Texas AG (The guy suing tates for not stealing the election from Biden) is under FBI investigation. He wants a pardon

[Winston]

Slate Magazine just put 2 and 2 together.
Ken Paxton knows his lawsuit is junk but wants a pardon from Donald Trump for his charges of bribery and abuse of power:
Slate Magazine:

The Supreme Court, however, is not going to take up Paxton’s invitation. It has asked for a response from the four defendant states by 3 p.m. on Thursday; in light of the court’s hasty disposition of similarly laughable complaints, we can safely assume that the justices intend to dispatch this case promptly. Paxton’s suit is shot through with conspiracy theories and constitutional claims with no basis in law. Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins, who typically authors the office’s lawsuits, did not sign on to this one, nor did his deputies; instead, Paxton brought in a “special counsel” from outside the agency. His suit is so ridiculous that it led some commentators to wonder whether the attorney general might have another motive for filing it. Paxton, after all, is reportedly under investigation by the FBI for alleged bribery and abuse of office. Trump, meanwhile, has been distributing pardons to his allies like candy. Paxton’s suit makes more sense as pardon-bait than it does as a legal document. And he may need presidential clemency to escape the federal criminal charges that could be imminent.

Texas AG Ken Paxton, under FBI investigation, asks the Supreme Court to hand Trump the election. (slate.com)

He is NOT under FBI investigation. Where the fuck did you see that?

Look, dumbfucks. I have already explained it as it was personally explained to me by the very judge (Mark Rusch) who appointed the retired sitting judge presiding over the Paxton case. Some jackass found a technicality on securities violations and has pressed Paxton's prosecution (going on 5 years now) for political reasons only. This is never going to trial. It's bullshit.

BUT EVEN IF IT'S ALL TRUE, NONE of that takes away from the case before the SCOTUS.

Now, let's focus on the ass kicking you commies are about to receive, curtesy of the 12th Amendment.

Hey dumbass, for your scenario to happen the House would have to vote for Trump, with a quorum present. The House is majority democrat. They can refuse to sit and guess who becomes president? Harris you ignorant shit. Talk about overloading your asshole.

Ummm....I think you missed something....

Read it again:

if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.

No, I don't think I missed shit. No quorum, the VP elect becomes president. Say hey to President Harris.

 

[DrLove]

Fake news that was debunked days ago.

I love your retard reactions though. Laughing and pointing at you makes life just a little bit better.

Methinks they are all getting nervous. Wonder how many heart attacks the SC will give them?? LOL

None, because they won't be taking the case. So what will be the Dumpster Boy's final play - Infecting the EC with his bullshit? Inciting his armed zombies to start a civil war?? Or just going away like a good boy and The Biggest LOSER (not pounds ;-) ???

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Slate Magazine just put 2 and 2 together.
Ken Paxton knows his lawsuit is junk but wants a pardon from Donald Trump for his charges of bribery and abuse of power:
Slate Magazine:

The Supreme Court, however, is not going to take up Paxton’s invitation. It has asked for a response from the four defendant states by 3 p.m. on Thursday; in light of the court’s hasty disposition of similarly laughable complaints, we can safely assume that the justices intend to dispatch this case promptly. Paxton’s suit is shot through with conspiracy theories and constitutional claims with no basis in law. Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins, who typically authors the office’s lawsuits, did not sign on to this one, nor did his deputies; instead, Paxton brought in a “special counsel” from outside the agency. His suit is so ridiculous that it led some commentators to wonder whether the attorney general might have another motive for filing it. Paxton, after all, is reportedly under investigation by the FBI for alleged bribery and abuse of office. Trump, meanwhile, has been distributing pardons to his allies like candy. Paxton’s suit makes more sense as pardon-bait than it does as a legal document. And he may need presidential clemency to escape the federal criminal charges that could be imminent.

Texas AG Ken Paxton, under FBI investigation, asks the Supreme Court to hand Trump the election. (slate.com)

He is NOT under FBI investigation. Where the fuck did you see that?

Look, dumbfucks. I have already explained it as it was personally explained to me by the very judge (Mark Rusch) who appointed the retired sitting judge presiding over the Paxton case. Some jackass found a technicality on securities violations and has pressed Paxton's prosecution (going on 5 years now) for political reasons only. This is never going to trial. It's bullshit.

