Thank you Bush...

[healthmyths]

As Bad Rachel notes, "5,000 Syrians have been massacred by Bashar Assad since March, including 300 children. How are those sanctions workin’ out, Mr. Obama?"

Missing Bush | The Weekly Standard

 

[rightwinger]

As Bad Rachel notes, "5,000 Syrians have been massacred by Bashar Assad since March, including 300 children. How are those sanctions workin’ out, Mr. Obama?"

Missing Bush | The Weekly Standard

Agree...we need Bush

We havent had a decent invasion and occupations since Bush was president

 

[healthmyths]

As Bad Rachel notes, "5,000 Syrians have been massacred by Bashar Assad since March, including 300 children. How are those sanctions workin’ out, Mr. Obama?"

Missing Bush | The Weekly Standard

Agree...we need Bush

We havent had a decent invasion and occupations since Bush was president

Are you a concerned environmentalist? I mean do you follow most of the environmental concerns and agree with the restoration of the environment?

 

[DontBeStupid]

As Bad Rachel notes, "5,000 Syrians have been massacred by Bashar Assad since March, including 300 children. How are those sanctions workin’ out, Mr. Obama?"

I disagree. I don't think we should let Syria dictate our foreign policy.

You can think that if you want though. We're a free country.

 

[High_Gravity]

As Bad Rachel notes, "5,000 Syrians have been massacred by Bashar Assad since March, including 300 children. How are those sanctions workin’ out, Mr. Obama?"

Missing Bush | The Weekly Standard

What are you suggesting we do here? bomb Syria? invade them?

 

[Unkotare]

The problem with having President 'Lead from Behind' is that now if we suggest that such options are on the table no one would believe us.

 

[DontBeStupid]

The problem with having President 'Lead from Behind' is that now if we suggest that such options are on the table no one would believe us.

Do we really need all options on the table all the time in all situations? Won't that also make people not believe us?

 

[Lovebears65]

The international world is laughing at us right now. Iran is the loudest .. In their eyes we are getting weaker and weaker and what happens when our enemies think we are weak ?? What if they feel we are so weak they try to do another 9.11 type attack

 

[Nosmo King]

Let's review.

The Bush plan: Invade Iraq. Force regime change. Rid the world of what he told us was an imminent threat to our security and destroy the massive stockpiles of Weapons of Mass Destruction he told us were there. The whole thing cost 800 billion dollars and 4200 American lives as well as nearly 40,000 maimed and wounded Americans. Countless cases of PTSD and a whole nation of pissed off Iraqis.

The Obama plan: use drone attacks and NATO air strikes to aid and abet the Libyan resistance to Qaddafi. Rid the world of a regime that has a track record of supporting terrorism, cruelty to their own countrymen and corrupt, ineffective government. What was the final grand total spent in Libya? No American lives lost, no wounded, no long term disabled servicemen.

Yeah! That Bush plan seems to have real advantages, if you happen to run Halliburton!

So, if the topic is Syria, which plan would you want the United States to employ?

 

[Nosmo King]

Oh. By the way, the Bush plan has some faults. It takes 8 years, costs beyond American lives and treasure are relations with steadfast allies and the political future of anyone who implements it and a depletion of our military readiness world wide.

The flaws with the Obama plan are only seen by his political opposition, primarily because it's cheaper and more effective than the Bush plan.

 

[healthmyths]

As Bad Rachel notes, "5,000 Syrians have been massacred by Bashar Assad since March, including 300 children. How are those sanctions workin’ out, Mr. Obama?"

Missing Bush | The Weekly Standard

What are you suggesting we do here? bomb Syria? invade them?

I am not suggesting anything.. I simple put up the quote and picture!

BUT as far as Obama handling Syria, et.al..

UNLIKE Obama who called our military on "air-raiding villages and killing civilians" or Reid who said "War is Lost".. or Kerry who called our troops Terrorists" or Murtha called our troops Murderers or Durbin "Nazis"..
Almost All AMericans support our President and MOST of us adhere to the concept "Waters edge" which obviously Obama,Reid,Durbin all Democrats DID NOT AFTER they had begged Bush to liberate Iraq!
Note what the following Democrats said before the Liberation of Iraq :


BEFORE BUSH ... When CLINTON was President...
"..deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD".Bill Clinton,1998
"..most brutal dictators of Century", Biden,1998
"Iraq compliance with Resolution 687 becomes shell game"..Daschle 1998
"He will use those WMDs again,as he has ten times since 1983" ..Berger- Clinton National. Security. Advisor 1998
"posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WMD programs" Levin 1998
"Saddam has been engaged in development of WMDs which is a threat.."Pelosi 1998
"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building WMDS.."Albright 1999

"Saddam to refine delivery systems, that will threaten the US..."Graham 2001
"Saddam has ignored the mandate of the UN and is building WMDs and the means to deliver.." Levin 2002
"Iraq's search for WMDs ...will continue as long as Saddam's in power"..Gore 2002
"Saddam retains stockpiles of WMDS.."Byrd 2002
"give President authority to use force..to disarm Saddam because an arsenal of WMDs.threat our security".Kerry 2002
"..Unmistakable evidence Saddam developing nuclear weapons next 5 years.."Rockefeller 2002
"Violated over 11 years every UN resolution demanding disarming WMDs.."Waxman 2002
"He's given aid,comfort & sanctuary to al Qaeda members..and keep developing WMDs"..Hillary 2002
"Compelling evidence Saddam has WMDs production storage capacity.." Graham 2002



HAVE you heard any GOPs calling our troops Terrorists, or Killers even now their C-I-C called them those names!

