Teen Mmay Get 2yrs For Sex With Jesus Pic

[martybegan]

Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.

I bet if he had fake sex with an Obama statue you would demand 2 years at a minimum.

Naw...pesky 1st amendment.

If he did it with his own statue, it would probably be fine under the 1st, however he did it to someone else's, and the 1st amendment doesn't allow you to fuck around with someone else's property.

The statue wasn't at all harmed, nor did its owners complain.

Anything else?

Ray Rice's wife didn't complain..

Anything else poogoo?

 

[Ravi]

What would Ben Carson say?

 

[Pogo]

I have no doubt that some liberal ACLU jew lawyer will take the case and argue in court that the picture of the teen humping the statue was artistic expression and a form of modern art. ......

I've been in courts, and read through a lot of legal documents... I have yet to see any case about anything anywhere, even in TV-land, where the judge first needs to know the attorney's religion.

Weird post dood.

 

[Pogo]

Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.

I bet if he had fake sex with an Obama statue you would demand 2 years at a minimum.

Naw...pesky 1st amendment.

If he did it with his own statue, it would probably be fine under the 1st, however he did it to someone else's, and the 1st amendment doesn't allow you to fuck around with someone else's property.

The statue wasn't at all harmed, nor did its owners complain.

Anything else?

Ray Rice's wife didn't complain..

Anything else poogoo?

Who the fuck is Ray Rice? Does he own this statue?
Again -- anything else?

 

[Pogo]

Certainly needs his ass kicked.

For....?

 

[martybegan]

Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.

I bet if he had fake sex with an Obama statue you would demand 2 years at a minimum.

Naw...pesky 1st amendment.

If he did it with his own statue, it would probably be fine under the 1st, however he did it to someone else's, and the 1st amendment doesn't allow you to fuck around with someone else's property.

The statue wasn't at all harmed, nor did its owners complain.

Anything else?

Ray Rice's wife didn't complain..

Anything else poogoo?

Who the fuck is Ray Rice? Does he own this statue?
Again -- anything else?

Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.

I bet if he had fake sex with an Obama statue you would demand 2 years at a minimum.

Naw...pesky 1st amendment.

If he did it with his own statue, it would probably be fine under the 1st, however he did it to someone else's, and the 1st amendment doesn't allow you to fuck around with someone else's property.

The statue wasn't at all harmed, nor did its owners complain.

Anything else?

Ray Rice's wife didn't complain..

Anything else poogoo?

Who the fuck is Ray Rice? Does he own this statue?
Again -- anything else?

I guess he lucked out, if he did it to a representation of Mohammed he would have a fatwa all up his ass.

 

[UllysesS.Archer]

About a week confined in a cell with someone who could force him to assume his "Jesus position" might be enough to focus his mind.

So you disagree with the First Amendment.
Fine, start a petition to rescind it. Until then, law of the land, like it or lump it.

You really don't understand the First Amendment, do you? If the church wished to press charges, the kid has no First Amendment defense. Why? Look at the picture, he is on the church's property, and as soon as he laid hands upon the statue, he became a criminal.

You can protest all you want, but you cannot touch someone else, or get on someone else's property, this includes businesses and places of worship.

Law of the land, like it or lump it. By the way, you just got schooled!

 

[Ravi]

I guess he lucked out, if he did it to a representation of Mohammed he would have a fatwa all up his ass.

And then you would have probably realized that he hadn't done anything criminal.

 

[martybegan]

I guess he lucked out, if he did it to a representation of Mohammed he would have a fatwa all up his ass.

And then you would have probably realized that he hadn't done anything criminal.

He was trespassing at a minimum.

 

[Ravi]

I guess he lucked out, if he did it to a representation of Mohammed he would have a fatwa all up his ass.

And then you would have probably realized that he hadn't done anything criminal.

He was trespassing at a minimum.

He should sue the church under the attractive nuisance law.

 

[Sunni Man]

I have no doubt that some liberal ACLU jew lawyer will take the case and argue in court that the picture of the teen humping the statue was artistic expression and a form of modern art. ......

