Tariff ruling.

[mudwhistle]

 

[0311]

What good was the decision then?... and In what "other ways"? and what if the people wanted the tariffs? would the decision then be thwarting their will?

what good was the decision then? what was it's impact economically? "entrenched" starting from when? and caused by what specifically?

The 6 - 3 reaffirms that the Legislative Branch, NOT the Executive Branch controls the purse.

 

[ElmerMudd]

So, Clinton and Obama played by those rules. Of course they had no politically derived impedance like Trump has had.

Bullshit. You are a sniveling, whiny Trump supporter who says stupid stuff in trying to make your cult leader look bad. All Presidents have been constrained by the Constitution. No president has fought to not abide by the constraints of the president's power. Trump wants to do everything his way.
Anyone who does not agree with what he wants to do, how he wants to do it is a "slime bucket", "bad person", "conspiring with foreign governments." He is calling supreme court justices who have given him more power than any President,"slime bucket", "bad person", "conspiring with foreign governments."
Trump is a spoiled child.

 

[Hollie]

Because tariffs have been inflationary. Also, the less control Dotard has over the economy the better off we are.

It really infuriates the leftist FAGATs that the Trump economy has reduced inflation, expanded GDP, increased the financial markets to record highs and increased wages,

 

[mudwhistle]

The 6 - 3 reaffirms that the Legislative Branch, NOT the Executive Branch controls the purse.

Justice Clarence Thomas just UNLEASHED pure FIRE in his dissent on the tariff ruling, dropping TRUTH BOMBS that expose the majority’s BS and defend President Trump’s America First authority like a boss! He didn’t mince words. He straight-up NAILED it:“NEITHER the statutory text nor the Constitution provide a basis for ruling against the President.”BOOM. Read that again. The Constitution and the law ITSELF back Trump—no ifs, ands, or buts.Thomas keeps swinging:“Congress authorized the President to ‘regulate . . . importation.’ Throughout American history, the authority to ‘regulate importation’ has been understood to include the authority to impose duties on imports.”Historical facts don’t care about your feelings, globalists.He doubles down:“The meaning of that phrase was beyond doubt by the time that Congress enacted this statute, shortly after President Nixon’s highly publicized duties on imports were UPHELD based on identical language.”Nixon did it. Courts said YES. Same exact words. Case closed.Then the kill shot:“The statute that the President relied on therefore authorized him to impose the duties on imports at issue in these cases.”Crystal. Clear.
https://x.com/GuntherEagleman/status/2024872921290698960/photo/1

 

[Mac-7]

.

I never listen to anything that USA Today says. They're whining leftist liars.

.

They got it right this time

The black robes pulled the rug out from under trump and American trade policy

 

[Mac-7]

He still has authority under different laws and he can also foce countries to buy a license to export to us. Noting changes

I hope you are right

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I hope you are right

.

Plan B.

He's always thinking three or four steps ahead.


.

 

[mudwhistle]

It really infuriates the leftist FAGATs that the Trump economy has reduced inflation, expanded GDP, increased the financial markets to record highs and increased wages,

That's why they're doing everything they can to **** up the economy.......and then blame it on Trump.

 

[kyzr]

They got it right this time

The black robes pulled the rug out from under trump and American trade policy

They just told Trump to use the right section of the law, not that all Trump's tariffs are illegal.

 

[kyzr]

Plan B.
He's always thinking three or four steps ahead.

If that was true he would have just signed another EO fixing the tariffs instead of whining about the USSC.

 

[ColonelAngus]

I am a racist homophobic transphobic misogynist who wants to kill grandma.

Can a lefty explain to me the specific economic impact of these specific tariffs and why it is good for the USA to not have these specific tariffs?

Thanks.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

If that was true he would have just signed another EO fixing the tariffs instead of whining about the USSC.

.

We'll see eventually.

.

 

[Clipper]

Trump is winning, despite this temporary setback.
You, on the other hand, are losing every single day.
Because your mind has been compromised by the Democrat Party, an irrational, hate-filled, sad, sick, creepy group of total losers.

"My father was a Communist and I'm proudly one too!"

You call the two-bit hustler & conman from Queens having his ass handed back to him by SCOTUS, winning?

If your boy is winning then why did he have "code brown" moment running down his pantleg, whine, piss & moan & throw a temper tantrum today over the decision for the whole country to see?

 

[Blaster]

They got it right this time

The black robes pulled the rug out from under trump and American trade policy

Trump has other ways to enforce tarriffs. He is just too smart for those justices.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Trump has other ways to enforce tarriffs. He is just too smart for those justices.

.

4D chess while they are all still playing Go Fish.

.

 

[citygator]

.

4D chess while they are all still playing Go Fish.

.

No one wins by losing more than Trump.

 

[d0gbreath]

John Roberts is the worst Chief Justice since Earl Warren, who Eisenhower said was one of the biggest regrets of his career.

It was 6-3 dude.

 

[Blaster]

It was 6-3 dude.

That just proves SCOTUS is not a Conservative majority.

 

[mudwhistle]

If that was true he would have just signed another EO fixing the tariffs instead of whining about the USSC.

He just did, shitforbrains.