The anti-semite squad

[Rigby5]

I hope that you are wrong.

For goodness' sake, let the Jewish people live in that tiny piece of land.

Haven't they suffered enough throughout history?

Okay. by that logic, we should pay black people in this country reparations...

I'd have no problem giving the Jews a bit of land. Let them have some miserable state in the western US that nobody live in.

Thank you for your opinion.

IMHO, there is a bit of a difference: the Jewish people, by and large, have been a positive and constructive element in any society.


Have a nice day!

Sure, I am Jewish and can appreciate what Jews have accomplished.
But that does not mean Jews belong in the Mideast.
Nor should there ever any any country dedicated as a "homeland" for one specific religion, culture, or race.
That is always going to cause illegal discrimination.
Which is especially bad in Israel because the Jews are the minority.

 

[irosie91]

Stop supporting the Zionist Entity.

It would just kill you to refer to Israel by it's proper name. You could get a job in an Arab Country using a marker pen to cover up any mention of the name Israel in foreign press.

The problem with calling it Israel is that the name is fake, borrowed from mythology.
The history of the name is not what people claim it is, and the people claiming to be Israelis are actually Russian and Polish refugees who do not belong in the Mideast.
Zionist is a better name because that identifies their political polarity, and how different they are than Jews.

you do islamo nazi propaganda well-----GOEBBELS would be proud

 

[Rigby5]

Man does that explain a lot. Your anti-liberty, pro-totalitarianism runs deep from your German roots.

Yes, I really like civilization. Unlike Libertarian Children who think it happens by magic.

Nothing says “civilization” oppressive Nazi fascism

You still have this backwards.
Germany is the most Libertarian culture and the least centralized and fascist.
When they were cheated and forced to surrender through starvation war crimes in WWI, they jumped the shark.
They decided to become even more fascist than the Allies that abused them.
But that is not normal for Germans.
It was the opposite of what Germans normally are.
They just did it to get back at their abusers.
Fortunately they lost again, but were guided back on track, to their more Libertarian roots.

 

[Rigby5]

That anyone other than the people who lived there signed off on it is irrelevant, Poodle.

All evidence to the contrary, little kitty.

You wanted a One World Order, you got it. The UN gave the Jews Israel and they are absolutely, unequivocally recognized world-wide. This is what happens when nations surrender their sovereignty.

You’re the only one I know dumb enough to complain about getting exactly what you ignorantly desired.

No I don't think so.
Israel was created actually entirely by Truman and the US.
The rest of the world just went along because the US had all the power, money, and weapons.

If the UN was a "One World Order", it would be vastly superior to what it is now.
Now it is just a single unopposed and corrupt entity, the US, dictating.
A real "One World Order" would be vastly superior because the many different interests would neutralize any one corrupt power, and keep it balanced.
A real "One World Order" would have codified principle of rights, with blind justice and rule of law.
The UN has none of that, and instead does essentially whatever the whim of the US is.
Totally a dictatorship.

 

[Rigby5]

Actually, the UN has realized its mistake.

Hahahahaha! That is as idiotic as saying, “well actually the rapist realized his mistake”. The rape happened, dumb-shit. Doesn’t really matter what the rapist thinks.

Wrong.
The mistake was ongoing and continuing, not like a rape.
It is still going on now.
So it can and should be stopped.
It is not like a rape because if it were, then it would have been over 5 minutes later, in 1949.
Rapes are not ongoing and continual, like how Israel is abusing the Arabs.
That is more like slavery or apartheid.

 

[Rigby5]

The Indians and Pakistanis didn't have to be imported to create those nations.

In fact, the 1947 partition saw the displacement of millions (20 million from some estimates) of Hindus from what became Pakistan and Muslims from what remained of India. Resulting in up to 2 million deaths.

Like Israel, India and Pakistan have had an ongoing, and bloody conflict for 70 + years over the disputed borders.

Today, India (like Israel) retains a 25% Muslim population while Pakistan contains 0% Hindus.