I've been in courts, and read through a lot of legal documents... I have yet to see any case about anything anywhere, even in TV-land, where the judge first needs to know the attorney's religion.

Weird post dood.

Don't be obtuse.

The reality is that the majority of ACLU lawyers are jews. ......

 

[Pogo]

I have no doubt that some liberal ACLU jew lawyer will take the case and argue in court that the picture of the teen humping the statue was artistic expression and a form of modern art. ......

I've been in courts, and read through a lot of legal documents... I have yet to see any case about anything anywhere, even in TV-land, where the judge first needs to know the attorney's religion.

Weird post dood.

Don't be obtuse.

The reality is that the majority of ACLU lawyers are jews. ......

Is it? Should I axe for a link, or would it be mindless to expect anyone actually compiled such a mindless list?

What the fuck does a lawyer's religion have to do with his or her practice?
How many plumbers are Presbyterians? How many bakers are Buddhists? How many teachers Taoist? Can you spell 'obsessed'?

 

[Vandalshandle]

The whole thing will be either dismissed altogether, or bargained down to community service, if nobody wants to spend the money to fight it. It is unconstitutional to criminalize being an obnoxious asshole. Otherwise, there have been dozens of people I have known over the years who would have been incarcerated. Besides, that, I suspect that we have better uses of our jails and prisons than for something like this.

 

[Ravi]

I have no doubt that some liberal ACLU jew lawyer will take the case and argue in court that the picture of the teen humping the statue was artistic expression and a form of modern art. ......

I've been in courts, and read through a lot of legal documents... I have yet to see any case about anything anywhere, even in TV-land, where the judge first needs to know the attorney's religion.

Weird post dood.

Don't be obtuse.

The reality is that the majority of ACLU lawyers are jews. ......

Is it? Should I axe for a link, or would it be mindless to expect anyone actually compiled such a mindless list?

What the fuck does a lawyer's religion have to do with his or her practice?

He's just jealous that the vast majority of Jews are more intelligent than he.

 

[Pogo]

About a week confined in a cell with someone who could force him to assume his "Jesus position" might be enough to focus his mind.

So you disagree with the First Amendment.
Fine, start a petition to rescind it. Until then, law of the land, like it or lump it.

You really don't understand the First Amendment, do you? If the church wished to press charges, the kid has no First Amendment defense. Why? Look at the picture, he is on the church's property, and as soon as he laid hands upon the statue, he became a criminal.

You can protest all you want, but you cannot touch someone else, or get on someone else's property, this includes businesses and places of worship.

Law of the land, like it or lump it. By the way, you just got schooled!

That's trespassing. Has nothing to do with the First Amendment or free expression.

You just flunked Social Studies.

 

[Meathead]

The kid is one sick fuck, He mmay have a stutter too.

 

[Pogo]

If he did it with his own statue, it would probably be fine under the 1st, however he did it to someone else's, and the 1st amendment doesn't allow you to fuck around with someone else's property.

The statue wasn't at all harmed, nor did its owners complain.

Anything else?

Ray Rice's wife didn't complain..

Anything else poogoo?

Who the fuck is Ray Rice? Does he own this statue?
Again -- anything else?

I guess he lucked out, if he did it to a representation of Mohammed he would have a fatwa all up his ass.

So that would be a "no".

Is that a big word for you?

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

And in a related story....

“The statue was not a piece of City commissioned artwork and consequently it has been removed,” city spokeswoman Sara Couper told Global News.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

It truly is.

And a First Amendment, free expression defense is very much warranted - the suspect should be subject to no punitive measures. Americans have the fundamental right to engage in forms of expression both offensive and moronic.

Hey stupid, the statue wasn't his.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

It truly is.

And a First Amendment, free expression defense is very much warranted - the suspect should be subject to no punitive measures. Americans have the fundamental right to engage in forms of expression both offensive and moronic.

It crosses the line and is like disturbing the peace but worse.