Sorry Trumpers ... This Measure Says Growth Is Slower Under Trump Than Obama

Fuck you, idiot. 10 years ago Obama was president and the Democrats had a comfortable majority in the house and a filibuster-proof supermajority in the senate. Unemployment was in the double digits. And unemployment stayed high until after the 2010 Republican revolution.
Okay, I'm just curious here. I'm not trying to convince you of anything.

Are you saying that (a) Obama had some responsibility for the double-digit unemployment rate, and that (b) the GOP had some responsibility for it dropping?

Please feel free to go into as much detail in your answer as you'd like, thanks in advance.
.
 
Sorry to burst the cloud over your mind Trumpers. Your delusions are precious to you but I have to prick that orange bubble that has you howling with joy at Trump rallies as lies fall faster from Trump's mouth than Autumn leaves.

Sorry darlings, "According to BEA data, GDI has grown at a 2.3% annualized pace since Trump took office, vs. 2.4% during Obama’s two terms."

Apologies for pricking your orange bubble. Donald Trump is bloating the economy with tax cuts for the rich and burgeoning debt but still can't beat Obama.

Donald Trump has rendered the economy obese and debt-ridden with debt rising faster at >2 x GDP growth.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

This Measure Says Growth Is Slower Under Trump Than Obama

Gross domestic income should in theory track GDP, but it tells a slightly different story.

By
Justin Fox
September 23, 2019, 11:00 PM GMT+7
1200x-1.jpg

ILLUSTRATION: GEORGE WYLESOL FOR BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK

The economy has been perhaps the brightest spot of Donald Trump’s unconventional presidency. A recession would tarnish this, which is presumably why he gets so worked up about perceived missteps by the Federal Reserve. But by one measure, economic growth is already slower during the Trump era than during Barack Obama’s eight years as president.
That measure is gross domestic income. GDI is part of the same quarterly national economic accounting by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis that gives us gross domestic product but is released a month later. The two numbers should, in theory, be identical, but they never quite are because of the vagaries of real-world data. In a 2010 paper, economist Jeremy Nalewaik—then at the Fed, now at Morgan Stanley—made the case that “GDI better reflects the business cycle fluctuations in true output growth.”

publishing the average of GDP and GDI. Also, the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia now calculates a statistically smoothed melding of GDP and GDI, devised in part by Nalewaik, that it calls GDPplus. The presidential growth rates admittedly depend a lot on the starting quarter one chooses, especially for Obama, who took office amid the worst recession in 75 years. Also, while growth rates have been about the same or only moderately higher under Trump, people aren’t wrong to think the economy is better. More are sharing in growth now because the long expansion has brought workers off the sidelines.

• Timing Is Everything

If you measure from the quarter before they took office, Trump leads in GDI growth, 2.5% to 2.1%. Measure from the last quarter of the first year in office (because it takes time for policies to have an effect), and it’s Trump 2.5% to Obama 2.4%.



• Smooth Calculator
According to BEA data, GDI has grown at a 2.3% annualized pace since Trump took office, vs. 2.4% during Obama’s two terms.

• On the Job
Payroll employment has grown at a 1.5%annual pace during Trump’s time in office, faster than the 1% during Obama’s entire presidency but slower than the 1.9% of Obama’s second term.
Real annualized growth rate from first quarter of administration

Data: Bureau of Economic Analysis

• But Wait, It Gets Better
Of Americans age 25-54, 80% had jobs in August, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the highest prime-age employment rate in more than a decade and perhaps a better measure of economic health than either GDP or GDI growth.
Fuck you, idiot.

10 years ago Obama was president and the Democrats had a comfortable majority in the house and a filibuster-proof supermajority in the senate. Unemployment was in the double digits. And unemployment stayed high until after the 2010 Republican revolution.

Your pain is palpable. Have a nice glass of orangeade to dull your mind.
 
Everything about Trump is a facade or an out and out lie.

Sent from my SM-N976V using Tapatalk
 
Economies always have mixed data. At this moment:

Positives: Outstanding unemployment rate, good wage growth, decent GDP growth.

Negatives: Exploded deficit, Fed back to pumping hundreds of billions into markets, still in a manufacturing recession (maybe coming out of it soon)

Overall, a good economy. But that's about it at a macro level. The goofy hyperbole is just blissful partisan ignorance.
.
 
Economies always have mixed data. At this moment:

Positives: Outstanding unemployment rate, good wage growth, decent GDP growth.

Negatives: Exploded deficit, Fed back to pumping hundreds of billions into markets, still in a manufacturing recession (maybe coming out of it soon)

Overall, a good economy. But that's about it at a macro level. The goofy hyperbole is just blissful partisan ignorance.
.
That DP growth was trashed by Trump & Republicans under Obama.

Trump promised us 4%.

