Sorry Comrade Trump, you did NOT win the EV in a landslide.

The numbers don't matter. He won. He's President after his inauguration today.

And, as always, they'll claim a mandate, which is nothing more than an excuse to try to push their agendas down our throats.

They end up over-reaching and blowing it. That's why our political pendulum continues to swing back and forth.

The Dems did it beginning in 2008. Hardcore partisan ideologues just don't learn. They're just too full of themselves.

Will Trump be any different? It's possible, but looking at his cabinet picks, early signs are not promising.
.
I agree that it isn't a "landslide", but if you take Commiefornia out of the picture Trump won the PV by over a million. Outside of urban areas, Hitlery was wiped out. She was the worst possible pic the democrooks could have made.

However I don't see how his cabinet pics have been "partisan". I've listened to Levin a few times recently and he is losing his mind over the SoS pick and the democrook billionaires. Trump is not a partisan in any way. I have heard him proclaim democrooks are better stewards of the economy, and his pics illustrate he still believes it.


 
The numbers don't matter. He won. He's President after his inauguration today.

And, as always, they'll claim a mandate, which is nothing more than an excuse to try to push their agendas down our throats.

They end up over-reaching and blowing it. That's why our political pendulum continues to swing back and forth.

The Dems did it beginning in 2008. Hardcore partisan ideologues just don't learn. They're just too full of themselves.

Will Trump be any different? It's possible, but looking at his cabinet picks, early signs are not promising.
.
I agree that it isn't a "landslide", but if you take Commiefornia out of the picture Trump won the PV by over a million. Outside of urban areas, Hitlery was wiped out. She was the worst possible pic the democrooks could have made.

However I don't see how his cabinet pics have been "partisan". I've listened to Levin a few times recently and he is losing his mind over the SoS pick and the democrook billionaires. Trump is not a partisan in any way. I have heard him proclaim democrooks are better stewards of the economy, and his pics illustrate he still believes it.
Regarding the vote, I think it's reasonable to agree that this country is divided right down the middle. It just seems to me that it should be governed accordingly. For some reason, the parties just don't seem to get that. Maybe it's their donors, maybe it's their bases, maybe it's both.

I'd agree that Trump is not the traditional partisan, but these picks are pretty conservative. Levin is a purist, so he's gonna be cranky if everyone isn't perfect. The one that really bugs me is Perry. And Pruitt, McMahon, DeVos, Mattis, Mnuchin? Holy crap, those are straight ahead hardcore conservatives who could have been picked by Pence or Cruz.
.
 
here's a little handy dandy app that will shirley come in handy dandy to counter drumpf's lies in the future....

Now you can fact-check Trump’s tweets — in the tweets themselves

By Philip Bump December 16
On Friday morning, President-elect Donald Trump took a new tack in his war on the Russia hacking issue.

Are we talking about the same cyberattack where it was revealed that head of the DNC illegally gave Hillary the questions to the debate?

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 16, 2016

As our Dave Weigel noted, this isn't really accurate. There was nothing illegal at play, and Donna Brazile wasn't the head of the Democratic National Committee at the time that she leaked town hall questions to the Hillary Clinton campaign.

Weigel wrote a whole post about the issue — but people who just click through to the link see only Trump's claim, and none of the context.
[...]

Now you can fact-check Trump’s tweets — in the tweets themselves
 
The numbers don't matter. He won. He's President after his inauguration today.

And, as always, they'll claim a mandate, which is nothing more than an excuse to try to push their agendas down our throats.

They end up over-reaching and blowing it. That's why our political pendulum continues to swing back and forth.

The Dems did it beginning in 2008. Hardcore partisan ideologues just don't learn. They're just too full of themselves.

Will Trump be any different? It's possible, but looking at his cabinet picks, early signs are not promising.
.
I agree that it isn't a "landslide", but if you take Commiefornia out of the picture Trump won the PV by over a million. Outside of urban areas, Hitlery was wiped out. She was the worst possible pic the democrooks could have made.

However I don't see how his cabinet pics have been "partisan". I've listened to Levin a few times recently and he is losing his mind over the SoS pick and the democrook billionaires. Trump is not a partisan in any way. I have heard him proclaim democrooks are better stewards of the economy, and his pics illustrate he still believes it.
Regarding the vote, I think it's reasonable to agree that this country is divided right down the middle. It just seems to me that it should be governed accordingly. For some reason, the parties just don't seem to get that. Maybe it's their donors, maybe it's their bases, maybe it's both.

I'd agree that Trump is not the traditional partisan, but these picks are pretty conservative. Levin is a purist, so he's gonna be cranky if everyone isn't perfect. The one that really bugs me is Perry. And Pruitt, McMahon, DeVos, Mattis, Mnuchin? Holy crap, those are straight ahead hardcore conservatives who could have been picked by Pence or Cruz.
.

you have a whacked out general who believes there was a child sex ring running out of the basement of a pizza shop.... by hillary clinton--- courtesy of alex jones (who personally was thanked by trump for his own & his deplorables support) as head of national security. that's what nightmares are made of.
 
I would personally like to thank the Democratic powers that be for making Hillary your candidate for president.
LOL!!!!!
 
Last edited:
If Trump won such a big victory, why has he spent the last week running around the country doing campaign rallies?
 
Mnuchin gave money to democrooks more than republicrats. Not hardcore anything.

Perry is not a hardcore conservative either. Has was a democrook at one point, and has soft immigration views. He wasn't a bad governor, but not one I would call "hardcore".

Don't really know the rest. I will be SHOCKED however if a hardcore conservative agenda is promoted by this administration.

The way Bush was reviled you'd think libturd professors were being pushed out of helicopters. His administration WAS NOT pushing a hardcore agenda. Just a war agenda. I would argue that if GWB had pushed a more conservative agenda, reduced government authority and balanced the budget, the democrooks would not have won in 2006 or 2008.

I remain optimistic.

 
http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/18/politics/electoral-college-donald-trump-monday/index.html


Trump's place in history

Heightening the tension in recent weeks: Clinton actually won the popular vote by about 3 million -- making Trump the worst-performing winner in the popular vote since 1876.

Trump's victory is not, as he has described it, a landslide. He is expected to garner just 56.9% of the electoral vote, assuming all electors vote according to their states' results. That will give Trump the 44th-largest share of the electoral vote out of 54 presidential elections since the modern system started in 1804.



Of course that does not matter to your cult members who will believe any lie that comes out of your protruding lips...

Trump's lying is compulsive. He fits the description in that old saying that my mom liked -

a guy who would climb a tree to tell a lie, rather than stay on the ground and tell the truth.
 
15th post
If Trump won such a big victory, why has he spent the last week running around the country doing campaign rallies?
To rub his victory in your leftist traitors faces.
Actually, he is attempting to inflate his victory by lying and claiming a landslide victory and mandate. That plus just ordinary arrogant bragging and boosting his narcissism. His ego has no bounds. But primarily, he is trying to lay hold to the fraudulent claim of winning a landslide victory and promote the lie that he had a historical electoral college margin of victory when he in fact, had one of the smallest in history. That means no mandate.
 
Least amount of EC Votes for Dem since Reagan. Not a "landslide" but a good ole ass whoopin
 
Back
Top Bottom