Ten Tenets of Freedom

Oddball

Unobtanium Member
Jan 3, 2009
109,453
121,534
3,615
Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
America needs about 500 guys like Bumper Hornberger in office.

by Jacob G. Hornberger, Posted December 8, 2009

Even while resisting the steady erosion of liberty in America, it is important that we keep in mind an overall vision of what a free society looks like. For if people lose sight of the “big picture,” the risk is that they end up settling for — and even celebrating — an unfree society whose controls have simply been modified or reduced.

This two-part essay will discuss ten tenets toward which we must continue to strive in our efforts to restore freedom to our land. Part 1 of the essay will cover the first five tenets and Part 2 will cover the other five tenets.

1. Income taxation

Repeal all taxes on income and, better yet, enact a constitutional bar to imposing income taxes. That includes taxes on wages, on capital gains, and on estates. People have the moral right to keep everything they earn and to do whatever they want with it, including saving their money and passing it on to their designated beneficiaries.

How can a person be considered truly free if the state has the power to take whatever percentage of income it wants from him? Whether the state sets the percentage at 5 percent or 100 percent, the principle remains the same: By wielding the power to set the percentage, the state effectively becomes the master of the people, who in turn become the servants.

2. Free trade

Freedom entails the unfettered right of people to enter into mutually beneficial exchanges with anyone anywhere in the world. When two people enter into an exchange, each benefits, from his own individual perspective. How do we know that? Because in every trade, both parties are giving up something they value less for something they value more. Otherwise, they would not enter into the trade.

Suppose John has 10 apples and George has 10 oranges. What would be a fair exchange? Five apples for five oranges? Not necessarily. Value is subjective. It lies in the eyes of the beholder. If John and George enter into a trade in which John gives 7 apples to George in return for 3 oranges, each side has raised his standard of living. The reason, again, is that they have both given up something they value less for something they value more.

3. Welfare

Repeal it all. No reforms. No modifications. No ridding the programs of waste, fraud, and abuse. Abolish every single program in which people receive largess from the government. That includes Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, farm subsidies, education grants, food stamps, small-business loans, bailouts, and every other welfare-state program.

The welfare state has been a disaster for the American people. For more than a century, Americans were characterized by such values as self-reliance, independence, and voluntary charity. That was the era in which there were no paternalistic or socialistic programs.

<snip>

The problem, however, is that all too many people no longer believe in themselves or in others. Or they think, &#8220;I would help others but no one else would.&#8221; Thus, a restoration of freedom entails not only an understanding of the principles of freedom and the virtues of a free market, it also entails a heightened sense of self-worth, self-esteem, and faith in freedom.

4. Economic regulations

Ditch them. Get rid of them all, including minimum-wage laws, price controls, rent controls, antitrust legislation, licensing laws, insider-trading laws, banking regulations, product-safety regulations, and stock regulations. In fact, the best thing would be to enact a constitutional amendment stating, &#8220;No law shall be passed respecting the regulation of commerce or abridging the free exercise thereof.&#8221;

What actually is meant by the term &#8220;free enterprise&#8221;? It means enterprise that is free of government control or regulation. &#8220;Free&#8221; means free, as in no control and no regulation. If economic enterprise is controlled or regulated, it is not free enterprise. It is controlled or regulated enterprise.

5. Open immigration

Every American living today takes it for granted that Americans are, by and large, free to cross borders from one state to another without governmental interference. The reason I say &#8220;by and large&#8221; is that in the Southwest and West, Americans traveling east and west are now required to submit to document checks and vehicular searches at the hands of the U.S. Border Patrol, an agency charged with stopping the flow of people illegally crossing the international border into the United States.

<snip>

Ironically, what 19th-century Americans discovered was that open immigration contributed to the enormous rise in the standard of living of the American people in the 1800s. While having no income taxation, no welfare state, few trade restrictions, and no economic regulations was a critical factor in improving the economic status of people, open immigration also played an important role. Immigrants brought a vitality and an energy that were immeasurable, not to mention the benefits that came from the division of labor they provided.

6. Gun control

It would have been more appropriate to have made the Second Amendment the first amendment to the Constitution. Without the right of the citizenry to keep and bear arms, the fundamental rights enumerated in the First Amendment are worthless. When the citizenry are well-armed, government officials tend to exercise caution in infringing such fundamental rights.

<snip>

It is that insurance policy against tyranny that was the primary guiding force behind placing the right to keep and bear arms immediately after the protections regarding freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom to assemble peaceably. The purpose of the Second Amendment is not to guarantee the right of hunting deer or self-protection against criminals. It provides the means by which the citizenry can protect the First Amendment.

