meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 25,885
- 22,519
- 2,290
This only concerns equitable injunctions.
No, that was their way of throwing a monkey wrench into blocking clearly unconstitutional EO's without addressing the EO itself.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This only concerns equitable injunctions.
They are called "inferior courts" for a reason.Where does the Constitution limit congresses power to create lower courts that have the judicial power of the United States?
Then they aren't citizens at all. That is the point. There is no recourse for the Court just opened the door to.Makes no sense
A child is either a citizen or not
He can’t be a citizen in one state but illegal in a neighboring state
For some reason, when I think of the viability of our country, the Simon and Garfunkel song, "Slip Sliding Away" comes to mind.
Class action isn't the answer, because it takes longer to certify a class, than is reasonable.It makes things more difficult to enjoin the executive, but not impossible, not by a long shot.
That is not what they ruledThen they aren't citizens at all. That is the point. There is no recourse for the Court just opened the door to.
Thats only one route. It takes more effort. More suits.Class action isn't the answer, because it takes longer to certify a class, than is reasonable.
Class certification in a class action lawsuit can take anywhere from 6 to 18 months on average, but this can vary significantly depending on the complexity of the case, the number of class members
No, they ruled the injunction only applies in 22 states. plaintiffs can sue in the other states, and there can be class actions suits as well.That is not what they ruled
They ruled they are citizens in 22 states
WTF?
The supreme court has no original jurisdiction.They are called "inferior courts" for a reason.
The only court that is co-equal to the President is the Supreme Court.
That's what the 14th amendment corrected.Then they aren't citizens at all. That is the point. There is no recourse for the Court just opened the door to.
Hodge podgeNo, they ruled the injunction only applies in 22 states. plaintiffs can sue in the other states, and there can be class actions suits as well.
or addressed both.Hodge podge
Citizenship under the 14th is a no brainer
Court should have made it clear
Actually it's a matter that it takes more time. And in the interim they can do tremendous damage, that can't be reversed.Thats only one route. It takes more effort. More suits.
I am not certain a trial court couldn't still put in a nationwide injunction while adjudicates the class action status, then reinstates the injunction once the status is certified.Actually it's a matter that it takes more time. And in the interim they can do tremendous damage, that can't be reversed.
Such as child separation.
You can't deport a citizen. Allowing even one instance already tells you how this ends. Kids in those 22 states are being given a gift before the storm hits. They will be the last.That is not what they ruled
They ruled they are citizens in 22 states
WTF?
Not for illegal aliens.That's what the 14th amendment corrected.
So, when are you going to stop being such a moron?So, when are Malaria and Barron leaving?
.So, when are you going to stop being such a moron?
Remember the words "congress can".I am not certain a trial court couldn't still put in a nationwide injunction while adjudicates the class action status, then reinstates the injunction once the status is certified.
IN the future, Congress can modify the current enabling legislation with new legislation, for example, permitting appellate courts to do nationwide injunctions.
you are going to be deported.
The left cult has evolved out of the ability to change.
.
When are you going to stop being a Trump TROLL?So, when are you going to stop being such a moron?