Teen Mmay Get 2yrs For Sex With Jesus Pic

Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

o-JESUS-STATUE-BLURRED-570.jpg


This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.


Something tells me that little fag will be on the other end of that pose when he goes to the joint.
 
Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

o-JESUS-STATUE-BLURRED-570.jpg


This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.


Something tells me that little fag will be on the other end of that pose when he goes to the joint.


What a great message that is to send a kid, right after school taught him about the First Amendment. :thup:
 
Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

o-JESUS-STATUE-BLURRED-570.jpg


This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.


Something tells me that little fag will be on the other end of that pose when he goes to the joint.


What a great message that is to send a kid, right after school taught him about the First Amendment. :thup:

WHo cares? I'm a huge believer in just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you SHOULD do it.

Fuck that little punk, enjoy your ass raping little bruh


What the fuck ever happened to respecting other people's shit?
 
Clearly any law that proscribes "offending the sensibilities of others" runs contrary to the First Amendment. Let's hope this byzantine bullshit gets wiped off the books.

Really? Expose yourself at a park and claim freedom of speech when arrested. See what happens.

How would that be "speech"?

You have a special talent you're not telling us about?
 
Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

o-JESUS-STATUE-BLURRED-570.jpg


This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.


Something tells me that little fag will be on the other end of that pose when he goes to the joint.


What a great message that is to send a kid, right after school taught him about the First Amendment. :thup:

WHo cares? I'm a huge believer in just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you SHOULD do it.

Fuck that little punk, enjoy your ass raping little bruh


What the fuck ever happened to respecting other people's shit?

Where did anyone complain?

48045-sign_duh.gif
 
Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

o-JESUS-STATUE-BLURRED-570.jpg


This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.


Something tells me that little fag will be on the other end of that pose when he goes to the joint.


What a great message that is to send a kid, right after school taught him about the First Amendment. :thup:

WHo cares? I'm a huge believer in just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you SHOULD do it.

Fuck that little punk, enjoy your ass raping little bruh


What the fuck ever happened to respecting other people's shit?

Where did anyone complain?

48045-sign_duh.gif


The cop who seen it happen complained.

But I see your point, it's okay to fuck with Christians things because they don't complain and are supposed to turn the other cheek and all that.

I mean seriously, is that really want the next generation learning, that our "freedom of speech" is more important than respecting another person's stuff? Especially if that other person is too nice to complain?

Here's a nice little comparison for you Ray Rice's wife didn't complain that he knocked her unconscious. Guess he should walk away from that to eh? Hey, no one complained....................
 
Teen May Get 2 Years For Pic Of Fake Oral Sex With Jesus PHOTO

The photo was taken in front of Love in the Name of Christ, a Christian organization in Everett, Pennsylvania, and posted on Facebook back in July.

On Tuesday, the 14-year-old — whose name has not been released by police — was charged with desecration of a venerated object, the Smoking Gun reported. If convicted, he could wind up spending two years in a juvenile jail, according to Kron 4.

“Desecration” is defined in Pennsyvlania as ““Defacing, damaging, polluting or otherwise, physically mistreating in a way that the actor knows will outrage the sensibilities of persons likely to observe or discover the action.”

Patheos.com notes that in Pennsylvania, a vandalism charge usually carries a maximum penalty of only one year in jail. JT Eberhard writes:

So let’s say an adult (subject to harsher penalties than minors) elected to spray paint “Jesus loves dicks” on the side of this boy’s school. That guy, at most (and the “at most” comes in to play for people with previous criminal records, which this boy doesn’t have), would serve a year in jail – and that’s assuming the cost of having the wall re-painted exceeds $150, otherwise the penalty would be less.

But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

o-JESUS-STATUE-BLURRED-570.jpg


This one will bring the phony christians out in droves.


Something tells me that little fag will be on the other end of that pose when he goes to the joint.


What a great message that is to send a kid, right after school taught him about the First Amendment. :thup:

WHo cares? I'm a huge believer in just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you SHOULD do it.

Fuck that little punk, enjoy your ass raping little bruh


What the fuck ever happened to respecting other people's shit?

Where did anyone complain?

48045-sign_duh.gif


The cop who seen it happen complained.

But I see your point, it's okay to fuck with Christians things because they don't complain and are supposed to turn the other cheek and all that.

I mean seriously, is that really want the next generation learning, that our "freedom of speech" is more important than respecting another person's stuff? Especially if that other person is too nice to complain?

Here's a nice little comparison for you Ray Rice's wife didn't complain that he knocked her unconscious. Guess he should walk away from that to eh? Hey, no one complained....................

I don't know who that is.

Both are important obviously but the Constitution is the Constitution -- you don't get to interpret selectively. Where do you draw the line then? Phil puts up an Obama sign on his lawn; Bill comes by and gives it the finger. Bill goes to jail getting on the "other side of that pose", because Phil's "sensibilities were offended".

Please. Grow a damn pair. We don't get to legislate mind control. :eusa_hand:

The First Amendment isn't there to protect speech nobody finds offensive, nomsayin'?

And no, no cop "seen it happen" -- it went on to Nosebook before the arrest -- two months ago.
 
But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

It truly is.

And a First Amendment, free expression defense is very much warranted - the suspect should be subject to no punitive measures. Americans have the fundamental right to engage in forms of expression both offensive and moronic.
 
But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

It truly is.

And a First Amendment, free expression defense is very much warranted - the suspect should be subject to no punitive measures. Americans have the fundamental right to engage in forms of expression both offensive and moronic.
Unless of course they are talking about Obama and his wife, RIGHT?
 
I mean seriously, is that really want the next generation learning, that our "freedom of speech" is more important than respecting another person's stuff? Especially if that other person is too nice to complain?

There's nothing more important than Americans' fundamental right to freely express themselves, where the right to free expression has nothing whatsoever to do with potential damage to private property or physical harm to other persons – neither of which are at issue in this case.

Here's a nice little comparison for you Ray Rice's wife didn't complain that he knocked her unconscious. Guess he should walk away from that to eh? Hey, no one complained....................

This fails as a false comparison fallacy.

You're confusing criminal law, assault, which is a crime against the community as well as the person attacked, with that of civil law, concerning the right to free speech.

And that's the mistake being made by those seeking to prosecute the suspect, where they're attempting to make criminal a civil act of free expression, protected by the First Amendment, regardless how offensive.
 
But a 14 year-old does something stupid that causes literally zero property damage and he could face two years in juvenile jail because it’s a “venerated object”? That’s insane. That’s really ludicrous.

It truly is.

And a First Amendment, free expression defense is very much warranted - the suspect should be subject to no punitive measures. Americans have the fundamental right to engage in forms of expression both offensive and moronic.
Unless of course they are talking about Obama and his wife, RIGHT?
Wrong.


You'll find no one seeking criminal charges against a racist depicting the president and First Lady as apes, for example, as we in fact have a rightist on this very forum doing just that with impunity.
 
There are a lot of religious statues out there, and we should not want to start to see this happening a lot which is likely to happen if nothing is done. It is despicable.
And what exactly would you like to see 'done'?


This is the nature of a free society and people, in the context of our Constitutional Republic – where free expression often manifest as despicable and offensive, but not criminal.
 
I have no doubt that some liberal ACLU jew lawyer will take the case and argue in court that the picture of the teen humping the statue was artistic expression and a form of modern art. ...... :cool:
 

Forum List

Back
Top