Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's about time for this bill to pass.
Hopefully it will encourage other states to do the same.
New Texas Bill Would Make Running Over Protesters Legal. | Central Track
Drivers Wouldn't Be Held Liable For Running Over Protesters Who Are Blocking Traffic If Denton County House Rep Pat Fallon's Proposed Bill Passes.www.centraltrack.com
No/Low Information Leftist ....He was the blob's political opponent?
You EVER fucking hear of "TOO MUCH OF A GOOD THING IS A BAD THING?" Well all these PROTESTS have been anything BUT PROTESTS, and they sure the fuck have NOTHING to do with DEMOCRACY. This is MOB RULE. They've been RIOTS, and LOOTING, and BURNING DOWN BUSINESSES, and BLOCKING OFF ROADS, and they've gotten VIOLENT and people have been beaten and even KILLED, and yes, it has gone ON and ON and ON and fucking ON..!!! So there comes a point where ENOUGH is fucking ENOUGH.I want to take the time to make it perfectly clear... I don't mind that people protesting... I don't mind that at all. Go you guys.I don't. I think it has a chance. Obviously a cop can drive to safety, even if it means mowing down a protestor or two, so why shouldn't any citizen be given the same legal ability to stay safe?I agree it won't pass... However I have no problems with the bill. Stupid should never be rewarded.Won't pass
If there's a crowd around your vehicle kicking it, climbing on it, pounding on it and actually break one of your windows, are you going to just sit there and let them possibly KILL YOU? You have to be joking. I'm mowing some people down, period. I'm driving to safety. I would not just sit there. Legal or not, I'm otta there.
However... If you actively try to put yourself in danger by literally blocking a highway... *shrugs* I don't think you should procreate anyway. It's been a joke for decades that people should go play in the street because it's a known danger. It's one of the most base ways of saying you are stupid, or I wish you would go away.
I believe in the right to end your own life if you want. And playing in the street is suggesting you are trying to do exactly that.
Why is it that everything the right proposes in regard to political protest involves legalizing the murder of protestors should they be inconvenienced by the protest? Of course the right seldom protests anything, so what they're trying to do is to be allowed to legally attack and intimidate the left.
The right hates democracy, and the First Amendment, unless they're using it to attack and lie about the left.
What damn part of all that are you fucking missing?
What part of THE PROTESTS WILL CONTINUE UNTIL POLICE STOP BRUTALIZING UNARMED CITIZENS?
THIS IS NOT MOB RULE. THIS IS THE PEOPLE TAKING THEIR COUNTRY BACK FROM THE DESTRUCTIVE POLICIES WHICH IGNORE THE PEOPLE.
This is has gone on for over 244 years. The protests have gone on for a few weeks.
Blame the victim and defend the perp ...Oh, so you're in favor of being able to run over somebody? Great. I'm sure that you're a fine human being.
It's about time for this bill to pass.
Hopefully it will encourage other states to do the same.
New Texas Bill Would Make Running Over Protesters Legal. | Central Track
Drivers Wouldn't Be Held Liable For Running Over Protesters Who Are Blocking Traffic If Denton County House Rep Pat Fallon's Proposed Bill Passes.
Oh, so you're in favor of being able to run over somebody? Great. I'm sure that you're a fine human being.
It's about time for this bill to pass.
Hopefully it will encourage other states to do the same.
New Texas Bill Would Make Running Over Protesters Legal. | Central Track
Drivers Wouldn't Be Held Liable For Running Over Protesters Who Are Blocking Traffic If Denton County House Rep Pat Fallon's Proposed Bill Passes.
Why do you guys hate the Constitution so much?
We don't. But is absolutely certain that you do.
The person you run over is the victim, you dolt.Blame the victim and defend the perp ...Oh, so you're in favor of being able to run over somebody? Great. I'm sure that you're a fine human being.
Typical Leftist shit ...
Damn you Leftist are dumb .....The person you run over is the victim, you dolt.
Don't be stupid. Deliberately hitting someone with your car makes you the criminal.Damn you Leftist are dumb .....The person you run over is the victim, you dolt.
This bill does not allow motorist to run over innocent pedestrians walking down the sidewalk.
It's aimed at Leftist Criminal Thugs and Domestic Terrorist who block roadways, denying EMS access and attacking motorist who try to drive through.
They are the perpetrators and get what they deserve !!!
Don't be stupid.Don't be stupid. Deliberately hitting someone with your car makes you the criminal.