BUT EVEN IF IT'S ALL TRUE, NONE of that takes away from the case before the SCOTUS.

Now, let's focus on the ass kicking you commies are about to receive, curtesy of the 12th Amendment.

Hey dumbass, for your scenario to happen the House would have to vote for Trump, with a quorum present. The House is majority democrat. They can refuse to sit and guess who becomes president? Harris you ignorant shit. Talk about overloading your asshole.

Ummm....I think you missed something....

Read it again:

if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.

No, I don't think I missed shit. No quorum, the VP elect becomes president. Say hey to President Harris.

There will be members from 2/3 of the states without even batting an eyelash. That will be like fogging a damn mirror.

You are seriously miscalculating this entire thing.

 

[Orangecat]

The guy suing tates

Has Tates gotten a lawyer yet?

 

[Rye Catcher]

Slate Magazine just put 2 and 2 together.
Ken Paxton knows his lawsuit is junk but wants a pardon from Donald Trump for his charges of bribery and abuse of power:
Slate Magazine:

The Supreme Court, however, is not going to take up Paxton’s invitation. It has asked for a response from the four defendant states by 3 p.m. on Thursday; in light of the court’s hasty disposition of similarly laughable complaints, we can safely assume that the justices intend to dispatch this case promptly. Paxton’s suit is shot through with conspiracy theories and constitutional claims with no basis in law. Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins, who typically authors the office’s lawsuits, did not sign on to this one, nor did his deputies; instead, Paxton brought in a “special counsel” from outside the agency. His suit is so ridiculous that it led some commentators to wonder whether the attorney general might have another motive for filing it. Paxton, after all, is reportedly under investigation by the FBI for alleged bribery and abuse of office. Trump, meanwhile, has been distributing pardons to his allies like candy. Paxton’s suit makes more sense as pardon-bait than it does as a legal document. And he may need presidential clemency to escape the federal criminal charges that could be imminent.

Texas AG Ken Paxton, under FBI investigation, asks the Supreme Court to hand Trump the election. (slate.com)

Being under investigation from the Obama FBI is a badge of honor.

It isn't illegal to sue a person or state for criminal activity.
This is simply a thinly veiled treat against them for bringing the lawsuit.....and here's the summary for the purpose of the lawsuit:

A Summary of the Texas Election Lawsuit

This is Trump's FBI, dumbass. Not Obama's. Obama ceased to be President 8 years ago. You're beyond stupid.

Mud is not stupid, he's simply an asshole and a damn liar.

 

[mudwhistle]

You're an idiot if you think that Trump owns the FBI.

Seems like you just admitted he’s incompetent.

No....he's just not a crook like Obama and Hillary.
If he was a crook or a dictator....he would have capped Comey and everyone else that was a threat to him.

 

[mudwhistle]

Slate Magazine just put 2 and 2 together.
Ken Paxton knows his lawsuit is junk but wants a pardon from Donald Trump for his charges of bribery and abuse of power:
Slate Magazine:

The Supreme Court, however, is not going to take up Paxton’s invitation. It has asked for a response from the four defendant states by 3 p.m. on Thursday; in light of the court’s hasty disposition of similarly laughable complaints, we can safely assume that the justices intend to dispatch this case promptly. Paxton’s suit is shot through with conspiracy theories and constitutional claims with no basis in law. Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins, who typically authors the office’s lawsuits, did not sign on to this one, nor did his deputies; instead, Paxton brought in a “special counsel” from outside the agency. His suit is so ridiculous that it led some commentators to wonder whether the attorney general might have another motive for filing it. Paxton, after all, is reportedly under investigation by the FBI for alleged bribery and abuse of office. Trump, meanwhile, has been distributing pardons to his allies like candy. Paxton’s suit makes more sense as pardon-bait than it does as a legal document. And he may need presidential clemency to escape the federal criminal charges that could be imminent.

Texas AG Ken Paxton, under FBI investigation, asks the Supreme Court to hand Trump the election. (slate.com)

Being under investigation from the Obama FBI is a badge of honor.

