Teen Mmay Get 2yrs For Sex With Jesus Pic

[HenryBHough]

In this 14 year old you see the future of The Democrat Party. They're salivating for him to age sufficiently to run for first The Senate then for President.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

There are a lot of religious statues out there, and we should not want to start to see this happening a lot which is likely to happen if nothing is done. It is despicable.

And what exactly would you like to see 'done'?


This is the nature of a free society and people, in the context of our Constitutional Republic – where free expression often manifest as despicable and offensive, but not criminal.

You can be as offensive as you can get away with in your own space but not at a church or at religious statues. Penalize him. What if this had been done at a synagogue? He would be looking at a hate crime then no matter how much people want to explain it away as innocent or how ignorant he was.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.

I bet if he had fake sex with an Obama statue you would demand 2 years at a minimum.

Naw...pesky 1st amendment.

If he did it with his own statue, it would probably be fine under the 1st, however he did it to someone else's, and the 1st amendment doesn't allow you to fuck around with someone else's property.

The statue wasn't at all harmed or defaced, nor did its owners complain.

Anything else?

Police don't need a complaint to enforce the law.

 

[daws101]

Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.

I bet if he had fake sex with an Obama statue you would demand 2 years at a minimum.

Naw...pesky 1st amendment.

If he did it with his own statue, it would probably be fine under the 1st, however he did it to someone else's, and the 1st amendment doesn't allow you to fuck around with someone else's property.

The statue wasn't at all harmed or defaced, nor did its owners complain.

Anything else?

Police don't need a complaint to enforce the law.

the kid is an amature.... besides it's a whole lot less offensive than then this gem
or this

and most certainly this:

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.

I bet if he had fake sex with an Obama statue you would demand 2 years at a minimum.

Naw...pesky 1st amendment.

If he did it with his own statue, it would probably be fine under the 1st, however he did it to someone else's, and the 1st amendment doesn't allow you to fuck around with someone else's property.

The statue wasn't at all harmed or defaced, nor did its owners complain.

Anything else?

Police don't need a complaint to enforce the law.

the kid is an amature.... besides it's a whole lot less offensive than then this gem
or this

and most certainly this:

They are impersonal publications versus doing something in person.

 

[daws101]

Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.

I bet if he had fake sex with an Obama statue you would demand 2 years at a minimum.

Naw...pesky 1st amendment.

If he did it with his own statue, it would probably be fine under the 1st, however he did it to someone else's, and the 1st amendment doesn't allow you to fuck around with someone else's property.

The statue wasn't at all harmed or defaced, nor did its owners complain.

Anything else?

Police don't need a complaint to enforce the law.

the kid is an amature.... besides it's a whole lot less offensive than then this gem
or this

and most certainly this:

They are impersonal publications versus doing something in person.

that's what known as a distinction without a difference.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.

I bet if he had fake sex with an Obama statue you would demand 2 years at a minimum.

Naw...pesky 1st amendment.

If he did it with his own statue, it would probably be fine under the 1st, however he did it to someone else's, and the 1st amendment doesn't allow you to fuck around with someone else's property.

The statue wasn't at all harmed or defaced, nor did its owners complain.

Anything else?

Police don't need a complaint to enforce the law.

the kid is an amature.... besides it's a whole lot less offensive than then this gem
or this

and most certainly this:

They are impersonal publications versus doing something in person.

that's what known as a distinction without a difference.

Or indifference?

 

[UllysesS.Archer]

About a week confined in a cell with someone who could force him to assume his "Jesus position" might be enough to focus his mind.

So you disagree with the First Amendment.
Fine, start a petition to rescind it. Until then, law of the land, like it or lump it.

You really don't understand the First Amendment, do you? If the church wished to press charges, the kid has no First Amendment defense. Why? Look at the picture, he is on the church's property, and as soon as he laid hands upon the statue, he became a criminal.

You can protest all you want, but you cannot touch someone else, or get on someone else's property, this includes businesses and places of worship.

Law of the land, like it or lump it. By the way, you just got schooled!

That's trespassing. Has nothing to do with the First Amendment or free expression.

You just flunked Social Studies.

It does in this case, and everyone on here with an ounce of smarts knows it. You cannot argue free expression, while breaking the law. And this boy was breaking the law, by trespassing, and if the DA wants to add more charges, then attempted vandalism,(his hands is on the statue's head, perhaps he is trying to rip the head off.) comes in to play from just the kid's on photograph.

I know you hate being wrong, but, as much as you are, you should be used to it, but you keep trying, one day you might be right.But, I'm sure it will be by mistake.

 

[daws101]

Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.

I bet if he had fake sex with an Obama statue you would demand 2 years at a minimum.

Naw...pesky 1st amendment.

If he did it with his own statue, it would probably be fine under the 1st, however he did it to someone else's, and the 1st amendment doesn't allow you to fuck around with someone else's property.

The statue wasn't at all harmed or defaced, nor did its owners complain.

Anything else?

Police don't need a complaint to enforce the law.

the kid is an amature.... besides it's a whole lot less offensive than then this gem
or this

and most certainly this:

They are impersonal publications versus doing something in person.

that's what known as a distinction without a difference.

Or indifference?

naw..

 

[Ravi]

About a week confined in a cell with someone who could force him to assume his "Jesus position" might be enough to focus his mind.

So you disagree with the First Amendment.
Fine, start a petition to rescind it. Until then, law of the land, like it or lump it.