Again, unless you can specify what constitutes police brutality it is just a slogan. The courts, local governments and the DoJ already review police actions to determine if excessive force has been used, and almost always find the police acted with appropriate force. The term, police brutality, has no meaning unless you can specify exactly what actions constitute police brutality and that is exactly what the courts do.Bullshit. Police brutality is a slogan not a real issue. What exactly constitutes police brutality and why are these retards marching on the highways instead of at their state capitol buildings? Because they are retards who have no clear message or issue.You EVER fucking hear of "TOO MUCH OF A GOOD THING IS A BAD THING?" Well all these PROTESTS have been anything BUT PROTESTS, and they sure the fuck have NOTHING to do with DEMOCRACY. This is MOB RULE. They've been RIOTS, and LOOTING, and BURNING DOWN BUSINESSES, and BLOCKING OFF ROADS, and they've gotten VIOLENT and people have been beaten and even KILLED, and yes, it has gone ON and ON and ON and fucking ON..!!! So there comes a point where ENOUGH is fucking ENOUGH.I want to take the time to make it perfectly clear... I don't mind that people protesting... I don't mind that at all. Go you guys.I don't. I think it has a chance. Obviously a cop can drive to safety, even if it means mowing down a protestor or two, so why shouldn't any citizen be given the same legal ability to stay safe?I agree it won't pass... However I have no problems with the bill. Stupid should never be rewarded.Won't pass
If there's a crowd around your vehicle kicking it, climbing on it, pounding on it and actually break one of your windows, are you going to just sit there and let them possibly KILL YOU? You have to be joking. I'm mowing some people down, period. I'm driving to safety. I would not just sit there. Legal or not, I'm otta there.
However... If you actively try to put yourself in danger by literally blocking a highway... *shrugs* I don't think you should procreate anyway. It's been a joke for decades that people should go play in the street because it's a known danger. It's one of the most base ways of saying you are stupid, or I wish you would go away.
I believe in the right to end your own life if you want. And playing in the street is suggesting you are trying to do exactly that.
Why is it that everything the right proposes in regard to political protest involves legalizing the murder of protestors should they be inconvenienced by the protest? Of course the right seldom protests anything, so what they're trying to do is to be allowed to legally attack and intimidate the left.
The right hates democracy, and the First Amendment, unless they're using it to attack and lie about the left.
What damn part of all that are you fucking missing?
What part of THE PROTESTS WILL CONTINUE UNTIL POLICE STOP BRUTALIZING UNARMED CITIZENS?
THIS IS NOT MOB RULE. THIS IS THE PEOPLE TAKING THEIR COUNTRY BACK FROM THE DESTRUCTIVE POLICIES WHICH IGNORE THE PEOPLE.
This is has gone on for over 244 years. The protests have gone on for a few weeks.
You post is just reeks of ignorance and stupidity. You call the protestors "retards" yet claim, despite all reasonable evidence to the contrary, that police butality isn't a real issue.
I guess the cities are just glad handing millions of dollars over to anyone who makes an excessive use of force claims for the fun of it. Taxpayers shelled out $300 million to settle police brutality claims last year alone:
Millions in lawsuit settlements are another hidden cost of police misconduct, legal experts say
Over $300 million was spent in fiscal year 2019 for judgments in three U.S. cities.abcnews.go.com
American police shot and killed over 1000 Americans last year. #1 in the free world. #2 - French police shot and killed 26 people last year. Germany was #3 with 18. In total, over 1500 people died in police custody or as a result of being shot by the police.
Here's an article from 2015 that says that police forces in the 10 largest cities paid out $248 million dollars to settle claims of police misconduct in 2014. This figure was up 48% just from 2010.
Cost of Police-Misconduct Cases Soars in Big U.S. Cities
The cost of resolving police-misconduct cases has surged for big U.S. cities, with the 10 cities with the largest departments paying out $248.7 million last year.www.wsj.com
And another that says Chicago paid out over $113 million just last year:
Chicago spent more than $113 million on police misconduct lawsuits in 2018 - The Chicago Reporter
The city paid more for police misconduct settlements last year than any year since at least 2011, bringing the total tab to well over half a billion dollars in just eight years.www.chicagoreporter.com
They just need to expand the castle doctrine to your vehicle.Won't pass
SMH @ the Stupid Shit Leftist post ....Don't be stupid. Deliberately hitting someone with your car makes you the criminal.
It does include your vehicle.They just need to expand the castle doctrine to your vehicle.
Done deal then. Peddle to the metal folks.It does include your vehicle.They just need to expand the castle doctrine to your vehicle.
If you have a situation where psychos are looking to be killed it does make sense to relieve drivers of responsibility for the peoples lives who want to dieAgain, unless you can specify what constitutes police brutality it is just a slogan. The courts, local governments and the DoJ already review police actions to determine if excessive force has been used, and almost always find the police acted with appropriate force. The term, police brutality, has no meaning unless you can specify exactly what actions constitute police brutality and that is exactly what the courts do.Bullshit. Police brutality is a slogan not a real issue. What exactly constitutes police brutality and why are these retards marching on the highways instead of at their state capitol buildings? Because they are retards who have no clear message or issue.You EVER fucking hear of "TOO MUCH OF A GOOD THING IS A BAD THING?" Well all these PROTESTS have been anything BUT PROTESTS, and they sure the fuck have NOTHING to do with DEMOCRACY. This is MOB RULE. They've been RIOTS, and LOOTING, and BURNING DOWN BUSINESSES, and BLOCKING OFF ROADS, and they've gotten VIOLENT and people have been beaten and even KILLED, and yes, it has gone ON and ON and ON and fucking ON..!!! So there comes a point where ENOUGH is fucking ENOUGH.I want to take the time to make it perfectly clear... I don't mind that people protesting... I don't mind that at all. Go you guys.I don't. I think it has a chance. Obviously a cop can drive to safety, even if it means mowing down a protestor or two, so why shouldn't any citizen be given the same legal ability to stay safe?I agree it won't pass... However I have no problems with the bill. Stupid should never be rewarded.Won't pass
If there's a crowd around your vehicle kicking it, climbing on it, pounding on it and actually break one of your windows, are you going to just sit there and let them possibly KILL YOU? You have to be joking. I'm mowing some people down, period. I'm driving to safety. I would not just sit there. Legal or not, I'm otta there.