It isn't illegal to sue a person or state for criminal activity.
This is simply a thinly veiled treat against them for bringing the lawsuit.....and here's the summary for the purpose of the lawsuit:

A Summary of the Texas Election Lawsuit

This is Trump's FBI, dumbass. Not Obama's. Obama ceased to be President 8 years ago. You're beyond stupid.

Mud is not stupid, he's simply an asshole and a damn liar.

Yeah....and you're ugly.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Slate Magazine just put 2 and 2 together.
Ken Paxton knows his lawsuit is junk but wants a pardon from Donald Trump for his charges of bribery and abuse of power:
Slate Magazine:

The Supreme Court, however, is not going to take up Paxton’s invitation. It has asked for a response from the four defendant states by 3 p.m. on Thursday; in light of the court’s hasty disposition of similarly laughable complaints, we can safely assume that the justices intend to dispatch this case promptly. Paxton’s suit is shot through with conspiracy theories and constitutional claims with no basis in law. Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins, who typically authors the office’s lawsuits, did not sign on to this one, nor did his deputies; instead, Paxton brought in a “special counsel” from outside the agency. His suit is so ridiculous that it led some commentators to wonder whether the attorney general might have another motive for filing it. Paxton, after all, is reportedly under investigation by the FBI for alleged bribery and abuse of office. Trump, meanwhile, has been distributing pardons to his allies like candy. Paxton’s suit makes more sense as pardon-bait than it does as a legal document. And he may need presidential clemency to escape the federal criminal charges that could be imminent.

Texas AG Ken Paxton, under FBI investigation, asks the Supreme Court to hand Trump the election. (slate.com)

Who or what is "tates"?

 

[colfax_m]

No....he's just not a crook like Obama and Hillary.
If he was a crook or a dictator....he would have capped Comey and everyone else that was a threat to him.

You're claiming that he can't run the FBI properly.

That makes him incompetent.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Slate Magazine just put 2 and 2 together.
Ken Paxton knows his lawsuit is junk but wants a pardon from Donald Trump for his charges of bribery and abuse of power:
Slate Magazine:

The Supreme Court, however, is not going to take up Paxton’s invitation. It has asked for a response from the four defendant states by 3 p.m. on Thursday; in light of the court’s hasty disposition of similarly laughable complaints, we can safely assume that the justices intend to dispatch this case promptly. Paxton’s suit is shot through with conspiracy theories and constitutional claims with no basis in law. Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins, who typically authors the office’s lawsuits, did not sign on to this one, nor did his deputies; instead, Paxton brought in a “special counsel” from outside the agency. His suit is so ridiculous that it led some commentators to wonder whether the attorney general might have another motive for filing it. Paxton, after all, is reportedly under investigation by the FBI for alleged bribery and abuse of office. Trump, meanwhile, has been distributing pardons to his allies like candy. Paxton’s suit makes more sense as pardon-bait than it does as a legal document. And he may need presidential clemency to escape the federal criminal charges that could be imminent.

Texas AG Ken Paxton, under FBI investigation, asks the Supreme Court to hand Trump the election. (slate.com)

He is NOT under FBI investigation. Where the fuck did you see that?

Look, dumbfucks. I have already explained it as it was personally explained to me by the very judge (Mark Rusch) who appointed the retired sitting judge presiding over the Paxton case. Some jackass found a technicality on securities violations and has pressed Paxton's prosecution (going on 5 years now) for political reasons only. This is never going to trial. It's bullshit.

BUT EVEN IF IT'S ALL TRUE, NONE of that takes away from the case before the SCOTUS.

Now, let's focus on the ass kicking you commies are about to receive, curtesy of the 12th Amendment.

Hey dumbass, for your scenario to happen the House would have to vote for Trump, with a quorum present. The House is majority democrat. They can refuse to sit and guess who becomes president? Harris you ignorant shit. Talk about overloading your asshole.

Ummm....I think you missed something....

Read it again:

if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.

No, I don't think I missed shit. No quorum, the VP elect becomes president. Say hey to President Harris.

There will be members from 2/3 of the states without even batting an eyelash. That will be like fogging a damn mirror.

You are seriously miscalculating this entire thing.