You really don't understand the First Amendment, do you? If the church wished to press charges, the kid has no First Amendment defense. Why? Look at the picture, he is on the church's property, and as soon as he laid hands upon the statue, he became a criminal.

You can protest all you want, but you cannot touch someone else, or get on someone else's property, this includes businesses and places of worship.

Law of the land, like it or lump it. By the way, you just got schooled!

That's trespassing. Has nothing to do with the First Amendment or free expression.

You just flunked Social Studies.

It does in this case, and everyone on here with an ounce of smarts knows it. You cannot argue free expression, while breaking the law. And this boy was breaking the law, by trespassing, and if the DA wants to add more charges, then attempted vandalism,(his hands is on the statue's head, perhaps he is trying to rip the head off.) comes in to play from just the kid's on photograph.

I know you hate being wrong, but, as much as you are, you should be used to it, but you keep trying, one day you might be right.But, I'm sure it will be by mistake.

If the church allows others to be on their grounds they wouldn't be able to single out one person and charge him with trespassing. So in this case the only law they can enforce is the unconstitutional law about not giving offense.

I must admit that I am totally enjoying watching the hypocritical cons being the PC police.

 

[Pogo]

About a week confined in a cell with someone who could force him to assume his "Jesus position" might be enough to focus his mind.

So you disagree with the First Amendment.
Fine, start a petition to rescind it. Until then, law of the land, like it or lump it.

You really don't understand the First Amendment, do you? If the church wished to press charges, the kid has no First Amendment defense. Why? Look at the picture, he is on the church's property, and as soon as he laid hands upon the statue, he became a criminal.

You can protest all you want, but you cannot touch someone else, or get on someone else's property, this includes businesses and places of worship.

Law of the land, like it or lump it. By the way, you just got schooled!

That's trespassing. Has nothing to do with the First Amendment or free expression.

You just flunked Social Studies.

It does in this case, and everyone on here with an ounce of smarts knows it. You cannot argue free expression, while breaking the law. And this boy was breaking the law, by trespassing, and if the DA wants to add more charges, then attempted vandalism,(his hands is on the statue's head, perhaps he is trying to rip the head off.) comes in to play from just the kid's on photograph.

I know you hate being wrong, but, as much as you are, you should be used to it, but you keep trying, one day you might be right.But, I'm sure it will be by mistake.

Trust me, I don't even need to break a sweat here. No, you can't waive the First Amendment on the basis of trespassing. Feel free to cite that clause in the Constitution.

Moreover the legal definition of trespassing:

An unlawful intrusion that interferes with one's person or property

--- really won't work here anyway since as already noted no such "interference" took place.

And no, "perhaps he is trying to rip the head off" will get you laughed out of court if not disbarred. And photographs can be (duh) photoshopped anyway -- which all by itself should be enough to get this tossed for lack of evidence, though I hope they don't go that route.

Will there be anything else today, Danth? Would you like a bag?

​ ​

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

 

[Mr. H.]

I'll admit, I LOL'd when I saw that picture.

Irreverent sacrilegious fuck that he is.

 

[Pogo]

Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.

I bet if he had fake sex with an Obama statue you would demand 2 years at a minimum.

Naw...pesky 1st amendment.

If he did it with his own statue, it would probably be fine under the 1st, however he did it to someone else's, and the 1st amendment doesn't allow you to fuck around with someone else's property.

The statue wasn't at all harmed or defaced, nor did its owners complain.

Anything else?

Police don't need a complaint to enforce the law.

But their prosecutor will need what's known as "evidence".

 

[SixFoot]

What a disgusting kid.

 

[Pogo]

There are a lot of religious statues out there, and we should not want to start to see this happening a lot which is likely to happen if nothing is done. It is despicable.

And what exactly would you like to see 'done'?


This is the nature of a free society and people, in the context of our Constitutional Republic – where free expression often manifest as despicable and offensive, but not criminal.

You can be as offensive as you can get away with in your own space but not at a church or at religious statues. Penalize him. What if this had been done at a synagogue? He would be looking at a hate crime then no matter how much people want to explain it away as innocent or how ignorant he was.

Really. So the State can dictate religious values now?

 

[Pogo]

In this 14 year old you see the future of The Democrat Party. They're salivating for him to age sufficiently to run for first The Senate then for President.

There's no such thing as the "Democrat Party". But thanks for the update on the rehab program on politics obsession. Looks like it's not going at all well.

 

[Pogo]

​

I love that one. Says so much.

 

[Pogo]

And in a related story....

“The statue was not a piece of City commissioned artwork and consequently it has been removed,” city spokeswoman Sara Couper told Global News.

Wtf is "Orly"? An airport in Paris AFAIK...

 

[Katzndogz]

The boy is being punished more for his state of mind than the actual act. Most criminal laws have enhancements for state of mind.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

There are a lot of religious statues out there, and we should not want to start to see this happening a lot which is likely to happen if nothing is done. It is despicable.

And what exactly would you like to see 'done'?


This is the nature of a free society and people, in the context of our Constitutional Republic – where free expression often manifest as despicable and offensive, but not criminal.

You can be as offensive as you can get away with in your own space but not at a church or at religious statues. Penalize him. What if this had been done at a synagogue? He would be looking at a hate crime then no matter how much people want to explain it away as innocent or how ignorant he was.

Really. So the State can dictate religious values now?

Really. The state can protect religious values. Wow.