However... If you actively try to put yourself in danger by literally blocking a highway... *shrugs* I don't think you should procreate anyway. It's been a joke for decades that people should go play in the street because it's a known danger. It's one of the most base ways of saying you are stupid, or I wish you would go away.
I believe in the right to end your own life if you want. And playing in the street is suggesting you are trying to do exactly that.
Why is it that everything the right proposes in regard to political protest involves legalizing the murder of protestors should they be inconvenienced by the protest? Of course the right seldom protests anything, so what they're trying to do is to be allowed to legally attack and intimidate the left.
The right hates democracy, and the First Amendment, unless they're using it to attack and lie about the left.
What damn part of all that are you fucking missing?
What part of THE PROTESTS WILL CONTINUE UNTIL POLICE STOP BRUTALIZING UNARMED CITIZENS?
THIS IS NOT MOB RULE. THIS IS THE PEOPLE TAKING THEIR COUNTRY BACK FROM THE DESTRUCTIVE POLICIES WHICH IGNORE THE PEOPLE.
This is has gone on for over 244 years. The protests have gone on for a few weeks.
You post is just reeks of ignorance and stupidity. You call the protestors "retards" yet claim, despite all reasonable evidence to the contrary, that police butality isn't a real issue.
I guess the cities are just glad handing millions of dollars over to anyone who makes an excessive use of force claims for the fun of it. Taxpayers shelled out $300 million to settle police brutality claims last year alone:
Millions in lawsuit settlements are another hidden cost of police misconduct, legal experts say
Over $300 million was spent in fiscal year 2019 for judgments in three U.S. cities.
American police shot and killed over 1000 Americans last year. #1 in the free world. #2 - French police shot and killed 26 people last year. Germany was #3 with 18. In total, over 1500 people died in police custody or as a result of being shot by the police.
Here's an article from 2015 that says that police forces in the 10 largest cities paid out $248 million dollars to settle claims of police misconduct in 2014. This figure was up 48% just from 2010.
Cost of Police-Misconduct Cases Soars in Big U.S. Cities
The cost of resolving police-misconduct cases has surged for big U.S. cities, with the 10 cities with the largest departments paying out $248.7 million last year.
And another that says Chicago paid out over $113 million just last year:
Chicago spent more than $113 million on police misconduct lawsuits in 2018 - The Chicago Reporter
The city paid more for police misconduct settlements last year than any year since at least 2011, bringing the total tab to well over half a billion dollars in just eight years.
The US has a much higher homicide rate than Germany or France as well as a much larger population, so our police have to deal with many more violent criminals than French or German police do, so naturally they have to use more force. The issue is not how many shootings there were, but case by case, was this shooting justified. Neither you nor the other morons rampaging through our streets is apparently capable of making such judgements. So, once again, police brutality is just a slogan chanted by stupid, ignorant people rampaging through our streets looting, burning and wantonly destroying public property while Democratic politicians cheer them on.
Seriously that is a stupid bill and probably will not pass even in a controlled republican states.
They usually include a clause such as "exercising due care," which will always end up in court. The only people who would even considered running over someone already has mental problems. Exercising due care by running someone over. Yeah I wonder what the time limit on that is before it becomes a matter of being annoyed and in a hurry.
If you have a permit then the permit allows them to be in the street and as long as they are in the right location as permitted. IF they are not then they have to move.
Protesters cannot block traffic in public places. IF they do the police can tell them to move.
So to run them over is overkill.
Well, the article in the OP cited a bill that was introduced in 2017. It never made it out of committee. In Texas, the legislature meets for 90 days every two years so the earliest this can be re-considered is May 2021. I'm pretty sure it will be one of the "front burner" topics is the blob wins re-election and Texas remains red (both of which would seem to be tied to one another incidentally). If the blob is voted out or if Texas flips blue, you'd see a bit more conciliatory posture from the pachyderms in Austin. A lot of the politics in that state is based on pop culture and opportunism. Its slowly sinking into the GOP majority that a state income tax is needed because the property-tax model is not supporting the infrastructure and the upper limits of taxing homeowners is being reached. Now that covid has destroyed the tax income from the tourists taxes, the state income tax is a real possibility. The lottery didn't pan out they way they thought it would. So if Biden becomes President, you may see the packies in Texas push through a state income tax and blame it on Biden.
