kyzr
Diamond Member
1. No pay until they show up for work.
2. TX supreme court has the ball on removing them.
2. TX supreme court has the ball on removing them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Blue states don't need to. They already did!Every state should immediately reGerrymander.
No need, they're already not getting paid for those positions.1. No pay until they show up for work.
2. TX supreme court has the ball on removing them.
All blue states already have all districts demofks. How with no districts left? You remain stupidEvery state should immediately reGerrymander.
What about the Trump party that wants to redistrict after 5 years.It amazes me how the party who claims to want democracy flees the state because they don't think they will like the results of democracy.
After 5 years?The voters put them in charge, and one of the privileges of being in charge is redrawing the districts.
After the census, every 10 years.Democracy in action.
No, what republicans are doing is the farthest thing from democracy.What the democrats are doing is the farthest thing from democracy, and childish to boot.
Did they do it in a year ending in 5?/----/ Now tell us about Illinois gerrymandering. Go ahead, I dare you.
WHEN?The Democrats did it first.
A lie by omission. The bill would have been pointless because it would not have addressed the gerrymandering already in place.Easy.....The 2022 Freedom to Vote Act. Which passed the House, but not the Senate because of the Repug filibuster.
This bill would have ended gerrymandering. How can you be this clueless, ignorant, and stupid?
Oh, I forgot.....you are a Trump voter. You pretend to be knowledgeable and a strong debater, but you are obviously neither. --
![]()
The Freedom to Vote Act
The bill would bolster our democracy by protecting voting rights, ending partisan gerrymandering, improving campaign finance, and safeguarding the electoral process.www.brennancenter.org
/----/ Dumb question. That's not what the Constitution states.Did they do it in a year ending in 5?
The first meeting of Congress was in 1789, and the first census was in 1790 BECAUSE that was within 3 years.
/-----/Well CB, now you've done it and gone used arithmetic and logic, which surely now will cause every lefty reading this thread to lose focus and drift off back into their TDS mode.
I know that./----/ Dumb question. That's not what the Constitution states.
Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution states:
The actual Enumeration (what we call the Census) shall be made
within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United
States, and within every subsequent Term of ten years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.
1. Last time I checked, 5 years is within 10 years. Just because it was traditionally held on a year ending in 0 doesn't mean it can't happen sooner.
2. The first meeting of Congress was in 1789, and the first census was in 1790 BECAUSE that was within 3 years.
U.S. Constitution – Article 1 Section 2 – The U.S. Constitution Online – USConstitution.net - U.S. Constitution.net
U.S. Constitution – Article 1 Section 2 Article 1 – The Legislative Branch Section 2 – The House <<Back | Table of Contents | Next>> The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have...www.usconstitution.net
/----/ "Then every 10 years after that"I know that.
Then every 10 years after that
"5 years is within 10 years"?
It doesn't work like that.
"and within every subsequent Term of ten years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct".
What reason would states have to redistrict congressional representation, without a census being taken?
See above you retard.Well CB, now you've done it and gone used arithmetic and logic, which surely now will cause every lefty reading this thread to lose focus and drift off back into their TDS mode.
TERM of 10 YEARS, not within, TERM./----/ "Then every 10 years after that"
You're changing the wording of the Constitution which states: "and within every subsequent Term of ten years.
Dictionary.com
within. preposition.
View attachment 1146824
- occurring inside (a particular period of time):
"sold out within two hours" · "33% were rearrested within two years of their release"
Trump Orders Census Takers Not To Count Anyone Wearing A Sombrero
Do you know what the word “within” means?I know that.
Then every 10 years after that
"5 years is within 10 years"?
It doesn't work like that.
"and within every subsequent Term of ten years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct".
What reason would states have to redistrict congressional representation, without a census being taken?
Do you know what TERM (of 10 years) means?Do you know what the word “within” means?