Last year 2.8%, this years could be 2.3%.
 
No worries [emoji6]. I’ll just go on the street, and make some moves.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Economies always have mixed data. At this moment:

Positives: Outstanding unemployment rate, good wage growth, decent GDP growth.

Negatives: Exploded deficit, Fed back to pumping hundreds of billions into markets, still in a manufacturing recession (maybe coming out of it soon)

Overall, a good economy. But that's about it at a macro level. The goofy hyperbole is just blissful partisan ignorance.
.
That DP growth was trashed by Trump & Republicans under Obama.

Trump promised us 4%.

Last year 2.8%, this years could be 2.3%.

It is worse on a per capita basis if you factor down for population growth.
 
I always wonder if anyone actually knows how to think.

There's no class, like "hey man, here's how to know things!"

That whole trope about the Dems having fillibuster proof anything was mostly a myth. At the time, a gentleman by the name of Joe Lieberman, Dem turned Ind., was turn-coating and on Hannity's radio show, literally under the control of Hannity's narrative, like 2x a week.
 
Economies always have mixed data. At this moment:

Positives: Outstanding unemployment rate, good wage growth, decent GDP growth.

Negatives: Exploded deficit, Fed back to pumping hundreds of billions into markets, still in a manufacturing recession (maybe coming out of it soon)

Overall, a good economy. But that's about it at a macro level. The goofy hyperbole is just blissful partisan ignorance.
.
Tip of the day:

Mac, Get the hell out of any investment that is even remotely related to sub-prime corporate debt.
 
Economies always have mixed data. At this moment:

Positives: Outstanding unemployment rate, good wage growth, decent GDP growth.

Negatives: Exploded deficit, Fed back to pumping hundreds of billions into markets, still in a manufacturing recession (maybe coming out of it soon)

Overall, a good economy. But that's about it at a macro level. The goofy hyperbole is just blissful partisan ignorance.
.
That DP growth was trashed by Trump & Republicans under Obama.

Trump promised us 4%.

Last year 2.8%, this years could be 2.3%.
Correct, Trump was talking out his ass.

My post was not political.
.
 
Economies always have mixed data. At this moment:

Positives: Outstanding unemployment rate, good wage growth, decent GDP growth.

Negatives: Exploded deficit, Fed back to pumping hundreds of billions into markets, still in a manufacturing recession (maybe coming out of it soon)

Overall, a good economy. But that's about it at a macro level. The goofy hyperbole is just blissful partisan ignorance.
.
Tip of the day:

Mac, Get the hell out of any investment that is even remotely related to sub-prime corporate debt.
Are you pretending that I said "get the hell out of any investment that is even remotely related to sub-prime corporate debt", and are you pretending the industry is not concerned about corporate debt in any way?

And were you planning on answering my questions about the unemployment rate Obama inherited and how the GOP magically made it fall like it did?

Oh, and exactly what does your attempt at deflection have to do with my post?

I don't expect much honesty or accuracy or economic knowledge from you folks, but let me know on those, thanks.
.
 
Last edited:
Sorry to burst the cloud over your mind Trumpers. Your delusions are precious to you but I have to prick that orange bubble that has you howling with joy at Trump rallies as lies fall faster from Trump's mouth than Autumn leaves.

Sorry darlings, "According to BEA data, GDI has grown at a 2.3% annualized pace since Trump took office, vs. 2.4% during Obama’s two terms."

Apologies for pricking your orange bubble. Donald Trump is bloating the economy with tax cuts for the rich and burgeoning debt but still can't beat Obama.

Donald Trump has rendered the economy obese and debt-ridden with debt rising faster at >2 x GDP growth.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

This Measure Says Growth Is Slower Under Trump Than Obama

Gross domestic income should in theory track GDP, but it tells a slightly different story.

By
Justin Fox
September 23, 2019, 11:00 PM GMT+7
1200x-1.jpg

ILLUSTRATION: GEORGE WYLESOL FOR BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK

The economy has been perhaps the brightest spot of Donald Trump’s unconventional presidency. A recession would tarnish this, which is presumably why he gets so worked up about perceived missteps by the Federal Reserve. But by one measure, economic growth is already slower during the Trump era than during Barack Obama’s eight years as president.
That measure is gross domestic income. GDI is part of the same quarterly national economic accounting by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis that gives us gross domestic product but is released a month later. The two numbers should, in theory, be identical, but they never quite are because of the vagaries of real-world data. In a 2010 paper, economist Jeremy Nalewaik—then at the Fed, now at Morgan Stanley—made the case that “GDI better reflects the business cycle fluctuations in true output growth.”

publishing the average of GDP and GDI. Also, the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia now calculates a statistically smoothed melding of GDP and GDI, devised in part by Nalewaik, that it calls GDPplus. The presidential growth rates admittedly depend a lot on the starting quarter one chooses, especially for Obama, who took office amid the worst recession in 75 years. Also, while growth rates have been about the same or only moderately higher under Trump, people aren’t wrong to think the economy is better. More are sharing in growth now because the long expansion has brought workers off the sidelines.

