Tariff ruling.

Uh.. ok. You asked a question. I answered. I'm not his campaign manager. I don't think he's even planning to run.
How about that. You recommend a man not in any campaign, not running for anything vs candidates who are in campaigns who expose why they want to be elected.
Is that a diversion?
 
Tariffs on exports?


Stupid Ox. Say country X tarrifs INCOMING USA goods at 50% but their currency is worth 1/4 and they live in poverty mostly?

Trump being reasonable set USA incoming tariff at 1/2 or 25% to give them a needed scaling.

It's ALL BEEN POSTED (ROBERT W chart yesterday) YOU CHEESE DICD' PILE OF HUMAN SEWAGE!!!!!! IT WAS KNOWN TO BE LIKE THIS DAY1. GET OFF MY POSTS WITH STALLING BS!!!!!
 
And now it's not. But, what can I do to help?


Don't vote for the Democrats, they're all bad at this point in time, the ones with a conscience like Tulsi and RFKjr left long ago. That is not an endorsement of the GOP, which has its own problems, mainly "Pro Israel RINOs." 45% of Americans are now Independents, the highest ever. We need to pay attention.
 
Stupid Ox. Say country X tarrifs INCOMING USA goods at 50% but their currency is worth 1/4 and they live in poverty mostly?

Trump being reasonable set USA incoming tariff at 1/2 or 25% to give them a needed scaling.

It's ALL BEEN POSTED (ROBERT W chart yesterday) YOU CHEESE DICD' PILE OF HUMAN SEWAGE!!!!!! IT WAS KNOWN TO BE LIKE THIS DAY1. GET OFF MY POSTS WITH STALLING BS!!!!!
Be nice. Just once, so you can see what it's like.
 
Be nice. Just once, so you can see what it's like.
Not since 04NOV2020. It's a war, you people started it. I used to be nice.

since time of war I will not tolerate your lying trolling BS one syllable brings the hammer. I quit the boards for some time ((1-2 years?) Then came back to help the Trump fight. Not to have a nice discussion with you Horses rear ends. Do not try wasting my time!!!!!//
 
How much is Canada robbing our farmers in total dollars?

Why aren't you buying agricultural products that don't depend on foreign imports like fertilizer, gas, diesel, farm equipment, foreign labor?

WW
 
No evasion, Shitlips.

Trump is using the same justification/Constitutional basis for the new tariffs other Presidents have used

He isn’t tied to only the one the SC ruled on. Understanding this takes a minimal amount of critical thinking skills, which is why you are clueless.
 
Only if you are a retard.

Can we still say retard here?

(Oh, it's Roe v. WADE, not Roe v. Wake)

Roe was decided by 5 REPUBLICAN and 2 DEMOCRATIC justices. REPUBLICAN justices upheld it for 50 years.

It's only when Trump stacked the court with Catholic fanatics that we got an insane ruling that has caused chaos and has actually caused the number of abortions to INCREASE.

This case was constitutionally pretty clear. Only Congress can impose taxes, not the President.

Sorry, but Roe was CLEARLY unconstitutional.
 
Try buying US agricultural products.

They use fertilizer.

Most fertilizers use potash.

90% percent of fertilizer product depends on foreign imports of potash with 85-90% of that coming from Canada.

WW


Why don't you provide the list you are using?

How about you supplying a list of products from fuel to food to vehicles to electronics to etc. that you use to buy 100% American products that don’t have any imported materials?

It will be a much shorter list.

WW
 
Trump was not involved.

It began on Facebook.

The rumor that Haitian immigrants ate a pet cat in Springfield began in early September 2024 with a Facebook post to a private group called "Springfield Ohio Crime and Information", and that post was later re-posted elsewhere. The post said:<a href="Springfield pet-eating hoax - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>51<span>]</span></a>


The author of the Facebook post later deleted it and expressed regret that the story fueled conspiracy theories.<a href="Springfield pet-eating hoax - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>52<span>]</span></a><a href="Springfield pet-eating hoax - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>53<span>]</span></a> The neighbor who initially relayed the story to the poster said that she was not "the most credible source", and clarified that it was not her daughter's friend but just a rumor she heard from a friend's acquaintance.<a href="Springfield pet-eating hoax - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>7<span>]</span></a><a href="Springfield pet-eating hoax - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>8<span>]</span></a>
He told a racist lie, and the nation heard him.

No responsible person would spew such racist falsehoods without verification, but he appeals to racists.

"They're eating the dogs, the people that came in, they're eating the cats," Trump said during an answer to a question about immigration. "They're eating the pets of the people that live there, and this is what's happening in our country, and it's a shame."

 
How about you supplying a list of products from fuel to food to vehicles to electronics to etc. that you use to buy 100% American products that don’t have any imported materials?

It will be a much shorter list.

WW
Will you prove my claims for me? It is what you expect me to do for you!
 
15th post
He told a racist lie, and the nation heard him.

No responsible person would spew such racist falsehoods without verification, but he appeals to racists.

"They're eating the dogs, the people that came in, they're eating the cats," Trump said during an answer to a question about immigration. "They're eating the pets of the people that live there, and this is what's happening in our country, and it's a shame."

1771876986544.webp
 
Stupid Ox. Say country X tarrifs INCOMING USA goods at 50% but their currency is worth 1/4 and they live in poverty mostly?

Trump being reasonable set USA incoming tariff at 1/2 or 25% to give them a needed scaling.

It's ALL BEEN POSTED (ROBERT W chart yesterday) YOU CHEESE DICD' PILE OF HUMAN SEWAGE!!!!!! IT WAS KNOWN TO BE LIKE THIS DAY1. GET OFF MY POSTS WITH STALLING BS!!!!!
No matter how you try to juggle reality, the plain fact as the USSC decision made clear. That tariffs are a TAX on AMERICANS.
 
No evasion, Shitlips.

Trump is using the same justification/Constitutional basis for the new tariffs other Presidents have used

He isn’t tied to only the one the SC ruled on. Understanding this takes a minimal amount of critical thinking skills, which is why you are clueless.
You have to realize, the other tariffs Trump can turn to are legislated transfer of tax authority, with a defined situation under which they can be applied, and limits or boundaries to the amount of tax authority being transferred.

Trump can't understand why the constitution has separation of powers, under which he can completely embargo a country, but can't tariff them $1.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom