I thought this would get more attention.

Yes. Because trump and R's promised their constituents they would get to the bottom of the sordid affair and reveal who was involved.
So Biden and the Democrats had no moral obligation to Epstein's victims? Only Trump and the R's did because they promised to get to the bottom of the sordid affair?

If the Democrat cared about women and girls, would they not have released the Epstein Filed?

By the way, the Trump administration is certainly getting to the bottom of the sordid affair, and Democrats are rightfully embarassed at how many of them were involved. Epstein was a magnet to Democrats, because they would not jettison him for being an amoral asshole the way Donald Trump did, long before revealing his presidential ambitions.
 
So Biden and the Democrats had no moral obligation to Epstein's victims? Only Trump and the R's did because they promised to get to the bottom of the sordid affair?

If the Democrat cared about women and girls, would they not have released the Epstein Filed?

By the way, the Trump administration is certainly getting to the bottom of the sordid affair, and Democrats are rightfully embarassed at how many of them were involved. Epstein was a magnet to Democrats, because they would not jettison him for being an amoral asshole the way Donald Trump did, long before revealing his presidential ambitions.
Your pathetic attempts to make this about D's reminds me of the regime selectively releasing dozens of photos of Epstein with Bill Clinton in the early document dumps. You asked why the release of the files became a big issue for D's when it's been R's and the base who have lead the charge demanding their release.

How the Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files became a vehicle for QAnon​


Maga’s obsession with the files shows how a fringe QAnon conspiracy theory has taken root in the pro-Trump movement

The release of the “Epstein client list” has long been the holy grail for the Maga movement. Supposedly, this list, once released, would incriminate a veritable who’s who of liberal elites complicit in Jeffrey Epstein’s child sex-trafficking operation and expose the moral rot at the heart of the Democratic establishment.

The mystery surrounding the Epstein files also became a vehicle for QAnon conspiracy theorists to push their ideas about a “deep state” cover-up of a network of global pedophiles into the broader tent of the Maga movement.

During his campaign, Donald Trump promised on several occasions to declassify the Epstein files, which would include the “list”. Before they joined the government, Trump’s FBI chief, Kash Patel, and deputy FBI chief, Dan Bongino, spent years on podcasts and TV appearances winking at QAnon and Epstein conspiracy theorists and demanding the files’ release, even suggesting that the Biden administration was withholding them to protect its own.


Now, UNLIKE THE BIDEN ADMIN, the trump regime is legally obligated to release all the files. Each day that goes by is another day it is in violation of the law trump signed.

BTW, GFY.
 
Your pathetic attempts to make this about D's reminds me of the regime selectively releasing dozens of photos of Epstein with Bill Clinton in the early document dumps.
Wow, there were dozens of pictures of Epstein with Bill Clinton?

How in the world did that happen?!?!
 
The Epstein Files Transparency Act was not law while Biden was president you insufferable liar.
<~~~~~~~~~~>
Under the Biden administration, the Department of Justice (DOJ) released approximately 33,295 pages of records related to Jeffrey Epstein.
The question is why didn't they release the the total amount of the files?
 
<~~~~~~~~~~>
Under the Biden administration, the Department of Justice (DOJ) released approximately 33,295 pages of records related to Jeffrey Epstein.
The question is why didn't they release the the total amount of the files?
The law required them to withold certain files.

If they had released the ones they were required to withhold, you would be screaming about that. The difference is that you would be right.That time.
 
The law required them to withold certain files.

If they had released the ones they were required to withhold, you would be screaming about that. The difference is that you would be right.That time.
<~~~~~~~~~~>
Indeed, the names of victims are required to be held. That's the law. Yet, you're claiming the release of 33,000 odd pages compared to 3.5 million pages with retraction of victims names is comparable?
Believe that and there's beachfront property for sale in Arizona and the Guinee Gangplank is for sale in New York.
 
<~~~~~~~~~~>
Indeed, the names of victims are required to be held. That's the law. Yet, you're claiming the release of 33,000 odd pages compared to 3.5 million pages with retraction of victims names is comparable?
Believe that and there's beachfront property for sale in Arizona and the Guinee Gangplank is for sale in New York.
What are you saying?

That there were/are 3.5 Million pages and they only released 33,000 and something?

Do you have some evidence for that?
 
Epstein Muslim Muslim Epstein Epstein Muslim ALL TDS STAIN ALL MIDDLERSTAIN Epstein Muslim Muslim Epstein Epstein Muslim ALL TDS STAIN ALL MIDDLERSTAIN Epstein Muslim Muslim Epstein Epstein Muslim ALL TDS STAIN ALL MIDDLERSTAIN like LentilCurry yummy going on all day sucker.
 
Your pathetic attempts to make this about D's reminds me of the regime selectively releasing dozens of photos of Epstein with Bill Clinton in the early document dumps. You asked why the release of the files became a big issue for D's when it's been R's and the base who have lead the charge demanding their release.

How the Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files became a vehicle for QAnon​


You are running with this story (same one cited below) as legitimate as simulatneously scream about some "QANON".

1772318766500.webp



You cannot be helped, stupid.

LOL
 

MS NOW’s Lisa Rubin Explains ‘How We Know’ Missing Epstein Pages Are FBI Memos Of Victim’s Trump Allegations​

MS NOW’s senior legal reporter, Lisa Rubin, joined anchor Ana Cabrera on Tuesday morning to discuss the latest bombshell reporting about the ongoing Jeffrey Epstein saga, the revelation that some 50 pages related to President Donald Trump are missing.

“I want to say something about how we know the pages are missing and who might have seen them. Because based on NPR’s reporting, many of these documents — and I think some of our viewers are familiar with this — they have a number at the very bottom that starts with EFTA, for Epstein Files Transparency Act, and then has a number. That number has a meaning,” began Rubin, adding:

Epstein Files Are Missing Records About Woman Who Made Claim Against Trump​

The vast trove of documents released by the Justice Department from its investigations into the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein failed to include some key materials related to a woman who made an accusation against President Trump, according to a review by The New York Times.

The materials are F.B.I. memos summarizing interviews the bureau did in connection to claims made in 2019 by a woman who came forward after Mr. Epstein’s arrest to say she had been sexually assaulted by both Mr. Trump and the financier decades earlier, when she was a minor.

The existence of the memos was revealed in an index listing the investigative materials related to her account, which was publicly released. According to that index, the F.B.I. conducted four interviews in connection with her claims and wrote summaries about each one. But only one of the summaries, which describes her accusations against Mr. Epstein, was released by the Justice Department. The other three are missing.

The public files also do not include the underlying interview notes, which the index also indicates are part of the file. The Justice Department released similar interview notes in connection to F.B.I. interviews with other potential witnesses and victims.


The word "bombshell" gets over used. This isn't one of those times. Contemporaneous notes and FBI 302 summaries of those notes from interviews involving a person who accused trump of gross sexual impropriety when she was 13 years old have been withheld by the DoJ.

Maybe this would be a good time to attack Iran.
More allegations with no facts, yet this is the same group that cries for facts when dealing with their own.
 
More allegations with no facts, yet this is the same group that cries for facts when dealing with their own.
Oh of course!

Some missing page numbers when the law specifically requires that certain information be redacted, and they're like "impeach the m***********!"

But let some illegal alien be caught with fifty pounds of meth and DHS says "these are the exact kinds of criminals we said we'd get rid of first," then the "not Democrats" and Democrats are like "wait . . . was he . . . convicted?"

Really, are we supposed to act like we are fooled to keep from hurting their feelings?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom