I thought this would get more attention.

MS NOW’s Lisa Rubin Explains ‘How We Know’ Missing Epstein Pages Are FBI Memos Of Victim’s Trump Allegations​

MS NOW’s senior legal reporter, Lisa Rubin, joined anchor Ana Cabrera on Tuesday morning to discuss the latest bombshell reporting about the ongoing Jeffrey Epstein saga, the revelation that some 50 pages related to President Donald Trump are missing.

“I want to say something about how we know the pages are missing and who might have seen them. Because based on NPR’s reporting, many of these documents — and I think some of our viewers are familiar with this — they have a number at the very bottom that starts with EFTA, for Epstein Files Transparency Act, and then has a number. That number has a meaning,” began Rubin, adding:

Epstein Files Are Missing Records About Woman Who Made Claim Against Trump​

The vast trove of documents released by the Justice Department from its investigations into the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein failed to include some key materials related to a woman who made an accusation against President Trump, according to a review by The New York Times.

The materials are F.B.I. memos summarizing interviews the bureau did in connection to claims made in 2019 by a woman who came forward after Mr. Epstein’s arrest to say she had been sexually assaulted by both Mr. Trump and the financier decades earlier, when she was a minor.

The existence of the memos was revealed in an index listing the investigative materials related to her account, which was publicly released. According to that index, the F.B.I. conducted four interviews in connection with her claims and wrote summaries about each one. But only one of the summaries, which describes her accusations against Mr. Epstein, was released by the Justice Department. The other three are missing.

The public files also do not include the underlying interview notes, which the index also indicates are part of the file. The Justice Department released similar interview notes in connection to F.B.I. interviews with other potential witnesses and victims.


The word "bombshell" gets over used. This isn't one of those times. Contemporaneous notes and FBI 302 summaries of those notes from interviews involving a person who accused trump of gross sexual impropriety when she was 13 years old have been withheld by the DoJ.

Maybe this would be a good time to attack Iran.
Easiest way to know whether the evil Orange Man deliberately avoided releasing some documents would be to go back and look at all the Epstein File documents released by the Biden administration.

If any of the documents seemingly not released by the Trump administration were also not released by the Biden administration then, clearly there must be a perfectly innocent explanation.

On the other hand . . . if it can be proven that any of the Epstein files that the Biden administration released were then not released by the Trump Administration, that would be clear proof of a Trump cover up.

Then, you really would have him this time!

So which documents fit that bill, i. e. documents released by Biden, but not by Trump?
 
Trump is fully protected.

It sure would be nice to see other people held accountable, assuming someone else played a role in this.

But Trump? No. He's taken care of. And he thinks that we should all move on from this huge, ugly crime, of course.
The cloak of innocence is intended to protect people from liberal persecution. Working as intended. Probably why you loons are whining so much.
 

MS NOW’s Lisa Rubin Explains ‘How We Know’ Missing Epstein Pages Are FBI Memos Of Victim’s Trump Allegations​

MS NOW’s senior legal reporter, Lisa Rubin, joined anchor Ana Cabrera on Tuesday morning to discuss the latest bombshell reporting about the ongoing Jeffrey Epstein saga, the revelation that some 50 pages related to President Donald Trump are missing.

“I want to say something about how we know the pages are missing and who might have seen them. Because based on NPR’s reporting, many of these documents — and I think some of our viewers are familiar with this — they have a number at the very bottom that starts with EFTA, for Epstein Files Transparency Act, and then has a number. That number has a meaning,” began Rubin, adding:

Epstein Files Are Missing Records About Woman Who Made Claim Against Trump​

The vast trove of documents released by the Justice Department from its investigations into the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein failed to include some key materials related to a woman who made an accusation against President Trump, according to a review by The New York Times.

The materials are F.B.I. memos summarizing interviews the bureau did in connection to claims made in 2019 by a woman who came forward after Mr. Epstein’s arrest to say she had been sexually assaulted by both Mr. Trump and the financier decades earlier, when she was a minor.

The existence of the memos was revealed in an index listing the investigative materials related to her account, which was publicly released. According to that index, the F.B.I. conducted four interviews in connection with her claims and wrote summaries about each one. But only one of the summaries, which describes her accusations against Mr. Epstein, was released by the Justice Department. The other three are missing.

The public files also do not include the underlying interview notes, which the index also indicates are part of the file. The Justice Department released similar interview notes in connection to F.B.I. interviews with other potential witnesses and victims.


The word "bombshell" gets over used. This isn't one of those times. Contemporaneous notes and FBI 302 summaries of those notes from interviews involving a person who accused trump of gross sexual impropriety when she was 13 years old have been withheld by the DoJ.

Maybe this would be a good time to attack Iran.

I'm sure plenty of your fellow loons are obsessing over your latest conspiracy theory.

The rest of us are laughing at you, as usual.
 
The proof of Trump's guilt is the fact that you cannot see Trump's guilt.

Is that about it
The same logic applies the Clinton's. Except that when to the Clinton's, you people have investigated for over 30+Years and found no guilt and you continue io investigate them

Should read as: The same logic applies to the Clintons. Except when it comes to the Clinton's, you people continue to investigate them. After over 30+Years you people have never found guilt. Yet you people continue to investigate them.
 
Last edited:
Easiest way to know whether the evil Orange Man deliberately avoided releasing some documents would be to go back and look at all the Epstein File documents released by the Biden administration.
Once again, you are 100% wrong. the trump regime is under a legal obligation to release all the files in its possession. The law trump signed stipulates the reasons the regime has given for not releasing certain files makes their retention an illegal act.
 
