Climate change and Iran agreement are not treaties. To be treaties they have to do the 2/3 thing. Then this would amend the constitution which would require 2/3 of states approving.
They are international agreements. People like to compare international agreements to treaties to make what Obama did sound bad. They are not the same. Treaties are hard to accomplish. He was right because it not going to happen in the US of mistrust.
Yet how could Trump pull out of the INF treaty. If it requires 2/3 vote to enter then it should require it to exit. A treaty is a law of the land. It is like an amendment. So people saying Obama cannot enter an agreement but Trump can pull out of an agreement. Also make his own agreements.
Still if Trump can pull out of these agreements, Biden can enter another agreements. Cruz logic is flawed because they are not going to do a Treaty when they do not have too. Biden will just do an agreement like every President has done in the past.
What the **** is an "internatonal agreement" if it's not a treaty? It has no legal force in this country, which means it's a fiction.
I have long advocated a "Dictionaries for Democrats" program, so that they can finally find out what words actually mean.
That's sort of like the "Liberal Dictionary" that I've often posted entries from. That was written so normal rational adults can understand what liberals are really saying. For example:
Liberal Dictionary:
==========================================
International agreement - a worthless scrap of paper.