The parallels are striking ... except the Indian partition casualties are an order of magnitude higher than the Israeli / Palestinian conflict ... with 1/1,000,000 of the worlds outrage and attention.

Wrong.
The Moslem invasion and conquest of India happened over 800 years ago, so could not be undone.
The Moslems there now are not the original invaders, so can't be punished for their abuses or made to leave.

{...
Muslim conquests in the Indian subcontinent mainly took place from the 12th to the 16th centuries, though earlier Muslim conquests include the invasions into modern Pakistan and the Umayyad campaigns in India, during the time of the Rajput kingdoms in the 8th century.
...}

The abuses of the native Palestinians by Israeli invaders is current, ongoing, and we do know who the criminals are, like Netanyahu.
And they can and should be punished, if not deported.

 

[Rigby5]

srael was given to the Jews by God. Palestinian Nazis came from Arabia they should go back there.

Um, so if they were God's special people, why does God keep letting them get genocided? God seems like a pretty neglectful pet owner. Someone needs to call the Cosmic SPCA.

Actually, it's a little worse than that. God's relationship with his people mostly seems to be abusive.

I mean, if God actually existed, which thankfully he doesn't.

You sound like an antisemite Nazi. There are Jewish texts on suffering.Suffering

The word "Semitic" means of an Arab language group.
It does NOT mean Jewish, even though Hebrew is of an Arab language group.
All those who speak any Arab language group natively are Semitic, so Omar and Tlaib are Semitic.

There are several branches of Semitic languages. Jewish Hebrew is one, Arabic is another, Maltese is one, Akkaddian was one, Aramaic was another.

Wrong.
All the branches of the original Arab language group are still part of the Arab language group.
The fact there are more modern branches does not change the original source.
The word Semitic mean of Arab origins and refers to language.
It in no way means Jewish, and certainly not Ashkenazi Jews who speak the Germanic Yiddish as their native language.

Since Hasidic Jews are Arab, they are also Semitic, so you can say that a person how hates Arabs or Hasidic Jews is anti-Semitic, but you can never say an Arab is anti-Semitic, and hating an Askenazi Jew does not make the person anti-Semitic.

wrong again----the word "SEMITIC" does not come close to meaning "ARAB" It refers to a large group of languages emanating from a large area----afro-asiatic.
Your explanation of YIDDISH is even more idiotic. Yiddish is a FUSION of the Indo-european language
HIGH GERMAN and Hebrew. It arose amongst Jews who had migrated to that area during the Roman conquests. Hebrew is a Semitic language. It is not arabic.

Wrong.
The word Semitic ONLY refers to the Arab language group, which includes, Hebrew, Akkadians, Phoenicians, Amorites, Canaanites, Chaldeans, etc., as well as more modern Arabs.

And you seem to know even less about Yiddish.
It most certainly is of Germanic origins.
It contains no significant Hebrew at all, and contains far more Slavic than Hebrew.

read my note again----it is entirely correct. "ARAB LANGUAGE GROUP" is not a "thing"
SEMITIC LANGUAGE GROUP is a thing. Try not to tell a chaldean that he is AN ARAB.
That garbage has come and gone with the stench of BAATHISM. Yiddish is written using
the Hebrew alphabet-----it certainly LOOKS LIKE HEBREW ---but its common or profane vocabulary is slavic and german -----words like SHIT AND WHORE AND PIG. More sublime words and concepts are Hebrew

You don't know what an Arab is.
A Chaldean most certainly IS an Arab, and so is a Hebrew.
Semitic means Arab.
It does not mean Arabic, as that is a more modern Arab language.
Arabs came from Africa by way of the Levant, they did not come from the Arabian Peninsula.
Baathism is totally modern 20th century invention and irrelevant.

As for the "Hebrew alphabet", Hebrew historically had no written script at all until around 100 BC, and then essentially the Phoenician script of Aramaic was borrowed. There really is no independent Hebrew alphabet.

