Winston
Platinum Member
Ummm....I think you missed something....He is NOT under FBI investigation. Where the fuck did you see that?Slate Magazine just put 2 and 2 together.
Ken Paxton knows his lawsuit is junk but wants a pardon from Donald Trump for his charges of bribery and abuse of power:
Slate Magazine:
Texas AG Ken Paxton, under FBI investigation, asks the Supreme Court to hand Trump the election. (slate.com)The Supreme Court, however, is not going to take up Paxton’s invitation. It has asked for a response from the four defendant states by 3 p.m. on Thursday; in light of the court’s hasty disposition of similarly laughable complaints, we can safely assume that the justices intend to dispatch this case promptly. Paxton’s suit is shot through with conspiracy theories and constitutional claims with no basis in law. Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins, who typically authors the office’s lawsuits, did not sign on to this one, nor did his deputies; instead, Paxton brought in a “special counsel” from outside the agency. His suit is so ridiculous that it led some commentators to wonder whether the attorney general might have another motive for filing it. Paxton, after all, is reportedly under investigation by the FBI for alleged bribery and abuse of office. Trump, meanwhile, has been distributing pardons to his allies like candy. Paxton’s suit makes more sense as pardon-bait than it does as a legal document. And he may need presidential clemency to escape the federal criminal charges that could be imminent.
Look, dumbfucks. I have already explained it as it was personally explained to me by the very judge (Mark Rusch) who appointed the retired sitting judge presiding over the Paxton case. Some jackass found a technicality on securities violations and has pressed Paxton's prosecution (going on 5 years now) for political reasons only. This is never going to trial. It's bullshit.
BUT EVEN IF IT'S ALL TRUE, NONE of that takes away from the case before the SCOTUS.
Now, let's focus on the ass kicking you commies are about to receive, curtesy of the 12th Amendment.
Hey dumbass, for your scenario to happen the House would have to vote for Trump, with a quorum present. The House is majority democrat. They can refuse to sit and guess who becomes president? Harris you ignorant shit. Talk about overloading your asshole.
Read it again:
if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.
No, I don't think I missed shit. No quorum, the VP elect becomes president. Say hey to President Harris.