7. Civil liberties

In the aftermath of the Iranian elections, Iranian officials began rounding up dissidents, incarcerating them, charging them with crimes against the state, and threatening them with kangaroo trials and punishment. That&#8217;s the way that tyrannical governments ensure that their orders for people to shut up and stop criticizing government are enforced.

It is that power &#8212; the power to arbitrarily seize people and incarcerate and execute them &#8212; that supplies the teeth to the decrees ordering people to shut up. After all, if the government wields the power to tell people to keep silent but lacks the power to do anything to people who refuse to obey the decree, then the first power becomes worthless. The government&#8217;s power to arbitrarily arrest, jail, and punish people provides the enforcement mechanism for enforcing its orders for people to cease their criticism of government.

8. The drug war

The drug war perfectly encapsulates the loss of freedom that the American people have suffered under the paternalistic regulatory state. What could be a more perfect assault on the freedom of the individual than for the state to have the power to arrest someone and punish him for doing nothing more than selling, purchasing, possessing, or ingesting some substance that government officials don&#8217;t approve of?

Everyone would agree that some substances can be harmful if ingested, especially in excess. Alcohol, tobacco, sugar, and fatty foods are examples. That&#8217;s not the point. The point is whether freedom entails the right to ingest whatever a person wishes to ingest and, if so, whether the state should be permitted to infringe that important aspect of freedom.

9. The monetary system

The United States was founded on a monetary system based on gold coins and silver coins. The reason for that was that the Framers understood that one of the greatest threats to the freedom and well-being of the citizenry was the government&#8217;s propensity to plunder and loot people&#8217;s wealth through the excess printing of paper money. Thus, by rejecting paper money in favor of gold coins and silver coins, our ancestors removed one of the most popular means that government officials have used to inflate the currency.

That intent was manifested in the Constitution. For example, the powers delegated to Congress did not include the power to issue paper money, establish a central bank, or enact legal-tender laws. There were also express provisions prohibiting the states from making anything but gold and silver coins legal tender and from issuing &#8220;bills of credit,&#8221; i.e., paper money.

10. Militarism and empire

When the United States was founded, the world was shocked by an unusual feature of American life: No standing military force, no conscription, no alliances with other nations, and a steadfast refusal to get involved in foreign conflicts.

The fact is that Americans had had a bellyful of empire, militarism, and foreign wars, which is what the British Empire was all about. They were also sick and tired of the debts, taxes, bureaucracy, regulations, gun control, and infringements on privacy and civil liberties that come with empire.

<snip>

Through the CIA and the Pentagon, the U.S. empire engages in all the things that our American ancestors found abhorrent: foreign interventions, foreign wars, entangling alliances, foreign aid, foreign meddling, assassinations, coups, torture, invasions, wars of aggression, and brutal occupations. It&#8217;s all done, of course, in the name of &#8220;freedom,&#8221; the bogus buzz word that has guided empires throughout history.

Ten Tenets of Freedom, Part 1 by Jacob Hornberger
 
10's across the Board! Even the Judge from the Ukraine held up a 10! (He disappeared immediately after)
 
Once upon a time, on a field shaped like a diamond a ball game was played. The game was similar to baeball today, but there were many fewer rules then there are today. The game to which I refer was played in the 19th Century, and in the last inning of that game, the visiting team was ahead and the home team a bat in the last of the ninth.
The home team had the bags loaded, and their powerful left handed first baseman at bat. The visitors, knowing and fearing his power shifted their defense to the right, leaving a large gap from the left field line to the power alley in left-center.
With two outs, and ahead by only one run, the visitors were on the brink of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
The visitors pitcher was clearly tired, and had few throws left. But in those days relief pitchers were rare, and a man was expected to go all the way. The visiting manager sent his two spare players down the left field line to 'warm' up, in case the game went extra innings, knowing his ace was soon to be done, yet hoping he could finsih the inning.
So the sceane was set, Smith and O'Malley warming up down the left field line; Jones, the left fielder playing deep and far into left center; and Davis on the hill ready to throw.
Davis winds and the batter swings, a deep, long and high fly ball down the left field line. Jones starts to run to make a play, but is too far from the line to have any chance, and then, from the dugout the visiting manager hollars for all to hear, "O'Malley in for Jones!"
O'malley drifts onto the playing field, and makes the catch saving the game for the visitors.

The point of the story? In the old days of baseball there was no rule requiring time to be out to make a subsitution; and no rule requiring all players but for the catcher to be on the field of play.
 