{...
The Hebrew alphabet, known variously by scholars as the Ktav Ashuri, Jewish script, square script and block script, is an abjad script used in the writing of the Hebrew language and other Jewish languages, most notably Yiddish, Judeo-Spanish, Judeo-Arabic, and Judeo-Persian. It is an offshoot of the Imperial Aramaic alphabet, which flourished during the Achaemenid Empire and which itself derives from the Phoenician alphabet.
...}

And once again, there can be no doubt that Phoenician and Aramaic are of Arab origins.

oh----you are so confused------neither Phoenician nor Aramaic is of "ARAB" origins.
ARABIANS were COMPLETELY illiterate until approximately 300 AD when they cobbled an
arabic alphabet together from PERSIAN script--------and they REMAIN in the majority COMPLETELY illiterate------I have had to deal with "arabs" who were INCAPABLE of so much as
drawing on "X" on a consent for an X-ray right here in the USA----especially the women

That is again totally ignorant and stupid.
Arabians are NOT the source of Arabs, Arab culture, or Arab DNA.
All people came from Africa, including Arabs like the Hebrew.
And they came first by way of land, so had to go through the Levant.
They could not have come from Arabia.
That would require ship building, which did not happen until much later.
The Levant is on the way to the Arabian Peninsula.
The Arabs in Palestine were there first, before some Arabs from Palestine migrated to the Arabian Peninsula.

 

[Rigby5]

Yiddish is nothing even remotely like Hebrew, and is totally of Germanic origins, not from the Mideast at all.

And English is indigenous to nowhere but a tiny obscure island off the coast of Europe.

Your point?

Wrong.
English is of Anglo Saxon origins, with come Celt and Jute thrown in, and is totally from the mainland Europe.
You can trace the migration of tribes through the language they split into.
And it is clear Yiddish did not come from the Mideast at all.

In fact----it is very clear that Yiddish came from the Mideast just as it is clear that LADINO came from the Mideast and the Hebraic form of FARSI (believe it or not----there is an hebraic form of Farsi. And then there is the Hebraic form of ARAMAIC ----------are you stupid enough to claim that the same alphabet JUST CAME TO BE over most of the world MAGICALLY?

Not a single person thinks Yiddish came from the Mideast.
It has always been classified by everyone as Germanic.

The fact everyone now uses the Arab Phoenician alphabet is irrelevant.
It has nothing to do with Hebrew.

More confusion from the gutters of LONDON EAST END. There is no "PHOENICIAN ARAB"
alphabet---

Wrong.
Phoenicians are all Arab, and they created the alphabet everyone uses.

[...
Phoenicia was an ancient Semitic-speaking thalassocratic civilization that originated in the Levant region of the eastern Mediterranean, primarily located in modern Lebanon. It was concentrated along the coast of Lebanon and included some coastal areas of modern Syria and Galilee, reaching as far north as Arwad and as far south as Acre and possibly Gaza. At its height between 1100 and 200 BC, Phoenician civilization spread across the Mediterranean, from the Levant to the Iberian Peninsula.
...}

Semitic means Arab.
(but Arab has nothing to do with Arabia or modern Arabic.)

 

[Rigby5]

Stop supporting the Zionist Entity.

It would just kill you to refer to Israel by it's proper name. You could get a job in an Arab Country using a marker pen to cover up any mention of the name Israel in foreign press.

The problem with calling it Israel is that the name is fake, borrowed from mythology.
The history of the name is not what people claim it is, and the people claiming to be Israelis are actually Russian and Polish refugees who do not belong in the Mideast.
Zionist is a better name because that identifies their political polarity, and how different they are than Jews.

you do islamo nazi propaganda well-----GOEBBELS would be proud

Nonsense.
When Joshua invaded the Land of Canaan and massacred Canaanite women and children, that was the most fascist and nazi crimes one could imagine. And it is anyone who wants to identify with those ancient crimes that is the modern threat to civilization.

 

[JoeB131]

In fact, the 1947 partition saw the displacement of millions (20 million from some estimates) of Hindus from what became Pakistan and Muslims from what remained of India. Resulting in up to 2 million deaths.