Once again, you are 100% wrong. the trump regime is under a legal obligation to release all the files in its possession. The law trump signed stipulates the reasons the regime has given for not releasing certain files makes their retention an illegal act.
Wrong.

Files can be withheld if they include personally identifiable information of victims, child pornography or information, that would harm ongoing investigations.

Read the law.
 
Did I say the missing documents are proof of trump's guilt? No. I just would like to know why the documents weren't released.
<~~~~~~~~~~>
Guess you should be asking Merrick Garland, Christopher Wray and Joey Biden.
If there was any truth in this latest NPR expose they should tell us why they didn't pursue the allegations....
 
<~~~~~~~~~~>
Guess you should be asking Merrick Garland, Christopher Wray and Joey Biden.
If there was any truth in this latest NPR expose they should tell us why they didn't pursue the allegations....
You guys really need another deflection. We are talking about the here and now. The reporting on the missing docs has been substantiated by numerous news agencies. Are you folks going to spend your lives pretending information that isn't favorable to the regime is to be ignored?

The Justice Department has withheld some Epstein files related to allegations that President Trump sexually abused a minor, an NPR investigation finds. It also removed some documents from the public database where accusations against Jeffrey Epstein also mention Trump.

Some files have not been made public despite a law mandating their release. These include what appear to be more than 50 pages of FBI interviews, as well as notes from conversations with a woman who accused Trump of sexual abuse decades ago when she was a minor.

NPR reviewed multiple sets of unique serial numbers appearing before and after the pages in question, stamped onto documents in the Epstein files database, FBI case records, emails and discovery document logs in the latest tranche of documents published at the end of January. NPR's investigation found dozens of pages that appear to be catalogued by the Justice Department but not shared publicly.

 
Once again, you are 100% wrong. the trump regime is under a legal obligation to release all the files in its possession. The law trump signed stipulates the reasons the regime has given for not releasing certain files makes their retention an illegal act.
<~~~~~~~~~~>
Indeed, so was the Biden administration and it's Dept. of Justice legally obligated to release All the files, yet it was not done. What were they hiding?
As of February 2026, the Department of Justice (DOJ) under the Trump administration has released approximately 3.5 million pages of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.

Read more:
.https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/5740973-why-biden-didnt-release-the-epstein-files-but-maybe-should-have/

Democrats have suggested that Biden left that decision to his Attorney General, Merrick Garland.
Obviously Garland in his pursuance to convict Trump something/anything, did not find anything to prosecute Trump.
 
You thought.

1772140121701.gif
 
Now the republicans in congress are holding hearings and starting to question some of these people who appeared in the epstein files.

A breath of fresh air from the biden era stonewalling that released exactly zero files.
 
You guys really need another deflection. We are talking about the here and now.
The Biden Administration wasnt some long ago history. it was 14 months ago.

Can you explain why, when Trump was elected releasing the epstein files suddenly became a democrat priority.

The same republicans that demanded the release of the epstein files in 2025 had been demanding them during the Biden Administration, and your team completely ignored them.

Why was that?
 
Certainly not by The Following.
Clinton said, "define sex" with his Rhodes scholar response. That is an indictment on a man with a real reputation in that endeavor who is a gold member of the big club and the American judicial system with friendly faces would make his exoneration even easier.
 
15th post
<~~~~~~~~~~>
Indeed, so was the Biden administration and it's Dept. of Justice legally obligated to release All the files, yet it was not done. What were they hiding?
As of February 2026, the Department of Justice (DOJ) under the Trump administration has released approximately 3.5 million pages of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.

Read more:
.https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/5740973-why-biden-didnt-release-the-epstein-files-but-maybe-should-have/

Democrats have suggested that Biden left that decision to his Attorney General, Merrick Garland.
Obviously Garland in his pursuance to convict Trump something/anything, did not find anything to prosecute Trump.
The Epstein Files Transparency Act was not law while Biden was president you insufferable liar.
 
The Biden Administration wasnt some long ago history. it was 14 months ago.

Can you explain why, when Trump was elected releasing the epstein files suddenly became a democrat priority.

The same republicans that demanded the release of the epstein files in 2025 had been demanding them during the Biden Administration, and your team completely ignored them.

Why was that?
Yes. Because trump and R's promised their constituents they would get to the bottom of the sordid affair and reveal who was involved.
 
You guys really need another deflection. We are talking about the here and now. The reporting on the missing docs has been substantiated by numerous news agencies. Are you folks going to spend your lives pretending information that isn't favorable to the regime is to be ignored?

The Justice Department has withheld some Epstein files related to allegations that President Trump sexually abused a minor, an NPR investigation finds. It also removed some documents from the public database where accusations against Jeffrey Epstein also mention Trump.

Some files have not been made public despite a law mandating their release. These include what appear to be more than 50 pages of FBI interviews, as well as notes from conversations with a woman who accused Trump of sexual abuse decades ago when she was a minor.

NPR reviewed multiple sets of unique serial numbers appearing before and after the pages in question, stamped onto documents in the Epstein files database, FBI case records, emails and discovery document logs in the latest tranche of documents published at the end of January. NPR's investigation found dozens of pages that appear to be catalogued by the Justice Department but not shared publicly.


Listen nitwit, you are absolutely ridiculous to accuse others of deflection when you start talking about the Epstein files in a thread you started addressing a topic and a matter that had nothing to do with the Epstein files.

You are a walking, talking contradiction, with serious cognitive dissonance problems. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Back
Top Bottom