Last edited:
Ten Tenets of turning the US into a Third World Country
 
Repeal all taxes on income and, better yet, enact a constitutional bar to imposing income taxes. That includes taxes on wages, on capital gains, and on estates. People have the moral right to keep everything they earn and to do whatever they want with it, including saving their money and passing it on to their designated beneficiaries.

Right... and how do we fund the Army?

Freedom entails the unfettered right of people to enter into mutually beneficial exchanges with anyone anywhere in the world. When two people enter into an exchange, each benefits, from his own individual perspective. How do we know that? Because in every trade, both parties are giving up something they value less for something they value more. Otherwise, they would not enter into the trade.

Suppose John has 10 apples and George has 10 oranges. What would be a fair exchange? Five apples for five oranges? Not necessarily. Value is subjective. It lies in the eyes of the beholder. If John and George enter into a trade in which John gives 7 apples to George in return for 3 oranges, each side has raised his standard of living. The reason, again, is that they have both given up something they value less for something they value more.

Are you saying there are laws against barter? :cuckoo:

3. Welfare

Repeal it all. No reforms. No modifications. No ridding the programs of waste, fraud, and abuse. Abolish every single program in which people receive largess from the government. That includes Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, farm subsidies, education grants, food stamps, small-business loans, bailouts, and every other welfare-state program.

Yes... fuck the old, the sick, and wounded veterans. They should ahve been born nobels if they didn't want to live in the gutter. Back to 1845!

Ditch them. Get rid of them all, including minimum-wage laws, price controls, rent controls, antitrust legislation, licensing laws, insider-trading laws, banking regulations, product-safety regulations, and stock regulations. In fact, the best thing would be to enact a constitutional amendment stating, “No law shall be passed respecting the regulation of commerce or abridging the free exercise thereof.”

Yes! Fuck transparency! Bring back the trusts! More monopolies 1845, here we come! Put the children back in the coal mines!

Every American living today takes it for granted that Americans are, by and large, free to cross borders from one state to another without governmental interference. The reason I say “by and large” is that in the Southwest and West, Americans traveling east and west are now required to submit to document checks and vehicular searches at the hands of the U.S. Border Patrol, an agency charged with stopping the flow of people illegally crossing the international border into the United States.
!

wait... so.. open the border?


Moron...

8 I cansee and 9 I can like.
 
&#9773;proletarian&#9773;;1852379 said:
Right... and how do we fund the Army?

If you support taxation than gunpoint obviously.

Are you saying there are laws against barter? :cuckoo:

There certainly is. At the end of the barrel of a gun the government takes what it deems necessary.

Yes... fuck the old, the sick, and wounded veterans. They should ahve been born nobels if they didn't want to live in the gutter. Back to 1845!

If you support violence to "help the veterans" that is your choice. Just don't pretend your peaceful or justified.

Yes! Fuck transparency! Bring back the trusts! More monopolies 1845, here we come! Put the children back in the coal mines!

Do you know what the largest monopoly is (and also has the least amount of transparency)? Government.

wait... so.. open the border?

Whose border is it? Yours? Who are you to say I can't cross that border?
 
1. Income taxation

Repeal all taxes on income and, better yet, enact a constitutional bar to imposing income taxes. That includes taxes on wages, on capital gains, and on estates. People have the moral right to keep everything they earn and to do whatever they want with it, including saving their money and passing it on to their designated beneficiaries.

How can a person be considered truly free if the state has the power to take whatever percentage of income it wants from him? Whether the state sets the percentage at 5 percent or 100 percent, the principle remains the same: By wielding the power to set the percentage, the state effectively becomes the master of the people, who in turn become the servants.
I think the ability to vote in the next set of representatives off sets this perceived king like power.

2. Free trade

Freedom entails the unfettered right of people to enter into mutually beneficial exchanges with anyone anywhere in the world. When two people enter into an exchange, each benefits, from his own individual perspective. How do we know that? Because in every trade, both parties are giving up something they value less for something they value more. Otherwise, they would not enter into the trade.

Suppose John has 10 apples and George has 10 oranges. What would be a fair exchange? Five apples for five oranges? Not necessarily. Value is subjective. It lies in the eyes of the beholder. If John and George enter into a trade in which John gives 7 apples to George in return for 3 oranges, each side has raised his standard of living. The reason, again, is that they have both given up something they value less for something they value more.
I'm not real motivated by this. While I could stand to stop the embargo of Cuba I could support an embargo against other threats including technological embargos which SOMEHOW keep every country on earth from having atomic bombs we could build 55 years ago.
3. Welfare

Repeal it all. No reforms. No modifications. No ridding the programs of waste, fraud, and abuse. Abolish every single program in which people receive largess from the government. That includes Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, farm subsidies, education grants, food stamps, small-business loans, bailouts, and every other welfare-state program.