Yes, it did. It was terrible. What's your point? that the British should have drawn lines based on where people lived rather than what worked for them?

Today, India (like Israel) retains a 25% Muslim population while Pakistan contains 0% Hindus.

The parallels are striking ... except the Indian partition casualties are an order of magnitude higher than the Israeli / Palestinian conflict ... with 1/1,000,000 of the worlds outrage and attention.

Which means, exactly nothing. Those Hindus and Muslims had lived there for hundreds of years.

They didn't have to imported.

Now, let's talk about the elephant in the room. There were very few Jews living in Palestine before the British took it over and tried to resettle it, and there weren't a whole lot signing up in the 20's and 30's.

The this guy came along...

And the whole world felt bad about it...

But feeling bad doesn't mean you have the right to give away someone else's stuff.

 

[irosie91]

In fact, the 1947 partition saw the displacement of millions (20 million from some estimates) of Hindus from what became Pakistan and Muslims from what remained of India. Resulting in up to 2 million deaths.

Yes, it did. It was terrible. What's your point? that the British should have drawn lines based on where people lived rather than what worked for them?

Today, India (like Israel) retains a 25% Muslim population while Pakistan contains 0% Hindus.

The parallels are striking ... except the Indian partition casualties are an order of magnitude higher than the Israeli / Palestinian conflict ... with 1/1,000,000 of the worlds outrage and attention.

Which means, exactly nothing. Those Hindus and Muslims had lived there for hundreds of years.

They didn't have to imported.

Now, let's talk about the elephant in the room. There were very few Jews living in Palestine before the British took it over and tried to resettle it, and there weren't a whole lot signing up in the 20's and 30's.

The this guy came along...

View attachment 491341

And the whole world felt bad about it...

But feeling bad doesn't mean you have the right to give away someone else's stuff.

why don't you give us the STATS-----not just "NOT A WHOLE LOT" Very few people were
living in Manhattan in 1650 and almost no jews. "IMPORTED" --Most of the people that I know who went to live in Palestine BEFORE World War II were not "IMPORTED" ---they escaped
shariah shitholes. Your discussion is silly. Your contrived utterly erroneous HUMAN MIGRATIONS of the Levant-------is PSYCHOTIC.

 

[Indeependent]

I was just watching self-hating Jew Jerry Rivers on Hannity; what a piece of shit.
I wish a terminally ill person would blow his fucking head off.

 

[Indeependent]

In fact, the 1947 partition saw the displacement of millions (20 million from some estimates) of Hindus from what became Pakistan and Muslims from what remained of India. Resulting in up to 2 million deaths.

Yes, it did. It was terrible. What's your point? that the British should have drawn lines based on where people lived rather than what worked for them?

Today, India (like Israel) retains a 25% Muslim population while Pakistan contains 0% Hindus.

The parallels are striking ... except the Indian partition casualties are an order of magnitude higher than the Israeli / Palestinian conflict ... with 1/1,000,000 of the worlds outrage and attention.

Which means, exactly nothing. Those Hindus and Muslims had lived there for hundreds of years.

They didn't have to imported.

Now, let's talk about the elephant in the room. There were very few Jews living in Palestine before the British took it over and tried to resettle it, and there weren't a whole lot signing up in the 20's and 30's.

The this guy came along...

View attachment 491341

And the whole world felt bad about it...

But feeling bad doesn't mean you have the right to give away someone else's stuff.

The Hindus and the Muslims have been murdering each other since Islam began based on religion, not borders.
But nice try.

 

[JoeB131]

why don't you give us the STATS-----not just "NOT A WHOLE LOT" Very few people were
living in Manhattan in 1650 and almost no jews. "IMPORTED" --Most of the people that I know who went to live in Palestine BEFORE World War II were not "IMPORTED" ---they escaped
shariah shitholes. Your discussion is silly. Your contrived utterly erroneous HUMAN MIGRATIONS of the Levant-------is PSYCHOTIC.

