And we don't elect presidents using the popular vote either....soYou mean like the lie that Hillary was actually so popular yet lost even though she supposedly won by just under 3 million votes?http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/18/politics/electoral-college-donald-trump-monday/index.html
Trump's place in history
Heightening the tension in recent weeks: Clinton actually won the popular vote by about 3 million -- making Trump the worst-performing winner in the popular vote since 1876.
Trump's victory is not, as he has described it, a landslide. He is expected to garner just 56.9% of the electoral vote, assuming all electors vote according to their states' results. That will give Trump the 44th-largest share of the electoral vote out of 54 presidential elections since the modern system started in 1804.
Of course that does not matter to your cult members who will believe any lie that comes out of your protruding lips...
According to vote totals if you exclude one state, CA, Trump won the popular vote by 200,000 votes. Somehow one state generated enough votes to pass Trump by 2.8 million total votes. Considering the fact that Obama beat Romney by only 500,000, how do you suppose CA was able to create so many more votes for an unpopular bitch like Hillary Clinton?
So dumb.We don't remove states.