Supreme Court Strikes Down Louisiana Abortion Restrictions

[XponentialChaos]

 

[Rambunctious]

On Monday, the Supreme Court blocked Louisiana from enforcing a law restricting abortion in June Medical Services v. Russo.

Supreme Court strikes down Louisiana abortion restrictions in victory for women's rights

On Monday, the Supreme Court blocked Louisiana from enforcing a law restricting abortion in June Medical Services v. Russo.The law, which would have required abortion providers to obtain admitting privileges from local hospitals, could have left only one doctor legally able to provide abortions...

www.rawstory.com

This decision will backfire on liberals....it will give Trump a second term.....and you tards can thank Roberts for it.....

 

[Mac-7]

Nobody of any significant age has an Innocent soul.

What crimes against humanity could you charge a 3 year old with and get a conviction in a court of law?

the answer is nothing

 

[Bush92]

This places the issue of privacy rights at the center of the November election.

Infanticide is not a privacy issue. It's murder.

 

[Bush92]

Infanticide is not a right.

 

[Bush92]

On Monday, the Supreme Court blocked Louisiana from enforcing a law restricting abortion in June Medical Services v. Russo.

Supreme Court strikes down Louisiana abortion restrictions in victory for women's rights

On Monday, the Supreme Court blocked Louisiana from enforcing a law restricting abortion in June Medical Services v. Russo.The law, which would have required abortion providers to obtain admitting privileges from local hospitals, could have left only one doctor legally able to provide abortions...

www.rawstory.com

Roberts keeps smacking Trump down. Thank God for him!

Roberts is a closet faggot communist.

 

[SaxxyBlues]

Love the way pro lifers look to the contents of her uterus, and forget there is a functional, emotional, woman attached. If pro lifers had a better plan for the child women might take them up on their offer. But to force a woman to bear a child she cannot care for is wrong. The only option they have is grow up in poverty and get murdered like in NYC today

Precisely the way you have forgotten, or ignore, that there is a functional living human being attached to the
mother?

I guess it's all a case of perspective, isn't it, And since the child is unable to speak for him or herself we
simply do the expedient thing and exterminate the innocent silent human being.

What a profound statement about our nation isn't it. The notion that the unaborted child will undoubtedly wind up living in poverty until it is prematurely murdered in the streets is another profound statement about
our society that can see no future for our children except murder by abortionists or criminals which is
an ironic self fulfilling prophecy.

The innocent silent developing fetus of a piss poor man that has no sense of responsibility, does not care and will not perform. The unconscious fetus does not have mental capability, plus it is sitting in the uterus of a woman with enough on her plate as is. She does have awareness and her life to care for. Unwanted pregnancy happens. The developing embryo is stopped from growing. Therefore it doesn't suffer, the woman doesn't suffer and society doesn't suffer. All this harp from pro life people like with a change of law tranquility will occur in the American people. I know men aren't used to shedding once a month but an egg is discarded every month. Women are close to their bodies and only they know what's best for them. Outsiders dictating over a woman's body is what Roe v Wade was about. Children die everyday, some people see the situation and want to have power over the ordeal. Them pushing women around is the source of the problem. No respect from the man, no respect to the man.

 

[Bush92]

Love the way pro lifers look to the contents of her uterus, and forget there is a functional, emotional, woman attached. If pro lifers had a better plan for the child women might take them up on their offer. But to force a woman to bear a child she cannot care for is wrong. The only option they have is grow up in poverty and get murdered like in NYC today

Precisely the way you have forgotten, or ignore, that there is a functional living human being attached to the
mother?

I guess it's all a case of perspective, isn't it, And since the child is unable to speak for him or herself we
simply do the expedient thing and exterminate the innocent silent human being.

What a profound statement about our nation isn't it. The notion that the unaborted child will undoubtedly wind up living in poverty until it is prematurely murdered in the streets is another profound statement about
our society that can see no future for our children except murder by abortionists or criminals which is
an ironic self fulfilling prophecy.

The innocent silent developing fetus of a piss poor man that has no sense of responsibility, does not care and will not perform. The unconscious fetus does not have mental capability, plus it is sitting in the uterus of a woman with enough on her plate as is. She does have awareness and her life to care for. Unwanted pregnancy happens. The developing embryo is stopped from growing. Therefore it doesn't suffer, the woman doesn't suffer and society doesn't suffer. All this harp from pro life people like with a change of law tranquility will occur in the American people. I know men aren't used to shedding once a month but an egg is discarded every month. Women are close to their bodies and only they know what's best for them. Outsiders dictating over a woman's body is what Roe v Wade was about. Children die everyday, some people see the situation and want to have power over the ordeal. Them pushing women around is the source of the problem. No respect from the man, no respect to the man.

Fetus = human being.

 

[theHawk]

I knew Roberts would continue to be a turncoat. What a disgrace.

Quite frankly at this point I don’t care about the abortion thing anymore. Yes, it is murder. But if leftwing shit stains and blacks want to murder their own population, have at it.

 

[SaxxyBlues]

On Monday, the Supreme Court blocked Louisiana from enforcing a law restricting abortion in June Medical Services v. Russo.