Okay, is this where you regale us with your stories about New England Nazis who only lived in your head?

The reality- Most Zionists are Europeans, not Middle Eastern Jews.

How is it that nearly every Prominent Zionist politician since 1948 was either born in Europe or their parents were?

I mean, if there were all these Middle Eastern Jews escaping from Shariah Hell-holes, you'd THINK they'd be a bigger factor in Zionist society.

 

[JoeB131]

The Hindus and the Muslims have been murdering each other since Islam began based on religion, not borders.
But nice try.

Not really. If they were, the whole region would be Muslim today. they were under the thumb of Islam for a lot of India's history before the Raj.

In fact, Muslims do a lot better at co-existing with other religions, which is why you can find Christians, Zoroasterians, Samaritans, Mandians, Yazidis, Ba'hai, and a bunch of other groups living across the Islamic world..

Meanwhile-. Europe was almost exclusively Christians... up until the last century when they stopped believing in Sky fairies.

 

[Indeependent]

why don't you give us the STATS-----not just "NOT A WHOLE LOT" Very few people were
living in Manhattan in 1650 and almost no jews. "IMPORTED" --Most of the people that I know who went to live in Palestine BEFORE World War II were not "IMPORTED" ---they escaped
shariah shitholes. Your discussion is silly. Your contrived utterly erroneous HUMAN MIGRATIONS of the Levant-------is PSYCHOTIC.

Okay, is this where you regale us with your stories about New England Nazis who only lived in your head?

The reality- Most Zionists are Europeans, not Middle Eastern Jews.

How is it that nearly every Prominent Zionist politician since 1948 was either born in Europe or their parents were?

I mean, if there were all these Middle Eastern Jews escaping from Shariah Hell-holes, you'd THINK they'd be a bigger factor in Zionist society.

Most Zionists are Europeans, not Middle Eastern Jews.

Bullshit...
How many have you had a talk with?
You probably would walk away from a Jew trapped in Iran wanting to live in Israel.

 

[fncceo]

The reality- Most Zionists are Europeans, not Middle Eastern Jews.

The people who want to slaughter Jews (y'all know who you are) don't give a fetid dingo's kidney if you're a Sephardic Jew or an Ashkenazic Jew, or a Karaite Jew, or any other sort of Jew. They don't care if you're observant or atheist.

The only thing that matters to them is that you're a Jew and you need to die.

 

[JoeB131]

I was just watching self-hating Jew Jerry Rivers on Hannity; what a piece of shit.
I wish a terminally ill person would blow his fucking head off.

Geraldo was never known as "Jerry Rivers".

He was born Gerald Riviera

Geraldo Rivera - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Indeependent]

The Hindus and the Muslims have been murdering each other since Islam began based on religion, not borders.
But nice try.

Not really. If they were, the whole region would be Muslim today. they were under the thumb of Islam for a lot of India's history before the Raj.

In fact, Muslims do a lot better at co-existing with other religions, which is why you can find Christians, Zoroasterians, Samaritans, Mandians, Yazidis, Ba'hai, and a bunch of other groups living across the Islamic world..

Meanwhile-. Europe was almost exclusively Christians... up until the last century when they stopped believing in Sky fairies.

You're a liar; there are as many Hindus as Muslims and they murder each other for fun.

Muslims do a lot better at co-existing with other religions, which is why you can find Christians,
Ever hear of the Balkans, liar?

How the hell did you get a Master's Degree; I would love to know which authors you were required to be brainwashed by.

 

[JoeB131]

Bullshit...
How many have you had a talk with?
You probably would walk away from a Jew trapped in Iran wanting to live in Israel.

Actually, I would say it was none of my business.

Our problems with Iran are because of our own stupid policies. DOn't know how old you are, I remember when the Shah was overthrown because he was a useless Zionist/American tool, and his own people hated him for it.

Sadly, before he got thrown out, he purged any of the people who might have brought Democracy to Iran, and now we are stuck with the Mullahs.