And, based on congressional makeup:

Alabama: 7-1 (R)
Alaska: 3-0 (R)
Arizona: 5-4 (D)
Arkansas: 4-0 (R)
California: 45-8 (D)
Colorado: 4-3 (D)
Connecticut: 5-0 (D)
Delaware: 1 (D)
Florida: 14-13 (R)
Georgia: 10-4 (R) (see why the Georgia election is complete bullshit?)
Hawaii: 4-0 (D)
Idaho: 4-0 (R)
Illinois: 11-7 (D)
Indiana: 7-2 (R)
Iowa: 3-1 (D)
Kansas: 5-1 (R)
Kentucky: 5-1 (R)
Louisiana: 5-1 (R)
Maine: 2-0 (D)
Maryland: 7-1 (D)
Massachusetts: 9-0 (D)
Michigan: 7-1-1 (D)
Minnesota: 6-2 (D)
Mississippi: 3-1 (R)
Missouri: 6-2 (R)
Montana: 2-1 (R)
Nebraska: 3-0 (R)
Nevada: 2-0 (D)
New Hampshire: 4-0 (D)
New Jersey: 10-2 (D)
New Mexico: 2-1 (D)
New York: 21-6 (D)
North Carolina: 10-3 (R)
North Dakota: 3-0 (R)
Ohio: 12-4 (R)
Oklahoma: 4-1(R)
Oregon: 4-1 (D)
Pennsylvania: 9-9 (tie)
Rhode Island: 2-0 (D)
South Carolina: 5-2 (R)
South Dakota: 3-0 (R)
Tennessee: 5-2 (R)
Texas: 23-13 (R)
Utah: 3-1 (R)
Vermont: 2-0-1 (D)
Virginia: 7-4 (D)
Washington: 7-3 (D)
West Virginia: 3-0 (R)
Wisconsin: 5-3 (R)
Wyoming: 1 (R)

That's 26-24-1

 

[mudwhistle]

No....he's just not a crook like Obama and Hillary.
If he was a crook or a dictator....he would have capped Comey and everyone else that was a threat to him.

You're claiming that he can't run the FBI properly.

That makes him incompetent.

It's not the job of the president to run the FBI. He is supposed to hire the Director that runs it.
If he did run the FBI you faggots would say he needed to be impeached for interference.

 

[colfax_m]

It's not the job of the president to run the FBI. He is supposed to hire the Director that runs it.
If he did run the FBI you faggots would say he needed to be impeached for interference.

We did try to impeach him for interference but Trump's position was that he runs every executive agency beneath him and therefore it's impossible for him to interfere in something he controls.

So if you were consistent, either Trump is incompetent or he should have been impeached.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Fake news that was debunked days ago.

I love your retard reactions though. Laughing and pointing at you makes life just a little bit better.

Methinks they are all getting nervous. Wonder how many heart attacks the SC will give them?? LOL

None...

 

[Blaine Sweeter]

Slate Magazine just put 2 and 2 together.
Ken Paxton knows his lawsuit is junk but wants a pardon from Donald Trump for his charges of bribery and abuse of power:
Slate Magazine:

The Supreme Court, however, is not going to take up Paxton’s invitation. It has asked for a response from the four defendant states by 3 p.m. on Thursday; in light of the court’s hasty disposition of similarly laughable complaints, we can safely assume that the justices intend to dispatch this case promptly. Paxton’s suit is shot through with conspiracy theories and constitutional claims with no basis in law. Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins, who typically authors the office’s lawsuits, did not sign on to this one, nor did his deputies; instead, Paxton brought in a “special counsel” from outside the agency. His suit is so ridiculous that it led some commentators to wonder whether the attorney general might have another motive for filing it. Paxton, after all, is reportedly under investigation by the FBI for alleged bribery and abuse of office. Trump, meanwhile, has been distributing pardons to his allies like candy. Paxton’s suit makes more sense as pardon-bait than it does as a legal document. And he may need presidential clemency to escape the federal criminal charges that could be imminent.

Texas AG Ken Paxton, under FBI investigation, asks the Supreme Court to hand Trump the election. (slate.com)

Exactly.
Absolutely 100% right.
He's making a big show of taking this lawsuit to SCOTUS and I bet dollars to donuts Trump pardons him.
Unless he sees it for the scam that it is.
You know a shitter knows another shitter when they see one.