The welfare state has been a disaster for the American people. For more than a century, Americans were characterized by such values as self-reliance, independence, and voluntary charity. That was the era in which there were no paternalistic or socialistic programs.
My lack of faith in my common man goes against this. We gotta keep the destitute from feeling disenfranchised enough that kidnapping my children and ransoming them off is easier than collecting welfare.
Then again I'm fine with not building new levees as a form of welfare for land developers stupid enough to think the floodplain is where new development belongs so I don't totally disagree.

4. Economic regulations

Ditch them. Get rid of them all, including minimum-wage laws, price controls, rent controls, antitrust legislation, licensing laws, insider-trading laws, banking regulations, product-safety regulations, and stock regulations. In fact, the best thing would be to enact a constitutional amendment stating, “No law shall be passed respecting the regulation of commerce or abridging the free exercise thereof.”

What actually is meant by the term “free enterprise”? It means enterprise that is free of government control or regulation. “Free” means free, as in no control and no regulation. If economic enterprise is controlled or regulated, it is not free enterprise. It is controlled or regulated enterprise.
Nah. If you leave civilians and capitalists alone then houses in St. Louis would still be heated by coal. The banking system proved it can't work w/o massive regulation. Also the capitalists of the 19th century made braving the indians preferable to living in the city. I don't believe in free enterprise anymore than I believe in a world w/o laws regulating my "right" to fire my rifle though my neighbor's body.
5. Open immigration

Every American living today takes it for granted that Americans are, by and large, free to cross borders from one state to another without governmental interference. The reason I say “by and large” is that in the Southwest and West, Americans traveling east and west are now required to submit to document checks and vehicular searches at the hands of the U.S. Border Patrol, an agency charged with stopping the flow of people illegally crossing the international border into the United States.

<snip>

Ironically, what 19th-century Americans discovered was that open immigration contributed to the enormous rise in the standard of living of the American people in the 1800s. While having no income taxation, no welfare state, few trade restrictions, and no economic regulations was a critical factor in improving the economic status of people, open immigration also played an important role. Immigrants brought a vitality and an energy that were immeasurable, not to mention the benefits that came from the division of labor they provided.
I'm almost for this. Really.

I'll argue the 1800s in general are a poor economic example thanks to our need to expand into, benefit from, and populate depopulated Indian lands. But we may as well keep money from illegal immigrants in the country.

Obviously if 1.4 billion Chinese suddenly wanted to move into the U.S. that would lower our standard of living. I am more lenient than most folks on this though.
6. Gun control

It would have been more appropriate to have made the Second Amendment the first amendment to the Constitution. Without the right of the citizenry to keep and bear arms, the fundamental rights enumerated in the First Amendment are worthless. When the citizenry are well-armed, government officials tend to exercise caution in infringing such fundamental rights.

<snip>

It is that insurance policy against tyranny that was the primary guiding force behind placing the right to keep and bear arms immediately after the protections regarding freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom to assemble peaceably. The purpose of the Second Amendment is not to guarantee the right of hunting deer or self-protection against criminals. It provides the means by which the citizenry can protect the First Amendment.
Practically I'm pretty ok with our current gun laws. I can go buy an AK-47 if I want so I think a cost/benefit analysis puts us in a decent place. What would you like to change?
7. Civil liberties

In the aftermath of the Iranian elections, Iranian officials began rounding up dissidents, incarcerating them, charging them with crimes against the state, and threatening them with kangaroo trials and punishment. That’s the way that tyrannical governments ensure that their orders for people to shut up and stop criticizing government are enforced.

It is that power — the power to arbitrarily seize people and incarcerate and execute them — that supplies the teeth to the decrees ordering people to shut up. After all, if the government wields the power to tell people to keep silent but lacks the power to do anything to people who refuse to obey the decree, then the first power becomes worthless. The government’s power to arbitrarily arrest, jail, and punish people provides the enforcement mechanism for enforcing its orders for people to cease their criticism of government.
I think I agree with this one. Obviously the government needs to be able to arrest murderers and thieves. We push it a little too far with "Patriot Act" provisions I feel though.
8. The drug war

The drug war perfectly encapsulates the loss of freedom that the American people have suffered under the paternalistic regulatory state. What could be a more perfect assault on the freedom of the individual than for the state to have the power to arrest someone and punish him for doing nothing more than selling, purchasing, possessing, or ingesting some substance that government officials don’t approve of?