NO and you won't because of the naive belief that at the water's edge we are all Americans..
UNLIKE you traitors/Democrats/Obama that during Bush's administration acted as CHEERLEADERS for the Terrorists.. and such Cheering was proven to directly result in US troops deaths!
YES you traitors and the above Cheerleaders caused Terrorists to believe you traitors cheers for them!!!

Traitors !

 

[J.E.D]

As Bad Rachel notes, "5,000 Syrians have been massacred by Bashar Assad since March, including 300 children. How are those sanctions workin’ out, Mr. Obama?"

Missing Bush | The Weekly Standard

Jesus H Christ, enough with the Bush threads. You have your head so far up his ass, it isn't even funny anymore. Let it go man! You're hung up on some washed up US prez from the two-thousandies!

 

[WillowTree]

As Bad Rachel notes, "5,000 Syrians have been massacred by Bashar Assad since March, including 300 children. How are those sanctions workin’ out, Mr. Obama?"

Missing Bush | The Weekly Standard

What are you suggesting we do here? bomb Syria? invade them?

No,, we just need to sit back and count the bodies like we did in Rawanda.

 

[daveman]

Pfffft. They're just little foreign brown people. Who cares?

/American left

 

[Unkotare]

Do we really need all options on the table all the time in all situations?

Yes we do, "in all situations" that warrant it.

Won't that also make people not believe us?

Not if they have reason to take us at our word.

 

[Unkotare]

You can tell it's been over ten years since 9/11. The left is becoming more and more shameless in their desire to go back to ignoring problems and hoping they will never get to us and treating terrorism like a police matter or something that can be addressed on the political cheap.

-lob a few bombs into the desert, maybe blow up a baby food factory overnight when only the janitor is around, and call it a day

-throw the blind shiekh in jail and pretend terrorism has been solved

-let the UN publish some empty declarations it has no intention of honoring or enforcing

I guess ten years is long enough to forget what such a brilliant approach got us.

 

[tinydancer]

As Bad Rachel notes, "5,000 Syrians have been massacred by Bashar Assad since March, including 300 children. How are those sanctions workin’ out, Mr. Obama?"

Missing Bush | The Weekly Standard

What are you suggesting we do here? bomb Syria? invade them?

According to inside info the Syrian head honchos have sex tapes apparently now of almost every world leader screwing girls and boys.

And they are threatening to release them.

YOWZAH.

 

[tinydancer]

If they've got them, I don't even know how this is going to play out.

 

[kiwiman127]

The Weekly Standard? A tool of chickehawk William Kristol, one of the biggest cheerleaders of invading Iraq and of GWB. Why do people use strong leaning ideological resources and think they deserve creditability?

 

[healthmyths]

The Weekly Standard? A tool of chickehawk William Kristol, one of the biggest cheerleaders of invading Iraq and of GWB. Why do people use strong leaning ideological resources and think they deserve creditability?

What are these people's ideological "leaning"???

32 Democrat quotes ...

BEFORE BUSH ... When CLINTON was President...
"..deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD".Bill Clinton,1998
"..most brutal dictators of Century", Biden,1998
"Iraq compliance with Resolution 687 becomes shell game"..Daschle 1998
"He will use those WMDs again,as he has ten times since 1983" ..Berger- Clinton National. Security. Advisor 1998
"posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WMD programs" Levin 1998
"Saddam has been engaged in development of WMDs which is a threat.."Pelosi 1998
"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building WMDS.."Albright 1999



"Saddam to refine delivery systems, that will threaten the US..."Graham 2001
"Saddam has ignored the mandate of the UN and is building WMDs and the means to deliver.." Levin 2002
"Iraq's search for WMDs ...will continue as long as Saddam's in power"..Gore 2002
"Saddam retains stockpiles of WMDS.."Byrd 2002
"give President authority to use force..to disarm Saddam because an arsenal of WMDs.threat our security".Kerry 2002
"..Unmistakable evidence Saddam developing nuclear weapons next 5 years.."Rockefeller 2002
"Violated over 11 years every UN resolution demanding disarming WMDs.."Waxman 2002
"He's given aid,comfort & sanctuary to al Qaeda members..and keep developing WMDs"..Hillary 2002
"Compelling evidence Saddam has WMDs production storage capacity.." Graham 2002

Please explain why these "Democrats" wanted Saddam gone??