 

[Blaine Sweeter]

Fake news that was debunked days ago.

I love your retard reactions though. Laughing and pointing at you makes life just a little bit better.

Methinks they are all getting nervous. Wonder how many heart attacks the SC will give them?? LOL

None...

SCOTUS isn't going to take this on. It will be denied.
Claudidiot is a moron.

Legal Experts Call Texas Election Lawsuit 'Publicity Stunt' Supreme Court Will Never Hear

Legal Experts Call Texas Election Lawsuit 'Publicity Stunt'

One prominent judge in the state said Attorney General Ken Paxton has failed to show any evidence of fraud.

www.newsweek.com

"It looks like we have a new leader in the 'craziest lawsuit filed to purportedly challenge the election' category," said Steve Vladeck, professor at the University of Texas Law School.

Writing on Twitter on Monday, Vladeck said "The Court is *never* going to hear this one" and offered a detailed explanation.
"Although the Supreme Court has 'exclusive' jurisdiction over disputes between states, it does not automatically hear all such cases," Vladeck said. "Rather, states have to receive 'leave to file,' which usually requires showing that there's no other forum in which these issues can be resolved."

 

[Blaine Sweeter]

Slate Magazine just put 2 and 2 together.
Ken Paxton knows his lawsuit is junk but wants a pardon from Donald Trump for his charges of bribery and abuse of power:
Slate Magazine:

The Supreme Court, however, is not going to take up Paxton’s invitation. It has asked for a response from the four defendant states by 3 p.m. on Thursday; in light of the court’s hasty disposition of similarly laughable complaints, we can safely assume that the justices intend to dispatch this case promptly. Paxton’s suit is shot through with conspiracy theories and constitutional claims with no basis in law. Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins, who typically authors the office’s lawsuits, did not sign on to this one, nor did his deputies; instead, Paxton brought in a “special counsel” from outside the agency. His suit is so ridiculous that it led some commentators to wonder whether the attorney general might have another motive for filing it. Paxton, after all, is reportedly under investigation by the FBI for alleged bribery and abuse of office. Trump, meanwhile, has been distributing pardons to his allies like candy. Paxton’s suit makes more sense as pardon-bait than it does as a legal document. And he may need presidential clemency to escape the federal criminal charges that could be imminent.

Texas AG Ken Paxton, under FBI investigation, asks the Supreme Court to hand Trump the election. (slate.com)

Who or what is "tates"?

It's a typo.

 

[pyetro]

Slate Magazine just put 2 and 2 together.
Ken Paxton knows his lawsuit is junk but wants a pardon from Donald Trump for his charges of bribery and abuse of power:
Slate Magazine:

The Supreme Court, however, is not going to take up Paxton’s invitation. It has asked for a response from the four defendant states by 3 p.m. on Thursday; in light of the court’s hasty disposition of similarly laughable complaints, we can safely assume that the justices intend to dispatch this case promptly. Paxton’s suit is shot through with conspiracy theories and constitutional claims with no basis in law. Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins, who typically authors the office’s lawsuits, did not sign on to this one, nor did his deputies; instead, Paxton brought in a “special counsel” from outside the agency. His suit is so ridiculous that it led some commentators to wonder whether the attorney general might have another motive for filing it. Paxton, after all, is reportedly under investigation by the FBI for alleged bribery and abuse of office. Trump, meanwhile, has been distributing pardons to his allies like candy. Paxton’s suit makes more sense as pardon-bait than it does as a legal document. And he may need presidential clemency to escape the federal criminal charges that could be imminent.

Texas AG Ken Paxton, under FBI investigation, asks the Supreme Court to hand Trump the election. (slate.com)

Who or what is "tates"?

It's a typo.

He knows it is. He's playing dumb.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Fake news that was debunked days ago.

I love your retard reactions though. Laughing and pointing at you makes life just a little bit better.

Methinks they are all getting nervous. Wonder how many heart attacks the SC will give them?? LOL

None...

SCOTUS isn't going to take this on. It will be denied.
Claudidiot is a moron.

