Strict model of the left system

[rupol2000]

To know how to destroy the enemy, you need to know how it designed and how it works. The right will not achieve anything as long as the left swindlers lead them by the nose, and they do not know their weak points and only talk.

In this thread, we should at least reveal a sketch of this model, find out the main properties and principles of work.

I'll start with simplification.

The essence of the left model is slavery. And this is where we run into the main problem.

It is generally accepted that slaves are victims. In some cases this is true, but this is not the basis. The left system tries to destroy disloyal slaves, they are dangerous for it. The main slave mass is loyal to the left system. The evolutionary chance of an insignificant person is to be on a leash with the owner, just like dogs serve the owners for a piece of food.

Therefore, the social basis of the left is a symbiosis of masters and slaves.

That is the main problem. And it must be solved first.

This is precisely the reason why the right always leans on the middle class.

 

[rupol2000]

Here we can rely heavily on the experience of history. The left system is the system of agricultural empires. Their essence was that they raised slaves as capital for further expansion. Slaves created the economic base of the war, they were also used to capture new territories and colonization. Thanks to this, the slave population was constantly expanding, and this was de facto beneficial to the slaves themselves.

This was the essence of pan-Germanism, for example. Pan-Germanists announced theses such as the development of colonial lands, the concept of expansion to the east.

 

[rupol2000]

One of the fatal mistakes here: underestimating the power of slaves. No matter how insignificant the slave is, the organized slave herd has tremendous power. In the same way, one dog is insignificant compared to a bull, but a hundred dogs will tear a bull to pieces.

From this follows our first conclusion: the strength of the left lies in the organization of the herd and its direction.

This means that countermeasures should consist in the disorganization of the herd and its separation.

 

[rupol2000]

I think that the very anti-federal orientation of the right was subordinated precisely to this goal: to prevent the association of masters with slaves, plebeians with moneybags, their centralization. When the plebeians are scattered throughout the regions with local power, it is more difficult to build them into a unified slave army.

Therefore, the right must take all possible measures to defederalize, including prevent illegal corrupt ties between the federals and local authorities.

 

[rupol2000]

In knightly times, there was a principle: the vassal of my vassal is not my vassal. This should be considered. We do not fully understand this, but it seems to be a powerful decentralization tool.

 

[cnm]

Oh gawd.

 

[rupol2000]

In the field of PR, there should undoubtedly be propaganda of individualism, a bright strong personality: Superman, Knight, Artist, Beautiful Woman, and so on.

Slaves are always internally against a bright individuality, but they will not dare to break it if they do not feel the support of the power of the left. They need a "fas" command to do this.

This is the reason why the right tried to protect copyrights.

 

[rupol2000]

Leftists don't like harmony and rhythm. From the Reagan era to Obama, rhythmic and harmonious music dominated mainstream music. This also includes the pair dance, which demonstrates the harmonious union of a man and a woman with the leadership of a man without violence.

Without a doubt, this undermines the left movement.
This aesthetically, emotionally shows the superiority of the union over brut subordination, the beauty of the freedom of the union and its strength.
Therefore, whenever possible, harmony in art should be used, this is in the interests of the right.

 

[rupol2000]

This also applies to the beauty of the human body, face and movement. This is also from the field of harmony, and this should be put forward as an ideal. Romantics were right-wing, they always extolled beauty and harmony. First of all, the beauty of heroism, the beauty of nature and love.

Beautiness should become a kind of god, like the Aryan heavenly gods, who personified the beauty and majesty of nature and the heavenly forces.

These gods do not have to be declared gods, but they will be de facto gods, gods in the idealistic Platonic sense, as supra-material forces.

 

[rupol2000]

Beauty and harmony is actually a manifestation of higher forces in the material world. This is the embodiment of higher forces in matter.
And the victory of the right means the victory of higher powers over the lower demons of evil and the underworld.

 

[rupol2000]

For this reason, ugliness sex and hardcore must be completely rejected by the right. In the art of the Right, only eroticism is allowed withowt nudity. In the intimate sphere, depravity and licentiousness are unacceptable.
You should enjoy the beauty but not the vulgarity and base canine pleasures of a primitive sexual act.

 

[rupol2000]

In general, everything romantic should be extolled in the right art and PR. Romance is actually a manifestation of the right spirit. The more romance, the more chances for the right to win.

Groups such as scorpions, for example, are close to ideal.

But we must not forget about the heroic military ideals. Romance should frighten leftist slaves, and not just be something "sweet" in their eyes. Aryan heroes are formidable warriors, killers of villains who terrified merchants and their slaves.

This aspect is overlooked. It is very important. The Aryan hero slays the serpent. He is a righteous killer. He sheds blood.

 

[cnm]

Oh gawds.

 

[rupol2000]

Boys should be taught to military skills and concepts from childhood. It is necessary in every possible way to promote the desire of boys for fights, for physical superiority over an opponent, but you need to make sure that this is honest. A right cause is a struggle, one should not think that we can win without raising warriors. This is the greatest mistake of the right. As long as there are leftist villains in the world, they will not give you freedom without bloodshed. The heroes of the French Revolution and the Spring of Nations, аnd American liberation wars against Britain, and millions of rebels before them and after them, they all shed their blood for freedom.

Don't forget about it.

 

[rupol2000]

Therefore, the right man is a warrior in spirit. No other is given. Freedom do not give for free. Your slavery is the base of life of slaveowners

The right warrior is the basis of the foundations of a right cause.

 

[rupol2000]

Any hipsterism, pacifism, any call for "humanism" in relation to criminals and villains must be strongly rejected by the right. No compromises are acceptable here, except for tactical actions for the sake of populism.

 

[rupol2000]

 

[rupol2000]

"maybe I, maybe you will change the world", "dreamers like us" says Klaus Meine. But dreams alone won't change the world. Our dream must be supported by at least some kind of action. Preparing for the Freedom War is a good start. Preparation is already an action. This is how we make at least a step towards Freedom.

 

[rupol2000]

A normal woman inspires the right warrior to a feat. This is a heavenly force that is being destroyed by feminism and faggots. If you are a commander in the army, and you have women in combat positions under your command, you must interfere with their activities. Boycott the feminization of the army. Without being inspired by real women and love, withowt the role of Defender, the right warrior is not capable of anything.

 

[cnm]

What a load of puerile crap.