Supreme Court Strikes Down Blatently Unconstitional Gun Regulation

[progressive hunter]

women are strong enough, they don't need "self-defense", wise guy

then they dont need a special carve out for rape when it comes to abortions,,

 

[TemplarKormac]

figures pussys like you would complain on things you dont like but then agree with the ones you do like,,

His opinions insofar as I can tell, and as they are, are fake and hollow. He has no real opinions of his own.

 

[TemplarKormac]

 

[Rye Catcher]

Another one bites the dust.

Statement: Another one bites the dust.
Response: Only one? Just one child murdered, just one!

 

[TemplarKormac]

women are strong enough, they don't need "self-defense", wise guy

That's bullshit and you know it.

Solely being a woman does not make her impervious to harm. It does not imbue her with superpowers.

 

[Flash]

SCOTUS = More guns & less woman's rights

You are confused Moon Bat.

More Liberty and less killing of children.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Statement: Another one bites the dust.
Response: Only one? Just one child murdered, just one!

Cry more. If cars could run on liberal tears, the price of gas now would be irrelevant.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Define "Leftism".

Leftism:

The idea that the constitution says what it doesn't say and doesn't say what it actually says.

 

[Flash]

Groomercrats are extremely racist. You can tell by post like this.

Absolutely!

Our man Thomas even addressed the racism of gun control laws in the opinion.

 

[Flash]

That's what the left wants. Thankfully, we have justices like Clarence Thomas to defend our civil rights from the fascists.

 

[Flash]

Text, history and tradition instead of a scrutiny standard literally welds the casket shut on gun control.

Clarence Thomas cut the balls off of every single lower left wing court with one single swing of the sword.

This could not possibly be a more bigly win.

 

[Flash]

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Statement: Another one bites the dust.
Response: Only one? Just one child murdered, just one!

Troll stop projecting your hate

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

This is far worse than our most f*cked up nightmare scenarios

We are royally screwed

Unless the Supreme Court is expanded, the U.S. as we knew it is over

This was Putin's master plan, he tapped into Republican's religious & guns fetishes & he has single handedly destroyed us

So you believe Putin wants to arm as many US citizens as he can

OR

The Russians, since Gorbachav are weakening America through our education system, social system court system creating hate and division and weak( leftists) citizens.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

So you believe Putin wants to arm as many US citizens as he can

OR

The Russians, since Gorbachav are weakening America through our education system, social system court system creating hate and division and weak( leftists) citizens.

Putin wants a disarmed American population

 

[Rogue AI]

Wait until every violent thug, and a fast growing Latino population are all carrying around these conservative white peoples neighborhoods, schools, and churches.

Oh, did I forget to mention the rather large, and growing Muslim population also? No?

Armed folks don't wet themselves because other folks are armed. Your petty racist fearmongering is pretty sad. Did you get that from a Democrat publication, like a Beginner's Guide to the Democrat Klan?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Troll stop projecting your hate

He's not projecting anything. Insomuch as he isn't projecting at all. He's just repeating things both sides say about politics. In this case, he wants to repeat everything the left says about gun control or Supreme Court opinions regarding gun rights.

 

[Flash]

A great thing in the case is that it shoots a hole in the Libtard claims that the 2nd only protects muskets and not modern day weapons.

That is a huge win because any of these silly ass AWBs and magazine bans can be overturned,


Its reference to “arms” does not apply “only [to] those arms in existence in the 18th century.” 554 U. S., at 582. “Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, and the Fourth
Amendment applies to modern forms of search, the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.” Ibid. (citations omitted).

Thus, even though the Second Amendment’s definition of “arms” is fixed according to its historical understanding, that general definition covers modern instruments that facilitate armed self-defense. Cf. Caetano v. Massachusetts,

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Roberts voted with the majority.

He had too since he voted with the majority in Heller

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Define "Leftism".

Weakness. Weak mindedness.