Supreme Court reviewing birthright citizenship

[dudmuck]

Pregnant Chinese women are lining up to come to America to have their child here, whereupon they return to China. The child is raised in Communist China, then returns here with full American citizenship.
You like that idea?

babies require US passport to travel, and it must be renewed every five years.
It means the kid needs to be connected into the US to be able to keep that passport renewed.

 

[Lockback]

babies require US passport to travel, and it must be renewed every five years.
It means the kid needs to be connected into the US to be able to keep that passport renewed.

Oh that makes me feel so much better.

 

[Rogue AI]

The plain text of the 14th places the burden on Congress to determine. In every case that new groups of people have been granted birthright citizenship it was done by an act of Congress. No such act exists for illegal aliens or legal immigrants.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

I think that Roberts and Barrett will join with the three far left judges to give them 5 votes.

No Gorsuth

Most countries in Europe and Asia do not have birth right citizenship. Some at least require 1 parent to be a citizen which to me seems reasonable. The 14th Amendment had noble beginnings, but no one imagined one party would refuse to enforce the border and immigration laws and even create sanctuary cities. With that said, I think it’s an uphill battle for Tr ruthie

When the government said Most countries in Europe and Asia do not have birth right citizenship, Roberts was like, "so"?
LOL

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Precisely correct.

Damn Those third country loving conservative judges who are democrats somehow.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Pregnant Chinese women are lining up to come to America to have their child here, whereupon they return to China. The child is raised in Communist China, then returns here with full American citizenship.
You like that idea?

The 14th amendment didn’t exclude opportunistic pregnant Asian ladies. Ban them from coming here if you have a problem with them.

 

[Lockback]

Damn Those third country loving conservative judges who are democrats somehow.

No.
They're just not taking the proper look at the issue.
I know you love our country being completely overrun by foreigners. Because you hate the United States, besides your fake name and the disgusting use of Ronald Reagan's picture in your avatar.
It's estimated that within a few short years, ONE MILLION Chinese "birthright citizenship" babies will be eligible to vote.
You'd better bone up on your Mandarin, pal. Because we're losing this country. They couldn't have foreseen in 1858 how the 14th Amendment could be interpreted to aid our worst enemies. They couldn't travel back then like they can today.

 

[Lockback]

The 14th amendment didn’t exclude opportunistic pregnant Asian ladies. Ban them from coming here if you have a problem with them.

We should.
Immediately.
If not sooner.

 

[Marener]

Damn Those third country loving conservative judges who are democrats somehow.

It would be pretty hilarious if Trump were to win the case and then we get to deport Marco Rubio to Cuba.

 

[Lockback]

It would be pretty hilarious if Trump were to win the case and then we get to deport Marco Rubio to Cuba.

It doesn't work that way, idiot.

 

[egp320i]

Trump admin faces tough questions from skeptical Supreme Court over ‘quirky’ birthright citizenship arguments

“You obviously put a lot of weight on ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’ But the examples you give to support that strike me as very quirky,” he said.

nypost.com

By Ryan King and Josh Christenson

WASHINGTON — Supreme Court Justices from across the ideological spectrum pummeled a lawyer for the Trump administration with biting questions during oral arguments Wednesday over the president’s executive order on birthright citizenship.

While it wasn’t fully clear which way the high court will go in the landmark case, Republican-appointed justices made clear they were far from a lock for the administration — all while President Trump was in the room as the first sitting president in US history to observe oral arguments in person.

“You obviously put a lot of weight on ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’ But the examples you give to support that strike me as very quirky,” Chief Justice John Roberts asked US Solicitor General John Sauer early on.

Comment:
‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof' just means citizen.
They are not trying to abolish birthright citizenship.
They want to make it clear that birthright citizenship was only intended for American citizens.
It was not intended for foreign citizens who illegally entered our country.
However I don't have confidence that the Supreme Court will rule that birthright citizenship is only for American citizens.

the 14th states lawful citizen, that means legally here

illegals are not therefore if they arrive pregnant and have a child that child is void

they cannot use that child as an anchor to say, I get to stay, it's mean to take me away
from my child

that is what democrats argue because that takes away their future vote

 

[egp320i]

It would be pretty hilarious if Trump were to win the case and then we get to deport Marco Rubio to Cuba.

marco was born in the USA therefore your whole statement is void like your mind

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Most countries in Europe and Asia do not have birth right citizenship. Some at least require 1 parent to be a citizen which to me seems reasonable. The 14th Amendment had noble beginnings, but no one imagined one party would refuse to enforce the border and immigration laws and even create sanctuary cities. With that said, I think it’s an uphill battle for Trump.

It's not "Trump's" battle.
It's EVERY AMERICANS BATTLE.
You think this only affects Donald Trump? (wtf?)

 

[candycorn]

If We cannot control our immigration, then we are not a sovereign country.
If we are not a sovereign country then our government, laws and culture are in jeopardy.

We’ve had the same system for 250 years or so.

It’s worked fine

You’re full of prunes.

 

[candycorn]

It would be pretty hilarious if Trump were to win the case and then we get to deport Marco Rubio to Cuba.

I think his 2nd wife wasn’t a citizen either so his punk kids will get the heave-ho too..

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

No.
They're just not taking the proper look at the issue.
I know you love our country being completely overrun by foreigners. Because you hate the United States, besides your fake name and the disgusting use of Ronald Reagan's picture in your avatar.
It's estimated that within a few short years, ONE MILLION Chinese "birthright citizenship" babies will be eligible to vote.
You'd better bone up on your Mandarin, pal. Because we're losing this country. They couldn't have foreseen in 1858 how the 14th Amendment could be interpreted to aid our worst enemies. They couldn't travel back then like they can today.

Correct.
In hindsight......the 2A was worthless. Utterly useless. Too bad the FF's didn't make it a mandatory death sentence for betraying the Constitution. The Communists and radical Left are slowly winning this war.
Freedom is obviously a mistake that noone appreciates and even fewer willing to fight for it. Humanity is Insanity.

 

[Marener]

marco was born in the USA therefore your whole statement is void like your mind

Uh, did you miss the entire point of the ******* case?

Read the thread title, moron.

 

[egp320i]

Uh, did you miss the entire point of the ******* case?

Read the thread title, moron.

yes I did and what the **** does that have to do with rubio who somebody pointed out?

they are arguing the language even though it's black and white

right now we still have anchor babies, therefore the USA is NOT upholding the law, period

if you are not legal to be here and give birth your child is NOT either, it's void and you both get deported

 

[Marener]

yes I did and what the **** does that have to do with rubio who somebody pointed out?

they are arguing the language even though it's black and white

right now we still have anchor babies, therefore the USA is NOT upholding the law, period

If Trump were to end birthright citizenship, Rubio would lose his citizenship.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

I believe the current *pResident orange bag 'O shit has absolutely no respect for the constitution or the rule of the founder's legislation in our founding documents. I also believe the current orange bag 'O shit is a complete narcissist piece of human garbage with daddy issues. A *pResident for a TABLOID society that stands for nothing but whatever is popular. Lowest common denominator stuff.

Speak up.