Strict model of the left system

If a warrior does not have the ideals of protecting his beloved women and children, as well as a humiliated people, he has no other incentives. The incentive of the slave warrior is only dog-service for money, base pleasures and robbery. This cannot serve as an incentive for the right Warrior of Light.
 
The value of labor. Of course, any right is forced to work, and work must be respected.

But the value of labor should not be exaggerated. The value of labor was undoubtedly preached to the slaves so that they would work harder for the expansion of empires and the luxury of the slave owners.

In the right system, creative work should be welcomed. The value of ordinary labor should not be too great.

In addition, the more a man works, the less time and effort he has to develop military qualities and fight.

Accordingly, it is necessary to cultivate love for a harsh life and limit the desire for monotonous work.
It is better to work less and limit yourself unnessesary "luxury" things. This is useful both for cultivating a stern character and for striking a leftist system that attracts the consumer with unnecessary material fetishes.
 
In any case, the work does not bring prosperity. The more the slaves work, supposedly for their own good, the more the leftist system robs them.

The left itself prefers to sit on social benefits and drink alcohol.
 
A true right-wing man should despise soft-bodied moneybags like Trump who allegedly "achieved something with their hard work." Money is needed as a means of struggle, but not as an end goal.

Knights have always despised merchants, they considered extravagance one of the highest values.

The knight did not ally with the merchant even when it was a matter of life and death. The merchant was below the commoners in the eyes of the knight.
 
The very idea of working for material well-being is a vicious leftist idea and a tool in the hands of leftist swindlers. This disorientates the right movement.

Material wealth is necessary, but it is not an end in itself.
 
When soft-bodied moneybags like Trump are looked at with respect, it adds credibility to them. Slaves always try to imitate moneybags. the free man must despise them.
 
Mercantile values and luxury destroy the right system. This is a window for corruption. When the ruler can be seduced by material values, he becomes unstable in the truth. The right power cannot be dependent on money and material goods. This is the key to corruption.
 
Accordingly, here we can reveal one more objective property of the left: they are trying to seduce with material goods.
 
This was also done by the Marxists. Their main value was to increase the material wealth of the people.

Naturally, in reality, these material goods belonged to the Bolsheviks themselves, and the people did not even have enough food.

But they tempted the slaves precisely with material wealth: this is important.

The right one should look only at the ideals bestowed by Heaven, and not think about the material, exept good weapons. If there is freedom, there will be bread, and nothing else is needed for an aristocratic soul.
 
A man works all day long for a big TV, a new iPhone and fashionable clothes, he flushes his life down the toilet in order to be a miserable slave near a trough with food for pigs.
 
Let's return to the model.

The issue of resource allocation.

The left redistribute the resource, the right, on the contrary, leave everything in the ownership of each individual.

From here it follows that individual wealth is an inalienable property of the right system, and individual poverty is a property of the left system.

This is at the very core of their design. Decentralization of resources = individual wealth and individual freedom.

This is very important for understanding of design, and this is qute easy to understand
 

Forum List

Back
Top