Supreme Court Strikes Down Blatently Unconstitional Gun Regulation

[bigrebnc1775]

Another one bites the dust.

 

[2aguy]

Can't wait to read it.....who wrote the opinion...please say Thomas....

 

[martybegan]

Can't wait to read it.....who wrote the opinion...please say Thomas....

Yep, Thomas, supposedly 135 pages.

 

[martybegan]

Another one bites the dust.

That means "shall issue" is now the law of the land.

Look for NYC to assign one Police officer to issue permits for the entire city, and a 2 year backlog.

 

[2aguy]

Yep....Thomas....great..........

 

[2aguy]

Yep, Thomas, supposedly 135 pages.

Thanks........my Dailywire Leftist Tears Tumbler is just over flowing.........need to put it in the pool so it doesn't flood the house.........

 

[2aguy]

Another one bites the dust.

And here it is......Thomas addressing the lower courts just ignoring Heller and the rest of the Supreme Court rulings...

(1) Since Heller and McDonald, the Courts of Appeals have devel- oped a “two-step” framework for analyzing Second Amendment chal- lenges that combines history with means-end scrutiny. The Court re- jects that two-part approach as having one step too many. Step one is broadly consistent with Heller, which demands a test rooted in the Sec- ond Amendment’s text, as informed by history. But Heller and McDon- ald do not support a second step that applies means-end scrutiny in the Second Amendment context.

Heller’s methodology centered on constitutional text and history. It did not invoke any means-end test such as strict or intermediate scrutiny, and it expressly rejected any interest-balancing inquiry akin to intermediate scrutiny. Pp. 9–15.

 

[2aguy]

And this...

Because “individual self-defense is ‘the central component’ of the Second Amendment right,” these two metrics are “‘central’” considerations when engaging in an analogical inquiry. McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767 (quoting Heller, 554 U. S., at 599).

 

[2aguy]

Thomas is dealing with the leftist attempt to just declare entire cities "Sensitive Places," so they can keep gun bans in place...

That said, respondents’ attempt to characterize New York’s proper-cause require- ment as a “sensitive-place” law lacks merit because there is no histor- ical basis for New York to effectively declare the island of Manhattan a “sensitive place” simply because it is crowded and protected gener- ally by the New York City Police Department. Pp. 17–22.

 

[basquebromance]

SCOTUS = More guns & less woman's rights

 

[basquebromance]

The Supreme Court must be dismantled, rebuilt, and expanded to save the Constitution.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

SCOTUS = More guns & less woman's rights

Are you saying women don't have a right to self defense?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The Supreme Court must be dismantled, rebuilt, and expanded to save the Constitution.

The ruling used the guidelines of the Constitution you idiot.

 

[basquebromance]

New York Governor Kathy Hochul said the Supreme Court has "stripped away the rights" of New York with a decision "frightful in its scope," setting us back "to the days of our founding fathers."

 

[basquebromance]

Are you saying women don't have a right to self defense?

women are strong enough, they don't need "self-defense", wise guy

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Can't wait to read it.....who wrote the opinion...please say Thomas....

It's in the link.

 

[Failzero]

That means "shall issue" is now the law of the land.

Look for NYC to assign one Police officer to issue permits for the entire city, and a 2 year backlog.

Los Angeles County is Issuing thousands of CCW permits ( With tens of thousands of Initial Interviews done or pending )

 

[bigrebnc1775]

New York Governor Kathy Hochul said the Supreme Court has "stripped away the rights" of New York with a decision "frightful in its scope," setting us back "to the days of our founding fathers."

No gun laws

 

[basquebromance]

Guns don't kill people.

Supreme Courts beholden to the NRA kill people.

 

[bigrebnc1775]