Everyone would agree that some substances can be harmful if ingested, especially in excess. Alcohol, tobacco, sugar, and fatty foods are examples. That’s not the point. The point is whether freedom entails the right to ingest whatever a person wishes to ingest and, if so, whether the state should be permitted to infringe that important aspect of freedom.
I could almost be ok with laws that would legalize heroine and other "bad" drugs if folks locked themselves up voluntarily when high on PCP. Humans can't take care of themselves around even alcohol though so we need babysat by the state. I'll legalize a couple recreational drugs if we can multiple by 10 the penalty for those committing crimes while high or drunk.
9. The monetary system

The United States was founded on a monetary system based on gold coins and silver coins. The reason for that was that the Framers understood that one of the greatest threats to the freedom and well-being of the citizenry was the government’s propensity to plunder and loot people’s wealth through the excess printing of paper money. Thus, by rejecting paper money in favor of gold coins and silver coins, our ancestors removed one of the most popular means that government officials have used to inflate the currency.

That intent was manifested in the Constitution. For example, the powers delegated to Congress did not include the power to issue paper money, establish a central bank, or enact legal-tender laws. There were also express provisions prohibiting the states from making anything but gold and silver coins legal tender and from issuing “bills of credit,” i.e., paper money.
Capitalism is ok enough to allow the free open international market to set the value of paper currency. Why regulate this and nothing else? Gold and silver don't need to be tied up in currency. Heck. Most of my currency is in electronic paper money right now. Very abstract.

10. Militarism and empire

When the United States was founded, the world was shocked by an unusual feature of American life: No standing military force, no conscription, no alliances with other nations, and a steadfast refusal to get involved in foreign conflicts.

The fact is that Americans had had a bellyful of empire, militarism, and foreign wars, which is what the British Empire was all about. They were also sick and tired of the debts, taxes, bureaucracy, regulations, gun control, and infringements on privacy and civil liberties that come with empire.

<snip>

Through the CIA and the Pentagon, the U.S. empire engages in all the things that our American ancestors found abhorrent: foreign interventions, foreign wars, entangling alliances, foreign aid, foreign meddling, assassinations, coups, torture, invasions, wars of aggression, and brutal occupations. It’s all done, of course, in the name of “freedom,” the bogus buzz word that has guided empires throughout history.

Ideally I do agree with this. And I feel we're in a terrible place as the world police. What to do about it I don't know.

Practically in this world of improved transportation and the almost instant threat many nations can pose to us make the evils of some military industrial complex necessary.

Thanks for the post. Gave me plenty to discuss.
 
&#9773;proletarian&#9773;;1852379 said:
Right... and how do we fund the Army?

If you support taxation than gunpoint obviously.

Is that supposed to be a sentence?
Are you saying there are laws against barter? :cuckoo:
There certainly is. At the end of the barrel of a gun the government takes what it deems necessary.

Right... show me a law that says I can't engage in barter.

Moron.
If you support violence to "help the veterans" that is your choice. Just don't pretend your peaceful or justified.

wow... there is no facepalm big enough.
Yes! Fuck transparency! Bring back the trusts! More monopolies 1845, here we come! Put the children back in the coal mines!
Do you know what the largest monopoly is (and also has the least amount of transparency)? Government.

:eusa_eh:

You think there's only one kind of government? Do you thin I support a large central authority? *points at the red flag in avatar and numerous posts espousing classical liberal and libertarian principles*
wait... so.. open the border?
Whose border is it? Yours? Who are you to say I can't cross that border?
[/QUOTE]

So you support criminals who undermine a peaceable and prosperous society?
 
&#9773;proletarian&#9773;;1852758 said:
Right... show me a law that says I can't engage in barter.

Moron.

Any tax.

Moron.

I agree to work for you for 1 ounce of silver per hour. You pay me 1 ounce of silver for 40 hours a week 52 weeks a year. I have bartered my service to you the business owner. I take my 40 ounces of silver home. All is fair and square here correct?

Wrong. This type of barter is unacceptable because government will demand payment for services (completely irrelevant to this barter) I never agreed to, requested, or wanted.

You think there's only one kind of government? Do you thin I support a large central authority?

There is only one kind of government. It's necessarily a monopoly, and it will necessarily use force and threats to exist. When it ceases to become a monopoly and does not use force or threats it ceases to be a government.

So you support criminals who undermine a peaceable and prosperous society?

I absolutely do not which I why I oppose criminals (politicians) drawing lines in sand declaring their rule over a territory.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top