• Timing Is Everything

If you measure from the quarter before they took office, Trump leads in GDI growth, 2.5% to 2.1%. Measure from the last quarter of the first year in office (because it takes time for policies to have an effect), and it’s Trump 2.5% to Obama 2.4%.



• Smooth Calculator
According to BEA data, GDI has grown at a 2.3% annualized pace since Trump took office, vs. 2.4% during Obama’s two terms.

• On the Job
Payroll employment has grown at a 1.5%annual pace during Trump’s time in office, faster than the 1% during Obama’s entire presidency but slower than the 1.9% of Obama’s second term.
Real annualized growth rate from first quarter of administration

Data: Bureau of Economic Analysis

• But Wait, It Gets Better
Of Americans age 25-54, 80% had jobs in August, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the highest prime-age employment rate in more than a decade and perhaps a better measure of economic health than either GDP or GDI growth.
Think Bloomberg has any motive for such hilarious spinning?
 
Sorry to burst the cloud over your mind Trumpers. Your delusions are precious to you but I have to prick that orange bubble that has you howling with joy at Trump rallies as lies fall faster from Trump's mouth than Autumn leaves.

Sorry darlings, "According to BEA data, GDI has grown at a 2.3% annualized pace since Trump took office, vs. 2.4% during Obama’s two terms."

Apologies for pricking your orange bubble. Donald Trump is bloating the economy with tax cuts for the rich and burgeoning debt but still can't beat Obama.

Donald Trump has rendered the economy obese and debt-ridden with debt rising faster at >2 x GDP growth.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

This Measure Says Growth Is Slower Under Trump Than Obama

Gross domestic income should in theory track GDP, but it tells a slightly different story.

By
Justin Fox
September 23, 2019, 11:00 PM GMT+7
1200x-1.jpg

ILLUSTRATION: GEORGE WYLESOL FOR BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK

The economy has been perhaps the brightest spot of Donald Trump’s unconventional presidency. A recession would tarnish this, which is presumably why he gets so worked up about perceived missteps by the Federal Reserve. But by one measure, economic growth is already slower during the Trump era than during Barack Obama’s eight years as president.
That measure is gross domestic income. GDI is part of the same quarterly national economic accounting by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis that gives us gross domestic product but is released a month later. The two numbers should, in theory, be identical, but they never quite are because of the vagaries of real-world data. In a 2010 paper, economist Jeremy Nalewaik—then at the Fed, now at Morgan Stanley—made the case that “GDI better reflects the business cycle fluctuations in true output growth.”

publishing the average of GDP and GDI. Also, the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia now calculates a statistically smoothed melding of GDP and GDI, devised in part by Nalewaik, that it calls GDPplus. The presidential growth rates admittedly depend a lot on the starting quarter one chooses, especially for Obama, who took office amid the worst recession in 75 years. Also, while growth rates have been about the same or only moderately higher under Trump, people aren’t wrong to think the economy is better. More are sharing in growth now because the long expansion has brought workers off the sidelines.

• Timing Is Everything

If you measure from the quarter before they took office, Trump leads in GDI growth, 2.5% to 2.1%. Measure from the last quarter of the first year in office (because it takes time for policies to have an effect), and it’s Trump 2.5% to Obama 2.4%.



• Smooth Calculator
According to BEA data, GDI has grown at a 2.3% annualized pace since Trump took office, vs. 2.4% during Obama’s two terms.

• On the Job
Payroll employment has grown at a 1.5%annual pace during Trump’s time in office, faster than the 1% during Obama’s entire presidency but slower than the 1.9% of Obama’s second term.
Real annualized growth rate from first quarter of administration

Data: Bureau of Economic Analysis

• But Wait, It Gets Better
Of Americans age 25-54, 80% had jobs in August, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the highest prime-age employment rate in more than a decade and perhaps a better measure of economic health than either GDP or GDI growth.
Think Bloomberg has any motive for such hilarious spinning?

Preventing another Trump bankruptcy? Of the USA.
 
Sorry to burst the cloud over your mind Trumpers. Your delusions are precious to you but I have to prick that orange bubble that has you howling with joy at Trump rallies as lies fall faster from Trump's mouth than Autumn leaves.

Sorry darlings, "According to BEA data, GDI has grown at a 2.3% annualized pace since Trump took office, vs. 2.4% during Obama’s two terms."

Apologies for pricking your orange bubble. Donald Trump is bloating the economy with tax cuts for the rich and burgeoning debt but still can't beat Obama.

