Deutschland And Democrats

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Oct 6, 2008
127,496
63,366
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1. "......July 16, 2024, the recent day when Germany’s interior minister banned a political magazine.
....leftist government’s decision to shutter Compact, a magazine that supports the Alternative for Germany (Alternative für Deutschland, or AfD) party. In June, AfD placed second in Germany’s elections to the European Union Parliament after running on an anti-illegal migration platform.

According to Nancy Faeser, the socialist interior minister responsible for the ban, Compact, which boasts 40,000 subscribers and reaches many more through online media engagement, is a publication of “intellectual arsonists who incite a climate of hatred and violence against refugees and migrants and seek to overthrow our democratic state.”
....she dispatched 339 police officers to raid 14 locations, including Compact’s offices, the offices of its parent company, and the homes of its staff and shareholders."



2. Could that happen in our country which, presumably, is guided by the only document that Americans have voted to be governed by, the US Constitlution?
Of course it could because of Democrarts.

The Democrat Party abhors the Constitution. It worked with its Big Tec allies to end free speech.
Free speech, mandated in the Constution.




3. Democrats put an anti-free speech advocate on the Supreme Court, and passed a law forbidding free speech:
. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors 2of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????


The 1954 federal Johnson Amendment prohibits a pastor from talking about candidates from the pulpit in light of Scripture. Thus, based on what a pastor says about an election from the pulpit, the tax code allows the government to tax a church. Consider that in light of the Internal Revenue Service's increasingly vague regulations, and you have a recipe for the censorship of religion. The IRS, through those vague regulations, reserves for itself tremendous discretion and power to decide which churches to punish for violations of the Johnson Amendment and which not to punish.”
Why don't churches pay taxes?



Fascists impose restrictions on free speech.



4. Democrat Supreme Court Justice Kagan on free speech...
"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:
"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."

In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."

Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."
If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"





5. Any reading of the first amendment will prove this to be unconstitutional.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.




6. Trump supports the Constitution

"My Administration is also defending religious liberty, and that includes the Constitutional right to pray in public schools. In America, we do not punish prayer. We do not tear down crosses. We do not ban symbols of faith. We do not muzzle preachers and pastors. In America, we celebrate faith. We cherish religion. We lift our voices in prayer, and we raise our sights to the Glory of God!"
Trump, SOTU 2020





Did you vote for free speech or against it?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top