Supreme Court strikes down Louisiana abortion restrictions in victory for women's rights

On Monday, the Supreme Court blocked Louisiana from enforcing a law restricting abortion in June Medical Services v. Russo.The law, which would have required abortion providers to obtain admitting privileges from local hospitals, could have left only one doctor legally able to provide abortions...

www.rawstory.com

This decision will backfire on liberals....it will give Trump a second term.....and you tards can thank Roberts for it.....

L

Love the way pro lifers look to the contents of her uterus, and forget there is a functional, emotional, woman attached. If pro lifers had a better plan for the child women might take them up on their offer. But to force a woman to bear a child she cannot care for is wrong. The only option they have is grow up in poverty and get murdered like in NYC today

Precisely the way you have forgotten, or ignore, that there is a functional living human being attached to the
mother?

I guess it's all a case of perspective, isn't it, And since the child is unable to speak for him or herself we
simply do the expedient thing and exterminate the innocent silent human being.

What a profound statement about our nation isn't it. The notion that the unaborted child will undoubtedly wind up living in poverty until it is prematurely murdered in the streets is another profound statement about
our society that can see no future for our children except murder by abortionists or criminals which is
an ironic self fulfilling prophecy.

The innocent silent developing fetus of a piss poor man that has no sense of responsibility, does not care and will not perform. The unconscious fetus does not have mental capability, plus it is sitting in the uterus of a woman with enough on her plate as is. She does have awareness and her life to care for. Unwanted pregnancy happens. The developing embryo is stopped from growing. Therefore it doesn't suffer, the woman doesn't suffer and society doesn't suffer. All this harp from pro life people like with a change of law tranquility will occur in the American people. I know men aren't used to shedding once a month but an egg is discarded every month. Women are close to their bodies and only they know what's best for them. Outsiders dictating over a woman's body is what Roe v Wade was about. Children die everyday, some people see the situation and want to have power over the ordeal. Them pushing women around is the source of the problem. No respect from the man, no respect to the man.

Fetus = human being.

Minnows=fish bait

 

[Anathema]

What crimes against humanity could you charge a 3 year old with and get a conviction in a court of law?

the answer is nothing

I'm talking about a far higher law than anything on paper or devised by humanity.

Hell, I committed my first (of many) hate crime at 25 months old... My mother gave birth to my younger brother and my response was ... “I don’t want it. Give it back.” Our relationship went downhill from there.

 

[Mac-7]

What crimes against humanity could you charge a 3 year old with and get a conviction in a court of law?

the answer is nothing

I'm talking about a far higher law than anything on paper or devised by humanity.

Hell, I committed my first (of many) hate crime at 25 months old... My mother gave birth to my younger brother and my response was ... “I don’t want it. Give it back.” Our relationship went downhill from there.

Ok, you are posting from SillyVille

have it your way

 

[Coyote]

sad
View attachment 356760

Oh look....another RWNJ deceptive quote.

Did Ruth Bader Ginsburg Cite 'Population Growth' Concerns When Roe v. Wade Was Decided?

The Supreme Court justice's remarks in a 2009 interview have led to accusations that the Supreme Court justice was a proponent of eugenics.

www.snopes.com

What's True
Ginsburg once said she believed that others' concerns about overpopulation might have influenced the high court's decision in Roe v. Wade.
What's False
Ginsburg did not say she personally supported Roe v. Wade because it could help limit the population growth of "undesirable" communities.

Maybe Ginsburg was referring to the racist founder of Planned Parenthood Margret Sanger's abortion theory.
View attachment 356776

You guys are jusr chock full of false quotes aren’t you? She never said. She also opposed abortion. You guys should love her. Well, maybe not... she supported contraception after all.

 

[Coyote]

It makes no difference. You are executing still innocent people.

If you feel that strongly you should begin by saving innocent children before tackling the much more difficult choice of saving murderers from execution

I am not the one who falsely claims to be pro-life.

 

[Mac-7]

I am not the one who falsely claims to be pro-life.

Agreed

you fully support killing innocent unborn children

 

[Anathema]

I knew Roberts would continue to be a turncoat. What a disgrace.

Exactly. As I said, someone needs to take them out behind the wood shed.

 

[Coyote]

I am not the one who falsely claims to be pro-life.

Agreed

you fully support killing innocent unborn children

No, like many complex issues, my support is qualified. What is your excuse?

 

[Mac-7]

I am not the one who falsely claims to be pro-life.

Agreed

you fully support killing innocent unborn children

No, like many complex issues, my support is qualified. What is your excuse?

lets cut to the chase here

you insist on the right to kill unborn children as long as America has the death penalty for rapists and murders

is that about it?

 

[meaner gene]

I am not the one who falsely claims to be pro-life.

Agreed

you fully support killing innocent unborn children

If you're catholic that statement is false. As any catholic knows, babies are not born innocent, they have to be cleansed of their sins by baptism.

 

[Mac-7]

As any catholic knows, babies are not born innocent, they have to be cleansed of their sins by baptism.

When did godless libs adopt theocracy as their preferred form of government?