabic.

Wrong.
The word Semitic ONLY refers to the Arab language group, which includes, Hebrew, Akkadians, Phoenicians, Amorites, Canaanites, Chaldeans, etc., as well as more modern Arabs.

And you seem to know even less about Yiddish.
It most certainly is of Germanic origins.
It contains no significant Hebrew at all, and contains far more Slavic than Hebrew.
read my note again----it is entirely correct. "ARAB LANGUAGE GROUP" is not a "thing"
SEMITIC LANGUAGE GROUP is a thing. Try not to tell a chaldean that he is AN ARAB.
That garbage has come and gone with the stench of BAATHISM. Yiddish is written using
the Hebrew alphabet-----it certainly LOOKS LIKE HEBREW ---but its common or profane vocabulary is slavic and german -----words like SHIT AND WHORE AND PIG. More sublime words and concepts are Hebrew

You don't know what an Arab is.
A Chaldean most certainly IS an Arab, and so is a Hebrew.
Semitic means Arab.
It does not mean Arabic, as that is a more modern Arab language.
Arabs came from Africa by way of the Levant, they did not come from the Arabian Peninsula.
Baathism is totally modern 20th century invention and irrelevant.

As for the "Hebrew alphabet", Hebrew historically had no written script at all until around 100 BC, and then essentially the Phoenician script of Aramaic was borrowed. There really is no independent Hebrew alphabet.

{...
The Hebrew alphabet, known variously by scholars as the Ktav Ashuri, Jewish script, square script and block script, is an abjad script used in the writing of the Hebrew language and other Jewish languages, most notably Yiddish, Judeo-Spanish, Judeo-Arabic, and Judeo-Persian. It is an offshoot of the Imperial Aramaic alphabet, which flourished during the Achaemenid Empire and which itself derives from the Phoenician alphabet.
...}

And once again, there can be no doubt that Phoenician and Aramaic are of Arab origins.
oh----you are so confused------neither Phoenician nor Aramaic is of "ARAB" origins.
ARABIANS were COMPLETELY illiterate until approximately 300 AD when they cobbled an
arabic alphabet together from PERSIAN script--------and they REMAIN in the majority COMPLETELY illiterate------I have had to deal with "arabs" who were INCAPABLE of so much as
drawing on "X" on a consent for an X-ray right here in the USA----especially the women
 
Stop supporting the Zionist Entity.

It would just kill you to refer to Israel by it's proper name. You could get a job in an Arab Country using a marker pen to cover up any mention of the name Israel in foreign press.

The problem with calling it Israel is that the name is fake, borrowed from mythology.
The history of the name is not what people claim it is, and the people claiming to be Israelis are actually Russian and Polish refugees who do not belong in the Mideast.
Zionist is a better name because that identifies their political polarity, and how different they are than Jews.
 
The ZIONIST ENTITY is an illegal state

India and Pakistan were created in exactly the same way a year before Israel. They were a former British colony, partitioned into separate states which declared themselves to be independent states. Are they illegal states too? Are you over in the India / Pakistan threat spewing hate at them?

Or .... as I suspect ... this is all about Jews, isn't it?

Wrong.
First of all, the people of Pakistan and India have always been native, and it was their choice to separate.
The British had nothing to do with it.
Second is that Israel was illegally declared because it was done by a minority of illegal immigrants and not natives or the majority.
 
Yiddish is nothing even remotely like Hebrew, and is totally of Germanic origins, not from the Mideast at all.

And English is indigenous to nowhere but a tiny obscure island off the coast of Europe.

Your point?

Wrong.
English is of Anglo Saxon origins, with come Celt and Jute thrown in, and is totally from the mainland Europe.
You can trace the migration of tribes through the language they split into.
And it is clear Yiddish did not come from the Mideast at all.
In fact----it is very clear that Yiddish came from the Mideast just as it is clear that LADINO came from the Mideast and the Hebraic form of FARSI (believe it or not----there is an hebraic form of Farsi. And then there is the Hebraic form of ARAMAIC ----------are you stupid enough to claim that the same alphabet JUST CAME TO BE over most of the world MAGICALLY?

Not a single person thinks Yiddish came from the Mideast.
It has always been classified by everyone as Germanic.

The fact everyone now uses the Arab Phoenician alphabet is irrelevant.
It has nothing to do with Hebrew.
More confusion from the gutters of LONDON EAST END. There is no "PHOENICIAN ARAB"
alphabet---
 

Forum List

Back
Top