Donald Trump has rendered the economy obese and debt-ridden with debt rising faster at >2 x GDP growth.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

This Measure Says Growth Is Slower Under Trump Than Obama

Gross domestic income should in theory track GDP, but it tells a slightly different story.

By
Justin Fox
September 23, 2019, 11:00 PM GMT+7
1200x-1.jpg

ILLUSTRATION: GEORGE WYLESOL FOR BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK

The economy has been perhaps the brightest spot of Donald Trump’s unconventional presidency. A recession would tarnish this, which is presumably why he gets so worked up about perceived missteps by the Federal Reserve. But by one measure, economic growth is already slower during the Trump era than during Barack Obama’s eight years as president.
That measure is gross domestic income. GDI is part of the same quarterly national economic accounting by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis that gives us gross domestic product but is released a month later. The two numbers should, in theory, be identical, but they never quite are because of the vagaries of real-world data. In a 2010 paper, economist Jeremy Nalewaik—then at the Fed, now at Morgan Stanley—made the case that “GDI better reflects the business cycle fluctuations in true output growth.”

publishing the average of GDP and GDI. Also, the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia now calculates a statistically smoothed melding of GDP and GDI, devised in part by Nalewaik, that it calls GDPplus. The presidential growth rates admittedly depend a lot on the starting quarter one chooses, especially for Obama, who took office amid the worst recession in 75 years. Also, while growth rates have been about the same or only moderately higher under Trump, people aren’t wrong to think the economy is better. More are sharing in growth now because the long expansion has brought workers off the sidelines.

• Timing Is Everything

If you measure from the quarter before they took office, Trump leads in GDI growth, 2.5% to 2.1%. Measure from the last quarter of the first year in office (because it takes time for policies to have an effect), and it’s Trump 2.5% to Obama 2.4%.



• Smooth Calculator
According to BEA data, GDI has grown at a 2.3% annualized pace since Trump took office, vs. 2.4% during Obama’s two terms.

• On the Job
Payroll employment has grown at a 1.5%annual pace during Trump’s time in office, faster than the 1% during Obama’s entire presidency but slower than the 1.9% of Obama’s second term.
Real annualized growth rate from first quarter of administration

Data: Bureau of Economic Analysis

• But Wait, It Gets Better
Of Americans age 25-54, 80% had jobs in August, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the highest prime-age employment rate in more than a decade and perhaps a better measure of economic health than either GDP or GDI growth.
Fuck you, idiot.

10 years ago Obama was president and the Democrats had a comfortable majority in the house and a filibuster-proof supermajority in the senate. Unemployment was in the double digits. And unemployment stayed high until after the 2010 Republican revolution.

Your pain is palpable. Have a nice glass of orangeade to dull your mind.
:cuckoo:

Drink some more grape koolaid, idiot.
 
I do wonder how many Trumpsters realize that Trump is running this economy from a place that is fiscally to the Left of Keynes himself.

.
I wonder how many people at USMB are so fucking stupid that they think Trump has ever presented himself as anything other than a pragmatic centrist. Some idiots think that he is a hardcore wingnut.

Unlike you, Macfraud?
:2cents:
 
Last edited:
I do wonder how many Trumpsters realize that Trump is running this economy from a place that is fiscally to the Left of Keynes himself.

.
I wonder how many people at USMB are so fucking stupid that they think Trump has ever presented himself as anything other than a pragmatic centrist. Some idiots think that he is a hardcore wingnut.

Unlike you, Macfraud?
:2cents:
Still avoiding my questions.

You're the fraud.
.
 
Fuck you, idiot. 10 years ago Obama was president and the Democrats had a comfortable majority in the house and a filibuster-proof supermajority in the senate. Unemployment was in the double digits. And unemployment stayed high until after the 2010 Republican revolution.
Okay, I'm just curious here. I'm not trying to convince you of anything.

Are you saying that (a) Obama had some responsibility for the double-digit unemployment rate, and that (b) the GOP had some responsibility for it dropping?

Please feel free to go into as much detail in your answer as you'd like, thanks in advance.
.
yes and yes, obviously, dumbass.












wtf, are you an idiot, or just playing stupid?
 
Fuck you, idiot. 10 years ago Obama was president and the Democrats had a comfortable majority in the house and a filibuster-proof supermajority in the senate. Unemployment was in the double digits. And unemployment stayed high until after the 2010 Republican revolution.
Okay, I'm just curious here. I'm not trying to convince you of anything.

Are you saying that (a) Obama had some responsibility for the double-digit unemployment rate, and that (b) the GOP had some responsibility for it dropping?

Please feel free to go into as much detail in your answer as you'd like, thanks in advance.
.
yes and yes.
I believe that you believe that.

Want to go into some detail? Exactly how is Obama at fault for the double-digit unemployment rate, and exactly how did the GOP bring down the unemployment rate?
.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top