Legal Experts Call Texas Election Lawsuit 'Publicity Stunt' Supreme Court Will Never Hear

Legal Experts Call Texas Election Lawsuit 'Publicity Stunt'

One prominent judge in the state said Attorney General Ken Paxton has failed to show any evidence of fraud.

www.newsweek.com

"It looks like we have a new leader in the 'craziest lawsuit filed to purportedly challenge the election' category," said Steve Vladeck, professor at the University of Texas Law School.

Writing on Twitter on Monday, Vladeck said "The Court is *never* going to hear this one" and offered a detailed explanation.
"Although the Supreme Court has 'exclusive' jurisdiction over disputes between states, it does not automatically hear all such cases," Vladeck said. "Rather, states have to receive 'leave to file,' which usually requires showing that there's no other forum in which these issues can be resolved."

There is no doubt the USSC will reject this next attempt at retardation but the Trump base will believe it has merit because Ken Paxton filed it...

Only a true red in the face moron still believe Trump has a chance and Trump is playing these fools and you know what I am glad he is taking their money!

 

[Rye Catcher]

Slate Magazine just put 2 and 2 together.
Ken Paxton knows his lawsuit is junk but wants a pardon from Donald Trump for his charges of bribery and abuse of power:
Slate Magazine:

The Supreme Court, however, is not going to take up Paxton’s invitation. It has asked for a response from the four defendant states by 3 p.m. on Thursday; in light of the court’s hasty disposition of similarly laughable complaints, we can safely assume that the justices intend to dispatch this case promptly. Paxton’s suit is shot through with conspiracy theories and constitutional claims with no basis in law. Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins, who typically authors the office’s lawsuits, did not sign on to this one, nor did his deputies; instead, Paxton brought in a “special counsel” from outside the agency. His suit is so ridiculous that it led some commentators to wonder whether the attorney general might have another motive for filing it. Paxton, after all, is reportedly under investigation by the FBI for alleged bribery and abuse of office. Trump, meanwhile, has been distributing pardons to his allies like candy. Paxton’s suit makes more sense as pardon-bait than it does as a legal document. And he may need presidential clemency to escape the federal criminal charges that could be imminent.

Texas AG Ken Paxton, under FBI investigation, asks the Supreme Court to hand Trump the election. (slate.com)

Being under investigation from the Obama FBI is a badge of honor.

It isn't illegal to sue a person or state for criminal activity.
This is simply a thinly veiled treat against them for bringing the lawsuit.....and here's the summary for the purpose of the lawsuit:

A Summary of the Texas Election Lawsuit

This is Trump's FBI, dumbass. Not Obama's. Obama ceased to be President 8 years ago. You're beyond stupid.

Mud is not stupid, he's simply an asshole and a damn liar.

Yeah....and you're ugly.

Hey I complemented you! You're not very bright but not stupid. And you are a damn liar, as well as an Arrogant Self Serving-Hole: A hole is a vapid, empty vessel, as all of your comments prove.

 

[Nostra]

Slate Magazine just put 2 and 2 together.
Ken Paxton knows his lawsuit is junk but wants a pardon from Donald Trump for his charges of bribery and abuse of power:
Slate Magazine:

The Supreme Court, however, is not going to take up Paxton’s invitation. It has asked for a response from the four defendant states by 3 p.m. on Thursday; in light of the court’s hasty disposition of similarly laughable complaints, we can safely assume that the justices intend to dispatch this case promptly. Paxton’s suit is shot through with conspiracy theories and constitutional claims with no basis in law. Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins, who typically authors the office’s lawsuits, did not sign on to this one, nor did his deputies; instead, Paxton brought in a “special counsel” from outside the agency. His suit is so ridiculous that it led some commentators to wonder whether the attorney general might have another motive for filing it. Paxton, after all, is reportedly under investigation by the FBI for alleged bribery and abuse of office. Trump, meanwhile, has been distributing pardons to his allies like candy. Paxton’s suit makes more sense as pardon-bait than it does as a legal document. And he may need presidential clemency to escape the federal criminal charges that could be imminent.

Texas AG Ken Paxton, under FBI investigation, asks the Supreme Court to hand Trump the election. (slate.com)

Another bullshit thread title from pyetro

Where in your link does he ask for a pardon?

Let's see the quote.